Some time ago, the so-called ‘Danish study’ swept through the digital underground. The authors showed that Pfizer’s Covid vaccines in Denmark had a suspicious safety profile: A few small batches, distributed early in the campaign, were associated with unacceptably high number of adverse events (almost one in 10 recipients reported an AE), while the later batches showed orders of magnitude less AEs. Even more fascinating than the study itself was the story how difficult it was to get it published.
We could not wait to repeat the study in the Czech Republic. We asked the State Institute for Drug Control (SUKL) for similar data. We reported the results in an article for the European Journal of Clinical Investigation. Our findings are even more disturbing than that of the Danish team.
From the start of the vaccination campaign until the beginning of summer 2023, the Czech SUKL received a total of 14,386 reports of suspected AEs for covid vaccines. This number far exceeds the number of AEs reported for all other drugs combined in normal years.
Incredibly, the SUKL did not bother to link the AE reports with the corresponding batch numbers for almost half of the reported AEs. Even in the case of death after a vaccine (216 reported cases), SUKL did not pair 117 of the deaths to a batch number. This is serious negligence, especially because information about batch numbers is readily available in another state-run database. Both these databases are easy to pair though the so-called “birth number” which is a compulsory state-provided citizen ID in the Czech Republic. What if all the 117 deaths for which the SUKL did not bother to trace the batch came from a single batch of vaccine? How would the SUKL recognise that this batch is a mortal threat to the Czech population and that it is necessary to pull it out urgently, which is its legal obligation?
The very fact that only 216 deaths after a Covid vaccine were reported is also interesting. We know from another government dataset that 1,688 people died in the Czech Republic within a week after a dose of one of the covid vaccines. We believe that death truly is an adverse event, and in the case of an experimental vaccine, all deaths that occurred within a week of the vaccine should have been reported to the SUKL. Even if all the 216 reported deaths occurred within a week of the vaccine (which we don’t know from the data), that would still be less than 13% of all cases. For less serious AEs, underreporting is likely to be much greater. This is a disturbing finding and a rare quantification of the elusive under-reporting factor.
A total of nine specific Pfizer batches appeared both in Denmark and Czech Republic. The AE counts for these batches correlate very well. Batches that had a lot of AEs in Denmark also had a lot of AEs in the Czech Republic, and vice versa. This significantly strengthens the hypothesis that individual batches really differ from each other in some genuine way, and that it is not just a fluctuation in reporting patterns.
The most interesting finding is the relationship between the size and type of the batch, the date of its release, and the number of reported AEs associated with this batch (see the figure below). Vaccines are divided into three panels. The top panel shows Pfizer products, the middle panel shows Moderna products, and the bottom panel shows all others. Each colored dot represents a single batch of vaccines. Individual vaccine types are color coded. The size of the dot shows the number of doses that the batch contained (the scale is logarithmic). The horizontal axis shows the date of release of the respective batch to the Czech market, and the vertical axis shows the number of AE reports per thousand doses in the batch. Note that the lower panel has a different scale on the vertical axis (shown in red) because the AstraZeneca products were really bad (they were also later quietly withdrawn from the market).
The most striking feature of the graph above is the dramatic decrease in the number of AE reports with the date of release. Batches that were released in spring 2021 showed a much higher number of AEs than batches released in 2022. In this sense, our findings correspond very well with the Danish study – the most problematic batches in Denmark were also the ones used at the beginning of the campaign.
What could be the reason for this disturbing difference among the batches?
- The high number of AEs in the spring of 2021 may be a result of vaccinating people during an ongoing epidemic, which used to be considered a bad idea before Covid. Moreover, the most vulnerable population was preferentially vaccinated at that time. However, this hypothesis is contradicted by the fact that during the booster campaign in the autumn wave of the epidemic (which also included the most vulnerable population), the number of AE reports did not increase.
- The batches from the spring of 2021 were used almost completely (because there was a shortage of vaccines then), while much of the later batches was left unused. So, maybe if we divided the number of AE reports by the number of doses used (instead of the number of doses contained in the batch), the differences would disappear. Unfortunately, we did not have this data. But this hypothesis is very improbable because the greater part of the miraculous decrease still takes place during the first half of 2021, when there was a shortage of vaccines, i.e. the batches were used almost entirely.
- Another possibility is a change in the willingness of people to report adverse events. But in this case, the effect is rather the opposite. While it was almost an act of civil disobedience to report an AE in the spring of 2021, later on – as the pressure to get everyone vaccinated increased – the motivation for people to report AEs rather increased. However, the graph above shows the opposite relationship.
- There remains the last possibility, which is the most disturbing of all. Perhaps the rush was such that the pharmaceutical companies did not have the production process completely mastered. We already know (from the testimony of USC Professor Phillip Buckhaults before the South Carolina Senate) that the technology of mRNA vaccine production changed fundamentally sometime between the registration studies and the start of mass production. The vaccine for which Pfizer received an EUA, and whose efficacy and safety is described in the registration study, is not produced by the same process as the vaccine that was injected into the arms of billions. It is therefore possible that the start of mass production by the new process was not well mastered, and the initial batches were simply not manufactured correctly. The explosion of AE reports in pharmacovigilance databases immediately after the start of the vaccination campaign may have caused minor ripples of panic and may have forced the companies to make some changes in the manufacturing process.
This last hypothesis is quite worrying because it would cast a shadow of doubt on the capabilities of regulators in many countries and – if ever proven correct – would have dramatic legal consequences for the vaccine manufacturers.
Tomas Fürst teaches applied mathematics at Palacky University, Czech Republic. His background is in mathematical modelling and Data Science. He is a co-founder of the Association of Microbiologists, Immunologists and Statisticians (SMIS, smis-lab.cz) which has been providing the Czech public with data-based and honest information about the coronavirus epidemic. He is also a co-founder of a ‘samizdat’ journal dZurnal (dzurnal.cz) which focuses on uncovering scientific misconduct in Czech science.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Something had to fill the gap left by traditional religions.
Humans just can’t do without some form of religion.
Oh tell me about it, what a night i’ve had with all that voodoo stuff.
Cammaerts is the author of a famous quotation (often mistakenly attributed to G. K. Chesterton) in his study on Chesterton:
This is why I never liked the atheist superstars Dawkins, Hitchens and Harris.
They were very clever and eloquent in pointing out the irrationality and inconsistencies of traditional religions, but never proposed a better alternative.
They really thought that destroying people’s religious beliefs would produce a good result in and of itself.
This is the problem with so many clever people. They are really intelligent and at the same time really stupid.
like septic scumbaggery you mean?
Reports of huge increases of still births and baby deaths in Scotland, Canada and New Zealand
What could be causing this?
One of the results of withdrawing medical support from communities dues to the Covid scare? Improper adjustment of the figures by the statisticians whose job it is to assure us that everything is just dandy?
But it would be nice to have some references…
well the placenta will obviously be examined in a post-mortem style investigation!
and if a mass of micro-clots are found it will be carefully filed with the “top people top people” filing the jab harms database.
Non-woke parents, of course!
Further research is needed to quantify the scale of each of these types. (I suspect that both are getting worse, or at least have been for the last decade.) Nonetheless, Rasmussen’s report provides valuable insights into a troubling phenomenon, and is worth reading in full.
This further research will be of especial value to trans-cis-gender LBGTQRUPSNE+ life-forms since it will validate the reasons for their existence…
The first thing the Soviets did in Berlin was to tear down Nazi statues. The first thing the Americans did in Iraq was tear down the statues of Saddam Hussein. The first thing the communists did after the revolution in America 2020/2021 was tear down the statues of the founding fathers. It’s symbolic. It’s what revolutionaries do.
Of course the academy is politicised! How else do you think Americans go from patriots to city-burning commies in three generations?
Who’s funding science? It’s hardly scientific to pay for the result you want.
This is a manifestation of the Frankfurt School’s ‘long march though the institutions’. The West is destined to fall without a shot being fired – and all it took was a few clever and manipulative men supported by the same folk who funded the Bolsheviks.
Amen!!
Over a decade I ago I gave evidence to a NICE meeting regarding a new treatment for keratoconus. The very first part of the discussion was on ‘diversity and inclusion’ rather than does it f…ing work or cause serious side effects.
In fact it does and ethnic minorities actually benefit more than most.
Priorities!
Perhaps it would be more fruitful to look at how much spending is controlled by Anthony Fauci
‘Israel Joins Japan And China In Preparing For Next SARS-CoV-2 Strain That Will Debut Soon As Delta Wanes In Some Countries. A Reassortant Strain Is Expected!’
https://www.thailandmedical.news/news/israel-joins-japan-and-china-in-preparing-for-the-next-sars-cov-2-strain-that-will-debut-soon-as-delta-wanes-in-some-countries-a-reassortant-strain-is
Will this same researcher come back in five years time and do the same analysis on UK school material that includes words and phrases like Climate Emergency, Sustainable, Net Zero, Carbon Credit, 97% of scientists agree, veganism, Prince Charles, Al Gore etc because our children are about to be propagandised and brainwashed into this self-destructive cult now.
About to? That horse bolted a long time ago.
Why do you think the current crop of university students are a flock of compliant, woke, vax loving sheep?
Yes but now the globalists puppets want to crank it up even further by teaching EVERY SUBJECT through the lens of clmate change
I warned y’all
Scottish Government’s Vax Passport Sending People’s Private Data To Amazon, Microsoft; Report
Fascists.
This almost certainly breaches the Data Protection Act 2018, even if it is the government doing it, not a private company like Sainsbury’s.
Sue the bastards and post this ZH article on other forums and Twitter.
Since when has government ever cared about the law? Convenient for me, I don’t have a phone & don’t intend getting vaxxed EVER.
Another plus for the unvaxxed is; Assisted death only for vaccinated, euthanasia association says not sure that’s a service the vaxxed will have the time to solicit either.
I don’t have a smartphone either. Friends are planning to give theirs up & get a simple mobile.
I’ll never have another ‘vaccine’, having come to the realisation that the medical-industrial complex has covered up the problems for >30 years. It’s now so bold that it’s imposing products that do us net harm (as opposed to products that don’t do any good). Read the book ‘Doctoring Data’.
Of course, if smallpox returns, some people might carefully add up the risks and benefits. The fatality rate in children in 1850s was 70% … giving rise to the only vaccine mandate the UK has ever had in two centuries.
>if smallpox returns,
find a cow with cowpox.
There was an article in the Guardian a year or so ago about the last person to contract (and die of) Smallpox, in 1978.
The article was clearly a pro-covid-vaccine nudge, but I’m inclined to believe it was factually reasonably accurate; the case is described here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1978_smallpox_outbreak_in_the_United_Kingdom
If so, then the woman’s doctor, who had unsurprisingly never seen Smallpox, initially diagnosed Chicken Pox, so there was a considerable delay between infection and diagnosis, which was when they went round and quarantined and vaccinated anyone who had been in contact.
But, the only other person to be infected was the woman’s mother, whose case was “very minor”. Given the delay between infection and diagnosis, and hence between infection and any action being taken, that seems quite surprising.
So, given that the Smallpox vaccine was not extensively used for a long time prior to this event, I’m inclined to thing that the population was effectively immune, and likely still is. Whether that is because of much improved public health, or maybe the virus mutated to a much less serious strain (like Scarlet Fever has become Scarletina), or even Cowpox became endemic and replaced Smallpox, no idea.
Early on in this crisis it was established that the government is above the law now.
The Keep Britain Free court cases established that.
Those in government now know they can pretty much do anything they like as long as it has popular support or they can create the illusion that it has popular support.
Actually, you don’t need popular support. All you need is a tame expert stating that this has to be done, and Bob’s your uncle…
Anybody else see another football mysteriously collapsed last night? Sheff United player. Sincerely hope he is okay, thank god he was talking to staff afterwards on way to hospital. Look on Twitter etc and people are doing all sorts of mental gymnastics to try suggest it is nothing to do with the vaccines. Absolutely brainwashed.
Sorry for derailing the main discussion!
Yes saw this, John Fleck – no mention of why or what anywhere to be seen last night – little made of it when I looked again this morning. Just after Sergio Aguero forced to consider retirement due to heart problems, had an argument about it with FIL last night. “Can’t be cos of Covid, come on son don’t be stupid, vaccines causing heart problems? I’ve not seen anything, he’s always bloody injured…” “yeah, with calf problems not a bloody heart attack!”
Interestingly, he tested positive for Covid-19 in June of this year, will have probably been vaccinated either pre-or post this date given his status as a sportsman and being in and around the Scotland squad over summer – naturally wont be linked to the vaccines though.
They are already trying to say Augero had a known heart condition since a kid. If it were that bad they would have been monitoring and he would not have been able to play professionally. With Fleck, some are saying having covid could have affected his heart. Yeh right.
Well the only things different in these past two years to the previous fifty where such events where thankfully rare are Covid, a respiratory disease like many others, and the vaccines using brand new barely tested mRNA technology.
Given all of these sportsmen would be under 40 if even UK-based, they will all have had either Covid or mRNA jabs or both.
If I were a gambling man, I would speculate there is a problem with mRNA vaccines. A big one.
Does this put the terms into context though? If I wrote a maths paper saying bollocks to diversity, would it still count?
Not a chance – it wouldn’t get published!
Dear Scumbags, THIS is what you are being distracted from today.
Not surprising. I’m a retired doctor, and before retiring six years ago was often involved in applying for funding for projects. There was always a section on how your project would improve diversity, minority group blah blah. You just had to play the game and dribble in the drivel.
My wife’s choir has the same issues.
Eisenhower warned about the corruption of science and here is Richard Feynman in 1966
“We live in an unscientific age in which almost all the buffeting of communications and television-words, books, and so on-are unscientific. As a result, there is a considerable amount of intellectual tyranny in the name of science.”