On July 9th, the Daily Sceptic published my article describing how three healthcare providers had reinstated a requirement for staff, patients and visitors to wear masks in all clinical areas. I also urged the readers who recognised the perniciousness of this restriction (a.k.a. the rational among us) to show their displeasure by lodging a formal complaint to the offending organisations. Today I can announce some good news: two of the errant establishments have now reversed their mask impositions.
The first health provider to backtrack was Manx Care (which runs health and social care services in the Isle of Man). After reinstating the need for face coverings on its premises on June 27th, this nonsensical, ideologically-driven measure was lifted on July 16th. A spokesman said:
Whilst masks are no longer universally required in Manx Care’s patient-facing settings, colleagues and visitors are reminded that they should do whatever makes them feel safe.
Its reverse ferret on masks is to be welcomed. As for the “whatever makes them feel safe” comment, I guess this is a reasonable suggestion; in a purportedly free country, people should be able to wear what they want, be it a clove of garlic around their necks, a lucky charm bracelet on their wrists or a strip of porous plastic across their airways.
The second organisation to do a volte-face was Worcestershire NHS Trust. On July 18th a spokesperson announced:
Following a significant reduction in the number of Covid positive patients in our hospitals, as well as a reduction in their length of stay, the requirement for masks to be worn in clinical areas has now been lifted.
While the Trust is trying to rationalise its rapid backtracking on the basis of less people registering positive on tests that are prone to error and bordering on meaningless (for example, they fail to reliably detect those that are infectious or imminently symptomatic), it deserves credit for promptly ditching its requirement for face coverings.
So two out of three healthcare providers quickly seeing sense is encouraging news. The outlier which has yet to retract its mask imposition is University Hospitals of North Midlands. However, there are indications that even in this bastion of pro-mask lunacy there is widespread non-compliance with the mask requirement. For instance, here are testimonies from two supporters of Smile Free (a campaign group opposed to mask mandates) that suggest that sanity is prevailing:
I’ve been to the University Hospital of North Midlands (Stoke on Trent) today prepared for battle about wearing a mask but I’m very pleased to report that the majority of people were not wearing a mask, not even all the staff.
May I take this opportunity to thank you for all your hard work regarding this crazy means of control!
Email received July 10th
Another Smile Free member wrote:
I had a great response from the hospital in Stoke. In my second e-mail to them, I asked if I would still be given medical treatment if I refused to wear a face mask. In reply they said that nobody would be denied care or medical treatment for not wearing one. This more or less seems to be an admission that they cannot enforce this.
On a more negative note, the initial responses from the pro-mask healthcare providers to the multiple complaints were a familiar mix of evasion and dubious justifications. The Complaints Team of University Hospitals of North Midlands stated:
As you will appreciate, being a major teaching hospital we have a significant number of patients that are immunocompromised as well as some staff. Our priority is to protect these individuals as much as we can whilst in our care as well as comply with our duties under the Health & Safety at Work Act.
Similarly, Sarah Shingler (Complaints Officer for Worcestershire Acute Hospitals) wrote:
With the number of Covid-positive patients increasing, we have reintroduced the use of masks in all clinical areas for staff, patients and visitors until further notice. This measure is necessary to protect colleagues and our patients from the risk of infection, and we are grateful for the support of those visiting and working in our hospitals.
Both these initial replies to formal complaints from members of the public implicitly assume that masks constitute an effective viral barrier and are not associated with a range of harms. The empirical evidence suggests otherwise (see here and here). As if this mono-focused obsession with one virus was not bad enough, Ms. Shingler aloofly dismisses complainants by stating:
We do not have anything further to add to this statement; please note that we will not respond to any further correspondence on this subject and will only register and investigate formal complaints which relate to direct experiences of the services at our hospital from patients or visitors who have attended… Any further emails received at this address which do not meet this criteria [sic] will be filed without response.
The propensity for those in positions of influence to mindlessly mimic the decisions of others was witnessed all too often during Covid. Therefore, the actions of one NHS Trust will potentially have ramifications for the rest, and it is legitimate for U.K. citizens – irrespective of geographical location – to make their concerns known to the pro-mask outliers. Also, it would be wise for complaints officers to pause and reflect that it is the country’s taxpayers who provide their salaries before they high-handedly dismiss their concerns.
But overall, the fact the two out of the three healthcare providers who recently re-imposed mask requirements have now jettisoned this restriction is grounds for celebration. And, given that these reverse ferrets occurred so quickly (in less than three weeks), it is reasonable to suggest that the multiple complaints submitted by Smile Free members and Daily Sceptic readers may have had an impact. In this increasingly technocratic world, it is refreshing to believe that visible dissent from ordinary people can achieve change.
Dr. Gary Sidley is a retired NHS Consultant Clinical Psychologist and co-founder of the Smile Free campaign opposed to mask mandates.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Covid = a cold
Yes I received the same nonsense response from Sarah Shingler on the 11th July.
It could have been summarised as:
“Go away, prole, we say masks just because. We are ignoring you from now on.”
Yes I had the same reply but wrote back anyway just for the record suggesting she might learn something from the Cochrane report on masks or perhaps read two excellent books The Facemask Cult by Hector Drummond and Unmasked by Ian Miller. Like to think we might have had some influence over their backtracking.
I got the same reply too. Wasn’t sure my complaint had been logged because initially they asked if I wanted to be referred to PALS.
They will never admit that they succumbed to pressure, but I guess we can chalk this up as a win.
“Our priority is to protect these individuals as much as we can whilst in our care…”
And prior to 2020 that wasn’t a priority?
There’s a growing amount of generalised neurosis. A fake creed of safetyism or increasing numbers of people with agoraphobic tendencies or who feel anxious around other human beings. Might be an idea to look at that but of course it remains hidden. C.S. Lewis said that in the dark days it will be easy for the devil to take souls because people will stop trusting and talking with each other and the human psyche becomes extremely fragile when deprived of the magic of meaningful human contact. The melancholy prospect of a generation of children growing up whose formative years were stunted my mask-wearing and similar neurotic derangement. It is also a very selfish creed..
It was always an outbreak of the “Something Must be Done” mentality. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politician%27s_syllogism
The worst part of introducing mask mandates anywhere, with no science of any description to back up their efficacy, was that, even before the Cochrane meta-review – which demonstrated them to be useless – any honest scientist or policy maker would recognize that even if there’s a chance that masks do nothing, issuing a mandate and recommending their widespread usage could give vulnerable people false confidence and cause them falsely to believe that they were safe in close proximity to an infected person!
Ditto for vaccination (of any kind, not just Covid)
They would wear a piece of cloth for a few hours, stuff it in their pocket when they were told to do so and then put it back on their face and this was supposed to be an infection control measure yeah right. And then they would just disgard them on tha pavement or in people’s gardens which shows you how seriously they really took the situation. This kind of power arrangement in a society is deeply morbid and dangerous.
To this day, I believe that most people did not take masks seriously, and put them on their face simply to go along with the crowd. I heard that in some parts of Asia during the “pandemic” wearing a mask in the presence of others became a gesture of politeness… So there you have it – nothing to do with health protection, just manners! Like a perverse new form of social etiquette.
It’s true you see south east Asian people in Britain on trains wearing a mask. Is it just pure politeness and etiquette? If so for me the fact that you could put something like that on your face, essentially just to fit in – one would have to ask, would such people be reliable at all when faced with a serious and intelligent enemy. Because if not then they become either a burden or collateral damage.
During ‘the madness’ my partner watched a woman wearing gloves, go to the cubicle, do her business then leave the toilets without either washing her gloved hands or changing the gloves. No concern with hygiene whatsoever. I guess to her mind either the gloves kept her hands clean, or she never washed her hands.
Proper hygiene measures require careful protocols. It was never about that, it was a visible sign of compliance.
The Common Cold Unit found that masks increased the risks of contracting rhinoviruses decades ago.
Don’t wait around too long and don’t feel defeated. It looks like that but it is actually the opposite in terms of what is being born.
The Australian abroginies foresaw a time when people would fight over toilet paper and then afterwards there would be a great divide. Part of humanity ascending and part of humanity staying forever in a dreary toilet paper world. This has already occurred. Don;t join the toilet paper enthusiasts join those who will learn a way to live without toilet paper, Honestly it isn’t that difficult there are many leaves that will wipe your arse way better than paper. I remember them in my youth. Dock leaves for example that would not only clean but they would also soothe.
Well done,and thankyou.
I don’t see how this is a victory as they have not admitted that masks are useless.