Having more vaccine doses leads to more Covid infections, a major study has found.
Researchers at the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio, USA, monitored over 47,500 employees for Covid infections during the first four months of 2024, when the JN.1 virus lineage was dominant. They found that being vaccinated increased infection risk by 46% with two doses, 95% with three doses and 151% with more than three doses, when compared to having zero or one dose.
These findings are shown in the table and chart below.
The study, which is awaiting peer review, confirmed the findings of earlier studies by the same team among the same population. The study in 2022 produced this famous chart, showing cumulative risk from increasing doses. A 2023 follow up found a similar outcome.
The authors have been bolder this time in proposing that the vaccines themselves are responsible for the increased risk – though they blame a possible interaction with natural immunity rather than a direct effect of the drug itself. They write:
Consistent with similar findings in many prior studies, a higher number of prior vaccine doses was associated with a higher risk of COVID-19. The exact reason for this finding is not clear. It is possible that this may be related to the fact that vaccine-induced immunity is weaker and less durable than natural immunity. So, although somewhat protective in the short term, vaccination may increase risk of future infection because the act of vaccination prevents the occurrence of a more immunogenic event. Thus, the short-term protection provided by a COVID-19 vaccine comes with a risk of increased susceptibility to COVID-19 in the future.
This of course supposes that the vaccines gave some protection in the first place, which on this evidence seems doubtful.
A more likely cause would be ‘original antigenic sin‘, where a narrow vaccine-based immune response prevents a broader immune response on encountering the virus, plus the development of tolerance towards the spike protein from repeated dosing.
Overall the study’s model found a low protective effect from the recent booster of 23%. However, the authors point out that this was only achieved by adjusting for the number of vaccine doses. In other words, by assuming the number of vaccines shouldn’t increase susceptibility and so adjusting the results accordingly, the latest booster seemed to be protective. But if you don’t make that adjustment, “the 2023-2024 formulation of the vaccine was not protective against COVID-19”, the authors state.
They conclude that “a more nuanced approach to COVID-19 is necessary”.
Although some individuals are at high risk of complications from COVID-19, and may benefit from receiving a vaccine frequently, the wisdom of vaccinating everyone with a vaccine of low effectiveness every few months to prevent what is generally a mild or an asymptomatic infection in most healthy persons, needs to be questioned.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
This article by Will Jones is vitally important, drawing attention to research at last admitting the connection between more vaccine doses and more infections, in this case, “covid”.
It ties in neatly with research comparing the health of vaccinated to unvaccinated babies:
Analysis of health outcomes in vaccinated and unvaccinated children: Developmental delays, asthma, ear infections and gastrointestinal disorders – PMC (nih.gov)
“Vaccination before 1 year of age was associated with increased odds of developmental delays, asthma, and ear infections. In a quartile analysis, subjects were grouped by number of vaccine doses received in the first year of life. Higher odds ratios were observed in Quartiles 3 and 4 (where more vaccine doses were received) for all four health conditions considered, as compared to Quartile 1. In a temporal analysis, developmental delays showed a linear increase as the age cut-offs increased from 6 to 12 to 18 to 24 months of age. Slightly higher ORs were also observed for all four health conditions when time permitted for a diagnosis was extended from ⩾ 3 years of age to ⩾ 5 years of age.”
I found the article while searching for a reason why more cases of babies dying of whooping cough are occurring now, as I wondered whether it was being caused by vaccines.
We all knew this. Complete Clown World. The Sheeple know not and will bleat for more during the next scamdemic and lockdown.
Verdict on mRNA: Unsafe, ineffective and in 2-8% of people, injury and death.
Verdicat on all quackcines: Totally unnecessary, immune destroying, disease generating. See autism.
Anecdotally ~50% of the people I worked with suffered from something post mRNA stabbination. Some were ill for weeks. But like the idiots that they are (some earning >£150 K p.a.), they would line up wearing a face anus wrap for the next dart.
Unstabbinated I was never ill. Apparently lots of exercise, a good diet, water, little alcohol and no drugs or smoking does work. As does ignoring fake news, fake science and fake experts.
The majority just went temporarily insane for a while, an unknown number still are!
It is just unfathomable, even now, what happened.
Still can’t fully get my head round what happened, it just defies reason!
I said I would never take the “vax” and stuck to it, almost all my family initially said the same and then suddenly were desperate to get theirs.
I wonder how many people have kept up with the schedule and are still alive and in good health. Surely such resilient characters deserve an accolade. My impression is one of cyclic maladies with ever decreasing circles, smaller gaps between periods of illness and it isn’t just the vaccinated. But I suppose that given the marvellous shedding characteristics of this little beauty it would be difficult not to be shed upon. It is beyond me how anyone could see the spike protein as a good thing in any context except warfare.
My dad’s response to my mum and sister getting covid recently was to rush out and get his 5th booster (I think). You’d think that if you are living in the house with somebody who has it and you haven’t yet got it yourself, that might suggest that getting a booster is at best a pointless action. Hell, maybe the previous booster was successful (lol).
They also moved to the countryside because the city was ‘too busy’, yet strongly support immigration. Thank mum and dad!
Complete net zero believers, yet are upset that a solar farm is being built next to them. (I can’t help but think that there’s an element of divine justice in this.)
I have a pal who drove ambulances to Ukraine. Massive supporter of Ukraine fighting on, but off Israel giving up.
He’s now involved in efforts to get the son of a Ukrainian woman living in his village over here to avoid the draft. I asked him who’s sons he wanted to fight in Ukraine.
It is a crazy struggle on both fronts. 600,000 Ukrainians dead beause Johnson didn’t let Ukraine negotiate and a situation developing in Gaza where most of the Israeli army doesn’t want to carry on because they are aware of the escalating casualties. And of course provocations in Taiwan. This might look insane when examined from a geopolitical perspective but it is happening simply because the Anglo-Americans know that their power is rapidly diminishing and so from ther point of view it makes sense to launch everything at once. Of course it is crazy and bound to fail but they are systemically bound to act this way.On a positive note the Russians and Chinese recongnise the insanity.There is a renewed faith in Christianity as a brother within Islamic countries given the reisstance to the genocide. I wouldn’t feel too stressed as a citizen of a western country because that is how your masters want you to feel.
Yes perhaps that is the truth of it all. People who are blithely unaware of the contradictions in their path. It does make you wonder. Could anything actually occur to shake their dogmatism? And if not then what do we make of it. This is the joy of the human condition I suppose. If humanity were to be completely rational then it would’ve been conquered by evil a long time ago.
HAHAHAHAHA!
Even the low estimates are twenty million dead and another 100 million disabled so that they require constant care. How many more do you want. You will get those numbers anyway given the explosion in cancers. Do you really think that when this death wave is over you will be sitting in a comfortable position looking out over a depopulated world? It will be very different. You will be lucky to get due process or even a trial or even a determination over the manner of your execution. Because when they find out they will tear the flesh from your bones.
Nature Bats Last.
My 23-yo repeatedly jabbed daughter just developed a tuna fish allergy last week (hives). Immune system disorder showing up? So, she can avoid fish, but what else will cause an allergy and will the symptoms turn into anaphylaxis requiring hospitalization and medical care? Multiply her seemingly minor affliction with millions, and we can all see why the medical system is breaking down with long waits and shortages.
“Overall the study’s model found a low protective effect from the recent booster of 23%. However, the authors point out that this was only achieved by adjusting for the number of vaccine doses. In other words, by assuming the number of vaccines shouldn’t increase susceptibility and so adjusting the results accordingly, the latest booster seemed to be protective. But if you don’t make that adjustment, “the 2023-2024 formulation of the vaccine was not protective against COVID-19”, the authors state.”
I’ve tried reading this carefully and am still baffled. It seems to say that the authors assumed the vaccines could not possibly increase susceptibility and so in calculating the protective effect they removed the number of doses as a factor. In other words, they didn’t like the result so they changed the calculation by removing the very elements they were checking for until they got the result they wanted.
Isn’t that how science works these days, it’s also quite handy to not hand over the methodology so that no one else can replicate your results.
I keep thinking I’m missing something obvious though as the statement is unusually brazen in its nonsensicalness.
It wil all break down and we won’t have much left, certainly not when you consider the populations levels that we might try to sustain. You will be lucky if you get away with a few hundred still alive and how long will that last given our dependency on imports.Because a time will come when it all dries up and then do you have a place to go or a meaningful existence. This is an important question. You would be surprised how many of our daily staples are entirely reliant on overseas sources. Lets say you wanted yo buy Vitamin C tablets – most of that is produced artificially in China. Very important and we are in danger of losing it. The same goes for so many things.Perhaps because we are an island we feel that nothing can ever really touch us. This is a big mistake.
“Let’s say you wanted to buy Vitamin C tablets.”
You need to start making sauerkraut, my friend.