Up to half the excess deaths in American nursing homes were due to the impact of lockdowns and mitigation measures on frail residents rather than the virus. That’s the conclusion of epidemiologist Professor Eyal Shahar in a new analysis of a study on U.S. nursing home deaths.
The study, published in the Journal of Health Economics in 2022, found that the greater the mitigation efforts in U.S. nursing homes, the higher the death toll during the pandemic. “Those efforts not only largely failed to reduce Covid mortality, but they also added non-Covid deaths. The more they tried to mitigate, the worse the outcome was,” notes Prof. Shahar.
“These results are consistent in three consecutive periods: May through September 2020, September through December 2020, and December 2020 through April 2021. Moreover, the relationship between quality ranking and mortality became stronger over time,” he adds.
The reason was the non-Covid death toll: “The higher the ranking, the higher the number of non-Covid deaths”.
While in the first wave the harsh mitigation measures do appear to have reduced Covid deaths somewhat, this effect was “insufficient” to make-up for the non-Covid deaths associated with a higher ranking. It was also not true for later waves.
The study authors propose the most likely causal explanation: that higher ranked nursing homes imposed stricter – and deadlier – mitigation measures. Prof. Shahar writes:
Quality ranking was a surrogate for adherence to mitigation guidelines. The higher the quality of a nursing home, the more strictly official guidelines were followed. And those guidelines had a wide range of adverse consequences, which the authors describe as “unfortunate downsides to these early policies that could have negatively impacted nursing home resident health”.
Citing relevant studies, they specify some of the mechanisms: extreme isolation, which may be deadly in Alzheimer’s; unsupervised meals leading to weight loss; a lack of communal activities, which reduced exercise and increased the time spent in bed; and a large decline in regular medical care of frail, elderly residents. These plausible mechanisms are documented in horrific personal stories.
The study authors claim that vaccination helped protect from Covid from 2021 onwards. Looking at their data, Prof. Shahar disputes this:
The effectiveness of Covid vaccines against Covid death was temporary and mediocre at best. Most likely, it was near zero or negative in the frail elderly. … The case fatality rate (CFR) did not decrease during the vaccination campaign. Nor did Covid vaccines reduce Covid and all-cause mortality in that vulnerable population.
Prof. Shahar estimates the proportion of excess deaths attributable to the mitigation measures. Making the defensible assumption that the lowest-ranking nursing homes show the level of mortality with no mitigation at all, he calculates that mitigation efforts accounted for “one-third to half of the excess mortality in 12 months”.
Notably, the study authors don’t try to claim the non-Covid deaths were missed Covid – a common argument from those wanting to exaggerate the impact of the virus. Prof. Shahar goes further and criticises the authors for failing to recognise that around a quarter of ‘Covid’ deaths were no such thing as they died ‘with Covid’ from other conditions: “Based on CDC data, about 25% of Covid deaths in the U.S. were misattributed in the first five months of 2021.”
With no evidence of net, or even any, benefit, and clear evidence of a devastating death toll, this study’s important findings show that even for those most vulnerable to the virus – those who many argue should receive ‘focused protection’ – mitigation measures do far more harm than good.
It turns out, when a flu-like virus comes along – even a novel(ish) and potentially engineered one – there’s still no better response than to keep calm and carry on. And whatever you do, don’t jettison dignity, compassion and freedom. It can be deadly.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
I would say that the Medical Nazis murdered far more than half. The ‘protocols’ certainly murdered thousands in every country. As did the stabbinations which were the only pass to freedom pace the fake science and fake news.
We know that maybe 25K max died from Rona over 2 years. The death rate was 0.1-0.3%.
Behind closed doors, older people were murdered through midazolam, morphine, ventilators, or other methods; or they died of something else but thanks to the fake PCR were put down as Rona deaths.
Criminality and evil on such a vast scale is almost impossible to comprehend. Without the communist NHS and state control of health, such a murderous rampage cannot happen. Also inexplicable is the sheeple devotion to their own enslavement and complicity in murder.
Yet the Rona retarded religious, including the useless medical unprofessionals, don’t view themselves as accomplices in the destruction of life and reality. This is how morally screwed up West Civ is.
But remember, ‘If it saves one life’ and ‘Look him in the eyes….’ Where the hell is that slogan when looking at the carnage and murderous policies?
Monstrous satanic evil.
And the other half, due to Remdisivir, and of course the “vaccines”.
In the UK according to NHS England’s own weekly data, only 5% of Deaths recorded with “Covid” had no other recorded co-morbidities and 80% of all deaths were over 60.
Prof. Shahar’s findings are vitally important, though carefully avoiding the Elephant in the Room, as everyone does: the ethnicity of the victims, mostly Ethnic Europeans, the World’s Smallest Ethnic Group, target of the Globalists.
Lawyers on standby…
The fattening of the legal profession in such circumstances was a common thread in the “Backbench Business: Access to redress schemes” in Parliament yesterday. Often the lawyers get more than the victims or the victims get nothing and it would have been cheaper just compensating them than paying lawyers.
However, there was no recognition that the advice of lawyers will no doubt precede the very action for which compensation is then sought.
I struggle with any article based on the concept of “covid deaths”. I think even in some ideal world where cause of death was established on a consistent basis with a good deal of care taken over it, it would still be rather tricky especially as you’re dealing with a cohort that is mainly quite old and frail anyway, with other things wrong with them. But we’re not in that ideal world, so the concept just seems utterly useless to me.
Safety measures that were brought in after Harrold Shipman were removed in 2020 that also put care residents at risk. Iain Davis mentions this in his book….Pseudo Pandemic New Normal Technocracy.
It is somewhat reassuring that more academics are now breaking cover and are prepared to identify the many harms caused by the response to Covid. The harms identified are entirely unsurprising and the risks of them were pointed out at the time by many of us. Regrettably, there remains no real accountability for the guilty men and women. They ought to be afraid to show their faces in public. Hopeful they will get their just desserts at some future point.
As Jimmy Dore said, we need nothing short of a revolution.
andrew bridgen parliament !