Prior to the advent of COVID-19, BioNTech, the German developer and owner of the so-called ‘Pfizer’ vaccine, had only ever done trials for cancer therapies. This was the company’s focus, not infectious diseases. But none of those trials got very far. None of BioNTech’s experimental cancer drugs had ever made it to a large-scale phase 3 clinical trial, and one of the just three phase 2 trials registered by BioNTech prior to 2020 was “prematurely ended” for unknown reasons. All in all, BioNTech had only tested its drugs on just over 400 – for the most part, extremely-ill – cancer patients.
In light of reports of surging cancer diagnoses since the rollout of the mRNA-based Covid vaccines, I wondered in a recent article whether BioNTech’s trials faltered because its mRNA-based cancer therapies were in fact promoting cancerous growths rather than inhibiting or reversing them.
Well, now we have further support for this hypothesis.
A new preprint by Rubio-Casillas et al. in the International Journal of Biological Macromolecules asks ‘N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ): Friend or foe of cancer?‘ Substituting N1-methyl-pseudouridine for naturally occurring uridine is precisely the innovation at the heart of BioNTech’s mRNA platform, which is thus, in reality, a modRNA or modified RNA platform. Katalin Karikó, who would go on to become a BioNTech Vice-President, shared the Nobel Prize in Medicine with Drew Weissman for having discovered this innovation.
N1-methyl-pseudouridine: friend or foe of cancer? The authors’ answer is clear: friend… of cancer. Thus, the abstract reads (emphasis added):
Additionally, it has been discovered that the mRNA vaccines inhibit essential immunological pathways, thus impairing early interferon signaling. … Evidence is provided that adding 100 % of N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ) to the mRNA vaccine in a melanoma model stimulated cancer growth and metastasis, while non-modified mRNA vaccines induced opposite results, thus suggesting that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines could aid cancer development.
Did BioNTech and the regulatory authority already know what Rubio-Casillas et al. found out? This is to say: did they know that the company’s mRNA platform could be oncogenic before the platform was rolled out to literally billions of people around the world as the basis of its COVID-19 vaccine?
The competent regulatory authority for two of the trials, including the one that was “prematurely ended”, was none other than the PEI: Germany’s vaccines and medicines regulator, whose cozy relationship with BioNTech I have written about here. (The competent authority for the third trial was Germany’s Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), a sister organisation of the PEI.)
As noted in my previous article on the subject, thanks to an American FOIA request and a court order, we have a virtually complete record of the clinical trials of BioNTech’s COVID-19 vaccine. These are the ‘Pfizer documents’ – a misnomer, since Pfizer merely conducted the trials on the German company’s behalf – which the FDA famously wanted to keep hidden for some 75 years.
Why should we not have just as complete a documentary record of BioNTech’s earlier cancer trials? The public interest is obvious, not just for Germany but indeed for almost the entire world. Germany’s relatively young freedom of information law needs to be tested. But if BioNTech did indeed detect a signal that its cancer drugs were promoting cancer, the PEI might well want to hide the documents not just for 75 years, but forever.
Robert Kogon is the pen name of a widely-published journalist covering European affairs. Subscribe to his Substack.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Off-T.
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/nhs-pushes-covid-spring-booster-jab-as-injuries-and-fatalities-mount/
And to cap the above our sainted NHS is offering Spring
vaccinebooster kill shots for the gullible.Ain’t life grand?
Thanks for the heads-up. Not really off-topic. Especially if one already has cancer.
And let us not forget four members of the British Royal Family got sick and two died and two alive but with cancer. All within the past three years.
This is not to be expected.
Lawyers use Royal Lives Clauses in the UK to address the problem of perpetuities and accumulations – legal rules limiting and outlawing gifts/bequests made in perpetuity.
These clauses are of the form of gifts/bequests made for the period measured by the life of the longest surviving member of a royal family alive at the time of the gift/bequest.
Royal Lives Clauses are used because it is common to expect long life in Royal households and families.
So how come in the UK we have seen serious illness and death in four members of the British Royal Family and all are at the top of the line of succession.
This is not a conspiracy theory but a scientific question prompted by the issue of the phenomenon of Covid vaccine turbo cancers.
I do wish that genetic engineers would stop trying to play God.
The truth is that the immune system is beyond puny human understanding and will ever be so, AI notwithstanding.
Their only nod to the immune system’s existence is how to evade their gene therapies being destroyed by it – with the now blindingly obvious disastrous consequences.
Later this morning in Parliament:
Covid-19 pandemic response and trends in excess deaths
https://www.parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/168f642a-5708-4b1a-9857-d8eacf475252
Charlotte Nichols MP highlights that, despite repeated follow-ups, her constituent Adam Rowland who was promised on TV by Rishi Sunak that the PM would be in touch with him regarding support for COVID vaccine injury, has not received a response from government.
https://parliamentlive.tv/event/index/168f642a-5708-4b1a-9857-d8eacf475252?in=11:32:12
https://www.globalresearch.ca/turbo-cancer-pfizer-moderna/5855015
A superb article which is the perfect accompaniment to Robert Kogon’s piece above. Basically the evidence is indisputable now that the mRNA poisons cause cancer and certainly the Turbo varieties.
Off-T
Well, this could be interesting. Lloyd’s, the London underwriters are refusing to pay out for the Nordstram damages on the grounds that such damages must have been government backed.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/uk-insurers-refuse-pay-nord-stream/5855071
(But) if their arguments are enough to convince a court in London, a decision in favor of the insurers would likely be a double-edged sword. Following Lloyd’s submission to US sanctions and its refusal to insure ships carrying Iranian oil, Western insurance underwriters (like their colleagues in the banking sector) are increasingly in danger of losing their global reputation for relative independence from the state. Should the West ultimately lose its grip on the global insurance market — or its reputation as a safe haven for foreign assets — €400 million will be unlikely to buy it back.
Slightly Off-T
https://www.globalresearch.ca/rulers-determined-kill-happen/5844843
A short compendium of articles discussing excess deaths and the depopulation agenda. Sobering reading.
You’re on a roll!
Now let’s see how many moaning minnies you attract. My guess is 0. 10/10 for being such a rebel contributor to this place.
I shall get round to reading one or two later as I’m just passing through.
Thanks very much Mogs
In my book, hux, there’s no such thing as off topic. Because everything is connected.
You know that, I know that.
And I do understand why you feel the need to write it
Keep em coming, hux, keep em coming