For several years, oncologists such as Professor Angus Dalgleish have been linking mRNA Covid vaccines to cancer onset and relapse. Of course, the pro-mRNA side has consistently dismissed such worries as nothing more than anecdotes and coincidences. However, population-level data supporting this link have appeared in a new peer-reviewed study titled ‘Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan‘.
The authors start by pointing out that age-adjusted mortality rates (AMRs) for all cancers continued their downward trend during the first year of the Covid Pandemic right up until the roll-out of the Covid jabs. A rather unfortunate coincidence, I’m sure you’ll agree.
The age-groups found to have had statistically significant excess cancer deaths were 75-79 year-olds in 2020, 2021 and 2022 and 80-84 year-olds in 2022, with both groups showing year-on-year increases. Both groups incidentally also had booster rates over 90%.
So far, so coincidental. It’s important to stress here that only five out of 20 cancers showed any excess deaths in 2020-2022. But the three that showed significant excess deaths in 2021 (pancreatic, prostate and ovarian cancers) coincidentally showed significant excess deaths in 2022 too. I guess that’s at least three more unfortunate coincidences. Lip/oral/pharyngeal cancers and leukaemia also showed significant excess deaths in 2022.
Discussing possible mechanisms to explain these results, the authors mention a long list issues with the mRNA shots: lipid nanoparticles spreading to various organs, long-lasting spike proteins in the blood, thrombosis, suppression of type I interferon responses “which play an essential role in cancer immunosurveillance”, increased IgG4 antibodies, reactivation of latent viruses and reverse-transcription of mRNA into DNA and integration into the human genome. On the last point, the authors quote our old friends at the FDA (emphasis mine).
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) states in its guidance for the production of viral vaccines for infectious disease, “There are several potential mechanisms by which residual DNA could be oncogenic, including the integration and expression of encoded oncogenes or insertional mutagenesis following DNA integration” [98]. The FDA’s guidelines are essential for Japan because Japan’s special emergency use authorisation depended on FDA approval during the COVID-19 pandemic
If the FDA is Dr. Evil, Japan’s Ministry of Health is Mini-me. But not as funny.
This article first appeared on Guy Gin’s Substack page, Making (Covid) Waves in Japan. Subscribe here.
Stop Press: Prof. Angus Dalgleish has written about the new study in TCW Defending Freedom.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Another Jenga block removed from the stack. Sooner or later the whole lot will tumble.
As this starts with “For several years…”, a suitably large war is likely to be manufactured before it tumbles.
What actual evidence makes you think that?
~10 people I know have contracted cancer, 3 have died, the rest injured, some (breast cancer) ‘saved’ by the tiktokking saints at the National Death service. The cancers listed in this article are acclerating in society at large – but of course the Stabbinations cannot be blamed. Even for those who are injured with cancer the idiocy remains firmly in place. The latest is that pace one of them, ‘my doctor said 1 in 2 have cancer and that with better diagnosing they are finding these cases’. I cut that into shreds in about 30 sec.
Cancer is from toxins. What toxins have been poured into our bodies since the 1960s – food processing, opiods et al, and the quackcines. In some areas, fluoride (derivative of aluminium) and chem trails in the skies. We don’t really have a clue about what is in our food or water supplies.
I know/knew 5 in the past 2 years. 3 dead; 1 terminal; one on second bout of chemo and may survive.
Here is an extensive history on Fluoride.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hvhAEiB19M&list=WL&index=33&t=3s
I’m no expert immunologist nor genetic engineer but I can bloody well read, research and think.
Warnings of specific dangers from the modified MRNA jabs were known from January 2022 in this paper-
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027869152200206X
(and yes I’m familiar with the “letter to the editor” and also the authors response)
Some of the said dangers, including death, now coming to fruition –
https://jessicar.substack.com/p/igg4-and-cancer-a-mechanism-of-action
The dangers of gene therapies in general have been known for decades.
Were the MHRA aware of these dangers?
If not, why not.
Hot off the press, there’s also this (Jessica no doubt influenced by my sweary words)
https://jessicar.substack.com/p/s2-of-spike-buggers-up-p53?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=516896&post_id=143630070&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=false&r=x6a6a&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
P53 being an essential cancer suppression gene.
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/four-years-of-them-and-us/
Liz Hodgkinson at TCW with a short article on “Them and Us.” Don’t I know it.
“What can we do? I sometimes wonder whether ‘them’ and ‘us’ are still speaking the same language or even living on the same planet. My only hope is that if we continue to soldier on and speak out, our numbers will eventually exceed theirs and sense will finally prevail.”
How long can the self-delusion of the jabbed continue? Will there be a mass uprising once people realize how they’ve been harmed? I think the self-delusion will continue for much longer than is logical. An old friend invited me to a Zoom book group but said that I might not want to join, Ha Ha, because in the last six months one member and two spouses have died. These 13 ladies are in their 60s and live in a very liberal area. I’m sure everyone they know has been jabbed numerous times, proudly posting their status on Facebook, so the thought that the jabs have poisoned them will not ever register.
Lots to think about here.
The AMR for cancer was almost unchanged between 2020 and 2021 and dropped between 2021 and 2022. The only reason this was classified as excess deaths was because their statistical model predicted a steep drop from 2020 to 2021 to 2022. This means it is vital to examine the assumptions underlying the model – in particular no autocorrelation and independence of errors. This was not covered in the paper.
Depending on the cancer, it typically takes years from the beginning of the cancer through diagnosis and treatment to death (there are exceptions). It would be truly dramatic if vaccines caused e.g.breast cancer leading to death within weeks. There is no suggestion of a vastly speeded up process. So it seems the most the vaccines can have done is speed up the final stages of some cancers.
The paper has an explicit objective – to examine the statistical relationship between vaccination and excess cancer deaths. As such it makes little effort to explore other possible explanations for the figures. There are just two sentences I can see:
Reduced cancer screening and healthcare due to the lockdown might increase deaths for any type of cancer. Still, the significant increases in mortalities for six specific cancer types were unlikely to be explained by a shortage of healthcare services.
This seems a bold assumption. It may well be that some specific cancer services were more affected than others or patients with some types of cancer were less inclined to seek support during Covid. If you look at figure 1 (AMRs over time) you can see that essentially the decline in AMRs stopped over 21/22. A key question is why did the rates decline in the first place? This presumably pertains to some combination of prevention (diet, exercise, non-smoking etc), diagnosis and treatment. Were Japanese were less inclined to take tests in 2020/21. Were regular screening programmes interrupted? etc.
I do agree with you to a large extent – there may well be other factors at play here other than mRNA. People avoiding hospitals in latter 2019 and 2020 is one that sprimgs to mind.
My worry though is that the authors of the papers I referred to earlier may well be correct, and if so then that would prove to be devastating for most of the western world especially when one considers the billions resting on the mRNA platform. It’s almost too big to fail, the next generation of pharma drugs/vaccines/gene therapies are resting on it being a success.
To my mind a solution would be for the two sides to meet regularly and discuss matters in an openly civilised manner. The ONS should open their books.On the face of it that should not be too much to ask but I fear there’s more chance of Israel and Hamas holding a friendly discourse.
Instead we just have the two camps dedicated to discrediting each others work. Surely to God it has to stop.
Imho bigpharma and their masters are totally bent, but I would be willing to change my mind if for example there were to be a mass survey of the health outcomes of the jabbed (and I’m talking about orthodox vaccines) as against the unjabbed – and there was no material difference.
The same could be done for mRNA but apparently although the ONS have the data it is not being released.
I appreciate your attitude.
What exactly is the data is that you want the ONS to release? They already provide deaths by vaccination status and deaths by cause of death. Is it specific causes of death by vaccination status? I can imagine that might be quite hard to extract and they might we wondering where these requests end. Has any country provided specific causes of death by vaccination status.
My areas of interest/expertise such as they are, lie in immunology, vaccinology and the basics of gene tec. My career depended upon reading, understanding, and criticising the contrary views of mainly medical experts and coming to decisions based on that. Mainly due to the MSM the public are fed only the narrative regarding covid and the jabs. This cannot be right.
The depth of analyses of statistics are beyond me and to answer your question I would welcome the ONS answering the recent requests made by and I think on behalf of the HART group by Prof. Norman Fenton – he and the Guardian’s Spiegelhalter seem to have different views regarding statistics.
I welcome all opposing views on this site, there should really be more, particularly as regards mRNA etc., Existing in an echo chamber can become repetitive and boring – and I’m no exception in that regard – I’ve been banging on about Seneff et al for years.
At least this site allows opposing views – unlike the Guardian where I was banned over 3 years ago for antivaxx comments – and to think I used to buy that thing for over 30 years.
.
Which brings me to that and other papers I mentioned earlier.
The original Seneff paper, as you correctly point out has been criticised but imho not disproven at all. From memory all the authors of the letter critical of it declare no competing interests, yet the reality is that at least three derive income from an “mRNA cutting edge” gene tec.vaccination company. Apparently this is ok because they authored the criticisms in their spare time….
Their mission statement is to take down all papers they perceive as spreading misinformation regarding vaccinations, particularly mRNA.
It’s a shame that the two sides can’t meet and have in depth discussions as regards the benefits/risks of mRNA then we all might learn more.
Also, does it do any good at this point to alert jabbed family and friends about the side effects and excess deaths? I talked with an unjabbed acquaintance last night, trading anecdotes about jabbed, trim siblings who’ve had recurring sicknesses over the past year. I mentioned several times how worried I was for my jabbed family members, including kids in their 20s (hers didn’t get the jab). As we parted, she mentioned her nephew’s jabbed fiancee, age 29, who was diagnosed with cancer a few months ago and now has a month to live. That brought tears to my eyes. Thanks, lady. How did that information possibly help me? I’d prefer willful ignorance now.
We can’t though… we have to be there for those we love at least. I have a roll call of stories too, and I have to be careful what I say, but I chip away where I can. We have to make sure that they aren’t strong armed into taking any more (because you are immuno suppressed etc – which was obviously brought on by bloody poison in the first place)!
Eventually those who aren’t killed off may join our side, that’s my hope!