If you were expected to agree to an employment contract, would you not want to read it before signing? When you go to a restaurant, do you look at the menu before ordering your food or just eat whatever you happen to be given by the waiter? Or when buying a house or a car, would you not first want to view it and find out the details before committing to the purchase? In these situations, it is highly unlikely that you would simply trust that everything will turn out fine, with no essential information to inform your decision-making. Yet this is exactly what it appears the Government would like you to do with the World Health Organisation (WHO) and its opaque International Health Regulations Amendments (IHRs). In fact, it’s worse than that. In addition to being given virtually no information about the WHO’s IHR amendments, the British public will not get a say in whether or not our nation is signed up to the changed agreements. Regardless of your opinion on the matter, the Government and the WHO will decide for you. This is despite increasing numbers of credible voices, including Members of Parliament, expressing grave concerns about what this could mean for our individual freedom, our health choices, our economy and for our hard-won British democracy. It is therefore incredibly important that we all become aware of the issues around this debate and then consider expressing any resulting concerns that we may have. Most people would take this approach to any other situation which could dramatically affect the way they live their life and impact on their family and future.
The IHRs are being hidden from public scrutiny
You would be forgiven for not knowing about the WHO’s IHR amendments, because there is scant coverage of what they are within the mainstream media and therefore very little public discussion about them. This is unacceptable, given the impact which they could have on our lives.
In summary, the WHO is currently developing two international legal instruments intended to increase significantly its authority in managing public health emergencies, including pandemics:
- Amendments to the 2005 International Health Regulations (the IHR amendments)
- A pandemic treaty (the WHO Pandemic Agreement)
The WHO International Health Regulations group is set to agree on the amendments package to present to the World Health Assembly in May at the 77th World Health Assembly. The last draft of that document made available by the WHO was over two years ago, in February 2022 and as summarised in this comprehensive UsForThem briefing paper (full paper here), which gives a feel for the scale and severity of the issues, particularly in terms of their implications for human rights, free speech and national decision making autonomy.
Furthermore, there is strong evidence that the process has not been lawfully adhered to. The WHO failed to publish the revised package of IHR amendments back in January 2024, as required under Article 55 of the IHR. This means that the WHO cannot now lawfully present the IHR for a vote within the timeframes required under international law. The May deadline for the vote must therefore be extended. You would expect that something as important as this would be raised in Parliament and widely reported in the mainstream press, but it has not been.
Negotiations on the IHR are continuing with the ninth and final round of negotiations between countries from March 18th until March 28th. But like the hypothetical house or car you would be forced to purchase without first seeing it, Parliament and the British public are not being given full details of the IHR amendments. They are being hidden from public and Parliamentary scrutiny. It is therefore impossible to know the full impact that the IHRs could have on our nation, on our democracy and on our autonomous decision making. However, what little we do know is alarming enough to have caused MPs and other credible voices to have raised grave concerns.
Many of those asking questions and demanding transparency on the WHO’s IHRs are highly respected politicians. Last year, Esther McVey MP, along with five other Conservative MPs, wrote a letter to ministers to warn of an “ambition evident… for the WHO to transition from an advisory organisation to a controlling international authority”. The letter was also signed by the Tory MPs Sir John Redwood, David Davis, Philip Davies, Sir Christopher Chope and Danny Kruger. The group raised serious concerns about the proposed amendments to the IHRs, warning that the WHO’s advice would be “binding” and would introduce a new requirement for countries to recognise the WHO as the global authority on public health measures. If passed in May 2024, the change would mean the WHO could enforce border closures, quarantine measures and vaccine passports on all member countries, including the U.K. It would do this in response to the threat of a pandemic, or the emergence of one, or some other public health crisis which the WHO would identify and define. Additionally, the draft of the treaty itself would commit member states to significant spending commitments for pandemic preparedness. Surely this is worth some level of public and parliamentary debate?
Calls for greater transparency and scrutiny of the IHRs were ramped up again in March of this year. A group of Conservative MPs has warned the U.K. risks “signing away” its powers to “unelected” WHO bosses, complaining about the proposed amendments in a letter to Alicia Kearns, Chair of the Foreign Affairs Select Committee. Members of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Pandemic Response and Recovery, have argued the treaty risks “undermining U.K. sovereignty”. The letter was signed by the former Brexit Minister and Chief Negotiator Lord Frost. Other signatories included MPs Philip Davies, Philip Hollobone and Sir Christopher Chope.
Voicing her concerns again on March 30th 2024, Esther McVey, now a Minister, has written in the Telegraph and stated, “We will never surrender powers to the World Health Organisation” and that, “No one is going to tell us how to take care of our citizens, or force us to impose any particular national response in future crises”. In this article she has claimed: “Our red lines in the negotiations include not agreeing to anything that cedes sovereignty, protecting our ability to make all of our own domestic decisions on national public health measures, including whether to introduce any lockdowns or restrictions, require vaccinations and mask wearing, and decisions on travel into and out of the country.” As one commentator pointed out on social media, although as a statement of intent this is reassuring from Esther McVey, it does not lessen the imperative for public scrutiny of these agreements. Indeed, given the secretive and anti-democratic manner in which the negotiations have been overseen by the WHO, and the significant implications the agreement could have on so many aspects of our lives, we have a right to see every detail before anything is agreed.
An urgent matter for public debate
This matter should be widely reported in the mainstream media, discussed in Parliament and debated by the British public. The decision in May will potentially have an enormous impact on everyone in the country, on our economy and on everyone’s health. It is extraordinary to witness an almost total denial of transparency in the process of developing the IHR Amendments which aspire to profoundly affect the health and rights of the British public. In response to criticism, the WHO’s Director General, Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, has said that the WHO has not sought to hide or obscure anything. However, although the interim drafts of the Pandemic Treaty have been published during the negotiation period, most recently in 2024, no interim drafts of the IHR Amendments have been published. This is despite repeated calls for transparency from parliamentarians and the public during the negotiation period. Again, if this was anything else which we were signing up to, buying or agreeing to, we would expect to see the details of it first.
Regardless of the legitimate concerns being raised, WHO officials are still pushing hard for the treaty and IHR amendments to be adopted in May 2024 despite no realistic prospect for any national-level scrutiny. Dr. Ghebreyesus has even warned nations that “everyone will have to give something, or no one will get anything”. Emphasising his insistence that individual nations must sign up to the IHR amendments, he has stated: “It’s mission-critical for humanity that you do. We cannot allow the cycle of panic and neglect to repeat.”
Along with the WHO refusing to disclose the full details of the amendments, our own Government appears to be being equally secretive. Lord Frost told the Telegraph that he was concerned the Government was “not really being that open about what it is doing” in treaty negotiations. He added: “The other concern is about the practical impact this treaty could have on our domestic laws.” Although a UN convention doesn’t itself have direct legal force in the U.K., international commitments have a very similar effect. As Lord Frost pointed out:
As we discovered with the Rwanda plan, the doctrine of many Government lawyers seems to be that international commitments are in practice just as legally binding as our own laws… In practice, if another crisis comes, there will be lots of pressure to act within the WHO framework, and Government lawyers will tell us we must.
Time to speak up
Surely one of the great lessons from the Covid pandemic was that our collective silence on important issues only makes matters worse in the long run. For example, it seems hard to find anyone who now says that they believe that lockdowns have not resulted in avoidable economic and societal harms. Children have suffered learning loss and mental illness and there is a record number of people on NHS waiting lists. The architects of the lockdowns are largely in agreement that they were necessary, but the British public are the ones now suffering from this heavy-handed policy decision. Many people say that they disagreed with lockdowns at the time but were reluctant to speak out. They often say that they were worried what other people might think of them if they voiced their concerns. But it is possible that at least some of the harms could have been avoided if more people had spoken out at the time.
It is true that being an ‘anti-lockdowner’ was stigmatised during the pandemic, with social media companies censoring dissenting voices and the media vilifying critics of this policy. At the time of writing, there is currently no pejorative applied to those who are asking reasonable questions about the WHO’s IHR amendments. So there should be no significant barrier to any of us speaking out. Social media companies do not appear to be censoring people who are asking for more information about the IHRs and the mainstream media have yet to condemn those who do so.
However, the WHO has indicated that it plans to form a proposed information control complex, in which WHO officials will coordinate censorship campaigns against WHO-identified “disinformation”. This is something which should worry us all. Critics of lockdowns, the mass vaccination of the population, masking, or any other pandemic response, could once again be silenced and vilified. As we witnessed before, scientific debate, as well as members of the public asking reasonable questions, could be regarded as off limits and socially unacceptable, with those who dare to voice their concerns being publicly shamed for doing so.
It would be unforgivable for the public not to be given more clarity on this important issue. We must see the full detail of what we are being signed up to. The time to speak up about it is now, rather than after the event. If there is nothing for the Government and the WHO to hide, they should disclose this information. The British public has a right to know and we should be given an opportunity to either accept or reject what is being proposed behind closed doors.
To support Mike’s case against his former employer for wrongful dismissal, go to the Democracy 3.0 website, navigate to ‘campaigns’ and click on ‘A Legal Battle for Free Speech‘.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
“World Health Organisation warns XBB.1.5 is the ‘most transmissible’ Covid variant yet as ‘the Kraken’ strain starts sweeping the U.K.”
Can I suggest the next variant is called ‘Fun time jolly feeling’.? Then we can really look forward to catching it.
At some stage post-modern irony might be the only option for nomenclature, once they run out of scary ones. Where they go after “Kraken” has to be “Satan,” and then what’s left for 2024?
Naming so-called variants after sea monsters after a few years of the Greek alphabet is a cynical and clearly planned move to make it sound ‘ooh so scary’ and force the normies back into mask wearing, social distancing compliance. I’m so fed up with this. Not wearing a mask, not social distancing (if I’m well!!), not taking a shot.
A cynic might observe that the “most transmissible” varieties are likely to cause relatively benign problems, which is why they survive and get transmitted. No point in killing the host, after all (and the money people know that as well).
“What we learned in 2022”
2023’s shortest document.?
And the reason for that is because they studiously ignored all actual evidence and data which did not support their anti-science, narrative, propaganda BS.
Anyway, you win Best Comment of the Day. Please accept this Cat Ass Trophy.
Thank you Mogwai. I will treasure it always…
“If Britain were more numerate, we might not have had to endure three lockdowns”
Once basic algebra has been mastered then we should be teaching about budgeting, investments and pensions. Let the brightest kids do the dead hard sums. You don’t need a working knowledge of Differential Equations to be a plasterer.
You never know; maybe competent accountants would have worked out that it would lead to a crash, and not to try “lockdown” at all!
Not sure how useful algebra is. The things you mention are useful. Key maths related skills are ability to look at statistics critically and basic economics, especially related to printing money.
But what got us to lockdowns was not innumeracy or lack of scientific knowledge, but greed, laziness, cowardice, gullibility, lust for power and plain evil.
Most important thing to teach kids – governments will do what they can get away with and they are not your friend, and it’s only the vigilance of the people that keeps them from becoming tyrants.
“Cube can be cuboid, but cuboid can never be cube”…Mr Mazumba, Craigie High School, Dundee, circa 1976.
This has seen me through life just fine.
Maybe learning something about scientific uncertainty would be more valuable, and they could start by teaching the scientists basic truths such as “models do not generate data,” “p-values do not show causes,” and even “crap peer review of crap research papers does not neutralise crap.”
It’s more than scientific uncertainty, though. It’s the corruption of science. And it’s corrupt peer review of corrupt research.
“should be teaching about budgeting, investments and pensions.”
The youth of today will have no requirements for the above subjects if CBDC becomes a reality.
“China’s Covid case ‘explosion’ not due to relaxed rules, WHO says
Then can we deduce that relaxing rules does not cause a case explosion..? Can anyone explain therefore why we are proposing to tighten rules..?
“This is the Times leading article three days into 2023. How can this be real?”
I have long been a critic of the Brian’s and Barbara’s, who turn up to the office with a streaming cold, on the grounds that they are loyal troopers for the company, and subsequently lay-up half the department with their germs. The proposal was to stay home if you are ill (a good idea), and use a mask if you are mixing with others (pointless). It is slowly morphing into something else, and for another reason, the fragility of our blessed NHS.
Well, since our ‘open borders’ policy came into force, we appear to have added 6 million people to our list, yet have reduced NHS beds by 45,000 since 2000. Did no-one imagine that our new citizens were going to get sick at some point, just like we forgot they would need to live somewhere..?
You’re right that the attitude to turning up to work with a cold may have changed. Decades ago, it wasn’t normal to take time off sick for minor ones. Lots of those working their way up didn’t want too much time off sick on their HR records, in case they were held back on account of it.
Help! The NHS needs saving! We must mandate Vicks vapour rub, red flannel and covering the silver in thunderstorms. Only quack remedies can protect a quack health system.
What has changed for Mark Harper. Oh, he’s a minister now…
There are only two explanations for Mark Harper’s ‘conversion’ :
1. Skeletons in his wardrobe
2. Brown envelopes, although a minister’s salary might qualify.
So his initial rejection of all the anti-human outrages was utterly false and amounted to posturing.
Either false or he has now been “got at” or bribed, as you suggest. Either way, disappointing but not surprising.
I do think blackmail and physical threats from organised crime groups are part of the overall equation to ensure the official narrative isn’t undermined – as well as “carrot-based” incentives, of course.
The Times: reliably shyster since 1981.
Today I received an email from Glos CC to say they are dropping out of the so-called “missing link” project as a website producer, with a link to this National Highways one: https://nationalhighways.co.uk/our-roads/south-west/a417-missing-link/ Evidently, “Something has been done”, in as much as they have held a meeting (sarc). Note the start and end dates, and the outline budget. Have fun.
Stringency Vs Life expectancy decline.
Pretty clear and impressive results.
Kraken !!.. Do me an F- in Favour ! That’s up there with Wancocks William Shakespeares 1st jab moment on GMB when he pissed himself laughing as Morgan tried to cover it , WTF is going on , it’s beyond all levels of sanity now but I bet most proles will fall for it
Oh, for fs sake !
The Kraken, this just makes them less and less believable, yet another cry wolf!
How about, variant “COVID sars Death spiral armageddon end of days bielzibub virus .0.2”
Kraken?
I think it’s hilarious. It reminds me of an 80’s TV space series, Star Trek, or even Red Dwarf.
Hilarious.
“Thunderbirds are Go!”
The NHS is utterly broken already. It just seems like it’s working. They trot out this trope every winter now and I’m surprised we don’t treat it like a sort of Anti-Christmas and have ‘Save the NHS’ chocolates and bunting going up shortly after the real Christmas – we like our festive occasions don’t we? Of course it’s used as the reason to bring back the controls as we all know. Next Christmas, it’ll be ‘NHS tottering along on a gammy leg’ and the one after ‘NHS on a trolley in its own corridor’ and so on. Apparently, according to Sunak in his embarrassingly short and vacuous New Year message, the NHS has been recruiting record numbers of doctors and nurses, and they’re pumping more money into the old girl than ever before…but it’s never enough. She, or he, has become a hopeless addict, addicted to managerial and admin staff on which much of its money goes….it certainly doesn’t go on nurses’ salaries or training. Or beds… When you haven’t got enough beds, maybe it’s time to build some more hospitals and fill them with doctors and nurses and drastically reduce those admin roles and maybe stop funding foreign adventures with your seemingly bottomless treasure chest. Everything is possible in a rational world, just not so in an insane one.
Or maybe slow down or possibly even stop the flood of ‘new patients’ followed by their families, arriving without passports in rubber dinghies.
TPTB in the UK have been systematically dismantling the NHS over at least the last twenty five years. This has also been used as a means of vastly increasing National Debt.
Each Winter we are told the NHS is on the point of collapse – it never is of course but the message helps to increase the sense of victimhood amongst the staff and undermines their morale. At the same time the public have become conditioned to expect poorer services and poorer outcomes because the NHS is under so much pressure.
Meanwhile, successive governments tell us we have a world class health service (clearly we don’t) and in order to save it, just a few more billions are required. Of course the country cannot afford these billions but if the economy is to be trashed there could not be better cover than pissing away money via our sainted NHS. Who would complain?
Why has “diversity and equality’ recruitment continued unabated. Well, this enables funds to be spent on trouble causers while their costs are hidden within the NHS budgets. Make no mistake these ‘diversity’ people are employed to create diversity but their definition of diversity is limited to a hotchpotch of random staff competing against each other and as malignantly directed by the Equality and Diversity officer; these are the sort that remain largely hidden from staff but issue strife inducing mandates to upset and undermine employee moral. The net result is that the whole organisation is permanently on edge and “on the point of collapse.”
At the moment the Unions are aiding and abetting the turmoil by promoting strikes which will simply turn public opinion against health service workers.
This is gaslighting on a par with the Scamdemic.
At some point some turd in government will be appointed to announce that “our world class and sainted NHS is sadly incapable of continuing in its present form and will be broken up,” neglecting to mention that as it collapses it is every man for himself. Of course by this point the economy too will be at or near collapse as the country will be busted. Certainly the loss of our hopeless NHS will exacerbate the death count but with depopulation a central feature of the One World Government agenda this will do nicely, thank you very much.
And lastly – it will all be our fault.
What’s not to like?
Excellent rant, HP!
By the way:
‘At some point some turd in government will be appointed to announce that “our world class and sainted NHS is sadly incapable of continuing in its present form and will be broken up,” ‘
They won’t put a negative spin on this but a positive one about choice and hitting targets and providing opportunity etc etc. It’s the way they roll.
Thanks Aethelred and yes, your final para is correct. The collapse of “our sainted” NHS, although all our fault will of course allow for the doors of our wonderful democracy to be thrown open. The freedom of (no) choice will be an inspiration and an opportunity to…oh, I don’t know.
What about?
“Build Back Better.”
The world now looks at America and laughs at what it’s become, its weak, poor morals and box ticking ideology with a decrepit old president and the worst administration in history have destroyed this once proud nation, its a sh#× hole.If i was Djokovic, I’d hold my head high and go no where near the dump!
I agree.
Djokovic should go on the offensive and tell the U S of A that henceforth he will be refusing any and all invitations to play in that country. No exceptions.
Job done.
Or perhaps more pertinently announce the above and add the rider that he is taking such action in order to support the International Hand Ball players; milk it for all its worth.
If Britain were more numerate, the gene therapy uptake would be in the single digits, not in the high double digits.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-quest-to-re-educate-jordan-peterson-11672854385
Those who sit on the so called professional committees, listening to the whinging bullies who complain “please sir, suchabody won’t do as they are told and should be penalised” make me heartily sick! They need to grow a backbone.
On a lesser note, I’ve been in and out of ‘rsebook jail on several occasions for spreading the truth. Threats and penalties don’t and won’t make me change my mind.
I’ll wear my ‘misinformation spreader’ badge with honour.
Before the mandates, I’d have agreed with Peter Hitchens.
Now, this is like saying to people that although the Nazis lost or are in their final stages, it’s still OK to continue to wear the armband and do the salute.
And he actually expressively confirms that in his article when making clear that this never was nor is about health but out that performative function.
The normalization of masks must be stopped NOW, to prevent their reintroduction via a mandate and also any other assault on one’s bodily autonomy, of which these mask mandates were most certainly the well planned for first step.
Agreed. And I still think it would be a very interesting social experiment to announce a return of clapping for the NHS every Thursday night, in your garden with your pots and pans. I’m genuinely interested how many would still be up for doing that compared with previous years. It’s a handy indicator of just how many brain dead muppets you still have in your midst. Just incase the feedback from the masktards is insufficient evidence…
Kraken. Tsk. They need to be more international in their approach like astronomers are with asteroids. Some cracking monster names they can work through, should keep them going until the next disease entity Billyboy has got lined up for us.
https://list.fandom.com/wiki/List_of_monsters
The next one, in alphabetical order, must surely be Leviathan, swiftly followed by the most deadliest strain of all – Muppet.
ONS weekly deaths publication just out
Deaths registered weekly in England and Wales, provisional: week ending 23 December 2022
Looking at the death occurrence data looks like there has been a huge spike in all cause death occurrences in England and Wales over the 2 weeks ending 23rd December 2022.
Caution required here as the last 2 weeks figures can be unreliable because it includes unreliable estimates of deaths that have occurred but not yet been reported. The update of these figures by ONS in the next two weeks should be more reliable as by then most occurred deaths will have been reported. We’ll see if this has been a big spike but I suspect there has been.
The ambulance strike was on 21st December, could be questions asked about that (?)
Here is the chart of death numbers vs the 2015-2019 average
And here’s the same data but this time showing the percentage by which deaths have exceeeded the 2015-2019 average i.e. the percentage by which the green line is above the blue line in the previous chart
And a reminder that even deaths labelled as covid are, as this ONS chart shows, a very small proportion of all cause deaths albeit this is looking at registered deaths up to 23rd December rather than deaths by occurrence date
Don’t like to post up things involving deaths labelled as covid as clearly that’s all it is now, a label in every case for deaths that are actually from a different cause (and some would argue that’s all it ever has been although I wouldn’t go that far)
But that huge caveat aside, if you look at the age distribution of covid labelled deaths from the ONS data, it’s startling that the most boosted age groups form an increasing percentage of all such deaths. And the covid labelled deaths amongst younger people is impossible to see on the chart without x-ray eyesight. And yet the experimental vaccination continues.
The EuroMOMO figures are awful as well: particularly France and Germany. No updated figures from Italy as yet. For week 50 Germany has a higher level of excess deaths by this measure than since before the virus arrived. That’s got to be impossible to ignore.
I think the only thing that could possibly save the NHS, after sacking a load of managers obviously, is if doctors start doling out prescriptions for red pills. They can start with their own staff!
Did anyone else experience issues donating using the Donorbox form (on PC)? It kept asking me to do the Recaptcha and then just hanging. Eventually, after about 5 or 6 goes I got it to work but I have no idea how. Anyway at last here I am!
…I’m on IPad and had to have a couple of goes too….welcome….
Bloody ‘captcha’ is an absolute PITA.
Anyway, glad you are here.
https://metatron.substack.com/p/mainstream-media-is-starting-to-get squeaky bum.
From Joel Smalley…
Last night I heard from someone operating in much higher circles than me with respect to the COVID scam. He informed me that this is the talk in newsrooms all around the UK:
So, they’ve got a bit of a quandry, haven’t they? The tide of public opinion has already turned against them. To continue on their current course of ignoring the facts in favour of the false narrative is just going to make things even more difficult for them to ever regain public trust. To continue the analogy, they are “swimming against the tide”. Or, as I have to tell my kids quite often, when you’re in a hole and want to get out, the first thing you do is stop digging!
And then to prove the point, my inbox is full of links to this Daily Mail article, trying to denigrate the courageous Member of Parliament for North West Leicestershire, Andrew Brigden for daring to try and bring public and political attention to the evident harms of the mass mRNA experiment, especially to children who are at zero risk from the disease:
I wouldn’t subject you to the torment of having to read the pathetic attempt at “journalism” but you should take a look at the comments section!
Take a look now before they disable it!
Propaganda works really well.
Until it doesn’t.
And then those that peddled it suffer the consequences. Let’s hope they are very dire!
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-11595547/Prestigious-medical-journal-slams-Tory-MP-Andrew-Bridgen-peddling-misleading-Covid-jab-claims.html#comments
We can only hope…..
Many thanks ebg.
There are still quite a few thickos infecting the Fail.
Yes, but at least the majority were on the ‘right side’…which is the best we can hope for.
I do genuinely often wonder what it must be like for those people, and there are a lot of them, who genuinely believe the entire thing….(I also genuinely wonder how they got like that as well!) Who have seen no reason to read or research anything and only know the MSM narrative….which they totally accept as the truth…!!
pandemic, death, masks, overrun hospitals, effective quacksines….
Alternative views to theirs must be bewildering….they must think we are off our trolleys!!? I suppose as the reality of the situation filters through they will come to understand….?
Long, interesting read on VAERS safety signal data which was only released via FOI
They really don’t want the truth out there.
https://jackanapes.substack.com/p/cdc-finally-released-its-vaers-safety?publication_id=747747&isFreemail=true
https://spectator.com.au/2023/01/are-genetically-modified-vaccines-safe/
Adding to the voices asking for the quacksines to be halted….a good article from Australia, where they are at least asking questions like this…..
If only we had equivalent media….
“At the World Health Summit in 2021, Stefan Oelrich, head of pharmaceuticals at Bayer said ‘mRNA vaccines are an example of cell and gene therapy,’ and marvelled that ‘If we had surveyed the public two years ago (and asked) ‘Would you be willing to take a gene or cell therapy and inject it into your body we would have probably had a 95 per cent refusal rate’. But as the unexplained excess death rate continues to rise alarmingly in Australia, it’s long past time for the gene technology regulator to halt the use of the Covid vaccines until their safety can be demonstrated.”
…adding to the posts from Freecumbria…isn’t the lack of any official discussion of this getting ridiculous…??
Clare Craig….Deaths 20% above expected levels in week 51.
2,493 extra deaths.
There were a total of 829 deaths from influenza and pneumonia and 429 that mentioned covid.
Deaths at home 38% above expected levels.
https://ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/bulletins/deathsregisteredweeklyinenglandandwalesprovisional/latest
Maybe something to lift the spirits?…
https://babylonbee.com/news/world-in-panic-as-science-announces-retirement
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The entire world is in a panic this morning at the news that Dr. Fauci, the living embodiment of science itself, will be retiring in December. The scientific community is already announcing mass resignations now that the High Priest and the mediator between mankind and the laws of nature will be gone. Experts are predicting a dangerous rise in superstition, divination, and Twitter misinformation without the wise and infallible words of Fauci there to guide humanity toward safety and ultimate perfection.
“This is a disaster,” said one scientist. “We are surely headed for another Dark Age without the transcendent wisdom of Gaia’s Oracle here to guide us. The end is nigh.”
Sources say Fauci plans to spend retirement golfing, spending time with family, and weaponizing Monkeypox in his basement.
LOL!
https://newspunch.com/world-economic-forum-declares-pedophiles-will-save-humanity/
Read it and weep.
This is who Jelly Welby is teamed up with.