People dealing with life-changing injuries from the Oxford-AstraZeneca Covid jab say they’re being silenced on social media when they try to talk about their symptoms. The Mail has the story.
They believe they are vaccine victims who suffered a number of severe reactions, including a father-of-two who formed a blood clot after being given the vaccine in spring 2021 causing a permanent brain injury.
The man is in the process of suing the pharmaceutical giant at the High Court in London over the injury, while the widower of a woman who died from the jab has also brought a claim.
Now, other victims who claim they reacted badly to the jab, and are not involved in legal proceedings, have claimed sites such as Facebook have given them “warnings” when they have tried to speak to others about their experiences.
They alleged that they are being forced to “self censor” and speak in cryptic language to avoid having groups shut down, the Telegraph reported.
UK CV Family – a private Facebook group with over 1,000 members for those who claim they were left injured or bereaved by the Covid vaccines – has had to take steps to avoid being shut down.
The group began in November 2021, led by Charlet Crichton, 42, after she suffered an adverse reaction from the AstraZeneca jab …
She told the paper: “I set up the group because I was finding people online in the U.K. like me. And we felt we didn’t have anyone to talk to about it apart from each other.” …
“We very quickly learned that we had to self censor, otherwise we’d be shut down,” she added, explaining that her own comments had previously been blocked “to prevent misuse”. …
Molly Kingsley, the co-founder of UsForThem, said the restrictions put in place by social media platforms were “Orwellian” after her views about the Government’s Counter Disinformation Unit were allegedly criticised by YouTube.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Well I don’t think anyone could accuse the UK police of ”racial prejudice against ethnic minorities”. Example 793 showing who gets a free pass to behave like a d*ck because they’re one of ‘the protected ones’ in society. Police are as pathetic as ever here;
https://x.com/HoodedClaw1974/status/1863161462996251047
Can I just ask, why are those Muslim Manchester airport thugs that violently attacked police and broke the nose of one officer still free when this guy, who just so happens to be white, also broke a police officer’s nose but was sent down for 4.5yrs?? Well I think I’ve just answered my own question. Total p*ss-take;
https://x.com/MerseyPolice/status/1861032820899987700
We are ruled by a minority for the minority….
This is hilarious. I would say don’t dignify it by discussing it or even thinking about it but they probably would pass such a law if they could get away with it. And I find the notion of exclusive protection of Abrahamic religions to be even funnier. Can you imagine a decadent crap hole like this one with an overlay of Abrahamic totalitarianism it is just bizarre.
https://www.youtube.com/live/RcxI3F_8pco?si=PMu67jj_MOnV9lrT
Meanwhile plod want Mahyar Tousi to stop by for a chat tomorrow at which time they will decide whether or not to arrest him.
https://disq.us/url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fyoutu.be%2FvK1066jWO5Y%3Fsi%3D8aO_oRz-0sxeqViQ%3AzPZUNeMotFpBvUFaO36_So0PJVs&cuid=7594221
The second short video is from Andre Walker. Despite my usual dismissal of him as a bit of a prat this promise of help for Mahyar is genuinely heart-warming.
Well, that hand written notice tells us all where the intolerance lies.
Prophet means intellectual, seer, visionary. Such people will always be attacked until the end of time. Any religion that seeks to prevent attacks upon prophecy is operating in an anti-divine manner. I have even heard saps on Radio 4 calling Mohammed ‘The Prophet’. He isn’t the prophet. He delivered a syncretic teaching based on a number of sources and even in the tone of their holy book there is a sense of doubt. This is nonsense. The whole point of the Christian teaching is the pervasiveness of light. There are many prophets and you can’t ask for them to be protected by law. They wouldn’t want that themselves they want the opposite.
There is no offence. If someone insults the divine in your presence then it is usually passion in the mode of ignorance or some emotional hang up. The fact that a human being says something against your belief system, that you find this hard to bear is simply a testament to your lack of faith. This is all nonsense. Theocracy has devious means of asserting itself and it never has much to to with God except as a means to an end which is as about as sinful as you can get.
“No matter who gets upset”——In an ideal world where everyone is equal that should certainly be the case. But it is quite clear that fear of offending Muslims is at a much higher level than fear of offending other religions. But the problem is that Islam is not just a religion. It is a Political and legal system s well. It will be the end of the free world if people cannot criticise, offend or disrespect Politics or Law. —–But religions should feel comfortable enough in their own skin to just ignore distasteful remarks about their religion.
Part of a free society is the freedom to exchange views on everything without breaking the law. I’m happy to discuss my religious views with someone whose religious views – either in favour of a different religion, or in favour of none – contrast with mine. I may not agree with the other person, and they may not agree with me, but that’s called open discussion or debate, and it’s fundamental to the British way of life. If God is offended by anything that’s said, then God is big enough to deal with it.
We must remain free to discuss contrasting views on religion, just as we must be free to discuss contrasting views on science (take Covid and the climate emergency, for example), politics etc. It’s healthy and actually helps increase understanding of people with different faiths and opinions. The alternative is that we all retreat into the bubble of our own world view and cease interacting with others in society.