In September, the Health Advisory and Recovery Team (HART) wrote and article explaining that because the harms from ‘Covid vaccines’ would manifest in inflammatory or autoimmune conditions, there is a risk that they may go unnoticed as the adverse events will be spread across many organ systems, as well as occurring over an extended period.
Of course, as the debate over the New Zealand leaked data shows us, what is really needed to disentangle harm from the injections from the theoretical harms from Covid are data properly separated by vaccination status, with a reasonably sized cohort of fully unvaccinated individuals.
This is something which to date authorities have been reluctant to provide, even when requested under Freedom of Information laws.
However, a new series of studies from investigators at a University in Seoul, South Korea, has been published which does provide some interesting – and alarming – data. These have not yet been peer-reviewed but notably they are based on a cohort analysis carried out on millions of subjects in the Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) database.
Three papers have so far been published and these confirmed the quite alarming increases in inflammatory and immune conditions (in the vaccinated) which had already been reported to HART by doctors on the frontline. A third study found increases in haematological (blood) disorders.
A high-level summary of the studies’ findings can be found here.
There are a number of points to be made about the studies:
- The cohort sizes are large: approximately two million vaccinated and over 300,000 unvaccinated.
- The age groups of the vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts are significantly different; however, it looks like this has been accounted for in the analysis since age is stated to be a covariate and the methodology is described as “multiple logistic regression analyses after adjusting for the covariates”.
- Subjects with the target conditions searched for were excluded from the cohorts analysed, which will substantially correct for any bias introduced thereby.
- Only those having two injections were included, the obvious question being: what made those who had only one injection refuse another?
- The follow-up period was only three months after the second dose, so no data are included for any booster doses, yet side-effects are considered by many to be cumulatively or synergistically worse the more doses given.
- As can be seen in the paper for inflammatory conditions, the gap between the cumulative incidence rate for the vaccinated groups and the unvaccinated is still widening at three months, which is the last time point reported. This must raise concerns about what happens afterwards, even without considering the impact of follow-up doses.
Though not all the diseases reported across these studies can be regarded as serious, many certainly are.
Moreover, the significance of these papers is that they strongly support the contention that – through whatever mechanisms – these injections significantly increase the incidence of a wide variety of harms across many body systems, especially those of an inflammatory or auto-immune nature.
Dr. Jonathan Engler is Co-Chair of the HART group, which first published this article. Subscribe to the HART Substack.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
It’s hard to disagree with those who say Democracy is a sham. Nobody voted for this and yet it’s foisted on us anyway. At least the pro-Pally f-wits in London are prepared to fight for the future they want. Everyone else just sits at home waiting to get shafted some more.
Actually Net Zero was in Labour and Tory manifesto’s. It is just that most people have no clue what is involved for their freedom and their prosperity. ——Most will probably think that there really is a climate crisis and all we need to do is get rid of fossil fuels and use wind and sun and everything will tick along just fine. ———-NOPE. IT WILL NOT
“London councils were the most likely to implement these charges, with responses revealing that at least 20 of the capital’s 32 boroughs have them in place.”
So, although many London councils claim to be against ULEZ they are nevertheless more than happy to screw their own people for not driving the correct car. In other words these sanctimonious so and so’s are lying barstewards who in reality are dancing to the same tune as the Khant.
Not damned bright enough to be aware of their own crude hypocrisy and lies.
A mini dump.
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/a-beginners-guide-to-the-great-covid-con-part-5-matt-hancocks-role/
A short but grim read.
As many of us on here have stated Hancock is bang to rights on the Care Home murders – Democide.
And here’s another worthwhile dump:
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/news-you-might-have-missed/
The clue is in the title.
We are being pushed, perhaps purposely, towards pitchfork time! Everyone will have to become a bladerunner!
I’ve been driving around my local area over Xmas with family guests and have noticed a significant increase in both 20 mph zones and surveillance cameras everywhere since the summer. This in a rural area with a p*ss poor bus service and mostly narrow country lanes with few or no footpaths. Oh, and fuel in these parts is 20p/litre more than guests pay at home. Democracy has died, bureaucratic totalitarianism rules.
Green = Red. ———Public policies are strangling us with regulations, mandates and impoverishment with climate the hammer that nails us to the floor. The pathetic excuse that we are in a “climate emergency” is not just a slap in the face to hard pressed families depending on their car. It is 5 uppercuts from Mike Tyson. There is no tyranny worse than the one that terrorises you for your own good as these people never sleep.
Why only concentrate on tailpipe emissions. EV’s are heavier than an equivalent ICE and produce more tyre and road wear, so instead of a clear new diesel, a filthy EV that will have to drive at least 60,000 miles before it is ‘carbon-neutral,’ will be producing micro rubber and plastics from tyres while causing greater road wear. I say penalise EV drivers for their selfish actions.
Rest assured they will have to move onto this soon enough – as more and more people are forced into EVs (or nothing) they’re obviously not going to drop parking charges just like they’re not going to give up fuel duty, so they will come up with some way of ranking EVs also or simply charge everyone sky high rates if they can’t be bothered.
They certainly won’t give up as long as the majority of those that vote tend to vote for establishment parties. No sympathy can be extended to the inconveniences and costs experienced and endured by the unthinking establishment party voter. Apart from the EU referendum the British people haven’t tried boycotting the establishment line by voting for centre Right challenger parties but it is way past time they gave it shot in 2024.
“Councils argue that such charges are need to improve air quality and encourage people to use more sustainable forms of transport”———–The first part of that is dubious and the second requires that this “sustainable transport” is available 24 hours a day to every workplace and back straight to your home which IT IS NOT. —Where is the sustainable bus at 5.30 am to take people right to their place of work? Or at midnight to get home from late shifts or start night shifts? Why are we letting these phony planet savers away with this tyranny? People go out to work and have bought vehicles in good faith with hard earned money only for these eco parasites to come along and tell them they cannot use those vehicles instead of allowing them to come to the end of their natural life and is a diabolical disgrace.