The £145 million Covid Inquiry is under fire from the Us For Them group, claiming it’s not digging into the impact of lockdowns on children and hinting at a legal showdown. The Mail has more.
A parents’ campaign group, Us For Them, says the official investigation is not properly considering the impact that isolation had on children, who were the group least likely to die from the virus but suffered most from lockdowns and school closures.
In a damning legal letter, Us For Them suggests the inquiry has already decided that ordering people to stay at home was “necessary, proportionate and justified” and so is “almost exclusively” focusing on whether lockdowns should have been imposed harder and sooner.
The correspondence to former Court of Appeal judge Baroness Hallett, who chairs the inquiry, also raises questions about the “fairness” of proceedings more generally.
The Mail on Sunday understands the group, which has more than 13,000 followers on Facebook, could issue a legal challenge, via a judicial review, early next year if the inquiry does not change its course.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
I am far from the litigious type by any stretch of the imagination, but I say, sue ’em for everything they got! Throw the book at ’em. Those who commit such vile crimes against humanity must, at the very least, pay reparations to those they have wronged.
I’ve got mixed feelings about this. UsForThem have been great, and anything that makes the scumbags life more difficult is quite appealing, but my gut tells me that the “inquiry” should not be engaged with as it’s based on a false premise – that there was deadly pandemic or public health emergency. The only kind of inquiry that could possibly work is one in which there were adversarial teams representing different views of covid, who could call witnesses as they saw fit and set their own agenda. Republican senators in the US are doing this, but our “right wing” political party are all virtually communists so they don’t seem interested.
This inquiry has done absolutely nothing right, it appears to have decided its conclusions before even hearing its first witness.
The best course of action would be for all of us to reject its legitimacy and refuse to accept the official verdict that it will conveniently provide. After all, the judge is refusing to hear all sides of the story so we should refuse to listen to her report.
Judges often make their decision based on their initial thoughts, but usually they try to at least pretend they are listening to all the evidence and arguments, but here there does not seem to be even any pretence about it.
How does one assess the crimes that led to and resulted from lockdowns? The fatality rate from clinical malnutrition is …..? and how many globally follow our lead ?
Baroness Hallet Duckwit (forgive the typo but it’s a reference to how she and the KC treated Carl Heneghan should be hung out to dry. (as should the KC)
The purpose of the Inquiry is to find that everything the “Experts” did was correct (and everything Johnson did was wrong).
It will justify the Globalists’ intention to remove control of “pandemics” and anything else they want from our elected Government and place it with the unaccountable WHO/UN.
Apologies for the oft-repeated quote from “Sir Humphrey Appleby”:
Forty years ago this was satire; today it is reality.
I started a petition ‘Stop the current Covid inquiry-waste of time and money’.
It was rejected, turns out there was a petition already:
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/652345