Women who don’t menstruate were several times more likely to experience unexpected vaginal bleeding after COVID-19 vaccination than before the vaccines were offered, a study has found. Nature has the story.
When COVID-19 jabs were rolled out globally, many women reported heavier-than-usual menstrual bleeding soon after vaccination. Study author Kristine Blix, at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health in Oslo, wanted to look at the trend systematically, particularly in women who don’t normally have periods, such as those taking contraceptives or who have been through menopause. The work is published in Science Advances.
The team didn’t investigate the reasons for the unexplained bleeding, but suggested that it could be linked to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein used in the vaccines. In general, the COVID-19 vaccines have been found to be safe and effective.
Blix and her colleagues used an ongoing population health survey called the Norwegian Mother, Father, and Child Cohort Study. “We had already, from the early pandemic, biweekly questionnaires going out to cohort participants to monitor effects of the pandemic,” Blix says. In the first questionnaire that covered COVID-19 vaccinations, sent in 2021, some women reported in free-text fields that they had experienced heavy menstrual bleeding. “This urged us to ask for bleeding patterns in a structured manner,” she says.
The team looked at more than 21,000 responses from postmenopausal, perimenopausal and non-menstruating premenopausal women — including some who were on long-term hormonal contraceptives.
The results were surprising, says Blix. They found that 252 postmenopausal women, 1,008 perimenopausal women and 924 premenopausal women reported experiencing unexpected vaginal bleeding.
Of these, roughly half of each group said that the bleeding came in the four weeks after the first or second vaccine dose, or both. Premenopausal and perimenopausal women were most likely to report unexpected bleeding in the month after the vaccine, with their risk being three to five times as high as before the vaccinations existed. The risk for postmenopausal women increased by two- to threefold.
Allow me to summarise: ‘We didn’t expect this and we don’t know why it’s happening. But don’t worry, the vaccines are definitely safe and effective.’
Worth reading in full.
Stop Press: Vaccine-pusher-to-women-in-Chief Dr. Viki Male continues to clutch at straws, claiming that “the association is still not strong enough to say ‘well, that postmenopausal bleed was probably caused by vaccination'”. Okay, Viki. But it’s strongly suggestive isn’t it? To the point that maybe you should consider suspending (at the very least) your support for the vaccines pending proper investigation into the cause.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
https://expose-news.com/2023/09/27/climate-crisis-activists-put-meat-on-banned-adverts/
Sorry about the dump given the sensitive nature of the article.
You do know your posts are being fact-checked by people who think men can have periods, don’t you??
What should I do Mogs?
“In general, the COVID-19 vaccines have been found to be safe and effective.”
When did they stop being 100% Safe and Effective? Someone needs to tell Mr Fauci.
Also, “in general”? What’s that supposed to mean?
Credit to this Blix woman for at least looking into it, but she seems ill qualified to work in “public health” as she seems to be under the impression we’ve recently had a “pandemic”.
My 60 year old wife was one of them.
She only had the jab so she could fly to the Maldives for a holiday of a lifetime with her girlfriends she had been saving years for.
I made her fill in a Yellow Card report which took ages to complete.
She hasn’t had another jab and won’t have anymore.
I still haven’t had any sort of jab for the past 40 years and would rather stay in the UK than play Russian roulette just so I could go on a plane.
‘Safe and effective!’ The constant use of that expression makes me begin to wonder if it’s some sort of post-hypnotic trigger that’s supposed to turn off people’s cognitive functions! Perhaps it’s because I refused to watch those daily state TV broadcasts that it does nothing to me!!
I thought these days “safe and effective” has taken on the character of a Monty Python sketch, with anyone saying the words then winking, tapping their nose and saying “say no more, say no more”
It is something we could adopt on here.
Including hat phrase is most likely the only way a research study or article about any adverse effects can be published. I had a friend who experienced this bleeding. Her pregnant daughter emotionally blackmailed her into getting the jabs. My friend won’t hear a word about the effects or her manipulative daughter. I haven’t asked my daughters about this particular effect, though I did warn two–the ones less bull-headed–about similar research quite awhile ago. As usual, they didn’t listen, as mothers don’t know anything…..
““the association is still not strong enough to say ‘well, that postmenopausal bleed was probably caused by vaccination’”. Probably? Yes. Definitely? More than likely.
For any other medicine the temporal proximity to the unusual effect would be considered to indicate a causal relationship. But never for vaccines… strange, that….
So..seriously how many is that in the anti-vaxxer’s were correct … again!
…and yet it was, and on YouTube and other platforms probably still is, misinformation/disinformation… which can now get your door kicked in and get you arrested!!
Shouldn’t the MSM point out this anomaly?…they might get people believing they give a crap if they made the effort!!
More here in this 2min clip about women in France suffering all sorts of gynae irregularities. I even remember Jessica Rose reporting ages ago on VAERS entries about little girls, like pre-schoolers, who’d also started bleeding and not just elderly women but ladies in advanced age ( 80s and 90s ) who started bleeding too. This is atrocious. What on earth is happening to people’s insides??
https://twitter.com/Demo2020cracy/status/1625158402266611717
…Imagine, if you will, a “vaccine” that doesn’t stop you catching the target disease. It doesn’t stop you spreading it. Imagine, if you will, a “vaccine” that has numerous horrible side effects, seen on a much larger scale than ever seen in any previous vaccine.
I give you the COVID “Vaccine.” I give you the new definition of “Safe and Effective.”
Imagine, if you will, it’s 2019 and somebody asks you if you’d rather catch a cold or get a novel injection with 1,291 side effects that they want to keep secret for 75 years!
”When Pfizer applied for FDA approval, they were aware of almost 158,000 adverse events. This really does not paint them in a favorable light. And now, a 38-page report features an appendix with a list that says Pfizer’s COVID vaccine has 1,291 side effects.
The list includes acute kidney injury, acute flaccid myelitis, anti-sperm antibody positive, brain stem embolism, brain stem thrombosis, cardiac arrest, cardiac failure, cardiac ventricular thrombosis, cardiogenic shock, central nervous system vasculitis, death neonatal, deep vein thrombosis, encephalitis brain stem, encephalitis hemorrhagic, frontal lobe epilepsy, foaming at mouth, epileptic psychosis, facial paralysis, fetal distress syndrome, gastrointestinal amyloidosis, generalized tonic-clonic seizure, Hashimoto’s encephalopathy, hepatic vascular thrombosis, herpes zoster reactivation, immune-mediated hepatitis, interstitial lung disease, jugular vein embolism, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, liver injury, low birth weight, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, myocarditis, neonatal seizure, pancreatitis, pneumonia, stillbirth, tachycardia, temporal lobe epilepsy, testicular autoimmunity, thrombotic cerebral infarction, Type 1 diabetes mellitus, venous thrombosis neonatal, and vertebral artery thrombosis among 1,246 other medical conditions following vaccination.
“This is a bombshell,” said Children’s Health Defense (CHD) president and general counsel Mary Holland.”
https://www.riotimesonline.com/brazil-news/modern-day-censorship/pfizer-covid-vaccine-has-1291-side-effects-reveals-official-documents/
For an illness so serious that you have to be tested to see if you have it.
Way way back not after the jabs started, I recall an interview with a receptionist at a huge GP practice in the NE, who stated that there was an extraordinary number of post-menopausal women coming in with bleeding, from mild to severe.
There were many reports of unusual/abnormal vaginal bleeding with the initial virus strain too – you know, the one they used the spike protein from for the jab. It was even discussed in THAT Dark Horse podcast from June 2021 with Brett Weinstein, Robert Malone and Steve Kirsch. TPTB knew it would cause ovarian problems because it did in the few rats they tested it on – what we don’t know are the long term consequences, although I’m sure we can all guess (cancers, sterility, other reproductive failures, etc etc etc).
I bet good old Dr Viki Male would be convinced that covid was the cause of the unexpected bleeding, if it was occuring a few weeks after a positive test. The association would definitely be strong enough then, oh yes.
Either way, an obvious side effect like this wouldn’t only be showing up after almost everyone has had the jab, if it had actually been fully tested with no short cuts, would it?
Heavy menstrual bleeding leads to iron deficiency. And according to “our marvellous NHS” that makes you more susceptible to illness and infection, including heart and lung problems.
Way to go, MHRA: make people more likely to become ill by pushing a poorly tested gene therapy on millions who didn’t gain any benefit from it whatsoever but who now run the risk of severe consequences.
Yep, I’m one of those women. After two jabs of AZ.