The U.K.’s Bar Standards Board has issued guidelines cautioning barristers against social media attacks on judges and the justice system. However, the devil is in the ‘lack’ of detail. The Telegraph has the story.
Barristers have been told not to launch “gratuitous attacks” on judges or the justice system on social media.
The Bar Standards Board (BSB), which regulates the profession, has revised its guidelines to provide clarity on what barristers are allowed to say online.
The nine-page guidance lists a “non-exhaustive” set of examples of the types of conduct on social media that could amount to a breach of the regulations, including “comments about judges, the judiciary or the justice system which involve gratuitous attacks or serious criticisms that are misleading and do not have a sound factual basis”.
Free-speech advocates, however, have warned the guidance fails to explain when robust debate of opposing views would be viewed as discrimination or harassment.
The BSB said the guidelines “make clear that it is the manner in which barristers express their views that is more likely to concern us rather than the substance of that view”.
However, it caveats that by adding: “Although the substance of a barrister’s view may also raise regulatory issues.”
The Bar Council welcomed the guidance, saying barristers ought to be capable of “maintaining civil discourse”.
Toby Young, founder of the Free Speech Union, warned that the guidance was “unavoidably imprecise” and open to interpretation.
He questioned the use of the word “gratuitous” and said it was not clear when a “robust response” to a point of view one disagrees with would turn into “harassment”.
He said: “This guidance represents a good-faith effort to balance barristers’ right to freedom of expression with the need to protect the reputation of the profession, but the problem is the language used by the BSB when describing what it has a ‘regulatory interest’ in is unavoidably imprecise and open to interpretation.
“For instance, what is an acceptable criticism of the justice system and what is ‘gratuitous’?
“At what point does a robust response to someone with whom you disagree cross the line and become ‘harassment’?”
The news comes after a number of barristers have used social media to vehemently disagree with colleagues, or, in some cases, to directly attack them.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Link isn’t working!!!
CDC Signals Changes to COVID-19 Vaccine Schedule, in Part to Address Heart Inflammation
https://www.theepochtimes.com/cdc-signals-changes-to-covid-19-vaccine-schedule-in-part-to-address-heart-inflammation_4259208.html
By Zachary Stieber
Tuesday 8th February 2pm to 3pm
Yellow Boards By the Road
A329 junction London Road & Oak Avenue
Near Oakingham Belle pub
Wokingham RG40 1LH
Stand in the Park Sundays 10am make friends, ignore the madness & keep sane
Wokingham Howard Palmer Gardens Cockpit Path car park Sturges Rd RG40 2HD
Henley Mills Meadows (at the bandstand) Henley-on-Thames RG9 1DS
Telegram Group
http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell
https://dailysceptic.org/why-werent-these-vaccines-put-through-the-proper-safety-trials-for-gene-technology-asks-a-former-pharmaceutical-research-scientist/
Oops
Moderator here: I’ve alert the Technogenius to the issue, thanks for letting us know
Alerted
Britain needs Lerts
This article looks very interesting but I cannot read it in full as both of the links provided lead to “page not found” error pages.
https://dailysceptic.org/why-werent-these-vaccines-put-through-the-proper-safety-trials-for-gene-technology-asks-a-former-pharmaceutical-research-scientist/
Thank you. Sadly I found the rest of the article didn’t add very much to what was really the most important point and in the excerpt.
The 77are onto it!
I have written to my MP (again) Greg Clark, Chair of the Science and Technology Committee, saying I wish to be informed before giving my consent to receiving a Covid vaxx. I have asked him to persuade me, using links and evidence.
Tumble weed warning…
Dear Patrick,
The vaccines are safe and effective
The vaccines are safe and effective
The vaccines are safe and effective
The vaccines are safe and effective
The vaccines are safe and effective
The vaccines are safe and effective
Any further questions please don’t hesitate to take the vaccine first and stop asking impertinent questions,
Yours, unfaithfully,
Your MP.
PS: Only a patriarchal white transphobe would even consider questioning the accepted wisdom. Turn yourself in for re-education.
Need not bother turning himself in a “collection service” will soon be available
The simple answer to this is that the reaction to the appearance of the virus has been hysterical. You might also ask why pandemic preparedness plans were ditched and why the sound advice of the WHO, warning against lockdowns and mask wearing, was overturned.
These decisions were made by politicians, not medical practioners, consumed by panic and international groupthink.
. . . money.
And paid for by Big Pharma and gamed by the Global Coven.
‘These decisions were made by politicians, not medical practioners’
Maybe. But they lent their ear to those medical practitioners and never questioned their advice, even when the advice was outright lies. Which it pretty much has been right from the start.
And the traitor medics never hesitated to carry out the politicians” orders, even knowing they were sadistic nonsense.
Money.
The role and interests of Whitty in all this needs some investigation, don’t you think?
Yes. Vallance was on the call to Fauci. Immediately afterward the advice on herd immunity, masks etc changed. These people did it for ego – expecting to be remembered for introducing new style ‘vaccines’ and money. Vallance, Van Tam and Whitty have a lot to account for. They also dislike the government, so they deliberately manipulated a weak PM.
And why was Ferguson, discredited over his foot & mouth modelling fiasco which resulted in the cull of 6 million animals consulted & who then went on to predict 510,000 UK & 2.2 million US deaths if it wasn’t for Gates’ funding him?
I think from the evidence so far we could reasonably assume that BG organised the complicit compliance of the Medical Regulators, Governments and Media.
I think from the evidence so far we could reasonably assume that Fauci organised the manufacture of the virus.
“The Real Anthony Fauci” reveals exactly how, when, the many and the money involved….ask yourself this, how in the world is it acceptable for the head of a public health quango – location is irrelevant – to own patents in some of the drugs the development of which he has funded , via various conduits controlled by him. I am , genuinely, struggling to grasp how that has happened and why it has been allowed to continue for many years. Don’t think “corrupt” is adequate enough a description somehow.
As I have mentioned before, his appearance in the NHS propaganda advert should be referred to the GMC – other medics have been censured for less and some struck off. He has, imho knowingly, ignored the Hippocratic Oath and I can imagine his Professional body’s code of conduct has similarly been brushed aside. But then he is untouchable….FTB.
A 2014 government press release stated the HMG was proud to place UK top in the race to allow fast track delivery of cutting edge medical technology to customers
Slight paraphrase of the original
This mRNA scam has been planned for a long time.
As a GP, I have been ashamed and not a little frightened by the total acquiescence of the medical profession. Complete cognitive dissonance and a total loss of critical faculties.
However here in Australia, saying anything against the government leads to suspension, and loss of job, but it doesn’t explain why the medical authorities have colluded. The bigwigs don’t lose their jobs. Must have been some Pfizer money coming their way as well
Are you referring to the virus whose complete genome sequence has yet to be found in any human being?
or in any RT-PCR test?
For the middle classes the first few months of lockdown were an extended paid holiday whether WFH or on furlough (100% top up by many employers) with the media telling them how stoic and brave they were as they clapped for the NHS.
Bonus excellent spring 2020 weather to get on with those long delayed gardening projects, followed by doing up the house. kids off school but forbidden to go out so bonding while doing up their bedrooms. All paid for by saving a few grand not going on holiday or commuting.
Advised not to go out so max use of home delivery by Tesco, Waitrose and Sainsbury’s followed by Waterstones, so the neighbours can see how cultured they are.
Kids kept quiet be ever extended range of home delivery Karryouts and Take Aways as Uber and the rest took profits at both ends of the transaction.
Can’t drive anywhere so start on home delivery booze earlier and earlier as time went by with Netflix to keep you company when the kids piss you off moaning about home schooling.
“We’re all in this together, so just get on with it; Martha, is there any claret left ?”
Always using a burgeoning bookcase as a backdrop for zoom calls (“look how intelligent I am!)
As the whole point is to experiment with mRNA Gene Therapy injections on the whole world, I doubt very much whether a real old fashioned vaccine will be allowed to slip through the net
I thought the decisions were made by Billionaires and the Pharma Companies, using their “many friends” in Governments around the world?
Way off the mark. Our current Orwellian circumstances have nothing to do with a bloody virus. The virus was released to bring in the so-called “vaccine” which is their gateway to digital ID and enslavement of the worldwide population.
As Neil Oliver puts it – it’s not about what they say it’s about.
Over the coming years when studies come out about the Chinese virus and the western political response to it the culprits will have long left the scene of their crimes with the police reluctant to reopen a cold case
Don’t know much about these things but why didn’t they produce a normal vaccine? Is it because they never isolated the thing? Or is it because it’s a coronavirus like the common cold and science hasn’t worked out a way to stop them? Why were these new technologies not deployed before to stop the common cold?
Agree with tom171uk but one must also note that this new technology is extremely cheap, flexible and easy to manufacture, especially in contrast to traditional vaccines.
In how far this switch was also pre-meditated by a pharma industry in trouble since 2 decades with its conventional approaches is (not) debatable, but Bayer Pharma CEO Oelreich has basically confirmed this already.
How come they were the most expensive of the vaccines then?!
Cheapest for the manufacturer, not for the customer.
And that is sorted by suggesting an emergency and bribes.
As noted “earlier”, Robert Kennedy describes the massive drug payola scam in which Fauci had his snout deeply buried including being involved with AZT , according to him, cost $5 per shot and was sold via the US Health “System” for $10,000 pa ….fully referenced in his book.
I think the French one Valneva is a conventional vaccine. It’s the one the UK government had a contract for, but cancelled it. I’ve also been a little perplexed by the lack of this question anywhere in MSM and beyond.
There’s quite a lot of interesting information about this stuff on the Valneva website. As I understand, the UK backed out because someone reckoned that it wouldn’t be approved by MHRA, although there’s a startling lack of information on the details of this.
As everything nowadays revolves around money (taxpayer’s) and which snouts get into which troughs of it, it’s probably not unreasonable to think that pressure from the Big Pharma of Government choice i.e. Pfizer may somehow be involved; and of course the UK has preordered millions of doses of their stuff at a cost of tens of millions. Knowing the inability of Governments to buy anything properly, the agreement(s) for this “vaccine” probably can’t be cancelled or altered without significant financial penalties.
Given their brazen behaviour, costing the UK large sums of money is unimportant when set against the likely loss of face of certain individuals.
Don’t know if you will be able to read this H. It is an extract from a lecture given at Oxford University by Kate Bingham, the former jabs csar.
Jabbit did say in Parliament that Valneva “would not have been approved” but this was changed in Hansard to “had not yet been approved”
She calls the decision to cancel the order as “inexplicable” and wondered if it was because the U.K. already had enough jabs. Since then the U.K. placed another order with Pfizer so clearly not.
Valneva looks to be a better option than the mRNA rubbish – but why does anyone need a vaccine at all for the ‘virus’?
because they say you do – all over the world
Nobody needs a “vaccine” for this virus. Worst case scenario is a week in bed and another week on the settee. End of.
The “vaccines” have not been introduced to protect health their purpose is track, trace, maim and kill.
Just think what could have been done with GBP400BN….or indeed the GBP600BN National Fund?
Javid is on the bandwagon, as illustrated by his comeback speech ending ‘build back better’ ie I’m onboard with this scam. Unfit to be in parliament, like most of them.
“build back better” seems to be the modern day equivalent of “Sieg Heil” (just saying).
Seem to be if you are a politician and you don’t say it you are marked out as not being with the programme.
That was why WHO changed the definition of Pandemic, it lowered the bar for when member governments were obliged to start stockpiling vaccines.
I have been perplexed by the attitude of the MSM since the beginning, especially their apparent inability to understand simple maths and data.
They were bought and paid for by tsunamis of propaganda advertising which still carries on.
Each day during the first week of lockdown one every single print newspaper from the Times to the Holyhead Courier had front and rear pages screaming identical full colour ‘messaging’ from the government to the public.
Not only were the UK government spending large sums on advertising, paid for at full rate, I also believe there was a section 4 given by Ofcom, which restricted what the MSM could report.
The government has spent over £320million on advertising, taking them from being way down the list of advertisers, straight to the top of the bunch. The main advertisers weren’t simply overtaken by the government, they significantly reduced their spending in advertising, simply due to the lockdowns and restrictions in place. (Why advertise something that cannot be enjoyed due to Covid restrictions.)
Ofcom acting as a censor had a chilling effect
That is the most sarcastic comment I have read today – spot on!!
Javid cancelled it because Pfizer told him to. It’s amazing how very quietly the other vaccines are being pushed out of the way except Pfizer. In the middle of a ‘pandemic’ a new source of vaccine was rejected, while all others also under emergency use only. It’s about money, always was. Having raped the Indian and African continents for years while we looked away now big pharma has come for us, with the help of Biden, Gove , Aherne et al
It’s the only one I would have had, but the order was cancelled.
Most odd as it is or was being made in Scotland
That’s easy, they were bought. BG donations to several broadsheets and much more. The beautifully named “Trusted News Initiative” as well.
Just listening to this article in full (via @voice reader app) and it is excellent.
https://dailysceptic.org/why-werent-these-vaccines-put-through-the-proper-safety-trials-for-gene-technology-asks-a-former-pharmaceutical-research-scientist/
Why is it always retired scientists who have to do the honest work? We all know the answer to this of course. Step out of line and goodbye career.
Let’s not kid ourselves we have freedom of speech in the west. That disappeared long ago, if it ever existed.
“Don’t know much about these things but why didn’t they produce a normal vaccine? Is it because they never isolated the thing? Or is it because it’s a coronavirus like the common cold and science hasn’t worked out a way to stop them? Why were these new technologies not deployed before to stop the common cold?”
“The common cold can be caused by various species of virus. These are mostly rhinoviruses but they also include at least one member of the coronavirus family.“
Four long established cold-causing coronaviruses, I believe.
“Four HCoVs (HCoV 229E, NL63, OC43, and HKU1) are endemic globally and account for 10% to 30% of upper respiratory tract infections in adults.
…
Until recently, HCoVs received relatively little attention due to their mild phenotypes in humans.”
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2759815
Please clarify. I think you’re saying that saying ‘it’s a kind of cold’ is wrong and said in ignorance. This is useful. However, I’ve had so many, many viruses, never tested. I’ve had gastric flus and stomach bugs and strange weird days or weeks of weakness – but I have mild asthma and its inflammatory phenomena tend to manifest in muscle aches, general dizziness etc when I’ve ‘caught something’ . This applies to the dozens of colds I’ve had too.
I must have had 120-200 discernable colds and viruses in my adult life. I realise that some weren’t a cold. But when I tested positive for sars covid 2 this year, it felt like the majority of these ailments do. Why should I not therefore compare it to a cold?
Same family. And of course, there is no vaccine or gene therapy for the common cold. And the only one used on humans for a coronavirus will probably kill far more people than it saves.
Well exactly, presumably – regarding same family – apart from it being a SARS. There are millions or active viruses, with myriad groupings. We permanently crawl with thousands of viruses and bacteria. And Star still hasn’t answered my question.
Excellent. Thank you.
What happens when a large amount of “something” used by humans, becomes less efficacious? It is replaced by a “bigger and better” version – like the automotive vehicle (and I am being very general natch) – if the provider of the original needs “feeding” ( money). So why are ” humans” treated differently? ( if you are a billionaire evil control freak eugenicist )…just another commodity and that is why this worldwide criminal cartel are no different in my mind to despots and dictators throughout human history – they just have more money to but off compliant participants and the internet; everything else is “as it was”.
A zoologist of my acquaintance wrote very cogently about Taxonomy, highlighting that there was – probably still is – a great deal of “professional” infighting about the nitty gritty family trees for plant life with the technical detail and Latin descriptors being extremely dense to a layman like me – it appears to be no different with viruses?
“buy”
Because ALL previous attempts at producing a “standard” Coronavirus vaccine failed, at the animal testing stage…
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22536382/
“Immunization with SARS coronavirus vaccines leads to pulmonary immunopathology on challenge with the SARS virus”
Conclusions: These SARS-CoV vaccines all induced antibody and protection against infection with SARS-CoV. However, challenge of mice given any of the vaccines led to occurrence of Th2-type immunopathology suggesting hypersensitivity to SARS-CoV components was induced. Caution in proceeding to application of a SARS-CoV vaccine in humans is indicated.
Can’t read it in full, but I remember that Prof. Hockertz was on this from the start and that Malone commented that one consequence of the misattribution was also that no toxicity studies in pregnant women had to be and weren’t undertaken.
The dosage lottery always amazed me, first with the AZ one, later with boosters decided upon and given on the fly and, above all, mixing the gene therapies without doing any proper research on that beforehand.
All the stuff the researcher mentions here is being taken as a given by any sane person and surely also used to be the standard industry practice.
Most people getting the injections likely think that these protocols were also diligently followed in the cases of the gene therapies, and they would be surprised that they weren’t- intelligent friends of mine told me so and that they got the injections because ‘they trusted big Pharma and its regulators’.
The industry and authorities have destroyed that trust completely and for good for all those who bothered to do some research for themselves already and will have done so for the rest of the people once their shortcuts and manipulations and their consequences become headline news, as they eventually will.
https://dailysceptic.org/why-werent-these-vaccines-put-through-the-proper-safety-trials-for-gene-technology-asks-a-former-pharmaceutical-research-scientist/
Verily, a miracle. A Shot in the Dark is transformed into a Shot in the Arm.
Cana it isn’t.
Usually they waited until the guests were drunk and then brought in the bad wine.
Our lot knew that the victims’ brains were already shot to pieces, so they could cone right in with the bad medicine.
Very true. The original occasion was also the joyous nuptials of two humans, whilst the latest seems to be the product of the coupling of Satan and Pandora.
Looks like someone’s injected the link with a duff spike protein.
https://dailysceptic.org/why-werent-these-vaccines-put-through-the-proper-safety-trials-for-gene-technology-asks-a-former-pharmaceutical-research-scientist/
Off topic: 60% maskless on Piccadilly Line this morning.
Better late than never, I suppose!
Could not be more On Topic, great news for a Monday morning as London tells Khan where to stick his extended mandate.
Half in the 2 big supermarkets I frequent, down from 90% masked last week.
We’re getting there.
But they will put them back on again in a heartbeat when told to do so.
I have zero illusions about that/mankind/Brits anymore.
Obeying Nanny State til the bitter end (of all pesky autonomous braincells)!
Except they can’t even do that consistently…
Lucky London.
Unfortunately, here in Northern Ireland, due to the collapse of the Stormont Executive we will have no one to take the sensible decision to end restrictions and remove the hated mask wearing.
Seems we will be consigned to masking up FOREVA!
They’re still following Fuehrer orders in June of ’45?!
When money and power are to be acquired ethics and morality often goes out of the window. Covid 19 was a clear opportunity for the unscrupulous to profit at the expense of humanity. Hence this is a clear case of crimes against humanity, and must be addressed as such.
Numbers bounce around about how many new $Billionaires have arisen in the US, Chinao or Worldwide off the back of Covid/lockdown.
50, 100, 400 were citeded even before vaccines.
I remember back during Lockdown Lite, partial reopening with max Social Distancing, when I was still confused about why they were carrying it on at all since Covid was clearly a busted flush.
“Surely it can’t just be about flogging a few masks made in third world sweat shops, nobody is going to much money just doing that?”
How wrong I was but it wasn’t The Plan, more like a stopgap.
“Hey you WHO! You said we make big money flogging vaccines but where are vaccines? we
got £€$¥ cashflow to consider!?”
WHO “Sorry guys the vaccines are running a bit late, technical issues. Try churning out a few billion masks which we’ll make compulsory, that should tide your cashflow healthy for a few months”
‘No ‘technical issues’ with masks?’
WHO,
I have no problem that the vaccines were introduced and used. But what I am troubled about is the governments’ lies, sorry mistaken statements, that they were absolutely safe. No one could know now or can know now. This remains new technology and these vaccines still have less than 2 years of data. But we used them in the hundreds of millions (that’s one way to get a test cohort). When we started the process the idea was to give them to the at-risk populations. There the risk-reward was at least explainable. But they kept pushing it lower and lower in age, even as many of the original promises kept turning out to be false. Of course Pfizer et al were pushing it to younger ages, so it wasn’t just government’s at work (and I’m not anti-pharma, they sometimes create near miracles). Even Pfizer though doesn’t want to do 0-2 jabs, but the CDC sure does.
When mandates appeared that was when I became incensed. A drug (that is what it is) with barely a tenth of the testing time, was now mandated for work, for travel, and for school some places. And still no one can give any real assurance that longterm impact won’t be negative. Nor in most nations can you bring suits against the manufacturers for harm caused by their drug. And as I have heard from other pharmacy research scientists, rushed approval has almost never turned out to be a good thing.
You write all that, but say “you have no problem that the vaccines were introduced and used”.
Can I just remind you that, by the regimes own figures, these injections have caused around 500,000 deaths in the US and Europe so far and millions of horrifying injuries.
In many countries there were no, or very few, ‘covid’ deaths until the injections were introduced and closer to home, Care Home deaths rocketing upwards after injection rollout.
In early 2021 eleven residents of Trecarrel Care Home in Tywardreath, Cornwall, which is close to where I live, suddenly died ‘of covid’ shortly after being given the injections.
No autopsies were performed and no post mortem test result were analysed. Instead, classifying these mass deaths, and thousands more just like it, as ‘covid deaths’ was made with an administrative sweep of the hand. These vulnerable people, a quarter of the entire care home, had survived a full year of the pandemic but fell victim to the experimental injection program. This terrible crime was repeated throughout the UK, and indeed right across the world.
But “you have no problem that the vaccines were introduced and used”
Thank you for the reminder. I have tended to forget that it’s not just the vax-injured and dead reported to VAERS, Yellow Card, EUDRA etc, already probably only 10% of the likely numbers, but all those who died *with* covid in that huge extended/two-peaked “second wave” who probably wouldn’t have if they hadn’t been vaxxed, the hundreds of thousands as you say, of old and frail for whom the vax was literally the nail in their coffin.
Add on the soaring child malnutrition rates and 2 years without schooling in many low-income countries. All medically pointless, to provide a theatrical backdrop for the vaccines in Europe and the Americas.
May well be less than 10%, given the extreme reluctance to concede that the clotshots cause deaths!
There are more care homes than usual in my small provincial city (Gods Waiting Room because many people retire to the nearby seaside towns).
Twice junior care staff told me similar stories of no Covid deaths until winter 2020/21 when there were suddenly three in one home and four in the other. Neither of the carers, who did not know each other, put those deaths down to injections which they only acknowledged had recently taken place when specifically asked.
Those numbers of fatalities fell within the normal range of ‘we always lose a few each winter’ and no investigations were ever made.
I reported this here at lockdownsceptics at the time.
This is the real reason the rules on post-mortem and authority to report cause of death were changed right at the beginning. The mRNA drugs ‘have to be considered safe’ as the holy grail of personalised drugs delivered via mRNA rests on that basis. Every trick in the book has been used, including the outright cynical 14 day delay after vaccination before a patient is (or was) considered vaccinated. This allow deaths, etc to be publicly reported as occurring in the unvaccinated. Fortunately not all countries followed that (New Zealand for example) so the effect should be observable in a comparison of data.
John O’Looney has given testimony that he was made aware of “events” in late 2019 by Mortuarys local to him….and then Midazolam hit.
“I have no problem that the vaccines were introduced and used. ” Do you think it has been money well spent?
“I have no problem that the vaccines were introduced and used. ”
Why not?
There was no justification for “emergency” use and no justification for the dishonest fast track approval based upon manipulative redefinition of terms.
You go on to make clear that you are well aware of the reasons to have very serious problems with the introduction and use of these “vaccines”.
You seem to be saying that despite there being no “emergency” and no possible rational justification for cutting corners on approval, you have “no problem” with it being rushed out and administered to “at-risk populations”!
Why, and on the basis of what honest cost-benefit analysis that established a large enough risk to a supposed “at-risk population” to justify cutting safety corners and all the expense involved?
Just a gut feeling that “there was such a big fuss about this disease that it must have been sensible to rush out an experimental treatment”? Should we always allow corner cutting on the basis of gut feelings and mass demand manufactured by fearmongering?
[Fwiw, I tend to agree that for older people it probably isn’t hard to justify the treatment if you ignore all external issues and just focus on risk/benefit to the individual. The older you are the higher the risks from covid and the lower the significance of concerns about long term complications, obviously. But should we really be just ignoring all those external issues? I think not!]
DoctorCOxford, with all due respect to your qualifications, experience and clinical expertise, it was clear and obvious to many mere laymen, myself included, that all the government claims about safety were lies from the day the vaccines were first introduced on the simple grounds that there had been no ‘long term’ to test, mid term either for that matter.
The same goes for any claims for safety around pregnancy including cross generation contamination (cf thalidomide which they took 5 years to admit their error).
Many of us said so at the time, here and elsewhere and that was before the term anti vaxxer had been concocted to shut down debate in the same way as ‘racist” and ‘homophope’ have been used for years.
k, correct. It has been unavoidably true for a long time there was never any need for vaccines that, had the early treatment regimes, with EXISTING drugs, been rolled out around the world with the same propaganda and zeal, this virus would have been stopped in its tracks, no lockdowns, no massive increase in debt, no elective surgery suspension ( and the effin Jabid spouting sheer bollox in the HoC today by not mentioning THEY lit the blue touch paper on the mental health/cancer crises by forcing lockdowns and then partied like 1999 FFHS ).
What does any vaccine enchanted medic in the UK have to see by way of jab deaths, adverse events off the charts, unprecedented in number before the penny has to drop – I have news for them – “YOU ARE TOO F&^%*)(G LATE, THAT TRAIN LEFT THE STATION A LONG TIME AGO, THE CHAIN GANG AWAITS”
Sorry , my anger got the better of me..
The ‘vaccines’ had already been developed; Gates and the rest were just waiting for a suitable ‘Pandemic’ to arrive before churning them out in their billions but worldwide lockdowns and vax mandates occured so quickly it caught them by surprise and they had to slow things down a bit to wait for their producers to catch up.
Calling them vaccines and changing the definitions for that was already an unforgivable, deadly manipulation that negates any of their good faith.
I have a big problem with you having no problem with the introduction and use of vaccines when they didn’t go through even a fraction of the normally 10 year checking and safety processes and when, in order to bring the vaccines to the market an EUA was needed, so it was done ONLY with the suppression of the safe and effective treatments, like Ivermectin, which they took considerable pains to smear, and the other protocols devised by the FLCC doctors, and absolutely no consideration was given whatsoever to proper prevention, with the appropriate testing and use of a high enough level of vitamin D3 supplementation [the 400iu handed out to elderly people by the NHS was a risible level]
This man knows what he’s talking about.
He doesn’t fit the new definition of an ‘expert’.
True. Obviously has no idea what he’s talking about.
How can he possibly be an expert – he’s never been on the BBC for a start..
Bet he hasn’t followed ‘The Science’
As individuals, are we open to “conspiracy theories”? The search for the reasoning behind what is obviously a globally coordinated malevolence is all consuming for many people with a critical thought bias…”Why weren’t the vaccines put through proper safety trials”? Why indeed? Do we accept that elements of government, science, medicine, education, media, the establishment too a great extent, have all been captured by the same blood lines that created the FED and conspired to facilitate WWI? The “vaccines” weren’t tested by a captured Gov/Scientific establishment because they were fully aware of the purpose of said “vaccines” and that purpose wasn’t to protect a populace against a “Novel virus” with a 99.8% recovery rate for but a tiny minority of those infected!
As many are now awakening from a Gov psy-ops induced coma and start to search for answers, will the results of that search be too horrifying too contemplate? All of this has been planned and activated by the “Government Public Private Partnership” in plain sight over many decades, and the literature and proof is freely available too all. The vast majority, with daily travails too navigate, just haven’t had the time or the inclination too lift their gaze. Time to awaken and recognize that war is being waged by governments around the world against their own citizens because of a “virus” that has resulted in negligible adjusted all cause mortality! The question is why?… That’s the conspiracy FACT!
If people had ‘risen up’ and gone after those who were pushing this, it could have ended a year and a half ago. Instead the ‘resistance’ has been:
..sending an e-mail to your local MP (ineffective)
..signing on-line petitions (does nothing)
..peaceful protest marches (result – nothing changes)
..handing in ‘Notices of Liability’ to schools (they’ll still go ahead and vaccinate)
Now we have the ‘Vaccine Passport’ up and running and in use every minute of every hour of every day.
Those who refuse the ‘vaccines’ don’t get to have a valid Pass.
That’s about it, in a nutshell, isn’t it?
And already speculation and excitement about what the 4th Jab will be – Novavax? Valneva? Who cares? It’s all part and parcel of the Great Covid Scam.
And where have ‘The Alpha Men Assemble’ vanished to? Was counting on them.
And what have YOU done to help, you useless drone? Took part in the Finnish freedom convoy, did you?
Ha ha ha.
I guess facts and the truth hurt. You can keep on believing that ‘Nuremburg 2’ is coming and politicians will be taken to trial, and that people will be taking their employers to court and receiving ‘very substantial amounts’ in compensation.
I have been actively letting people know that ‘Covid’ is a scam. My experience is that some had already come to that line of thought by themselves, and that those who believe what the Government has told them refuse to accept that the measures and vaccines aren’t with their best interests at heart.
The bottom line is that not a single politician, member of SAGE, or anyone else running this scam has been inconvenienced. They have got away with it all Scot free – and continue to do so. ‘Vaccine Passports’ arrived last July, and are in use right now. Elderly folk meeting like-minded others for a natter in a park in Bracknell might be a nice thing to do on a Sunday morning for them, but it is not an action that is going to get us out of this pickle.
2022 is just going to be a continuance of the ‘greyness of imprisonment’ of 2021. The next stages are the 4th & 5th jabs rollout, and the ‘vaccination’ of the 5-12 year olds.
Targeting individuals will simply backfire without a base of popular support. Mass civil disobedience, peaceful protest and using every possible channel to put our case is the way forward.
I agree. But discrediting the effectiveness of the vaccines helps too.
Yes indeed, but I kind of think I covered that with “using every possible channel to put our case”. My point was that persecuting SAGE members, tempting and possibly morally justifiable as it might be, is not going to help our case, in fact the opposite.
Mr Fox, the majority of comments on here come from the UK, which , although having had bad periods of government control during this debacle, is still one of the few Western countries to have retained some freedom.
Finland has always been a somewhat closed down society so ratcheting from that position creates a ‘prison’ quite quickly. In France it took Macron no time to imprison his populace in the spring of 2020 and again the following autumn. But his use of the ‘vaccines’ has been truely medieval. The populace are now merely subjects of the little emperor. The State demands supplication. Travel is near impossible inside and outside the state without supplication. And he promises more of the same.
Unless you live in such a State its near impossible to fully understand the psychological effect on its people.
Basically the difference between Finland and the UK is that it’s 99-100% face masks in the shops here, and (?) 50-70% in the UK, from what I gather.
Both countries prefer the ‘Vaxx Pass’ for travel, and strongly discourage ‘the unvaxxed’ to leave/enter.
Not true. After 11 Feb the UK entry for unvaxed is very much lighter. And there is no exit restriction. This is very different to the majority of EU nations that abide by the EU entry/exit rules and some ( like France) that forbid exit unless its for a specified declared purpose, ie its a prison state.
Like you I have only anecdotal information about mask use in any country I have not personally visited.
I have some sympathy with your POV, but why does the French Government continue to mandate vaccination on the one hand but allow non vaccinated people to enter Le Beau Republic – which they do, like the EU states, if you are “covid recovered”???? – OK it is time limited, but the principle still stands…
A negative LFT test is also required…
No one, it seems, but lil ole me has spotted this – rabid enforcement of a worthless jab mandate on the one hand but acceptance of the benefit of natural immunity, “on the QT, hush hush” as Sid said.
I think this door has to be pushed open with vigour – but then again, trying to get sense out of the French Consulate….bonne chance.
May I ask where vaccine passports have been required in your experience in Britain over the last few weeks, Emerald?
Alpha Men Assemble was Daily Mail scare spoof intended for their most gullible readers so I’m surprised if you really were relying on them, or perhaps your irony is lost on me ?
Who were those people in the videos giving empty pizza boxes karate chops? Daily Mail staff?
Lest we forget:
https://www.theweek.co.uk/news/uk-news/955293/alpha-men-assemble-mandatory-vaccination
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9w7znks-h5A
Bunch of numpties posing for cash.
“ “Government Public Private Partnership”” – as perfected over decades by Dr A.S Fauci, he of vaccine technology/drug patent holder infamy..
Why didn’t he say this in Dec 2020?
How do you know he didn’t?
As he is definitely saying it now I wonder if GB News will change their editorial policy, up their game, and start calling out the elephant in the room regarding the “safe and effective vaccines”.
They are happy to defend the right to bodily autonomy, which is helpful, but they need to dig down a layer and ask why bodily autonomy is so important, and the reasons this guy has set out in his article is one important part of that.
If he did he would have been cancelled by Ofcom, thre BBC and Zuckerberg.
Genuine question: these new injections were given on the strength of them preventing infection and severe illness. Then it was realised they didn’t prevent infection, but hey, they stopped you ending up in ICU or worse in a box. Then it was realised the effectiveness wears off very quickly, so let’s give boosters.
I’m starting to wonder if these injections did ANYTHING good. Has anyone seen evidence to suggest the severe illness benefit was coincidence just as lockdowns appear to have worked till you look in detail at the stats?
“I’m starting too wonder if these injections did anything good” Search out Dr Ryan Cole on duck duck go, don’t use google… prepare to be afraid, very afraid!
Yes – he called them out a LONG time ago.
Also Dr Richard Fleming – watch his video of the experiment of injected samples of all EUA jabs directly into the blood – frightening the rapidity of the known inflammatory effect – then fast forward to the high resolution slides of what was in a batch of every EUA jab batch sample…very scary, not for those of a nervous disposition.
The severe illness claim is a total myth dreamt up by regime modellers. I dont know why so many people on this site repeat it without question.
DS is all about getting those fundamental messages home. The virus is real dont ask any questions about that, the jabs do some good and there has been some justification for measures. They need to ensure future scams can be rolled out so its imperative to keep these notions alive
Read the excellent book by RJK, The Real Anthony Fauci, you’ll see that what has happened since March 2020 has happened before in America, in terms of vaccines.
Vaccines with little to no positives and in most cases, severe negatives, have been given out in the tens, if not hundreds of millions. The vaccines given to the US army before and during the 2nd Gulf war were responsible for myocarditis rates of 1 in every 35.
If you look at the symptoms of Gulf War syndrome and long covid, they are identical. For the former, they put the cause of that down to the vaccines alone. I wonder all of those people who say they have got long covid, have been vaccinated?
Not finished it yet but the first 80 pages contain enough bombshells even for this sceptic – it is a unique book for me, and I will use the QR codes to follow up as matters develop – I cannot see how this apology of a human being is going to escape this except if the Grim Reaper gets to him before the US Judicial system does.
If Trump wanted a vote grabbing election winning policy, it would be to nationalise the Pharma Cartel and arrest AFS for the crimes Dr David Martin has highlighted….no didn’t think so.
Yeah, do all those trails on the spike, then repeat them for the LNP alone.
Do all this prior to trails rollout in humans, do trails again on vunerable target groups.
Only roll it out to symptomatics AFTER successful trials in ALL cohorts.
If they change the recipe, do more trials.
If they kill people, STOP giving it people, especially CHILDREN, and BABIES.
If they don’t do this, and you are an expert in this stuff, speak up
very loudly BEFORE they roll out the insufficiently tested gene therapy.
if you leave it until there’s been thousands of deaths, and millions of AEs…well, you’re a bit of a *profanity* arn’t you.
^^^^^ this
Because they called it an ’emergency’, the governments had a timeline ie Agenda 20.. They had that ‘narrow window’ and no time to waste. The worldwide coordination was no coincidence. I’ve looked at Hart information during this but it has not been loud.
Hart are either fence sitters or controlled opposition who deliberately stay clear of hard issues that form the core of the deception.
My trust in the health authorities has gone, probably forever. I won’t trust a single vaccine developed post-COVID again, at least not without doing my own research beforehand.
Why probably…?!
Wish I could read in full, but the link is broken. Looks to be yet another voice in the chorus of conscientious professionals saying the same thing – they’re are not vaccines, they’re not safe, they’re not effective, they’re not fit for purpose unless the objective is to kill and maim, they’re not fit to be injected into anything (I’m glad they were never injected into pigs or rodents, wouldn’t wish them on pigs or rodents). We’ve been right all along, it was an intelligence test and we passed, and the makers and pushers of them deserve the harshest criminal penalties possible.
https://dailysceptic.org/why-werent-these-vaccines-put-through-the-proper-safety-trials-for-gene-technology-asks-a-former-pharmaceutical-research-scientist/
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ exactly this!!!!
Dr Flack quite rightly refuses to call them vaccines, but Will Jones introduces Dr Flacks article by saying he is writing about the new vaccine.
Jones has previously falsely classified positive PCR test results as ‘medical cases’ and pushed the regimes fake ‘covid death toll as genuine.
Why is Will Jones constantly deploying, and normalising, the regimes contrived terminology?
Good point. Perhaps the site editors are worried they’ll fall “foul of fact checkers” and external censorship and/or legal measures if they don’t. But I agree with you completely.
Guessing it’s to do with the Ofcom gagging order issued in 2020, which is very clear about sanctions being imposed on media publishers if they go against official government messaging. I’d imagine the Daily Sceptic is treading a very thin line – perfectly normal when governed by communists of course.
Also Dr. Flack called them gene based and not gene therapy.
Excellent question
The Australian tyranny is just a test run – The Conservative Woman Its what they have always known, tell people ‘its for your safety’ and its a fait accompli
From the article, written by none other than James Delingpole:
“In places like Britain, where currently these restrictions are fairly relaxed, it’s tempting to view the shenanigans of pound shop dictators in far-off lands like Canada, Australia and New Zealand as a little local difficulty from which we are happily exempt. Such complacency would be misplaced. First, we are merely in a Phoney War interlude, with many more miseries (shortages; financial system collapse; possibly war) about to come down the line from the same malign ‘elites’ who brought you the pandemic. Second, hotspots like Victoria need to be understood in their proper light: as a test run, by our dark overlords, to see just how far they can push us and how much they can get away with.”
He nails it.
Aus/NZ/Canada are test beds to see how far this programme can be pushed and how much they can get away with.
Real coverage now needs to be given to the Canadian Convoy’s protests – not just the smearing being done by the BBC.
THIS WAS POSTED BY SOMEONE CALLED “COUNTRYWATCH ” UNDER JAMES’ ARTICLE ON TCW
“Tyrants lie repeatedly to attempt to strengthen their stranglehold. I suspect many will be pleasantly surprised to see the true figures for vaccination and boosters are not nearly as high as the globalists would have you believe. See these stats posted onthe excellent Telegram channel of Robin Monotti Mike Yeadon and Cory Morningstar:
How many people are boostered (3 doses)?
World 12.66%
Gibraltar 86.68%
Denmark 61.56%
Italy 57.03%
Israel 54.95%
UK 54.86%
South Korea 53.79%
Germany 53.46%
Portugal 51.94%
Austria 50.05%
Netherlands 49.74%
France 48.75%
Spain 47.29%
Greece 47.19%
Canada 41.88%
Sweden 40.2%
Switzerland 39.6%
Turkey 38.33%
Australia 33.47%
New Zealand 28.9%
Poland 27.76%
USA 26.76%
Saudi Arabia 24.64%
Brazil 23.27%
China 22.92%
Croatia 14.57%
Russia 7.1%
Japan 4.83%
South Africa 1%
India 0.94%
Egypt 0.00%
Indonesia 0.00%
Mexico 0.00%
Nepal 0.00%
How many people are not “vaccinated”?
(% of population, -x% compared to 31 December 2021)
World 47.96 (-3.74%)
Egypt 73.9% (-5.3%)
South Africa 72.2% (-1.2%)
Russia 52% (-1.7%)
Nepal 51.4% (-15.2%)
India 48.2% (-8.8%)
Croatia 45.9% (-6.1%)
Poland 42.3% (-2.4%)
Mexico 40.7% (-2.9%)
Turkey 38.3% (-1.6%)
USA 36.3% (-2.8%)
Israel 34.3% (-1.6%)
Saudi Arabia 32.8% (-0.7%)
Switzerland 32% (-1.6%)
UK 29.9% (+0.3%)
Brazil 29.7% (-2.9%)
Greece 29.3% (-5.5%)
Netherlands 28.2% (-1.9%)
Germany 26.4% (-2.7%)
Sweden 26% (-3.8%)
Austria 25.3% (-2.4%)
France 23.5% (-3.3%)
Italy 23.3% (-1.7%)
New Zealand 23.3% (-1.1%)
Australia 21.4% (-1.9%)
Japan 20.8% (-0.8%)
Canada 20.5% (-2.2%)
Denmark 18.6% (-3.2%)
Spain 18% (-2%)
China 15% (-16.6%)
South Korea 14.1% (-3.9%)
Portugal 9.4% (-2.4%)
Date: 3 February 2022
Source: ZDF (German public TV)
Compiled by: t.me/booster_aufklaaerung“
AND SEE ALSO THIS – a great comment posted under the Delingpole article:
“At the end of his monumental biography of Adolf Hitler Ian Kershaw described Hitler as the main author of “the most profound collapse of civilisation in modern times.” We are gazing into the same darkness now and this warning from history should be the most urgent thought in our minds today. The parallels of the New Normal with the Third Reich, dismissed by the mainstream media, are accurate and appropriate. The Third Reich with all its horrors, and the Holocaust happened because ordinary people did nothing to stop it. The same thing is happening today. Everything that is happening today has a parallel in the history of the Third Reich, and we have only to look at that history to see where we are going. Perhaps not in literal form, but certainly in identifiable ways comparable with the aims of the Third Reich.
As far as I have been able to tell, there seems to be no empirical evidence whatever for the existence of a virus called Sars-Cov 2. There is a wealth of thoroughly referenced material available to support this view. If true, this makes belief in COVID-19 essentially an act of faith and renders any assertion that it is no more dangerous than seasonal flu, originated in a Wuhan lab, can or cannot be treated with experimental “vaccines,” can or cannot be treated with Ivermectin, does or does not have “deadly variants”, does or doesn’t warrant extreme “measures,” or can or cannot be mitigated by mask-wearing and “social distancing,” utterly redundant. There is a theme running throughout our dialogue that is predicated on the existence of this “virus”. We cannot afford to be so far in acceptance of this. There may or may not be a “virus”. I personally doubt it and would need a heck of a lot of evidence to change my mind.
One problem one has is this: a phenomenon that is experienced only through media is indistinguishable from an illusion. Yet people will react to such an illusion as though it were reality. There is no way to awaken the wilfully deluded. And that is what we are dealing with. I know from experience that facts, reasoned argument, or even an exhortation to do some research does not work. I believe that those who have now been programmed by a vast propaganda campaign that has permeated every aspect of our lives are wilfully deluded. They may know, deep inside, that something is profoundly wrong. But they will never admit it to themselves, much less to anyone else. I wish people would stop using this tiresome phrase “cognitive dissonance”, which is to be found everywhere in the New Normal discourse. We are dealing with wilful delusion, and that is the same wilful delusion that characterised the people of Germany in 1933-1945, cult members, religious or political fanatics. We’ve used all sorts of expressions to describe them, “New Normals,” “Zombies” etc. They are quite simply, living a lie. There’s no way of reasoning with such people.
I have a deeply-rooted feeling that the United Kingdom is essentially central in some way to the New Normal project. I can’t prove this: it is centred on the facts that we have been “foremost” in developing “vaccines” throughout this narrative and “at the cutting edge” of research essential to the maintenance of this programme. However, I am sure that the evidence is there, I’ve seen some of it myself provided by Reiner Fuellmich in his investigations but there is simply too much of it to cite here and now. Yet as the darkness gathers, I feel we may be powerless. The reality of this situation, which has become painfully evident in the last months, is that governments possess enormous power and can do whatever they like. Anyone who thinks another lockdown is impossible in the UK is again, wilfully deluded. Of course it’s possible, even probable. So is forced “vaccination,” “vaccine passports” and ultimately, the camps, or some equivalent version of social segregation and slavery. The “camps”, in whatever form they may take, are coming, make no mistake.
I harbour the feeling that this narrative has a finite time to run. Yet history teaches us that dictatorships, totalitarianisms and despotic regimes are never defeated by their oppressed peoples. They eventually implode under the pressure of their own corruption. I believe this one will do the same in about four years. But by that time there may be very little left of the world as we know it. Yet we do not need more dire warnings. We need to know what to do. The most important question to be asked is; what is to be done? It is to be hoped that the entire narrative is beginning to collapse under the weight of its own absurdity, and there is some evidence for this, as more and more people seem to be questioning it, giving further rise to an increased hysteria among the wilfully deluded as they cling ever more assiduously to their belief in a deadly, global pandemic.
Is there anything we can do? I believe there is, and it’s been pointed out many times by others. The answer is simple, but very difficult. It is a mass refusal to participate in the New Normal. It is peaceful non-compliance. This is not a quick fix. It is a long-haul project and it is worth remembering that it took Gandhi something like thirty-three years to achieve Indian independence. I do not believe I am saying anything new: but I do know that if we are to survive, we must be endlessly creative in our methods. For those of us that survive, if there is anybody left, we must think about building another world and, for myself, I have no wish to live in another version of the hierarchic society we have made, in a group or commune dominated by whoever has power granted to them by force, or force of personality, or money.”
AND LISTEN TO THE JERMWARFARE INTERVIEW WITH REINER FUELMICH – particularly the latter stages, from about 47 mins in where he talks about what we can do change by way of an exit strategy – setting up new hospitals and schools by and for the unvaccinated
https://jermwarfare.com/blog/reiner-fuellmich-covid-exit-strategy
I read Delingpole’s excellent article but haven’t got round to the comments BTL. That’s one hell of a powerful essay which you have kindly copied. Sadly, I fear the author is bang on the money.
Many thanks.
Sometimes you can learn as much from the BTL comments on TCW as you do from the article itself!
So much excellent writing happening, not enough time to cover it all!!!
I believe Soros hinted that the UK was in for a big surprise before the ‘outbreak’ was announced.
Globalists hate this country – especially its Brexit voters.
They did’t even follow the clinical trials process for vaccines.
One important aspect is that they don’t know the quantity of antigen produced. With conventional vaccines you know how much antigen you’re injecting (it’s in the syringe), but with the the gene-based vaccines you inject the instructions to make the antigen — the actual quantity produced is dependent on many factors.
You also can’t substitute time for people. Ie, if a normal study is 3 years x 1000 people, you can’t get all the same information with 6 months x 6,000 people. I was told repeatedly that this was the case for the vaccine trials, but it just isn’t true — yes, you end up with far more data for the first 6 months part of the trial — but zero data for the 5 year 6 month part of the trial, and thus near zero information about medium and long term impacts.
This reminds me of the classic Project Management joke ( Software Engineering )
If it takes One Woman 9 months to make one baby,
you just CAN’T take NINE Women and make One Baby in One Month !
Surely Schwab is working on this as we write?
Of course you can’t take nine women to make a baby in one month. There is the well known law that adding more people makes for delays, so it would probably take nine women to produce a baby in two months.
Off subject and perhaps too sci-fi.
Are we are about to be introduced to, shall we say ‘the others’ who whilst benevolent will be portrayed as the enemy and our own government elite (by then, with adjusted covid narrative and new vaccines) as heros, whilst actually being our enslavers? If I’m right then this post could close down discussions rapidly.
Please take a look at https://www.moh.gov.sg/
The last two graphs show the ICU and death distributions of vaccinated vs. unvacinnated normalized to 100.000 persons per group. The shift in the last 7 days is dramatic. Are there any explanations? New variant of covid?
The graphs display those “fully vaccinated” versus “not fully vaccinated” not versus “unvaccinated” so it’s hard to tell what’s going on here. Since only 9% of the population has not had any vaccine, it’s unlikely to be the unvaccinated causing a change on this scale.
Maybe they changed the definition of “not fully vaccinated” to include more people?
The numbers in any case are very small, about 2.8 to 3.5 per million (or a change from 14-18 people) in ICU. Could be just noise.
The definition of fully vaxed changed some time in January to mean those who have had the booster, so three injections in total. If you have had less than three, you are not fully vaxed.
Nope, I’ve only had vax 1&2, June/July 2021 but still have a Domestic vax pass.
It was ‘suspended’ when I tested covid+ but reinstated after 10 days isolation.
It is now live again even though I’m still covid+ (don’t ask me, try Track’n’Trace).
EDIT just renewed vaxpass, valid to 9th March even though no boost and currently ‘in hospital with covid’.
Test & Trace.
Track & Trace if you’re concerned about the whereabouts of a parcel.
Yeah, whatever.
I thought the term ‘fully vaccinated’ was changed to ‘up to date’ recently but that may be just in the USA. Up to date means they can change the vax criteria at will.
I figured that out when they first introduced the phrase last year and fully expected to have my vaxpass rescinded at any moment because not boosted but it never happened.
Probably because there are too many of us (4 million?).
Dropping the number of ‘up to date’ by that amount would be politically unacceptable, not to mention the hostility it might create among those suddenly demoted.
Aren’t some international travel despots insisting on evidence of a booster dose? I could be wrong as there is so much conflicting information.
I wouldn’t know as I no longer travel.
Mine is ‘domestic pass’.
You press a different button for an international pass. Don’t know how that works as some countries will be more stringent than others.
The original post from obelix related to Singapore.
‘Rats and Pigs’
Spare the rats and pigs, what have they done?
Why not use collaborators and politicians the nearest human equivalent
Too low-grade to be worth the trouble, I suspect.
Antibody Dependant Enhancement – vaccinated peoples innate immunity trashed
Watch the news/excuse for this Dutch HIV-mutant strain of CV19 gain momentum
Watch how HIV flow tests suddenly come to the fore
Vaccines will not go away, they will move to Flu and other jabs
Vaccine Passports will not go away. Steady nudge and push.
Nothing is as it seems. The evil persists and endures.
Absolutely agree. This is about control by any means necessary.
I am unconvinced that HIV causes AIDS. HIV medication (such as AZT) causes AIDS by destroying the immune system. So it seems quite feasible to me that this mutant strain of HIV is a desperate attempt to explain AIDS that has been caused by “vaccines”.
I’d agree. After having read the excellent “the Real Anthony Fauci” (Robert F. Kennedy Jr) it seems the link between HIV and AIDS is something of a lie perpetuated by Fauci’s cronies to keep them in work at a time they desperately needed another “pandemic” to keep their funding going. It’s the classic “Tell a big lie often enough and people will believe it”
I think the clincher for me was the observation in that book (something like) “Over one hundred thousand PostDoc researchers have had the opportunity over the past forty years to categorically prove the link between HIV and AIDS. To do so would win them ( probably ) a Nobel Prize, fabulous career advancement and wealth. Of all these 100,000 people nobody has ever done it.”
Yes ( see other comment re “The Real Anthony Fauci” book ) it seems AZT is a therapeutically useless highly toxic compound thrown on the scrap-heap by its original inventor which was then revived by Fauci as a “wonder drug”. But it actually kills people within months given the dosage a lot of AIDS patienst are given ( but the deaths are then put down to advanced AIDS “They would have died anyway” )
Fauci’s methodology appears to be
1) “Here’s a rubbish toxic compound that has no therepeutic benefit”
2) ” I’m going to put the NoCebo Group on Cyanide ( or similar ) ”
3) “Look, my useless toxic compound killed fewer people / slower / than the control group on Cyanide ”
4) “So my ( useless) drug must be safe and effective !”
This also applies to one of his other useless, toxid Covid “Wonder Drugs” Remdesivir ( which many USA doctors call “Run, Death Is Near!” )
If only everyone would read this book we might be in a different place.!
AZT – Fauci connived in its development – produced for $5 a throw and sold – because it was adopted by the US Health quangos – with the US taxpayer picking up the tab – for $10,000 pa……
Fauci – a fine example of public service, a caring sharing Doctor, putting patients first, right in the firing line.
I’ve just seen an ad by Rochdale Borough Council headlined “Give HIV the Finger – a finger prick is all it takes. HIV testing is free, quick, and easy.
On the Feb 10 drop into Rochdale Central Library”.
What is it with pricks?
“Dr. Dr., I can’t feel anything below my knees!”
‘Can you tell me how many bonfires I’ve got up?’
“Oh no. Now I’m paralyzed from the waist down!”.
“bonfires” should read ‘fingers’.
Htf did that happen?
Dontcha love predictive text..
Why would you inject something into your blood to fight off a respiratory illness?
Furthermore, why are they now suggesting this same injection could be used to fight off cancer?
They changed the definition of vaccine to suit their campaign, but didn’t they also change the boundaries of what constitutes as a pandemic?
Tis posited by in certain quarters that the nRNA cytotixic concoction is both mutagenic and carcinogenic! There’s a storm a coming…
Why would you accept injection from someone( not quite the same as ‘inject’)? Because you had been lied to and coerced by those ‘experts’ in ‘authority’ you were taught to respect!
The injections they now laughingly say “fights off cancer” have been shown to reactivate and generate it!
Black is White in the New Normal Madhouse.
In the 1950’s British Servicemen were exposed to Sarin and VX at Porton Down
The ‘volunteers’ were told that they were taking part in trials for a cure for the common cold
Nothing new under the sun
During my basic training at Catterick Garrison in the 70s, we were asked by staff training officer’s to volunteer (pecuniary emolument was offered) for Anthrax vax testing at Porton Down! After due consideration
i declined…Like you say ” nothing new under the Sun”.
Fourteen month’s into the biggest medical experiment in human history, an element of suspicion start’s to creep in for the indoctrinated compliant cohort?
Christ on a bike
Read Kathy Gyngell in today’s TCW…”Is the vaccine (or repeated doses) weakening our immune system” A concise appraisal of imminent vax catastrophe, plenty of link’s to the REAL science and scientists, enjoy…
Why wasn’t this obvious question asked by the Media nearly two years ago?
The problem is we all know the answer and it involves questions of financial greed, outrageous criminality a wicked indifference to human life – all backing a Billionaire’s personal project to “vaccinate” the world with ‘experiments’.
The only thing that has made sense to me is the panic, the propaganda, the hasty gene therapies were all designed to establish a medical certification mechanism – vax passports etc.
Every UK government formed since the mid-1950s has been presented with a national ID system by the civil service. Most governments, and politicians, sensibly avoid these initiatives as they are a political death sentence.
But systems evolve. Those drawn to “public service” embrace the pleasant lie they serve the public. But if you’ve ever worked in the public sector you quickly learn how much they despise the public they supposedly serve. All those annoying requests from plebs, the hassle of keeping track of people. Why don’t we have some kind of simple ID system? Other countries do.
That is what people seem to be missing. Control freaks seek control. The end justifies the means.
Along the way fellow travellers join in the fun. Profit is a factor. Big Pharma doesn’t care about national IDs in the UK, France or Paraguay. But they’ll play along because of the money.
But the goal is always control. Our world is run by bureaucratic nonentities who cannot stand the thought of you being free. That’s why they hate cars, pubs and the thought of you eating chips. You are ignoring their sterling efforts to improve the world. That’s the draw of a technocracy – a thin veneer of “improvement”, whether health, culture or life expectancy, is within grasp if only we’d listen to the experts. The fact you have ideas of your own about such matters is maddening to our betters.
We must comprehensively reject any form of ID, certification or government tagging. It is as simple as that.
The impending overhaul of our human rights laws will be a game changer in the regime’s favour. As I understand it, they’re taking away the power of the courts and giving it to the government.
At the same time, they’re coming in hard with Internet censorship, under the guise of fighting the good fight against trolls and “misinformation”.
Yes, I’m keeping a keen eye on our new bill of rights.
They want it all. And it is up to us to stop them.
As amusingly portrayed in the timeless Yes Minister/Prime Minister 4(?) decades ago and still true today.
I think they did all those studies, trouble is, it was on the population.
“That is why I use the term vaccine in quotation marks or simply describe them as injections.”
.
Can we not have an editorial decision at DS to prefer this kind of usage atl wherever possible?
Accepting the enemy’s choice of ground on which to fight is almost always a disastrous error.
Poison: “A substance that causes injury, illness, or death, especially by chemical means.”
That fits.
Calling it “poison” would be the direct equivalent of what the other side has done by calling them vaccines.
Unfortunately, some tactics work when you are the dominant force and not when you are the underdog.
I wasn’t making a serious suggestion.
But everybody I know who has had 3 jabs and talked to me about it has suffered injury.
I suspected as much, but it makes a useful point anyway.
At the least, it would be interesting to hear Toby Young explaining his thoughts on this kind of usage issue, as an experienced journalist and political activist. I suspect he would just say that it makes for more effective communication if you adopt the established usages. I’m sure that’s true, but I feel it also often concedes far too much to the other side of the debate.
People, including children, have been injected with an experimental Gene Therapy and have died within minutes …..poison or not?
I don’t think Tobes would be fully on board with that process, after all, he still thinks this is a confluence of political and scientific idiocy rather than malevolant intent to subjugate the 99%…
Allowing the Extreme Left to control the “terms of discourse” as Gramsci advised has been a huge mistake for 50 years!
Look where it has brought us!
What do you think has happened to that part of the Extreme Left program which required the ending of the extreme private wealth of capitalists (like Bill Gates, etc)?
The gene therapy “vaccines” have not been used by every country so has anyone seen data comparing side effects between those countries?
Good point – if France is mandating vaccines and using Valneva, is Valneva safer than say Pfizer or Moderna?
Why weren’t they put through proper safety trials? Because they would have failed them.
One of the big problems nowadays in many areas, not just epidemiology, is that of playing fast and loose with the concept of testing.
If you say ‘yes, but it needs to be tested’, it usually has to be followed with: ‘yes, but I mean proper testing’. Followed again by an explanation of what ‘proper’ means.
Test departments have been the bane of my life. They add expense and delays to projects, but no alternative has yet been found to rigorous and professional testing.
When I hear pharmaceutical companies announce that they will be able to turn new vaccines around in 100 days, I’m reminded of the standard test-department comment of ‘would you fly on a plane that had those corners cut when testing?’.
The frustrated recipient would probably say ‘yes’. But they need to be asked again while walking up the steps of the plane.
“Why Weren’t These Vaccines Put Through the Proper Safety Trials For Gene Technology?”
John D Flack senses things have changed, but he doesn’t exactly take us very far towards answering this question.
I wonder how he feels about his own past work developing “anti-fertility” medication?
Perhaps had he been more critical of the monster he was serving then, he might produce more thoroughgoing criticism now…
Nicked and amended from someone else on The Daily Sceptic.
The Covid experimental jab.
It’s safe and effective. Fail
It reduces transmission. Fail
It reduces symptomatic Covid. Fail
It makes the symptoms milder. Fail
It prevents hospitalisation. Fail
It reduces the chance of hospitalisation. Fail
It reduces the chance of serious illness. Fail
It reduces the chance of death. Fail
Ok. It doesn’t work and causes more harm than good.
One thing it’s been extraordinarily good at though is creating millions of new anti-vaxxers. There I was for the first 43 years of life, completely ambivalent about vaccines, then these ones came along, and now I’ll never take or allow other family members to take, any vaccine of any kind ever again! Amazing work Pfizer, Moderna, Astra Zeneca, and all the institutional and individual drug pushers out there
I was a similar age to you when the MMR hit the headlines in 1998.
I’ve been a “pro-safe-vaxxer” ever since.
Big Pharma, the medical and scientific community and their propagandists in the main stream media have shot themselves in the foot by rushing through these experimental jabs as more enlightened people like yourself will question all “vaccines” in the future.
I don’t like demonisation of any kind, but I didn’t think as carefully as I should have about the attacks on anti-vaxxers.
Now I understand why there are grave suspicions about vaccines and why those who have them are attacked.
Not only will I likewise NEVER have any kind of vaccine ever again, I am also VERY chary about the use of any pharmaceutical drugs – as far as I am concerned, to be used sparingly and only for what I consider to be a genuine emergency. If you read the patient information leaflet of any pharmaceutical medication the side effects will invariably be a lot worse that that which you wish to treat in the first place.
I recently had a nasty experience with some OTC ibuprofen. Turned out they contained an ingredient called “acacia powder” which, when my face began to swell up with blisters, I discovered I was allergic to. I used vitamin C and vitamin D3 in decent doses and the swellings and blisters resolved fairly quickly.
So much of what is out there in nature can be used either to prevent or treat a lot of ailments. Worth exploring first before resorting to anything big pharma offers.
The number 1 rule in pharmaceuticals is that the more powerful the drug, the more powerful the side effects, e.g. chemotherapy vs penicillin.
As for allegies, the swelings etc. are caused by the release of histamine. Taking antihistamines calms things down, e.g. hayfever. If Vitamins C and D3 had this effect maybe you should drop a line to the Lancet or BMJ with your findings?
Thanks DBB
I did actually have some antihistamines in my cabinet, but consulted the patient info leaflet, and the side effects included, rashes and possible blistering LOL, so needed to steer clear. I think from memory I did also take some quercetin which as I am sure you know does the same job as antihistamines and because I couldn’t take the antihistamines I needed to find natural ingredients which would do the same job – hence the D3 and the C.
Somehow I very much doubt the Lancet or BMJ would have much interest in my findings, but thanks for the suggestion all the same.
If this research is correct, it may account for the huge variability in toxicity in the mRNA injections. This cannot be acceptable practice from a regulatory standpoint.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/8tbOPuO0jyuV/
ACCEPTABLE INTEGRITY OF mRNA IN VIALS – PFIZER
In EMA documents Pfizer set their own arbitrary standard for “acceptable” integrity of mRNA in their active ingredient – >50%. Meaning that the batches can vary in the amount of active in drug substance between 50-100%. Researchers found a significant inverse relationship between this % and toxicity – the lower the integrity, the less toxic the batch. This huge variability also has very large impact on how much active ingredient ends up in a tiny amount of the vax in a vial, since these liquid substances are never equally distributed through the volume. Therefore, some vials may contain almost no or no active ingredient, while others contain concentrated amounts. This may explain some of the large variations we see among batches.
This “acceptability standard” was set by Pfizer arbitrarily. The toxicity of batches is inversely related to the % of integrity of mRNA in the batch. In other words, the more this bioweapon is broken, the safer it is. No batches are safe however, we are only discussing relative differences.
This was discussed quite early in the rollout of these vaccines. Regulatory oversight was known to be extraordinarily lax, with many truncates RNA species left in the finished product, whose effect is unknown.
https://www.pogo.org/investigation/2021/03/avoiding-the-subject-on-pfizer-vaccine-quality-control-fda-says-less-than-european-counterpart/
It has to be emphatically pointed out that the guidance in the UK to the administrators of the ‘vaccination’ program does not require that these jabs, that the manufacturers specifically state have to be given intramuscularly, are ensured by ‘aspiration of the syringe’ to actually be in muscle and not vein or artery.
Health Board rely on the advice from the WHO authored by Offit in 2005, but he is so conflicted that any advice he gives needs taking with a salt-mine.
Particularly in the case of known endothelial damage and clotting therein from these jabs, every possible effort should be made to ensure that ‘accidental’ injection into the vasculature does not happen. Note here that Dr John Campbell has been very critical of this failure to follow what was normal practice in the NHS while he was teaching nurses, noting that experienced vaccinators who aspirate IM vaccinations typically have a failure – blood in syringe – rate circa of 1 in 1000. Inexperienced vaccinators will have far worse rates that may well explain many of the deaths that occur within hours to days of vaccination.
On 5/2/22 the World Council for Health held their first Understanding Vaccine Causation conference. (Link below). At this point I do not believe that the true extent of the harms caused and will cause can be accurately estimated. The many recent MSM articles warning us that anything from skipping breakfast to watching live football can cause heart attacks and strokes suggests that further doubling down is inevitable.
https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/newsroom/
I’ve always thought that watching live football was a bit risky TBH [sarc] – even live dominoes can be dangerous….
Pfizer’s package insert for Comirnaty says that those kinds of studies were not done or not conclusive:
what happened to the AI system the MHRA had a tender out for in 2020:
‘The MHRA urgently seeks an Artificial Intelligence (AI) software tool to process the expected high volume of Covid-19 vaccine Adverse Drug Reaction (ADRs) and ensure that no details from the ADRs’ reaction text are missed.’
https://ted.europa.eu/udl?uri=TED:NOTICE:506291-2020:TEXT:EN:HTML&src=0
Genpact UK got the tender but I haven’t come across any more information about what it’s done and it’s impact.
https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/emea/uk-use-ai-covid-19-vaccine-side-effects
… but because of their limited efficacy as repeated injections – called boosters.
Or:
Because they boost you to heaven, son.
It’s just scandal on top of scandal, isn’t it? ‘Oh what a tangled web we weave/When first we practice to deceive’
I must add that all the advocated toxicity tests in other animals than humans disgust me equally. These are not objects to be vivisected and killed any more than other humans are. I know all the standard hoots against compassion, so spare me. They all boil down to ‘might is right’, in which case you and yours would make better subjects scientifically speaking.
Funny how so many of thes scientists and medical experts are only now getting brave enough to speak out and ask such questions. Where were they 12-18 months ago?
Ottawa Police’s New Measures Against Protesting Truckers Are Those Used by ‘Oppressive Regimes,’ Says Organizers’ Lawyer
https://www.theepochtimes.com/ottawa-polices-new-measures-against-protesting-truckers-are-those-used-by-oppressive-regimes-says-organizers-lawyer_4258245.html?
By Omid Ghoreishi
Tuesday 8th February 2pm to 3pm
Yellow Boards By the Road
A329 junction London Road & Oak Avenue
Near Oakingham Belle pub
Wokingham RG40 1LH
Stand in the Park Sundays 10am make friends, ignore the madness & keep sane
Wokingham Howard Palmer Gardens Cockpit Path car park Sturges Rd RG40 2HD
Henley Mills Meadows (at the bandstand) Henley-on-Thames RG9 1DS
Telegram Group
http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell
Lack of safety testing gave the jabs an element of risk, but the risk from the fake pandemic was allegedly far worse, so the compliant saw it as the lesser of two evils in a world where going out to buy a coffee could kill grannie.
Long and thorough safety trials would have taken the fangs out of the crisis – waiting years for ‘safe’ jabs would have given people plenty of time to realise their fear was unfounded, despite the constant propaganda.
That psychological manipulation of fear was essential to fast track the jabs because:
(a) they are not vaccines, they are toxic and the safety trials would have failed.
(b) the true contents of the vials are more likely to have been discovered.
(c) the agenda was to inject as many people as possible as quickly as possible because the true contents of the vials are part of a wider plan to control, sterilise, weaken, murder and transform a much reduced population into a slave class that is no longer human, has no rights, no control over their own lives and no soul.
I have been saying the same since mid 2020. At that time I was a conspiracy theory nutjob. Sadly, for most of my family and acquaintances I still am.
Me too, but at least we have our integrity
And a bit more of our health going forward!
And me – 2 of them have had ‘covid ‘ after being boosted, and having nasty reactions to boosting jabs, one of them has had covid for the second time now and although back at work says he is not fully recovered.
I would send him the protocols which are out there about de-toxing from the jab, but I know that he would dismiss them as “woo woo” because they have not been suggested by a Doctor. My family likewise regard me as an antivaxing nut job. We will see who is the last man (or woman) standing when all this plays out.
“there is now no control/placebo group”
Every month I receive a reminder from http://www.vaxcontrolgroup.com asking for an update of my medical status – the update is always ‘nothing to report’.
It’s a website tracking the medical status of unvaccinated people around the world. It’s all based on self-reporting, so isn’t particularly rigorous, but at least it represents the potential for some form of control group.
I should add that my attempts so far to be able to report ‘Caught Covid’ have failed miserably.
“Why Weren’t These Vaccines Put Through the Proper Safety Trials”
Bond: Do you expect me to talk?
Klaus: No, Mr Bond I expect you to die.
(Just replace Bond with any name)
Big pharma and NIH push Remdesivir as treatment while killing patients with this drug. Dr Harvy Risch stated HCQ and Ivermectin have similar results and government and corporate corruption illegitimately cut it off from treament protocols. Dr Richard Urso also stated that even if HCQ and Ivermectin are blocked from doctors to use these medicines as treatment for Covid. Get your Ivermectin today while you still can! https://ivmpharmacy.com
It’s good you are posting this article, but really, it’s old news. These questions, objections and points were raised by prominent scientists over a year ago, and linked here, btl.
One cannot help but notice the muddled attitudes of officialdom to trials. On the one hand you have accelerated and possibly incomplete testing of vaccines, while on the other you have a full clinical trial of steroids and tocilizumab as treatment of severe COVID 19. Given that this drug regime was already fully established for the underlying cause of COVID 19, namely a cytokine storm, it appears that trials are being done when they aren’t necessary, but not being done when they are. Discuss.
I recall John Flack from my time at Beecham Pharmaceuticals; a good guy with a great sense of humour. As I recall, his needle in a haystack aphorism ended with the words ‘farmer’s daughter’; which I guess is not too far away from the quoted treasure!
The really worrying thing is that there must be hundreds or even thousands of other ex-pharma employees with a similar level of knowledge as John. Where have they been hiding?
And I’m sure that Dame Raine & the MHRA will employ some form of Crown Immunity if pursued for liability
“1,5 million € for a virologist who presents scientific proof of the existence of a corona virus.”
Easy money… One would think…
https://new.awakeningchannel.com/15-million-e-18-million-reward-for-a-virologist-who-presents-proof-of-the-existence-of-the-coronavirus/
“Why Weren’t These Vaccines Put Through the Proper Safety Trials”?
Because the safety of them was not a consideration for a government seeking absolute control over us. We might also consider government, especially Boris, being subservient to the globalist policies of the UN, WEF and others.
We would be wise to familiarise ourselves with the stated aims of the various UN “Agendas”.
Why the **** are these “vaccines” pushed on to / in to healthy people at all? Safety and efficacy weren’t considerations ever: control of the masses was. Too many, far too many people were proven to be easily manipulated. Now the b’s know how easy it was, what’s coming next? Schwab et al must be licking their villainous lips!
Exactly, Big Pharma have now discovered that they never need go through the expense and time of proper trials again. If they can get a crisis manufactured, they will have any number of willing humans to experiment on.
Oh,I think I know the answer to this question. According to the GP, who denied me a medical exemption, yesterday, when I questioned the safety of the injections she said “we had to weigh the seriousness of this unknown virus against an experimental biological with no safety data. And the injections were chosen”. Wow, am I ever glad I never took this absolute disaster!
That admission from your GP is extremely important…a ‘smoking gun’. The head of the MHRA, June Raine, has repeatedly said that the ‘vaccines’ are safe ( “for most people”, she slightly qualified) and effective, and that the Yellow Card data is being monitored. “No safety data” is the crux of why these ‘vaccines’ cannot be mandated universally, particularly to children. It explains why Pfizer are resisting releasing further tranches of data about their product’s safety! Maybe her statement to you should be followed up by your local MP or even Raine herself. Your GP wouldn’t lie to you.
And still, having made that damning admission, the GP denied you the medical exemption.
Move over Mengele.
ANSWER: the Gov doesn’t care about the People
And the number of mRNA vaccines consumed in China is….drum roll…zero. A big fat zero according to Alex Berenson. Why would that be?
Why? Because the gene therapy route has more onerous qualification and reporting standards. Such higher standards would severely impact Big Pharma’s bottom line.