It is the 200th anniversary of the death of Edward Jenner, who is credited with the birth of vaccination.
He was a student of St George’s medical school, which has named a major science block after him. When the Medical Research Council and Glaxo decided to jointly fund a national vaccine institute to focus on vaccine research, it was named the Jenner Institute and built in Compton before moving to Oxford.
It is worth looking at his role in the development of vaccines as it was not related to his background.
He did the definitive challenge experiment following the observations of many others. The idea of protecting against smallpox, which was a mutilating infectious disease, with a tiny dose injected under the skin from a sufferer may have been around for many centuries, although it is clearly documented from the 1400s onwards. It was first brought to the U.K. in 1721 by Lady Mary Montague, who had observed the practice in Turkey and wanted to protect her children. However, the man who brought it to Jenner’s attention was a Mr. Jesty, a farmer who made the observation that none of his milk maids ever contracted smallpox although they did all get infected with cowpox, which was a very mild disease.
Mr. Jesty decided, in 1774, to test the hypothesis that cowpox could protect against smallpox by variolating or injecting a small amount of cowpox under the skin of his family and children, none of whom developed smallpox. This was an amazing first as he used an attenuated, similar and less toxic agent to induce a protective immune response against the highly infective and dangerous mutilating virus.
This approach was to be adopted by the father of laboratory developed vaccines, Louis Pasteur, who attenuated several agents by passaging them through cell culture. This was the process used by Calmette and Guerin to develop the BCG vaccine for tuberculosis at the turn of the 20th century.
Jenner’s contribution was to do the same thing, using cowpox, to a young boy called James Phipps, and then inject live smallpox as a challenge. Fortunately, the boy did not contract the disease and this major trial of one(!) was widely broadcast due to Jenner’s eminence as a Fellow of the Royal Society for studies on bird behaviour. Its effect was confirmed and eventually taken up by Napoleon and the USA.
This approach was eventually to lead to the total eradication of smallpox by 1980. Louis Pasteur was the first to make laboratory-derived vaccines, passaging agents through cultures and using the effect of attenuation mentioned above. His first was a vaccine to prevent a cholera-like diarrhoea in chickens, and he developed many agents against diseases such as anthrax and developed a vaccine for rabies to be given post-exposure.
The technology used to develop flu vaccines following the great Spanish flu of 1918-19 (which actually started in a fort in Kansas in the USA) centred around inactivated viruses, which also formed the basis of the first polio vaccine by Jonas Salk. The so-called Spanish flu infected around 500 million people and killed 25-50 million, most of whom were fit adults and not the elderly, who were most at risk to later flu endemics. It was therefore an obvious target for vaccination. It is worth noting that many trials of two million people were conducted and no conclusion regarding effectiveness could be confirmed.
The knowledge gained, however, was effective against another worldwide scourge: polio. It is worth noting that this vaccine did not prevent transmission, unlike the later, more sophisticated, attenuated oral vaccine of Sabin, which eventually became the worldwide vaccine and is highly effective. The problem with developing flu vaccines was evident when scientists became aware of different strains and the fact that they frequently changed, so that a vaccine needed to be strain specific.
It is beyond the scope of this article to go into any detail on this, but instead to highlight a lesson learned from the famous flu outbreak in 1976 at another American military establishment, Fort Dix, when 13 soldiers became very ill (one died) and it rapidly spread amongst the population.
The U.S. Government rapidly trialled a specific vaccine (four types from four different organisations) and immunised over 40 million people. Very observant clinicians noted a small increase in the numbers of people suffering from rare neurological conditions such as Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS)and myelitis, and wondered if this was related to the vaccine. This led to intensive monitoring, which confirmed that there was a three- to seven- fold increase in GBS in the weeks following the vaccine.
By the time this was established, the flu epidemic was dying out and a decision made to abandon the vaccine programme as it was clearly doing more harm than good. Fast forward to Covid, which unlike the previous flu outbreaks has ended up killing people with an average age of death higher than from other conditions. We have a vaccine programme which was rushed through with emergency powers that is being pushed on the population in the form of repeated boosters, even though the virus which the vaccines are aimed at no longer exists and has been replaced by more infectious but milder variants.
The AstraZeneca vaccine has been associated with so many clotting and cardiac issues that it has been quietly withdrawn and the mRNA vaccines are clearly causing an excess of cardiac and clotting issues too, as highlighted by Dr. Aseem Malhotra.
Where are the monitors and regulators assessing this today?
I am sure that the 1976 FDA and regulators would have concluded the obvious, in that there are far more deaths and injuries from the vaccine programme than the vaccines are ever likely to prevent from any new Covid variant. So why are we continuing with what some have called the biggest piece of mass criminal negligence since the thalidomide programme?
Ever since I raised the alarm that the boosters are preceding relapses of stable cancers and the occurrences of new B cell-based cancers such as lymphomas I have been contacted daily by doctors from far and wide who are seeing the same but not being listened to.
A short history of vaccines highlights the tremendous good that has been done for humanity with their development. However, the failure to monitor the Covid vaccine adverse effects and deaths risks undoing all that good work and tarring all vaccines with the same brush.
Dr. Angus Dalgleish is an expert in immunology and Professor of Oncology at University of London.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
I’m done, no more needles for me, covid was obviously a pass but now I regret having had all of the others as a child.
Every single study comparing stabbinated kids vs unpoisoned emphatically conclude that the unstabbinated are far healthier and often far more lucid and intelligent.
What Junk.
Jenner murdered his own son and his first victim a boy called Phipps.
Both died at age 21 after some 20 stabs of poison.
Jenner was not a doctor. He bought his certificate from St. Andrews. He knew nothing of virology or medicine.
Detailed studies prove that the smallpox quacksine killed more than those who would have died from smallpox.
None of the stabs are any better. All diseases disappeared post sanitation improvements.
Polio comes from lead and arsenic in the food supply.
Spanish flu was not Spanish nor a flu. It was meningitis bacterium from a US military stab compaign. A criminal event which imitates Rona.
It is a criminal industry which murders and injures for profit.
Period.
I think it was on this website that I saw a post saying that diseases supposedly eradicated thanks to vaccines had actually just been renamed and were these new childhood diseases we see, hand foot and mouth, slapped cheek, RSV etc. The poster compared symptoms of the old with symptoms of the new and it made sense. I always wish I’d taken a screenshot of it.
Absolutely. Almost a fluff piece on the success of historical stabs; glossed over within a couple of paragraphs. If anyone is in doubt read ‘Bechamp or Pasteur’ by Ethel D Hulme. There were so many doctors and scientists questionning the processes and efficacy of mass vaccination programmes at the time it was occurring i.e nearly a century ago and stating how and why they would not work as well as creating issues for the human immune system.
And Pasteur killed the king of Sweden with his rabies jab – and lots of others besides.
Totally agree Ferd111. It is good to have Dalgeish on our side, but I cannot believe he is so dumb and illiterate on the Jenner story.
The crapcinnes for smallpox were an utter disaster and in time, experts showed using thorough research and two cities who said No to the mandatory smallpox quackinnes that this was so. It was the improvements to sewerage, water etc. that had the impact not crapcinnes.
The quackcines for smallpox killed people. FACT!
One of the leading lights to show this was the case was Alfred Russell Wallace, a giant of Victorian science, who was actually also a joint discoverer of the theory of evolution, with Darwin, along with doing a heap of other incredible scientific work.
He got bumped off the podium with Darwin afterwards, because of his brilliant anti-smallpox crapcinne work, of course.
If anyone reading this is not familiar with his name, please research him on a proper search engine. And his work exposing the smallpox crapcinne is of of course omitted from Wiki, as you would expect.
Chicken and the egg. Whose to blame, the manufacturers or the regulators?
There are charts and charts showing how most diseases which children are vaccinated against dropped dramatically long before vaccines were available.
The explanation is that better hygiene, less malnutrition and in particular indoor toilets are what really got rid of these diseases.
I honestly don’t know whether that is true or not.
What I will grant the author is that as a result of COVID, not just the jabs, but the lockdowns, the masks, the social distancing – the whole horrid lot – all of it enthusiastically endorsed and promoted by the medical establishment and most medical professionals, I have no more trust in any of them.
They are clearly just like everyone else, concerned first and foremost about themselves and their own interest and everything else is second.
That’s fine. We’re all like that. Just don’t expect any trust in anything you say.
I understand they want put mRNA technology into all existing vaccines.
Why should we trust any pharmaceutical product? Pharmaceutical have previously received huge fines for malpractice.
Stand in the Park Make friends & keep sane
Sundays 10.30am to 11.30am
Elms Field
near Everyman Cinema & play area
Wokingham RG40 2FE
They are also planning to put it into animal vaccines – a great area of profit for pharma and remember Bourla is a vet. Anti biotics were included in animal feeds from 1950s onwards as they made animals FATTER by reducing some bacteria and encouraging others. I wonder if they have the same effect on us?
It’s stunning isn’t it!
Spreading these products indiscriminately around the world!
Have to shine the spotlight on the ‘regulatory’ system that is allowing this to happen.
The headline says it all; you must be an experienced journalist. It may well be that there will be a lot more scepticism about them all, not least the fact that the trade has manipulated the definition of the functionality of a product to be able to label it as a “vaccine”. Normally, new inventions acquire new words or phrases.
Although you mentioned the problems with flu vaccines, it might be closer to the point to describe what happened with the Common Cold Unit in Salisbury from around 1948 to 1990 https://salisburyhealthcarehistory.uk/harvard-hospital-common-cold-unit/ . After all, they were the first lot to observe coronaviruses under electron microscopy, and seem to have realised that vaccination wouldn’t work against “common colds” (otherwise they’d have made a financial killing if it did).
I’ve been quite keen as a patient to use vaccinations for various travel reasons, but less so now.
This whole sorry saga has caused a massive loss of trust in Public Health and the medical profession.
The loss of trust is what’s referred to in HM Armed Forces as ‘a self-inflicted injury’, which would land you in Military Court facing a Court-Martial.
On that theme, BigPharma have imposed enough ‘friendly fire’ accidental – or otherwise – on the users of their pharmaceutical products.
Let’s not forget the mRNA vaccine is the first of its kind, no other vaccine, ever ,was based on this technology. Earlier vaccines up until mRNA were very safe and effective. The chances of dying in childhood where far higher than they are today from things like poliomyelitis and tb (consumption) than dying of vaccine complications. I’m not anti vaxx I’m anti mRNA vaxx, i belive messing around with the very genetics of life itself can never end well!
Dinger64 you say: “Earlier vaccines up until mRNA were very safe and effective.”
Which vaccine products are you talking about exactly?
Can you provide a list?
Actually I’m totally embracing my newfound anti-vax status. I might get a T-shirt printed with it on for summer!
It’s not just vaccines I don’t trust. Why should I trust my doctor or other health practitioner any more when they have been shown to follow a political narrative rather than use their own clinical judgement? They always seem very keen to put me on long term treatments like statins – which I don’t really need – when they are known to carry significant risks. Of course prescribing these drugs to those who don’t need them allows them to claim a high success rate.
My GP always says you need this drug or that. I counter with whatever is wrong is likely the result of either what I do with or what I put into my body, shouldn’t we concentrate there first? He countered last time with ‘do you want these pills or not’. I walked out to continue my search for health alone.
It’s all about prescribing a product now isn’t it?
The medical industry/medical profession has fulfilled Henry Gadsden’s dream…
Gadsden was CEO of Merck between 1965 and 1975. In the late 1970s he told Fortune magazine he wanted the taking of drugs to be as every day as chewing gum so the company could “sell to everyone”.
So now we see mass populations being pressed to have medications, vaccinations, tests…
Taxpayers are being exploited with the over-use of all these often unnecessary and potentially harmful interventions.
It’s not about promoting health – it’s about promoting fear.
Instead of encouraging people to live their lives as healthily as possible, people are made to feel they’re potentially sick with something or other.
Our society is being debased by the highly lucrative sickness industry.
Hear, hear.
perhaps if we were to pay £20 ever time we visited a doctors surgery and removed the monies doctors received for dispensing pharmaceuticals we may all enjoy better health.
“Of course prescribing these drugs to those who don’t need them allows them to claim a high success rate.”
Good point!
No more jabs for my kids.
and although I know this ship has very much sailed, study was rigged, doctor was a crank and has been totally discredited yadda yadda yadda I was discussing the prevalence of autism in teens and kids today, and how it differs from pre Y2K autism. A lot of these autistic kids today are never going to be able to live by themselves, let alone have anything resembling a ‘normal’ life and there is no interest or discussion into why we have had a sudden increase in autistic children displaying more severe symptoms?
I can’t say whether there’s more severe autism now, but I wonder how many children have been harmed over the years by vaccines or at least not met their potential? Neighbors with PhDs in a STEM field have a young autistic son. I figured his diagnosis was a “disorder of the day,” but he’s definitely off. But as far back as 20 years, my cousin and her husband, both engineers, had children that are stupid (too harsh?) and severely learning disabled. Seemingly, these parents should have bright, high-achieving children. Is the prevalence of ADHD caused by vaccine damage or just over-diagnosis of boy behavior or too much screen time? Should (real) vaccines be given at all to children or should they be spaced out during childhood? What about adult injections for flu/shingles/pneumonia? What about tetanus shots given every 10 years?
Aluminium, Vaccines & Detox – Dr Sam Bailey (substack.com) Watched this yesterday and the good news is that silica rich water can help remove aluminium from the human body. Worth trying for autism and dementia in my opinion.
Crikey, this article by Angus Dalgleish is bad…up there with his atrocious article in the Daily Mail in July 2021: What every young person who fears the jab MUST be told: Vaccine expert ANGUS DALGLEISH dismantles beliefs that have seen rates stall among the 18-30s
Angus now recognises the Covid jabs are ‘disastrous’, but in July 2021 he was demanding that millions of young people discard their well-founded concerns about the jabs, and defer to his ‘expert’ unsolicited advice in the Daily Mail and submit to the Covid jabs which are unnecessary for young people.
‘Experts’…really, that word should be taken out of the dictionary…
With this article on The Daily Sceptic it appears Angus is seeking to protect the traditional vaccine industry, by isolating the Covid jabs as a bad egg.
Well sorry to disappoint you Angus, but the Covid debacle has opened up a whole can of worms about vaccination in general, including the blessed ‘traditional’ vaccine products on the schedule, see for example the NHS schedule.
The cat is out of the bag…time for an investigation of the ever-increasing number of lucrative vaccine products and revaccinations being foisted upon the community, from womb to tomb…
So, looking at the NHS schedule…
Think about the GlaxoSmithKline Bexsero MenB vaccine for instance, which is given to babies at 8 weeks and 16 weeks.
Andrew Pollard was involved with this vaccine product…and he’s also the Chief Investigator on the Oxford-AstraZeneca Covid vaccine trials.
Re men b – it’s a rare disease – but now the Bexsero MenB jab is pressed upon babies at 8 weeks and 16 weeks.
This is an aluminium-adjuvanted vaccine.
The MenB vaccine was originally rejected for the NHS schedule…until Andrew Pollard came along and became Chair of the UK Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation…and then, lo, Bexsero MenB was added to the schedule.
And in 2020 there was Pollard comfortably ensconced as Chair of the JCVI, while also behind the Oxford-AstraZeneca Covid jabs…that unaccountably got off the ground, against a virus it was known from the beginning wasn’t a serious threat to most people.
There are serious conflicts of interest to be explored…
I was banned from commenting on the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation-funded Daily Telegraph for raising Andrew Pollard’s conflicts of interest.
For more background, see for example: Prof Pollard Again: Oxford University Hosts British Government Vaccine Committee by John Stone in 2016, which includes my referenced comments about Bexsero MenB.
Conflicts of interest and taxpayer-funded vaccination policy…way overdue for investigation.
I noted above the Bexsero MenB vaccine is an aluminium-adjuvanted vaccine.
There are concerns about the safety of aluminium-adjuvanted vaccines but, as usual safety concerns are stifled…
It’s a long story…I’ve been trying to raise the alarm about this since 2013, see for example my email to Tom Jefferson, then a member of the Cochrane Vaccines field: Your review Adverse events after immunisation with aluminiumcontaining DTP vaccines: systematic review of the evidence
Lots more of my emails about Tom Jefferson et al’s ‘systematic review’ on aluminium and vaccine safety on this webpage: Cochrane – Aluminium and vaccine safety
There are letters/emails to Peter Gøtzsche, co-founder of The Cochrane Collaboration; John McConnell, then editor of The Lancet Infectious Diseases; David Tovey, then editor in chief of The Cochrane Library; Mark Wilson, then CEO of Cochrane; and Chris Baggoley, then Australia’s Chief Medical Officer.
None of them would properly address what I consider to be Tom Jefferson et al’s scientifically unsound systematic review, which concluded “We found no evidence that aluminium salts in vaccines cause any serious or long-lasting adverse events” while also admitting “Overall, the methodological quality of included studies was low”. And then they said: “Despite a lack of good-quality evidence we do not recommend that any further research on this topic is undertaken”.
?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
Is that not bizarre? Why would they recommend against any further research on the topic?
I wasn’t the only one to think this was weird…
Christopher Exley, who has researched aluminium for years, wrote letters to The Lancet Infectious Diseases questioning Jefferson et al’s conclusions in 2004 and 2006.
Another aluminium-adjuvanted vaccine is the HPV vaccine product that’s foisted upon young people.
In 2012, when it was announced in Australia that the Gardasil HPV vaccine would be given to boys, after being implemented for girls in 2007, I was very surprised to read HPV vax co-inventor Ian Frazer’s advertorial on The Conversation which noted:
?!?!?!?!?!?!
“…only a few individuals accumulate enough genetic mistakes in the virus-infected cell for these to acquire the properties of cancer cells.”
So why the heck are all the young people being given this aluminium-adjuvanted vaccine product?
Are you beginning to see a pattern here? With the Covid jabs. With the Bexsero MenB jab. With the Gardasil HPV jab. These medical interventions are being pressed upon mass populations, to purportedly protect against diseases which aren’t a serious threat for most people.
Mass populations are being exploited with highly questionable ‘vaccine’ products. This is just the tip of the iceberg. There is so much to be investigated and exposed about taxpayer-funded and highly conflicted vaccination schedules.
Yep, this vaccine had the most adverse event reports associated with it compared with all other vaccines before the clot shots came along. It’s the next vax on my daughter’s schedule, so no effing way. Fortunately they’re pretty chill here in the NL and if you don’t want to partake of a vaccine ( we didn’t get the Hep B one either ) there’s no pressure. You just get a reminder in the post then they leave you alone. The Defender are currently doing a series on this dangerous and unnecessary jab. Good info to share for anyone with kids;
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/hpv-vaccine-safety-concerns-part-1-et/
Mogwai, in Australia there’s a hard sell for all the jabs…Australia is a major player in the vaccine caper…
I undertook much correspondence on HPV vaccination a few years ago, see this webpage for info: Human papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination
Thanks. I’ll have a proper read later.
I had hoped that Cochrane would provide objective and independent evaluation of HPV vaccination…but I was disappointed…
See my BMJ rapid responses:
Cochrane HPV vaccine review severely compromised by conflicts of interest (2) 17/Sept/2018
Cochrane HPV vaccine review severely compromised by conflicts of interest (1) 17/Sept/2018
Mogwai, re the Hep B vaccine…another aluminium-adjuvanted vaccine.
In Australia it’s given at birth…and then again at 2 months, in the aluminium-adjuvanted six-in-one Infanrix shot, containing Diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (whooping cough), hepatitis B, polio, Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib)…which is given again at 4 months…and is given again at 6 months…
And yet an NHMRC report published in Australia in 1996 – Recommendations on hepatitis B immunisation (now rescinded) – noted under ‘Disadvantages’ that:
?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
There it is again! They end up jabbing mass populations of children “against a disease which they are at a low risk of contracting”!
It’s absolutely grim! The vaccine industry has been getting away with this for years, getting their unnecessary, and potentially harmful, products on taxpayer-funded vaccination schedules.
Who are the people evaluating and approving these products, what are their conflicts of interest? This is what must be exposed now, because the community is being grossly exploited with these medical interventions, reaching crisis point with the INSANE plan to jab the entire world population with Covid jabs, over and over again, against a disease it was known from the beginning wasn’t a serious threat to most people!
It’s important to address Tom Jefferson et al’s systematic review on aluminium and vaccine safety because it’s influenced taxpayer-funded vaccination policy in Australia.
See my email on this matter to Kristine Macartney, Director, National Centre for Immunisation Research & Surveillance, 20 March 2019:
Questionable claims for the safety of aluminium-adjuvanted vaccine products.
Kristine Macartney did not respond. There is no accountability for vaccination policy and practice in Australia.
See for example my follow-up email to Tom Jefferson in March 2018 – Call for retraction of Jefferson et al’s scientifically unsound review on aluminium and vaccine safety.
All those witnesses copied on the email, but nothing was done about it…
In regard to the Bexsero MenB vaccine and Andrew Pollard, also see another of John Stone’s articles: GSK document appears to show vaccine committee chair used position to favour own product, published in December 2015.
Please see my comments on John’s article, which include info re the Australian situation.
Totally agree Elizabeth. Dr Dalgleish has proven just how untrustworthy he is, even unprofessional imo ( wouldn’t one expect way better from an actual Professor?? ), with regards to that article he authored and, as far as I’m aware, I haven’t seen anything by him which explains the rationale for his change of stance since then or that he concedes he was incorrect in the information he was conveying therein. I’m afraid what he writes just smacks of too much ego and reminds me of Dr Paul Offit. Apparently we’re meant to all just nod along in agreement as our collective amnesia ensures that we never remember or mention the past evidence of these two men given their full support to this indiscriminate death shot campaign. I’m afraid you don’t get to do a full 180 U-turn with zero explanation and expect everybody to overlook your obvious duplicity. They take us for absolute fools.
Mogwai, here’s what Angus Dalgleish said about his Daily Mail article, in an article published on The Daily Sceptic on 19 December 2022:
So Angus Dalgleish considers his article in the Daily Mail to be very thorough!?
Very thoroughly bad I would say… It did rather more than ‘encourage’ young people to be jabbed, it was a hard sell, hyperbolic piece – apparently at the behest of the Government and the medical community.
And the article was ‘conducted by interview’ – he phoned it in… An article that pressed millions of young people to submit to a highly questionable medical intervention… Blimey… I wonder if he checked over the transcript and had any reservations about it?
Subsequent to the article, his own son, who he says did not want the jab but was coerced into it for work and travel, develops myocarditis, along with other young contacts developing problems.
The great light shines that the jabs might be a problem…but wasn’t Angus Dalgleish already alert to that possibility as he and his colleagues “had written right at the very beginning of the pandemic, a genetically engineered virus had serious implications for vaccine design”?!
What a contradictory shambles!
Yes, I seem to remember that one. He’s reluctant to take anything back that he said isn’t he? Professional pride? Ego? Either way he’s a slippery fish not to be trusted.
Damn right. Excellent post.
‘…Where are the monitors and regulators assessing this today?…’
I think they’re all busy tearing up rule books…
So the Spanish Flu killed roughly 10x more than the dubious claims for the Rona, from a much smaller global population? And yet it magically petered out all by itself, without a stab fest? There wasn’t wave after wave for year after year? And there’s never been one like it since? Amazing!
Re the ‘Spanish Flu’ also known as the 1918 influenza pandemic.
How many died? 50 million? 100 million? Give or take 50 million?
In a global population probably around 1.8 billion at the time?
Given the tsunami of misinformation/disinformation we’ve endured from ‘the authorities’ about the Covid debacle, all bets are off, and ALL their information is suspect now, including the variable number of deaths reported for the 1918 influenza pandemic.
It’s also interesting that Neil Ferguson et al of Imperial College London compared Covid-19 to the 1918 influenza pandemic in their Report 9, published in March 2020, you know, the modelling that ended up plunging the world into lockdown, and economic and social devastation…
What was the impact of Covid-19 in March 2020 that justified comparing it to the 1918 influenza pandemic?
Dazu kam seit Anfang Juni ein starker Ausfall durch Grippe-Erkrankungen, die, begünstigt durch unzulängliche Ernährung und durch Überanstrengung, schnell um sich gegriffen hatten und mit fast 400.000 Fällen im Juli ihren Höhepunkt erreichten. Im allgemeinen waren die Erkrankten nach vier bis sechs Tagen wieder dienstfähig, so daß mehr als 85 v.H. bei der Truppe behandelt werden konnten; volle Leistungsfähigkeit erreichten sie jedoch erst allmählich wieder.
https://digi.landesbibliothek.at/viewer/image/AC03617607/545/#topDocAnchor
That’s from the 1918 volume of the official German history of the first world war (published in 1944 and hence, not comtaminated with US propaganda). I’ll try a translation
Additionally, since the beginning of June, many soldiers became incapitated because of influenza which, propelled by malnutrition and overexertion, had spread rapidly and culminated with 400,000 cases in July. Usually, the affected would again be fit for duty after four to six days and more than 85% could be treated in field hospitals. Nevertheless, it took some time until they had completely recovered.
This refers to infantrymen of the German western field army in summer 1918, about 4,227,000 men living in cramped and unhygienic accomation (when they were lucky) and suffering from malnutrition and constant overtaxing. An infectious killer disease couldn’t dream of better hunting grounds.
Thanks RW.
Hmmm…we need a whole new look at the 1918 pandemic, in light of the Covid debacle.
It’s part of the big picture of the pandemic industry that’s been in the planning for years.
The 1918 pandemic was a pandemic of vaccine injury side effects courtesy of an American vaccine used initially on the military in the US & then the remaining stockpile was used up abroad.
Can’t find the link but in JAMA 1918 a study was published where a medic had sought to investigate the transmission route of this deadly ‘virus’. He transferred bodily fluids of snot & saliva from the infected to healthy volunteers by various methods including from cadavers. Not one of the healthy volunteers became ill.
This study was replicated with the same results.
The vaccine caused the ill health.
Thanks BB.
There certainly needs to be a review of the 1918 pandemic…
Curtis Cost has done one, been on the vaccine scam for over 30 years. Eye opening work.
My pet theory is that this was mostly an outburst of lucrative mass hysteria among US housewifes whose men had joined the army in France. From the German sources (many don’t mention it at all), it’s clear that this influenza pandemic wasn’t anyhow out of the ordinary, ie, not particularly lethal. A theory why it killed so many fairly young men in the USA would be that these were isolated in makeshift facilities and then succumbed to secondary bacterial pneumonia which – before antibiotics – couldn’t be treated.
You’re either conducting a false flag operation or have fallen prey to one: The so-called Spanish flu first occurred on the side of the Entente powers and then, jumped over to the Germans after a couple of months. And that was certainly not because of US vaxxtroopers armed with syringes.
Until recently I would have agreed with you. I’ve read around this & learned a lot. Watch Curtis Cost’s presentation to get references to peer reviewed & published papers relating to this.
We’ve been lied to for decades.
cbkovess
I think it is very important to point out the malnutrition and poor living conditions. I want to add a question about the air quality – just imagine all that shelling and all those chemicals in the air plus fires, not to mention chlorine and mustard gas at various times. They were exposed to toxic air and probably polluted water in addition to malnutrition and stress so it is not surprising that disease broke out.
There is also the matter of the army delousing stations – I can’t remember which chemical was used but that was probably deleterious to good health too.
Hmmmm, where do we find an objective evaluation of the 1918 pandemic, given vested interests have motives for beating it up?
Curtis Cost presentation to MD4CE group has links to his work
https://rumble.com/v23xeh8-curtis-cost.html
His book is ‘All vaccines are dangerous’
Thanks BB, I hadn’t heard of Curtis Cost, will follow up.
He was new to me too until our MD4CE meeting!
He’s been vilified for being anti-black…. He’s black…. But obviously the wrong shade of black
Turtles All The Way Down, available on Ebay. Nuff said.
‘A short history of vaccines highlights the tremendous good that has been done for humanity with their development.’
A short history of vaccines, if Dr Dalgleish were to study it, would show him that all the old child-killing diseases – measles, scarlet fever, etc – were beaten and in full retreat, defeated by sanitation, clean water and vitamin C, before vaccination started.
The dearth of discussion and the suppression of statistics with regard to covid-jab side-effects is nothing new. The vaccine industry, through its bought political and media pawns, has operated a veto on criticism since the 19th century. Only encomia such as Dr D’s above are permitted. If you try to publicize the truth, there is no price you will not pay.
Statistics from New Jersey estimate the autism rate among MMR-jabbed children at one case in 14.
Dissolving Illusions | Disease, Vaccines, and the Forgotten History – Dissolving Illusions details facts and figures from long-overlooked medical journals, books, newspapers, and other sources. Using myth-shattering graphs, this book shows that vaccines, antibiotics, and other medical interventions are not responsible for the increase in lifespan and the decline in mortality from infectious diseases.
I’m sure many of us have read this but if not it is an eye opener – surprising really that any of our ancestors survived at all!
“A short history of vaccines highlights the tremendous good that has been done for humanity with their development.” Could Dr Dalgleish be any more wishy-washy or disingenuous? Do you still stand by your article pushing the Covid pseudo-vaccines on young, not remotely at risk people, especially, as you admitted, your son even acquired cardiac damage as a result of being injected, presumably having trusted your medical advice? Why on earth should people take anything you say seriously now or trust you know what is best for their health? As of Jan 2023 I’d say the writing’s on the wall about these toxic jabs and if you don’t have the humility to look back and accept you were dead wrong in your stance and the part you played in pushing these on people who were at absolutely no risk of being severely ill from the virus then you’ll understand that we distrustful sceptics, still capable of critical thinking, do not take anything you say seriously going forward.
And for everyone else; whether you are in the ”viruses don’t exist” camp or not, this is still a good video by Dr Sam Baily ( 19mins ) looking at the future of mRNA ‘vaccines’.
https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/whats-next-for-mrna-vaccines:2
Unlike the Smallpox, TB, Tetanus and Polio vaccines, neither the Adenovirus jabs or mRNA ones are vaccines.
They are experimental gene therapies. They should never have been classified as vaccines, but that was “necessary” for the Global Health Bureaucrats to gain the Emergency Use they wanted without completing the extensive research which would otherwise have been essential.
I’ve always been highly selective about what I have injected into me, but I don’t intend ever again having another vaccine or “vaccine.”
Spot on.
I would say one big problem for me is that the medics who questioned the ethics of injecting people with an experimental ‘therapy’…were both vilified or sacked….…the one that were happy to do it are the one’s still there!!
It’s a bit like going to a hospital or surgery, you know is full of mini-me Goebbels’….
It’s a very big problem eygum…
In Australia, most health practitioners can’t practice if they haven’t had the Covid jabs, they’re mandated.
Critical thinking health practitioners who were unable to give their voluntary informed consent to the jabs are cancelled out of the system.
This means the ‘health’ system is now populated with compliant people who will do what they’re told. These people are unlikely to call out wrongdoing because they’ve been conditioned to comply.
Wow. This makes for a dangerous ‘health’ system.
I’m horrified by what has occurred in Australia, with the widespread jab mandates, and other oppressive measures, which the medical ‘profession’ went along with.
Many mandates have been dropped now (although the damage is done). But they remain in place for many health workers, and a lot of these people willingly comply!
As you say: “It’s a bit like going to a hospital or surgery, you know is full of mini-me Goebbels’….”
Robert Kennedy Jnr…at Children’s Health Defence…have just posted the third part in relation to investigating the HPV vaccine…well worth a read (just put HPV in the search)
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/?s=HPV
Another person doing Stirling work on vaccines is Del Bigtree at the Highwire…this is a truly frightening episode, with shocking statistics and testimony….and very watchable…
https://thehighwire.com/videos/del-bigtree-explains-why-it-aint-just-the-covid-vax/
This information on HPV is not new–I decided against giving my younger two the vaccine at least 10 years ago. The governor of Texas was pushing an HPV mandate for school kids, and there was much pushback based on reports of adverse effects, ineffectiveness against most strains, and observation that most infections resolve on their own. Nevertheless, I still got annual flu shots at work and the two-dose shingles vaccine in 2019. My knowledge of the HPV vaccine was enough to avoid this latest drug. But now I’m suspicious of all vaccines.
Survey from the ‘coalface’:
‘…vaccination uptake in England for the last flu season (2013–2014) was only 54.8% for healthcare workers with direct patient contact.’
https://bmjopenrespres.bmj.com/content/2/1/e000079
‘Those eligible include young children, people over 65, pregnant women and those working in the health service.
Of these groups, it seems that NHS workers have the lowest rate of take-up, with just over 40% of staff – including those who have contact with patients and those who don’t – having had the jab.’
‘professor (Heneghan) said not all vaccines were equal and others such as the measles jab had clear evidence of their effectiveness.
He said the same evidence could not be claimed for the flu vaccination.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-42634781
Not exactly a ringing endorsement.
From the beginning it was planned to exploit children and get them on the hook for Covid jabs, purportedly to protect the elderly.
See my emails to:
Peter Openshaw and Arne Akbar – Is it ethical to vaccinate the young to purportedly protect the old? 6 September 2022.
Peter Doherty – The plan… Covid jabs won’t work in the old…so jab the young…who don’t need them. 14 September 2022.
Also see my BMJ rapid response:
Is it ethical to vaccinate children to protect the elderly? 5 August 2020.
Just to say that I do not share the general anti-vaccine opinion that people have posted here. There is ample scientific evidence that exposure to a small dose of the real disease or to a simulated or dead version of it can confirm immunity to the full-blown version. However, I accept the seemingly clear evidence of harmful side-effects (including death) caused to a significant number of people by the Covid vaccines.
On a lighter note, hasn’t Jenner been cancelled yet? He must have had slave-produced sugar in his tea.
Michael, it’s not a matter of “exposure to a small dose of the real disease or to a simulated or dead version of it…” This is a very simplistic description.
There’s an ever-increasing number of vaccine products, multi-component shots, and revaccinations on vaccination schedules.
These vaccine products have a variety of ingredients, e.g. a growing number are aluminium-adjuvanted, as I’ve described in other comments on this thread.
The use of the term ‘anti-vaccine’ to label people seeking accountability for the proliferation of vaccine products must stop. These are medical interventions being foisted upon mass populations who may never have been at serious risk of disease.
By way of background to my interest in this subject, I started off investigating over-vaccination of pets in 2008, after one of my dogs became ill and was put down after what I subsequently discovered was gross over-vaccination with modified live virus and inactivated vaccine products.
It’s notable that the WSAVA vaccination guidelines for dogs and cats recommend:
Meanwhile, vaccination of humans is going through the roof, increasing the potential for adverse reactions, and significantly increasing the coffers of vaccine manufacturers and their supporters.
The WSAVA dog and cat vaccination guidelines also note:
It’s the same in human vaccination, we have no idea of the real number of adverse events after vaccination, as there is great reluctance for adverse events to be acknowledged, as people are witnessing clearly now with the Covid jabs.
It’s way past time for scrutiny of taxpayer-funded vaccination policy and practice, and burgeoning vaccination schedules which are steeped in conflicts of interest.
I have now (only now?!) become very dubious of all vaccines and medical interventions as Dr Dalgleish suggests. Even more so having read up on the disgraceful shenanigans of Fauci and Gates.
It is wrong to compare smallpox vaccines with vaccines for respiratory viruses and possibly other. Smallpox is transmitted by contact and the patient only becomes infectious when the sores appear. They are ill with identifiable symptoms before they become infections and can be isolated. This is a big factor in the elimination of smallpox.
We have also been informed that vaccines injected into muscle tissue will not stop infection and transmission of respiratory viruses because the vaccine cannot reach the lungs and might only reduce the seriousness of infections when the virus moves to internal organs in the late stages of the disease. We need a vaccine that can be administered by spray into the lungs to deal with respiratory infections.