Following my recent communication about my very real concern over the recurrence of cancer in many of my melanoma patients who have been stable for long periods, at least five years and in one case 18 years, other oncologists have contacted me to say they are seeing the same phenomenon.
Seeing the recurrence of these cancers after all this time naturally makes me wonder if there is a common cause? I had previously noted that relapse in stable cancer is often associated with severe long-term stress, such as bankruptcy, divorce, etc. However I found that none of my patients had any such extra stress during this time but they had all had booster vaccines and, indeed, a couple of them noted that they had a very bad reaction to the booster which they did not have to the first two injections.
I then noted that some of these patients were not having a normal pattern of relapse but rather an explosive relapse, with metastases occurring at the same time in several sites. Obviously, I began to wonder whether the booster vaccines could be causing these relapses and were not just coincidence, as my colleagues were willing to suggest.
Within a three-month period I have been able to identify eight people who have developed B-cell malignancies following the booster, with two of them reporting that they instantly felt very unwell after the booster, having had no problem after the first two vaccines, then describing the symptoms of extreme exhaustion and long Covid before being investigated and finding out that they had a B-cell leukaemia in two cases, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in five and a very aggressive myeloma in the other case.
Scientifically, I was reading reports that the booster was leading to a big excess of antibodies at the expense of the T-cell response and that this T-cell suppression could last for three weeks, if not more. To me, this could be causal as the immune system is being asked to make an excessive response through the humoral inflammatory part of the immune response against a virus variant which is no longer in existence in the community. This exertion leads to immune exhaustion, which is why these patients are reporting up to a 50% greater increase in Omicron, or other variations, than the non-vaccinated.
Having communicated these observations I was rapidly reminded that I had written an article, published in the Daily Mail in the middle of 2021, which encouraged people to get vaccinated, particularly younger people. This was a very thorough article, written under my name but essentially conducted by interview, for the purpose of condoning the vaccine rollout at the time. Although I had started to have concerns, the overwhelming push by the Government and the medical community was that this would be in everyone’s best interest. So the environment at that time was completely different to what it is now. Indeed, my own take on this was soon to change very dramatically when my own son developed myocarditis after having a jab he did not want but that he needed for work and travel purposes. I also then found out that one of his friends in his early 30s had suffered a stroke and that a niece of my close colleague had a fatal heart attack at the age of 34, having had the vaccine for her occupation as a nurse! I began to be highly alarmed that it was the vaccines causing these symptoms, and that just as we had written right at the very beginning of the pandemic, a genetically engineered virus had serious implications for vaccine design. This paper, which was suppressed and therefore did not appear in print for many months, reported that the sequence of the virus was completely consistent with having been genetically engineered, with a furin cleavage site and six inserts at places that would make the virus very infectious, and the reason this had such tremendous implications for vaccine design was that 80% of these sequences had homology to human epitopes. In particular, we had noticed a homology with platelet factor 4 and myelin. The former is also certainly associated with what is known as VITT (low platelets and clotting issues) and the latter associated with all the neurological problems, such as transverse myelitis, both of which are now recognised as side-effects of the vaccine even by the MHRA.
Although it took some time to get these findings out into press, they were delivered to and widely circulated to the Cabinet and various medical committees as we thought these observations were crucially important. Unfortunately, they were ignored.
However, the cases of myocarditis did not even need this trigger as young hearts over-express the ACE-receptor, which the virus had been trained in the laboratory to bind to with very high affinity and it is this that sets off the inflammatory response, which leads to myocarditis, pericarditis, stroke and deaths, which it is now clear are far more common in the under-40s than caused by the virus infection itself.
It was also shortly after this time that it became evident that the virus was attenuating, as all viruses do. In addition, treatment was improving so the virus was leading to fewer hospitalisations and deaths. I believe this is a very important factor to take into account as it was clear at the end of the first year that the pandemic was reducing and the virus becoming less aggressive, with the emergence of the Omicron variant, just as large sections of the population were being vaccinated.
In late 2021 it was becoming manifestly evident too that the vaccines were anything but safe and effective and that the disease was not nearly as problematic as it was at the beginning of 2020 when it was being rendered much worse with what I believed at the time to be ludicrous responses. These included both lockdown and the refusal to treat Covid as a respiratory airborne virus with consensus mechanisms but instead pushing patients on to a randomised trial, known as RECOVERY, which ended up showing what everyone knew: that if there is an acute inflammation in the lungs patients need dexamethasone. The early responses also included putting patients on ventilation, which now is known to be the last thing that should have been done as it seemed to encourage early death.
When the facts change, or new facts emerge, the position of all those in authority directing mandates should change but unfortunately, they did not.
I tried desperately to point out that all the evidence that vaccines might have been useful in helping to curtail the pandemic was changing; that it was becoming very clear that there were highly significant side-effects to the vaccine programme that Pfizer had gone to great lengths to cover up, and that it was only a court case in the U.S. that led to them becoming available. At this stage the whole vaccine programme should have been stopped but nobody seemed to want to address this, neither the Government, the medical authorities or the media.
Having written many articles for the Daily Mail arguing against lockdown and for it never to be used again, I was extremely keen to address my change of opinion on the vaccines and to warn people of their dangers particularly to younger people, and to point out there were no grounds at all for giving it to children. Unfortunately, all my efforts and approaches to the mainstream media on this subject have been rejected. This, I believe, is something that will come back to haunt all those who introduced an Orwellian kind of suppression to the emerging truth, which labelled doctors trying to save their patients along the lines of ‘first do no harm’ as outcasts or villains.
Angus Dalgleish is an expert in immunology and Professor of Oncology at St George’s Hospital Medical School, London. This article first appeared in TCW Defending Freedom.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
*Reverse Ferret Alert*
It is a good job he referred to the disgraceful article that I was just going to repost, where he urged young people to get a jab that they did not need and that would prove more harmful than beneficial. However, I see no regret or signs of remorse for the said article of bilge that he authored and the utter misinformation he was responsible for spreading.
Forgive me but here I am thinking an actual professor, no less, should know more than this non-medical person back in 2020 ( which I posted recently ) who stated very clearly and intelligently why they weren’t going to get a novel jab that they did not need, nor most of the population needed, as it happens. Shame on this ‘learned professor’ for the part he played in getting a toxic jab into as many arms as possible and turning his back on his oath, and in doing so supporting an incredibly harmful and destructive narrative.
Read this and learn, Prof, because this should have already been known to you and your ilk;
https://drtesslawrie.substack.com/p/paper-for-a-parliamentary-peer-so
one of the sad things about the jabs and the way they were effectively forced on us is that, for many people, it has destroyed our faith in the medical profession.
and that’s another indirect covid vaccine harm – people understandably and rightfully questioning everything pushed by the medical profession and refusing medication or treatments which are actually beneficial. as an example, other tried and tested vaccines (I think there is still a case to be made for some of them) will be refused as a result of all the outright lies and coercion and silence from the medical establishment.
Maybe a good thing
http://vaccinepapers.org/
Thanks for that link. Very interesting.
Absolutely. The net effect is not yet known, but isn’t it likely that confidence will have waned to the extent that normal activities are no longer trusted?
“one of the sad things about the jabs and the way they were effectively forced on us is that, for many people, it has destroyed our faith in the medical profession.”
Some people might argue that’s a good thing, though it would be sad if people went from one extreme – of blindly accepting everything medical doctors say – to the other extreme – of blindly rejecting everything medical doctors say, and throwing out the baby with the bathwater.
Blind faith in anyone or anything can be very risky. The only alternative to doing your own research is to do as you are told.
” it has destroyed our faith in the medical profession.”
Absolutely has destroyed my faith in everything – I’m just relieved I trusted my instincts and that I sought alternative opinions.
Agree, prior to covid hysteria I was more or less convinced that rational and scientific thinking and methods prevail eventually. That censorship, coercion and media lying are things which happen elsewhere, certainly, not in a democratic country. Past couple of years turned this believe on its head. Now, you’re safe to assume that pretty much everything where the government and shitty media want you to believe that the debate is settled, means exactly the opposite.
For me, the medical profession managed to do that all on its own a long time before the COVID pandemic was invented.
A recent (2020) example would be a refusal to treat by a so-called dentist (private) were the public reasoning boiled down to Because of this pills you’ve been prescribed to cope with the consequences of nobody being willing to pull your broken tooth, we unfortunately cannot pull your broken tooth (But we are so SORRY about that!).
Keep trying, Prof. Anywhere and everywhere.
Preaching to the choir here and on TCW but pester- power often wins out.
So you made recommendations, not based on solid evidence, but based on “the overwhelming push by the Government and the medical community”.
Shame on you.
And now you come here to complain that the media won’t listen to you. I’m afraid now you lie in the bed that you helped make.
I have no sympathy for you. If you and many others like you had had the integrity and courage not to let yourself be pushed, horrible things would not have happened.
Those same 3 sentences that you quote jumped out at me. “Condoning” implies acceptance of something that is regarded as morally wrong. He admits that he had concerns but, nevertheless (unbelievably!), went ahead with the article because “the overwhelming push by the Government and medical community was that this would be in everyone’s interest” and the environment then “was completely different”.
Wow! Truly, truly shocking to see that in black and white.
“In the wake of reports that people who have been doubly vaccinated are still catching Covid, some are arguing that this means the vaccine is ineffective.
Actually, the reality is quite the opposite. Those getting ill will have severely depleted immune systems. The only thing saving them, quite probably, is the vaccine. Without the jabs, they might well have died.”
“The speed at which it has all been done is part of the marvel. Trials that would normally take many years have been accomplished in weeks, because such vast resources have been made available.
But no corners were cut. All the various vaccines – AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Moderna and the rest – had to undergo rigorous safety checks.”
“A vaccine is a highly effective insurance policy against the disease – one which research has proven lasts at least six months.
THE TESTS WERE TOO RUSHED
This is a regular source of concern and anxiety. But consider the difference between this programme and all others: never before have so many scientists worked together, combining knowledge and pooling their results, in a global effort with a single goal.
The result was a set of vaccines that have proved highly effective against a brand new virus, and the UK jabbing programme was conducted with military efficiency.”
Just a few examples of how our Prof Dalgleish’s article from 2021 really did not age well and why people, especially those in the medical and scientific establishments, should be held accountable. The internet holds receipts and you won’t be getting off the hook so easily, rest assured.
One of my grandmother’s favourite expressions was “damned if you do, and damned if you don’t”. It looks like the professor is in that situation. There is little point in arguing now that he should have been more outspoken at the beginning of the vaxx rollout. I’d prefer that he and others admit mistakes were made rather than remain silent and hope it all blows over.
This poison is still being pushed, trials for other vaxxes using the toxic mrna technology are ongoing, while ignoring all the harm done, with a lot of guesswork as to what is the biggest cause of the vaxx injuries – the spike protein produced by the mrna, the LNP, the immune system response – probably all 3. The majority of doctors and HCWs are still silent, so when some do speak out, like Dr Malhotra and Prof. Dalgleish, this should be welcomed – this will only encourage more to follow suit. If all they can expect is attacks both from those who have much to hide and those who feel a reckoning is needed, we do not make advances on what I think at this point in time is the most important issue – halting the use of the covid vaxxes and making sure that a situation where hundreds of millions of people are tricked, lied to, bullied, shamed and coerced into taking an unsafe and ineffective chemical concoction cannot happen again. That when the pharma companies and their bought-and-paid for regulators try to push through untested, toxic drugs, they will resist more strongly.
Does the professor have a compilation of the documents sent to the cabinet and the medical committees, with dates when they were sent? The better the records in this respect, the easier to prove the negligence of the cabinet and medical committees in refusing to try to change course.
All he had to do, with regards to his 2021 article, was concede that he was wrong and regretted going along with the political/establishment pressure to uphold the narrative based on dogma alone, but if you re-read the above you will see no signs of regret in the role he played. This is of the utmost importance in how people perceive these ‘experts’ who should have known better from the start but decide to do a 180 because they can see the way public opinion ( plus the impossible to ignore safety issues and lack of efficacy ) has changed drastically over time. As it happens, as per my example above, lay people are proving to be more informed than actual academics and professors. Now why should that be, and why should they be allowed to get away with it? The public deserve an explanation and we want to see atonement, which I believe Dr Malhotra has already delivered in spades.
While I understand your argument, I struggle to agree.
This man and others like him who have changed their tune, are doing so without really properly acknowledging the damage they have done and worse still recognising that the only reason they are reassessing is because it hasn’t gone well.
Does he not realise that he contributed to the climate of hysteria by endorsing a treatment he had no idea worked properly? He’s not a layman. He’s a doctor. He has a. responsibility which he abdicated by his own admission because of pressure.
Russell Brand’s interview of Tim Robbins is another case of someone trying to turn himself into a “good person” after the fact. Watch it. Basically, after being all gung-ho about all the restrictions, Robbins only started to feel uncomfortable with the totalitarian measures when he started to realise they didn’t work. Now that it has all been a complete failure, he’s suddenly rediscovered his love of freedom.
The only thing that is saving us from a dystopian world (for now) is the complete and utter failure of everything they are trying. These people are simply now rushing to get on the right side of history. And if the pendulum swings again, you’ll be able to watch them rush back to the other side.
Quite agree. These people appear to expect a smooth transition from oppressor/part of the problem to saviour/part of the freedom movement with zero accountability. I’m sorry but I’m not a beggar who is grateful for crumbs thrown my way. These people are traitors and back-stabbers who completely lack integrity and ethics. They screwed us over from the outset with their lack of professionalism and adherence to the oaths they pledged and the onus was always on them to uphold the medical ethics that they’ve presumably abided by over the course of their careers and also to keep themselves up to speed on the unfolding and emerging scientific evidence regarding the scamdemic and gene-therapies. When a layperson is more well-read and informed than a professor then it really is a wake-up call regarding the corruption and lack of standards which is rife within the scientific and medical societies. Trust is destroyed, pure and simple.
Of course the media don’t want to know. For many reasons, not the least of which is that they are up to their necks in this – as is pretty much every other institution on Planet Earth.
Good reasons for the apparent “unforeseen consequences” are found in these two papers :-
https://dpbh.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/dpbhnvgov/content/Boards/BOH/Meetings/2021/SENEFF~1.PDF
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027869152200206X
That said, I’m sure the MHRA and JCVI were aware, so there’s absolutely nothing to worry about.
“So the environment at that time was completely different to what it is now.” Looks like a defensive argument under prosecution. It might depend on one’s understanding of “the environment”, I suppose, but the physical, or indeed biological facts have not changed, have they? Those who were promoting the use of a product which can cause real risks, in a manner which is dishonest, to say the least, can look forward to a loss of reputation at a minimum.
We can all have different feelings about whether someone should have known something, or behaved differently…and goodness knows I am so angry about this whole thing I feel as though I could literally throttle the perpetrators myself without any regrets.
But my Christian up-bringing makes me want to forgive (not forget) those who can admit to being wrong, or mis-lead, or even just stupid or cowardly, but who are now trying to make amends…I don’t know how else to deal or live with jabee friends and family otherwise!
I don’t expect others have to agree with me…
What is deeply worrying is if people like Dr Dalgleish can’t get the press and Government to listen, it shows what a state we are in…! As JaneG says..just keep plugging on…..
Not to mention that SADS (sudden adult death syndrome) is now off the scale. I had never heard of it before 2020. Nor have I ever seen so many defibrillators installed in public places , nor adverts on tv and radio suggesting really obscure things like loud noises or gardening can lead to heart attacks….it’s almost as if they knew what the side effects might be beforehand…imagine that….
I’m afraid I am just becoming angrier as I think about this particular slice of medical history.
To restate a point I made recently, how could it be that infectious disease specialists, with over a century of supposedly advanced diagnostic and treatment techniques, were left paralysed into inaction at the start of the outbreak?
Why did the profession stand by and deny the effectiveness of treatments when they had previously been known to work (the list is long but includes vitamin D, zinc, HCQ, IVM, and hydrogen peroxide mouthwash)?
I have also noted that the ethical orientation of the profession has in recent years been subtly altered. The simple straightforward Hippocratic oath (First, do no harm) has been extended to include a duty to have regard for a wider social responsibility. This clearly leaves doctors open to political manipulation.
it seems to me that the profession, to whom we have tried to attract the best and brightest, is one dominated by dogma, by status, and by fear. There are no incentives for doctors to question any established procedures or treatments – so we recruit these terribly clever people and the profession shuts them up. What a terrible waste of talent and money.
I welcome Dr Dalgliesh’s recent attempts to set the record straight, but he needs to look further and treat the disease, not just the symptom.
The reason the MSM doesn’t want to know about vaxxine injuries is because we no longer have a Free Press, they are ‘owned’ by outside sources and money talks.
there is only one way – to keep trying until it’s all over the media. otherwise nothing will ever change and we’re going to see more engineered viruses and rushed for profit vaxxes.
Andrew Bridgen MP has just claimed on GB News, (Nigel Farage show, speaking to Lawrence Fox), as I understand it, that he knows of executives of news organisations who would lose their jobs if they spoke out on “vaccine” harms. I challenge the Times muppets, if they are going to throw around comments dismissing people on this forum raising legitimate concerns about emergency use coronavirus medications as “anti-vaxxers”, to tell us if their journalist Oliver Wright, who has previously written on big pharma corruption (in the Independent, 2014) to come out and say whether Oliver Wright’s job with them would be safe if he now publicly raised similar concerns about (for example) Pfizer and this lucrative new medication they have been flogging. Muppets.
Big Pharma lobbyists exploit patients and doctors | The Independent | The Independent
Revealed: Big Pharma’s hidden links to NHS policy, with senior MPs saying medical industry uses ‘wealth to influence government’ | The Independent | The Independent
(Refresh page to reveal whole article?).
Me: November 2019 – surgery to remove a large stage 1 meningioma from my overworked brain. 2020-2021 – vaccines and boosters. November 2022 – surgery to remove two small stage 2 meningiomas. SMH, FML. What times we live in.
Thanks for the article. The anecdotes presented on cancer relapse are alarming, so lets hope they are as incorrect as the statements made by this so-called expert in immunology.
A brief summary of some of the more embarassing errors in the daily mail article:
“Having the jab is also in the younger age group’s interest. Without collective immunity, many of the good things in life – holidays abroad, gap years, music festivals and sports events – might never properly return.”
It’s entirely false to assume that, because a bout of Covid seems mild or asymptomatic, it cannot leave lasting damage.
A vaccine is a highly effective insurance policy against the disease – one which research has proven lasts at least six months.
It’s the most ambitious, daring, brilliant human accomplishment in decades. Why wouldn’t every single person, whatever their age, want to be a part of that?
But no corners were cut. All the various vaccines – AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Moderna and the rest – had to undergo rigorous safety checks.
The point is almost all drugs potentially have a side-effect. Packets of paracetamol, for instance, list skin rashes, itching, swelling of the mouth or face, shortness of breath, mouth ulcers, bleeding gums, unexplained bleeding and more.
Lizards do not grow into man-eating monsters when exposed to radiation, and vaccines do not change our DNA.
But there is no reliable evidence, none at all of which I am aware, that proves the jab has ever affected fertility.
But many younger people have compromised immune systems too. There’s often no way of knowing until it’s too late. You really don’t want to find out by suffering a serious bout of Covid.
In the wake of reports that people who have been doubly vaccinated are still catching Covid, some are arguing that this means the vaccine is ineffective.Actually, the reality is quite the opposite. Those getting ill will have severely depleted immune systems. The only thing saving them, quite probably, is the vaccine. Without the jabs, they might well have died.