There follows a guest post by Child and Adolescent Clinical Psychologist Dr. Zenobia Storah, Professor of Psychology Ellen Townsend, Clinical Professor of Public Health Allyson Pollock and Psychotherapist Sarah Waters, who say children were subjected to all manner of unevidenced and harmful interventions during the pandemic, not least of which was frequent testing, and we must now prioritise their recovery and ensure it never happens again.
Twice-weekly asymptomatic testing for COVID-19 was introduced in secondary schools in the U.K. in January 2021. Although guidance was specific to secondary education, many primary schools, nurseries and pre-schools also requested routine testing of children in their care. Regular self-testing by students has also been required at colleges and universities.
In the last month, the Government removed its testing advice for staff and pupils in most schools. We welcome this change. Mass testing has been harmful for many, especially for children. Indeed, experts have cautioned against asymptomatic mass testing. The lack of evidence on impact on transmission, high costs, and likely diversion of resources from important activities such as mental health support have all been cited. Incredibly, even though mass testing is screening, the U.K. Government ignored the Wilson and Junger 1968 principles of screening and never sought the advice of the National Screening Committee. We are not aware of any evidence-base for this policy or any risk assessment regarding potential psychological or physical harms.
Swabbing for either PCR or lateral flow devices (LFDs) is an unpleasant and invasive procedure that is distressing to children. In October 2020, when testing was introduced in Italian schools, paediatricians raised concerns about the risks posed by nasopharyngeal swabs, including the breakage of the swab with subsequent inhalation and possible injury to the nasal, oral and pharyngeal mucosa. Subsequently questions were raised in the European Parliament. Disappointingly there has been little interest in such concerns from professionals and policy-makers in the U.K.
Risk of psychological trauma has also been ignored despite widespread acknowledgement amongst parents of children’s distress during testing. Conditioned distress responses have been reported in young children, with older children displaying anxiety around testing, parents restraining children when swabbing, children exhibiting fear responses to parents following testing, and teens experiencing social embarrassment due to physical responses including vomiting following self-testing in school. Staff running testing centres confirm that these stories are commonplace and professionals have expressed concerns. Given that many nursery and school leadership teams insist on testing and that those administering tests are aware of these harms, lack of evaluation of this policy is unacceptable.
Wider-reaching psychological impacts have also been ignored. Routine testing of children teaches them that they are vectors of disease and a risk to others. It places on them a moral and civic obligation to subject themselves to invasive procedure for the supposed benefit of the community. Testing also normalises behaviours which are symptomatic of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder or health anxiety. We have observed parents who, encouraged by Government messaging, behave as if they have a version of factitious disorder in relation to Covid testing. Psychologically problematic practices have been promoted and become normalised. We have similar concerns with relation to other interventions imposed on children, including face masks, social distancing and over-rigorous hand hygiene regimes.
There is no precedent for a generation of children being routinely subjected to such practices. We can only hypothesise as to immediate and long-term consequences. However, we can extrapolate from existing knowledge of the sensitivity of children’s brain to environmental influences and stressors that there is real potential for significant harm. This may include instilling and normalising obsessive compulsive or health anxious behaviours, damage to children’s sense of self and safety, their relationships, their trust in authority and care-givers, and their capacity to engage in normal social interaction and intimacy, both currently and long-term.
The last two years have taken a devastating toll on the well-being of children and young people. There is now compelling evidence of a significant increase in distress amongst children and young people since March 2020. There is also increasing evidence of physical harm to children as a result of the pandemic response. It is clear that for children and young people, COVID-19 does not pose significant risk. However, they are facing an unprecedented crisis of mental health and well-being. As we move to ‘living with the virus’, we must prioritise their recovery. Resources should now be redirected towards promoting health and well-being. Policy-makers and professionals should be reminded of trauma-informed practice – a concept promoted and accepted widely in schools and colleges pre-pandemic, through initiatives such as THRIVE and the Trauma-Informed Schools programme – and urgently promote recovery.
In the U.K., pre-pandemic, the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child was universally endorsed. Our legal, clinical and educational systems reflected the principle that children’s best interests are paramount. It is disturbing that, during the pandemic, this principle was forgotten. We must ask ourselves how we got to a point where young people were routinely subjected to harmful and unevidenced interventions. As we support their recovery, we must ensure that they are never subjected to such experiences again.
Dr. Zenobia Storah is a Child and Adolescent Clinical Psychologist who currently serves as Clinical Lead at the Knowsley Neurodevelopmental Pathway in Liverpool.
Dr. Ellen Townsend is Professor of Psychology in the Self-Harm Research Group at the University of Nottingham.
Dr. Allyson Pollock is Clinical Professor of Public Health at Newcastle University.
Sarah Waters is a Psychotherapist and DDP Practitioner.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Of all the crimes committed by our government these last two years the ways they have treated our children must be near the very top of the inhumanity league.
I could gladly see the lot Hung out to dry for this.
The fault also lies with the parents who aided and abetted this wholesale abuse. Like the government.
It does, but those parents were misled, bullied and manipulated by the government and its employees. When the sainted NHS told them what to do, they obeyed because they had trust in that organisation, just as they trust in everything the nanny state tells them.
I’m sorry, but I have no sympathy for this argument.
There is no virtue in being obedient and people who blindly trust state institutions are incredibly foolish.
You don’t get any brownie points for suspending your critical thinking capabilities.
You wouldn’t have sympathy for someone who beat his children with a stick every day because a government institution said it would help drive covid away.
Well, I don’t have sympathy for those who thought shoving a stick up children’s noses regularly made sense.
And to say they had no choice is BS. There would have been a small price to pay. But they preferred the convenience of going along.
You don’t get any brownie points for suspending your critical thinking capabilities.
Absolutely – and you don’t get them for cowardice disguised as “doing the right thing”. For whom?
And to say they had no choice is BS
I never said they had no choice. I was just pointing out the manipulative pressure being put on them. Many parents (including, I am proud to say, my son and his wife) resisted the coercion but let’s acknowledge that the coercion should never have been used.
People should stand up to bullies, but others shouldn’t be bullying them in the first place.
People should stand up to bullies, but others shouldn’t be bullying them in the first place.
Yes – absolutely. They are the true villains – and there’s a distressingly large number of them. I include all the doctors who should have known better.
You underestimate the power of the various psychological manipulation agencies that governments put into action.
Always remember that the reason that you weren’t affected (perhaps) is because they didn’t need to target you — the most efficient method for them was the influence the easiest 3/4 or so, and let their hate drive the remainder into silence.
I’d suggest that if they did make the effort to target you then you might well have succumbed also (this is the ‘marketing’ argument — if you don’t respond to an advert the argument is that it is because you weren’t targeted, not because you’re better at seeing through the marketing).
That said, there’s much evidence to suggest that about 25% of the population are much more difficult to influence and perhaps there’s very little point in attempting to influence them, and you’re better off just using peer hate instead (eg, the Asch conformity experiments).
I understand your argument. It depends heavily on the idea that you have to take human nature for what it is.
As I see it, the argument is a cop out.
Firstly, leaders also have their nature and are very prone to grabbing power and, if given half a chance, taking advantage of others.
Why are we to expect those in power not to engage in psychological manipulation, in other words, to do better, but then can’t expect the general public to be engage in some critical thinking for a change and also do better?
There is something dangerous about the public cleansing itself of responsibility and shifting the blame entirely onto political leaders and officials.
The reasons for lockdowns, the terrible treatment of the elderly, of children, the succumbing to the panic and the fear, all lie in the heart of every individual. Why did they give in to the fear? Why were they incapable of standing up against what was clearly wrong?
Those who went along with what is objectively speaking the wholesale abuse of the population and have since changed their minds about it need to reflect on what made them suspend their better judgment.
Only if they are able to understand that will we have a chance of doing better in the future. Trying to pin all the blame of those in power is, to me, a cop out that will lead to more of the same in the future.
Hear hear! I completely agree. No excuses and no sympathy here either. There is zero excuse for being ill-informed, especially if your sole source of information is via your TV set. This just sets a dangerous and worrying precedent for the future, in my opinion. For instance, what if the government and health advisors came out and said that the tests are more accurate if an anal swab is performed? How many brain-dead, half-witted parents would follow that advice, like obedient automatons, doing precisely zero research of their own, and go ahead and anally swab their kids on the regular? It sounds far-fetched but it does make you wonder just how far this mass psychosis and normalization of child abuse would go. Look at that famous experiment where members of the public gave “electric shocks” to a screaming person all because they were told to do so and were told they’d be absolved from the responsibility of causing harm.
This fails to take into consideration that not all parents have the same educational background. The middle class in general is fundamentally hamstrung by the way the education system has taught the concept of education. No one expects you to give “brownie points” for anything. It is NOT FAIR to assume that everyone has critical thinking capabilities, or that they have been taught to use them. People have been deliberately taught to follow rules, to value the correct response over breadth of thought. This goes back a long way. It is no accident that the people most likely to stick things up their children’s noses three times a week are the same people who do everything the ‘rules’ require. That is what they have been taught. Honestly. People I know, some of them otherwise very intelligent, absolutely believe they have done the right thing. They were taught that. They are loyal. Unselfish. Law abiding. Polite. Caring. Humble. Don’t boast. Don’t lead, don’t risk, this is all TAUGHT.
Do not assume that everyone is coming from the the same basic position of ability. Many people are absolutely convinced that ‘criticism’ is a bad thing. It means being told you are wrong. How can people who have been so failed by education possibly think with any clarity?
People I know, some of them otherwise very intelligent, absolutely believe they have done the right thing. They were taught that. They are loyal. Unselfish. Law abiding. Polite. Caring. Humble. Don’t boast. Don’t lead, don’t risk, this is all TAUGHT.
I understand what you’re saying. But victimhood of any kind is bad for us. We must find our courage, and question our own situation and what we are told about it.
Without courage, I see these people (I know such people too) become disloyal to family members and friends who do not comply.
I see them show remarkable selfishness in allowing or endorsing the experimental injection of children, in order to make themselves feel more secure.
I see their politeness and caring stop when it comes to the “unvaccinated”; and I see them as anything but humble about their sources of knowledge compared to those of others.
They engage in virtue-signalling, which is a form of boasting. As for not leading or taking risks, there is no moral virtue in this. It’s merely timidity, at best.
They might well be law-abiding. So were the citizens of Nazi Germany and every other totalitarian state where the law trampled over the humanity of others.
I understand. I do. I just think its best not to generalise. Its like the thing with the boat – we’re not all in the same boat. Some people can’t, literally can’t, think in more than one dimension. And what we did is HARD. Pulling your child out of school is HARD. Not making them wear a mask when everyone else is is HARD. Not jabbing her was actually the easiest, lots of people i know drew the line at jabbing their kids.
All I’m really saying is, don’t assume everyone had the same information you/we had. The lies were so hard to fight, even though I was …. Mostly sure I was right. Most of the time. But its hard when you are alone, when you know everyone thinks you’re crazy.
I wore a mask when required because I do not want to stand out. Because if the sceptics lose, and we go down, I am afraid for my child’s future and I don’t want her any more obviously smelling of rebellion than she already does.
We looked for the information – because that’s what you have to do. Not on every subject, of course: but when something has been turned into a life and death issue, that is required. Unless you want someone else to take the responsibility for you.
Doing hard things is part of life. Being “unvaccinated” in parts of Australia at the moment is still bloody hard – believe me. We deal with it, because we refuse to be bullied. If we all submit, what hope is there for any child’s future?
I have no problem with the people who took the jab rather than lose their job, and every sympathy.
You do sometimes have to bend with the wind, and survive. But those who complied when they did not have to comply are different matters entirely. They have made things harder for others, in order to have what they regard as easier lives for themselves
Dammit. I was so hoping you would say, don’t worry. We’re not going down.
We’re not.
Bending with the wind is a necessity. So is understanding that it can blow from other directions.
I don’t mind doing hard things – that’s where the learning takes place. People who make a habit of submission and compliance only learn not to respect themselves.
This is not a valid defense in my view. Parents who went along with this placed more value on the desire to be seen to be doing the right thing than the health and wellbeing of their children. As parents we all had a choice. We all knew that lateral flow tests were unreliable and that covid was such a low risk to children. We could all see that constant testing, mask wearing and vaccinations weren’t making covid go away. We didn’t need evidence that it didn’t work…all parents could see it with their own eyes.
I didn’t mean it as a defence. Just pointing out the facts of the situation.
I had the privilege of watching a cousin fighting successfully to ensure that his child was not forced to wear a mask. Lucky child – knowing he was protected, and being given an example of standing up for principle.
My kid was the only one in the class not wearing a mask or who didn’t bring the self tests home weekly. All it took was a message to the headmaster and teacher. Minimal effort involved. But 19 other kids either had brainwashed or apathetic parents, which was just tragic in my view. It was only ever “strongly advised”, never mandatory.
A very important point. In my cousin’s case, he had to fight a mandate – and even that could be defeated.
Children have to matter more to their parents than pleasing or appeasing authorities.
Alot of them wanted to go on holiday!
International travel is not necessarily about ‘going on holiday’ – it’s about a freedom to go where you like.
And what’s wrong with wanting to go on holidays anyway?
I must respectfully disagree. It’s basically child abuse being carried out by the primary care-giver ( usually a parent ) under the guise of public health promotion by the authorities. The abused ( parents ) become the abusers towards their kids because they are complicit in this farce. Adults can at least consent and do their own due diligence, kids cannot be expected to do so and trust adults to have their safety and wellbeing as a priority. This has always gone on with regards to sexual, physical and emotional abuse but this is just another type of abuse as far as I’m concerned, and normalizing it by minimizing the negative effects just makes it all the more wicked. I do feel the long-term harms of masking, testing and Covid jabbing kids, not to mention the extensive damage lockdowns have done to kids, cannot be underestimated. It makes me shiver to think what else these pathetic excuses for parents would do to their kids if an authority figure told them to do so. It’s bad enough that parents are needlessly enrolling them in the biggest medical experiment the world has ever seen.
This Government now only answers to Globalist authorities and the WEF – the rest is just sham.
Councils now to be offered £10,000 for every individual Ukrainian they house – no family ties etc necessary. ( So, £10,000,000 for 1,000 Ukrainians – will they use it to fill the potholes or redecorate County Hall?)
Where has Sunak found the money?
Poor households can expect a £3,000 fuel bill to help support our Government’s declared Economic War against Russia.
No-one bats an eyelid.
Is this what a country being ‘taken down’ before our eyes feels like?
Yep!
Where have the councils found accommodation for ‘refugees’ when there has been a waiting list for council houses several miles long for the past 40 years!
There was a story about a Russian soldier who deserted his tank for a 10,000 USD prize. So a billion USD might be enough to make 100,000 Russian soldiers desert and end the war. But of course, it makes more sense to spend 100 billion USD on own military expenses next year…
P.S. In Germany alone several billion USD were spent by government on masks…
Adults can also be brainwashed. Whenever children are involved there also needs to be an independent person asking whether the children are adequately protected.
Society has gone mad over the last 18 months (the first few months of covid were somewhat rational) — the problem has been the silencing of any voice that didn’t go along with the madness.
Errrrr…….Scotland tried that with their ‘Named Person’ scheme.
Not good. Thankfully it was defeated, so far.
Exactly. The old “just following orders” excuse, as if that lets them off the hook. That doesn’t fly with me. It’s pathetic how malleable many people have become, even to the extent of putting the safety and wellbeing of their kids at risk. As the meme says; “You either learn from history or you trust the government. You can’t do both.”
Agree, first fault is with the parents.
I knew 22 months ago that only very old and, or infirm people were the only ones in danger of the “flu”. I would like to believe that the government, egged on by marxist Sage, and the ever socialist public sector unions just panicked!
A lot of the west seemed to do the same, so I am not really sure.
Do we get big pharma(like America), and socialism running our country from now on? Not in my name.
“Our legal, clinical and educational systems reflected the principle that children’s best interests are paramount. It is disturbing that, during the pandemic, this principle was forgotten.”
So, a bit like the way ethics in general was discarded.
Oh well, ‘lessons will be learned.’
Astonishing. They knew they had a duty to protect children and defend their interests, but they forgot.
Perhaps it wasn’t a principle at all. Perhaps it was just one of those things you say because it sounds like something you ought to do.
It’s a stick with which to beat the plebs but the authorities do as they please. That’s why cops drive while using hand held devices and politicians and civil servants have parties while the rest of us are locked up.
Spot on.
Why now? Big Pharma, SAGE & the Government knew fine well the damage that they were unleashing. Soon after roll out (Dec 2020) a handful of principled journalists and experts (both very much in the minority) began speaking out, with many imploring the government to immediately stop what it was doing. From December 2020 to March 2021 the info kept building up.
I reference the following 2 episodes of UK column, but there are several more – including an interview with Debi Evans SRN who outlines the dangers of untrained, unqualified people carrying out a nasal swab, which includes brain damage. .
Unfortunately I keep coming back to this point, why are all these medics (and journalists) keen to put their heads up now, but were utterly conspicuous by their absence last year when it really mattered and this lunacy could have been prevented? Article after article of virtue signalling or of the ‘it mustn’t happen again’ variety (or both) does not make up for the shameful silence that led to millions of kids being locked down, tested and then vaxxed – with the inherent lifelong consequences.
But they didn’t know many will say, b*****x I say. Read this from over a year ago.
Better late than never, but yes I wholeheartedly agree
I’m not sure better late than never is quite right.
If they think by changing their minds we are all good now, they’re completely mistaken.
Until I see some self-awareness of the personal mistake made and why, I have literally zero guarantee they won’t do something similar again in the future under similar circumstances.
Like.. for example… jump on the Putin is a monster and Russia is terrible bandwagon.
Totally agree. Lots of so-called sceptics are coming out of the woodwork now, despite most of them really knowing what was going on 2 years ago. Obviously feeling braver now that restrictions are disappearing.
Yes my father in law is like this – always berating the restrictions behind our closed door but would then obey the rules and politely shuffle along in his filthy mask (probably used the same one from July 20 all the way through) he said never again when the mask’s were reversed, but then obliged willingly when they were re-reversed again earlier this year/late last.
On Ukraine, he’s the same – agrees with some of my points and then sticks the BBC on and has the temerity to lambast Putin for putting out propaganda.
I can’t find the UKC episode with the Debi Evans SRN interview about the use of 6″ swabs (it was from March plus or minus 2021), but I did find this recording of it on BNT. WARNING: not for the squeamish!
Another topic that is currently not part of the public enquiry – because it is indefensible.
Yeah just gloss over the physical harm from these Made In China weaponised pieces of crap:
Antionietta Gatti | Analysis of Covid Test swabs | Planet Lockdown
https://www.bitchute.com/video/TrkiY1ZMXlo3/
ABRASIVE “Porcupine” Swabs: Dr. Antonietta Gatti’s Research On Covid Swab Elemental Composition
https://www.bitchute.com/video/UMTvSOpTR7Jm/
PCR Swab Test Examination for Ethylene Oxide?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/cD5bJfBQ5u7H/
These people are missing the point entirely.
Forcing children to take these tests made lots and lots of money for the Tories chums.
Just as getting parents to get their children vaccinated makes lots and lots of money for the right people (not just the covid jabs but all of the toxic vaccines).
Just like all the PCR testing, track and tracing and the four injections (which will become annual injections if not more frequent) have made the right people lots and lots of money.
Exposing children to serious meical harm because it makes the right people lots of money is nothing new, it is just that on this occasion it has been a bit more intense.
Admission, I havent read the whole piece.
Do the signatories state how many times they have petitioned the government, their MPs and their regulatory board about this over the last two years?
The pointless evil continues – they grip their trashed narrative with teeth of steel and the children are sacrificed.
An amoral darkness spreads across the world and our UK Government and Institutions were sold out to the project years ago!
Follow the money – ultimately the Bankers are to blame!
Meanwhile, the sheep discuss their holiday plans, the latest Covid graphs, where they will be allowed to go and their latest “Covid Test”
All you had to do was say no. None of my kids were ever tested once and no pressure was put on them by school to do so. I will never understand why parents agreed to have their children routinely swabbed for a disease that didn’t pose any risk to them. I’ve given them out to kids as a form tutor (well, unless I ‘forgot’
) – imagine what that was like for a sceptic…
my kids’ primary school was on the relaxed end. mine weren’t tested once. they staggered the drop off times – but most people have kids in different classes so it just meant lots of people hanging round in the playground chatting to each other and kids playing together – not what they were intending I expect
Let’s not forget:
If you are not poorly you don’t need a test.
If you are poorly you don’t need a test because NHS guidance states if you have cold / ‘flu-like symptoms go home and treat like ‘flu.
Of course the above only applies if you believe in the efficacy of tests. If you don’t believe in the efficacy of tests –
Don’t Test.
given that zoe is correct, we will hit a peak in new infections by about the 28th of march and it will fall rapidly from there
No restrictions, no masks, vaccines, no lockdown this time – but the curves will be indistinguishable
A bit like Sweden from the first wave.
exactly
Tell about this experiment to the German government (and gullible population). Actually, don’t bother, the idiots won’t listen.
Boris Johnson is a child abuser.
Whenever ‘children are involved’ you’ve got to be extra careful; they are a complex group that are easily influenced by adults, generally have limited capacity to voice their concerns and are overly impacted by peer-pressure.
But when it came to Covid our authorities just ignored this, and barged on with their ill thought through plans.
What’s worse, they even took advantage of the very aspects of children that need the most care — in particular, there was a stated intention to take advantage of peer pressure to get children to comply (whether masks or vaccines) — this is deeply unethical and should have raised alarm bells ringing.
The ‘trouble’ with children, of course, is that all too soon they become young adults — if at that point they think they’ve been taken advantage of then society might well have a serious problem on its hands (and quite right too — there should be repercussions of our collective folly).
Wasn’t there a moment of the youth rising up against the folly inflicted on them by adults? August 2011? On Saint Boris’s watch too (when he was London mayor)? Admittedly sheep syndrome played a big part in that, but it could happen again, if there is a moment when the young adults realise that they were totally done over by the suited liars they are told to vote for.
Some kids in Finland walk and cycle home from school wearing face masks. It has already become a ‘new normal’ here. How the Chinese must be laughing, destroying ‘the west’ from the inside – not a shot fired, just manufacturing face masks and shearing the sheep of their money.
As a parent, a wonderful piece.
As a cold, passionless observer, the psychological stresses exacted on children were a feature, not a bug.
Everything was deliberate, TPTB knew what they were doing and need a final, terrible reckoning.
Everything was deliberate, TPTB knew what they were doing and need a final, terrible reckoning.
I recall an interview with RFK Jnr, in which he said that this was “the fight of our lives” – Armageddon. I felt instinctively that he was right.
I knew that I was seeing evil – on a massive, bold and reckless scale. I didn’t want to see it, but it was inescapable.
I especially didn’t want to see all those who preferred to just go along with it, hoping it would all be over one day without too much trouble for themselves.
This has not been innocent, hapless blundering. There must be a reckoning. The mass crimes against children – starving to death in countries where supply chains have been shockingly disrupted; terrified, poked, prodded, gagged and experimentally injected – cry to the heavens.
Klaus Schwab (WEF) Wants Everyone Microchipped!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFhdHTcE4ac
Dr. Steve Turley
Saturday 26th March 1pm to 3pm
Yellow Boards LONDON
Junction Victoria St/Bressenden Pl
London SW1E 5NA
Stand in the Park Sundays from 10am – make friends & keep sane
Wokingham Howard Palmer Gardens
(Cockpit Path car park free on Sunday)
Sturges Rd RG40 2HD
Telegram http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell
I wonder if Herr Schweird is allergic to high velocity lead…..?
Enshrined in Statute (Lol) in English/Welsh/N.Irish law :-
The interests of the child shall be paramount.
Err, until we use them to protect granny etc.
Never forget, the bastards are STILL encouraging that kids be jabbed.
I do dread to think if this is the reaction by the state over a tiny risk factor over these last two yrs, what on earth would be the reaction if a virus came along with a much greater risk factor.
Billy’s working on it so I guess we’ll find out soon enough.
Some of the people addicted to testing swap stories with each other. One that’s doing the rounds is that the majority of hospitalised people are unjabbed, which is a reversal of the truth. I once tried disabusing them by pointing out the truth; the howls of anger and emotion were enough to dislodge their masks. Never again.
Germany has recently switched from testing all school children 5 times a week to only 3 times a week…
Today, VAERS is reporting a total 96 deaths for children, including 2 deaths for babies under 6 months! I cannot believe that parents are putting their kids through this.
Whitty ,SAGE and a scientifically ignorant bunch of politicians still do not recognise that this is not and never was a Pandemic of the under 30! The ‘Waitrose Warriors’ , still masked and leaping around and still pursuing exile for the unvaccinated forced at the unvaccinated, demanded the innocent sacrifice their education , social development and yes their health.
It makes it even worse when the test(s) are complete and utter medically meaningless and scientific lies and garbage!!
Are there not grounds for prosecution of those responsible for forced testing and masking of children?
“It” was not a pandemic.