- “Covid cases among over-70s hit highest ever levels” – Office for National Statistics finds around one in 23 in the age group has the virus – a higher prevalence than at the height of the winter Omicron wave, reports the Telegraph.
- “Ministers failed to allow Parliament opportunity to scrutinise UK Covid laws” – A cross-party committee of MPs said the Coronavirus Act was passed in an ‘unsatisfactory’ manner, reports the Guardian.
- “N.H. House Approves Bill for Ivermectin ‘Standing Order’ in Pharmacies” – The New Hampshire’s state House approved a bill making ivermectin available by a medical prescribers’ “standing order,” meaning pharmacists will be able to dispense the medication without individual prescriptions, reports TrialSite News.
- “CDC Removes 24% of Child COVID-19 Deaths, Thousands of Others” – The U.S. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has removed tens of thousands of deaths linked to COVID-19 to resolve a “coding logic error”, reports the Epoch Times. El Gato Malo is suspicious.
- “Moderna seeks FDA authorisation for fourth dose of Covid shot” – Drugmaker Moderna asked the Food and Drug Administration on Thursday to authorise a fourth shot of its COVID-19 vaccine as a booster dose for all adults, reports the Associated Press.
- “Family of marketing executive, 45, who died of a stroke caused by the AstraZeneca jab say she is ‘dismissed as collateral damage’ as they fight for £120,000 payout” – Nicola Weideling suffered catastrophic bleeds on her brain after being hospitalised with blood clots caused by the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine she received just 24 days before she died, reports the Mail.
- “Wetherspoon’s pub trade returns to near pre-pandemic levels” – Pub giant JD Wetherspoon said sales in the past three weeks have been slightly below pre-pandemic levels as it more than halved its losses amid the continued recovery in trade, the Mail reports.
- “Is China about to abandon Zero Covid? Lockdown is eased in Shenzhen” – China’s southern tech powerhouse Shenzhen has partially eased lockdown measures, after President Xi Jinping stressed the need to “minimise the impact” of Covid on the economy, the Mail reports.
- “Hospital restrictions remain absurd and cruel” – Many NHS sites are still imposing draconian and vindictive policies; children are being separated from parents and dying relatives are being abandoned to a lonely end, says HART.
- “Reports of child deaths in the VAERS” – HART reviews the 28 reports of deaths of children in the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System within six weeks of a Covid vaccine, arguing children have all of the risk and none of the benefit of vaccination.
- “How many times must they be told that masks make things worse?” – The evidence has been clear since early on and continues to grow that masks are hazardous to health, writes Kathy Gyngell in TCW Defending Freedom.
- “How Volatile Is Offshore Wind?” – It is commonly claimed that the wind is much more constant and reliable in the North Sea and around Britain’s coasts than it is inland – but it’s not true, says Paul Homewood in Not a Lot of People Know That.
- “Net Zero? Let the people decide” – If the pandemic has taught us anything it is that the Government following ‘the Science’ cannot be relied upon on to tell the whole truth on Net Zero any more than it did on Covid, writes Chris Davies in Bournbrook.
- “Cut speed limits and introduce car free Sundays to beat Putin oil shock, says IEA” – The International Energy Agency has called for radical measures not seen since the 1970s crisis to cope with the fall in supply, reports the Telegraph.
- “Going full ‘Extinction Rebellion’ will not defeat Vladimir Putin” – Don’t cut speed limits to beat the Russian despot, just drill for more oil, writes Matthew Lynn in the Telegraph.
- “Tony Sewell: ‘I was cancelled for my race report – but now I feel completely vindicated’” – The man who concluded that Britain is not racist describes his anger at vocal critics who seemingly took offence without reading his words, the Telegraph reports.
- “This is the end of free speech online” – The U.K.’s Online Safety Bill is an authoritarian nightmare, writes Fraser Myers in Spiked.
- “Lia Thomas’s victory is a defeat for women’s sport” – There is nothing fair or inclusive about allowing a male-bodied athlete to compete against women, writes Ella Whelan in Spiked.
- “Boris can’t ignore the culture wars forever” – The PM has a plan to deal with racial inequality – but will he go through with it, asks Henry Hill in UnHerd.
- “Equalities Minister says children should not be forced to take knee” – Kemi Badenoch said the idea of teaching race ideology is “absolutely terrifying” as she branded critical race theory “morally wrong” and insisted traditional values should not be thrown away, reports the Mail.
- “Why it was a mistake for Ofcom to remove Russia Today” – In conflicts, there is always a temptation to mirror the tactics of one’s opponents – which is why it’s depressing to see Ofcom do so by taking Russia Today (RT) off air, writes Fraser Nelson in the Spectator.
If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
About those “record-high” cases among people over 70, note that it was also true in Scotland as well as England, so anything about it being somehow due to Boris or Freedom Day is clearly spurious.
Don’t quibble, stick with the narrative.
LOL, the narrative has collapsed faster than formerly healthy young athletes on the field after getting jabbed.
Never forget that, just like the covid panic measures, these costs imposed on the British people are entirely self-inflicted (or rather, imposed on the ordinary folk of the nation by our political elites).
They result from the choice to side with one side over another in a remote conflict in which we have no moral duty to get involved on either side, and little real interest in the outcome, layered on top of climate alarmist panic measures imposed for decades now – again, a choice by our elites, to impose harsh consequences upon the nation as a whole.
Consent for these decisions is manufactured by heavy, emotionally manipulative propaganda twinned with the suppression of dissenting voices. Remember how covid dissent was silenced as “irresponsible, “granny killing”, while we were told there would be mass deaths if we failed to panic, so that dissenters were howled down by whipped up online mobs of panicked cowards. How our media decided for us that “the science was settled” on the supposed climate “emergency”, dissenters were excluded from media platforms and derided as “deniers”, and mobs of our young people were indoctrinated to believe that the world faces destruction if panic measures are not imposed? How we see today similarly hysterical claims about dire consequences if Russia’s desires for the Ukraine not to be part of NATO are not thwarted, immature fantasies about “moral duties” to interfere and jingoist appeals to supposed patriotic duty, while dissenters are howled down as “traitors”, “appeasers”, “Putin apologists”, and sources of dissenting news and opinion are openly silenced while we are deluged with mostly obviously false pro-Ukrainian and anti-Russian propaganda, couched in the terms most calculated to whip up hysterical war fervour and hatred of Russia.
Every time we let these emotionally incontinent moral panics overwhelm our society, we pay a heavy price.
Well I can’t top that.
I’m with Mr. Piggles – yes, Mark, can you please leave something for the rest of us to say!
Why aren’t you a columnist? One of your concise, to-the-point, well-reasoned and engaging posts contains more wisdom and common sense than a dozen or three Fraser Nelson effusions or offerings by other Establishment policy wonks.
Now I hope this doesn’t go to your head – but it’s (at least) three cheers.
Superb.
Extremely well put, thank you.
I was 50-50 sympathetic for Russia and Ukraine, both sides having good and bad festures.
Putins actions have made me more pro Ukraine but the anti Russia propaganda being spouted, not least by the BBC, is so obvious and puerile as to make me reconsider.
In a fight between Europe’s most corrupt government and the second most corrupt government, I fully agree that we should not be so quick to damn Russian or beatify Ukraine. This is a dirty game, played by men with dirty hands, and there’s a lot more than the eye can see.
You are well out on a limb in your conclusions about the two most corrupt governments. Bozo’s bunch of gangsters could definitely join these two, as could many others currently playing pretend democracy.
I didn’t realise it was a football match……..
I suspect it started rolling a long time before now, 2008, covid spending, covid overreaction, some might even say it’s deliberate, Russia sure does make for a good “bad guy” distraction though.
Hermann Goering: “The people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger.”
But Ukraine is not a simple distraction because:
Some “clever clogs” chatterers learnt recently that a famine took place in 1932-33 in the Ukraine, and many are showing off how cool they are by referring to it using the Ukrainian word “holodomor”. But they are too stupid to put two and two together.
3.3 million people have fled the Ukraine in the past fortnight. This may not be in every case because they all want the latest mobile phones that the streets of London are legendarily paved with. In most cases it’s not because their homes have been destroyed either, or several family members killed.
But I can tell you that wherever in the world there has been famine, there is an ancestral memory of it. People in the Ukraine and in much of southern Russia know what it means TO HAVE NO FOOD. In the Netherlands they also know. People in Britain haven’t got a clue.
I knew someone who was in Leningrad, as St Petersburg was then known, in 1964. There was a fear that another war would start. Within hours there was no food in the shops. And I mean absolutely no food – no jars of pickled tomatoes at the back of a shelf – no NOTHING. Within HOURS. The siege of that city had been lifted only two decades before, but people have an understanding for much longer than that. Many in Britain would be waiting around watching screens, sharing politicians’ and experts’ latest buzzphrases with each other, waiting for the next broadcast. Some would worry that cheapo “value” tins of baked beans weren’t their thing. It isn’t like that in the Ukraine. It isn’t like that in Russia either.
Astute observation, anyone over 50 in the UK who is not storing food atm probably never went to bed hungry.
It’s a 10 from me! You should write a guest article here.
In a well-articulated nutshell.
Last sentence: emotionally incontinent moral panics are now ARE our society.
So…the over 70s have the highest number of cases. Right. And they’re the most jabbed. So it’s going well then? Well, of course! Got another jab to sell. Apart from that, nothing else to see here, folks. I’m off to bed…
Governments should really substitute the adage they’re obviously adhering to, “If at first you don’t succeed, try and try again” for Einstein’s definition of ‘insanity’. But because they so prioritize public health ( PMSL! ) they never will.
Has anyone thought about cause and effect in the over 70s. Most jabbed and most cases?
BINGO. So many people can’t seem to connect the dots!
BINGO
“Mirror the tactics of one’s opponents”!?
Has Nelson been asleep for the past couple of decades? Suppressing sources of dissenting news and opinion has been prevalent in our system for decades, from the silencing of politically incorrect speech and political campaigning to the revoking of licences for foreign news outlets, and culminating in the all out war on dissent represented by the covid manipulation campaign and the latest proposals for speechcrime laws.
Nelson presumably is well aware of the falsehood that his position here embodies, so we can only assume that he seeks to misrepresent the position in order to push the war propaganda line that he raises in this piece and elsewhere, that we (and, absurdly, the corrupt kleptocracy that is the Ukraine) are “free” whereas Russia is “unfree”. In truth, the difference is merely one of degree and of particulars, and that goes doubly for the supposed difference between the Ukraine and Russia.
Anyone who tries to tell you that we are the “free world” and the US sphere rivalry with Russia is a Cold War style fight between a “free world” and an “unfree” is a liar.
“The fight is not just between Russia and Ukraine but a democratic view of life and authoritarian rule. In our system, we believe that truth is arrived at through open competition of argument. In Putin’s system, opposition is stymied and censored.“
“Stymied and censored”! Gosh, that would never happen in Britain!
The reason the US sphere is being so diligent in shutting down access to information that contests its war propaganda line should be obvious to any adult – it seeks to protect a false picture of events from inconvenient information that would instill doubt into the fervency of the manufactured consent for confrontation, hatred of Russia and ultimately war, cold, economic or open.
We’ve seen heavy pushing of the outright falsehood that the Russians “target civilians”. We’ve seen claims based on (at best) pure speculation built upon obvious Ukrainian propaganda lies that Russia’s military is “failing”, “running out of supplies” (laughable), “suffering from mass surrenders and desertions”, and all kinds of similar nonsense. We’ve seen fatuous claims of mass Russian opposition to the war based on the usual US-struck suspects engaging in their usual knee jerk opposition when they think they might have an opportunity to depose the Russian leader and get another US tool into power.
The truth about the performance of the Russian military and the attitudes of the Russian people will come out in time. Sensible analysis seems to suggest the campaign is going fine, albeit not perfectly, and mostly hampered by a refusal initially to use full force in the hope of limiting damage and costs. Likewise it looks as though the Russians by and large (usual suspects aside) are rallying around their leader, as you’d expect.
These conclusions are at best speculative – those telling you they know the situation behind the fog of war are liars, pure and simple. And for their lies to be accepted they need to shut down access to inconvenient facts and arguments.
The Spectator recently hosted a “Professor of War Studies” who appeared to be just out of school who had claimed; “I’m going to call, this. I think the Russian armed forces are going to collapse, followed by Putin leaving power.” He went on to assert:
“The first question when you’re launching any kind of military action is to have your military resources matched up to your strategic goals. Putin’s strategic goal here requires about a million troops – the overthrow of the Ukrainian government and the replacement
of it by someone more favourable to Russia. They’ve rolled up with about 200,000 troops, so completely mismatched resources to their aims…The second thing is, as has become clear to absolutely everybody, the Russian army is unable to do its own logistics, unable to repair its vehicles, has plenty of desertions….the morale of the Russians is about as low as it can get.”
When the Spectator asked him whether these opinions “might be warped somewhat by the fact that most of the information we’re getting comes from Ukrainian sources” (duh!), his
comedic response was to turn to “the US military’s assessment of the situation” – as though that would be somehow less propagandist and dishonest than that of their Ukrainian clients!
This “expert” starts from the clearly false assumption that Russia wants to militarily occupy the whole of the Ukraine (whence comes his silly assertion that they needed a million men), and based upon that, makes the frankly ridiculous suggestion that the Russian military high command would have gone into this campaign with the kind of huge mismatch he suggests. or that it can’t manage basic logistics. While it’s possible the Russians had an intelligence failure concerning the likely response of the Ukrainian military (there are suggestions that they hoped that the Ukrainian military could be persuaded to turn on the nastier nazi elements of the Ukrainian regime), it’s frankly stupid to speculate that the Russian staff didn’t plan for that not happening.
As for the suggestion that the Russian military can’t plan and execute logistics for a campaign so well within its capabilities as this one, so far, that is so ridiculous as to call into question the honesty or sanity of anyone making it. Charitably, in this case, we should probably assume this ”expert” is just too young and inexperienced to treat his own side’s dogmas and propaganda lies with due scepticism.
While it’s quite possible that the Russian military could get bogged down and Russian society ultimately collapse under the pressure of war and sanctions, it’s highly unlikely these things will happen quickly, as this kind of wishful thinking suggests.
Let’s wait and see what happens over the next couple of weeks.
It is true that in WW2 Russia needed approx 10x the number of men and machines its currently employing in Ukraine to dislodge what was then a demoralised and poorly equipped German army. Ukraine is a very big country with bad roads outside the few main highways.
It also does not seem Russia is employing its newest arms or indeed much of its airforce. This leads me to believe either it got its initial intelligence wrong, or its aims are very much restricted to Donbass and the coastline to Crimea. The Kiev pushes could be speculative/decoy, just using older equipment from the Belarus.
The truth is we just don’t know. Its all speculation.
I’m starting to think Zelenskyy is only holding out so Putin can take out Asov et al for him.
Starting to see much more air power, guided munitions, drones etc. and helicopter assaults than we saw at the beginning tbh.
https://southfront.org/war-in-ukraine-day-22-fog-of-war-is-thinning/
I have a post in auto-moderation with some more links for this analysis
Anyone who claims to support free speech must object to the removal of Any legal media especially if it opposes your personal opinion.
All sides should be heard
As for Russia Today it was one of my Google Favourites simply so I could know what ‘The Opposition’ were saying and so be able to refute it.
You are on a roll today sir! This guy agrees with much of what you say. And he’s in a position to know.
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/corruption/the-truth-behind-ukraine-v-russia-is-the-evil-within/
The Nuland phone call is most instructive. Neocons rule…
Why it was a mistake for Ofcom to remove Russia Today
As we have seen the last two yrs, the majority of people do not seem attached to their liberties and free speech, therefore they will find with the state aiming to censor opinion online as they have done offline, potential changes to the human rights act and also looking to limit protests, they will soon lose them. It also shows just how weak politicians are when their main gripe is not say poverty, fuel and utility prices, or lost liberties or even say the collapse of employment prospects, nope, its dave on twitter calling them names. Its astonishing really that the west can proclaim freedom, yet ban info they don’t like, the people who cheer the banning of outlets cannot then complain when they get banned or even arrested for having an opinion that someone felt “harmed by”
Excuse me, it’s not Dave it’s Davina!
” . . . higher prevalence than at the height of the winter Omnicon wave when not many people died ” as not mentioned by The Telegraph.
Putins “Caicescu booded off the balcony” moment?
Absolute Proof That All Fake News Is SCRIPTED!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHAg4H-dMKo
Dr. Steve Turley
Next Events
Tuesday 22nd March 2pm to 3pm
Yellow Boards By the Road
Junction A332 Windsor Rd/
A330 Winkfield Road
ASCOT SL5 7UL
Stand in the Park Sundays from 10am – make friends & keep sane
Wokingham Howard Palmer Gardens
(Cockpit Path car park free on Sunday)
Sturges Rd RG40 2HD
Telegram http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/mar/18/ministers-failed-to-allow-parliament-opportunity-to-scrutinise-uk-covid-laws
Poor little lambs, denied the opportunity to know and understand what they were voting for- not once, but time and time again. Repetitive actions that negatively affected millions of lives. MP’s – dangerous, useless shysters. Naught but a bunch of self-serving parasites who most certainly do not act in the best interests of the people.
Nobody ever goes round to their MPs house to have it out with them, do they? It’s the only language they understand, when you’re on their doorstep.
There doesn’t seem to have been much news about the ‘demo’ in London today. Will they be toppling the Evil Government this time… ?
What success/reaction have you had with that approach?
EF is the definition of a keyboard warrior. Hard as nails. In Finland.
Wonder if he’s put a brick through the Finnish PM’s window yet…or went round any of the MP’s houses over there to “have a go at them”..? Overly concerned about what’s going on in the UK as opposed to his own country of residence, which is a tad odd.
I banged on his office desk, more or less.
But he’s dodgy. Evidence leaked out from the Great Expenses Scandal 2009 onwards. Worse, the seat’s a Rotten Borough so, as someone put it, a pig in a Blue rosette would win. He has no competition.
MPs with a moral compass seem few and far between.
They didn’t vote for the Coronavirus Act 2020. They passed it on the nod, with Steve Baker blubbering like a baby. Not a single one of them called for a vote.
2 73 year olds here; still Covid free, test free and still SCEPTICAL!!!
Ditto … well, a healthy 68 y old. No mask, no tests, no jab. A free man.
Yesterday though I visited a branch of B&Q. All the staff were masked and the notices on the door read a bit like May 2020. Aarrghh.
Oh dear, but Ukrainian partisans reappear
“safe and effective”
https://emeralddb3.substack.com/p/its-official-the-vaccines-are-killing?s=r
It should be “Official” but it’s not really if it’s not reported is it.
A “food security expert” on Whitehall-linked regime radio (BBC R4) was saying this morning that there will be around half the yield per area in some parts of agriculture this year, because farmers will choose to benefit from soaring fertiliser prices by not using some of the fertiliser they have bought and then selling the rest or sitting on it.
That sounds awfully like the farmers we know and love. This “expert” knows his stuff.
I think he may have been Richard Tiffin from the Centre for Food Security at Reading University.
But wait until you hear the next bit.
Apparently a fall in yields by 50% and rocketing prices (i.e. large-scale food shortages) won’t be a big problem, because (guess what) … because lower yields are wonderfully enviro-doubleplus good – they are as green green green as one of Satan’s biggest bogies.
Never mind if millions starve to death. Think of the planet.
(Will there be containers we can jump in, while we’ve still got the energy, so as to contribute our bodies for pig food?)
There is no longer any way that a sensible observer can deny now that a huge cull is planned for the near future, the run-up to which is dressed up in enough bureaucratic, bullsh*t-expertological, and economic poo-language to make you want to vomit.
Those who want to dig into the Centre for Food Security may like to look for references to “epochs”, “social threefolding”, and that ol’ depopulationist favourite, “people, planet, and profit”, which also appears as “social, environmental, and economic”.
The solution is more meat eating as it means more manure to fertilise the fields. Suitably processed human waste is also good for this, with an an adundance available around Westminster.
They could replace chemical salt ferilisers almost overnight with Actively Aerated Compost Tea if they had the wil to do it. (see Elaine Ingram – soil food web) it would also reduce soil errosion.
Any farmers want to talk to me as a consultant drop me a line, I’ve got a few weeks free atm.
Would still like to see proof of the benefits of the jab. With infections allegedly rising no one can prove that the jabs have stopped you dying. The records do not show that people have stopped dying, only that they are still dying with their underlying conditions. Saying that all of those allegedly infected would have died/become seriously ill/even noticed without a test, without a jab, is preposterous.
It’s all b***ocks. A test with a sensitivity of 80% (i.e. false positive rate 20%) makes it about 50-50 that a person who’s negative who takes three tests will test positive at least once.
Have you seen a single academic paper or newspaper article comparing the relative benefits of an anti-SARSCoV2 injection for a) people who look after their immune systems, and b) lardarses?
The response when that question is asked in Britain is essentially for politicians, professionals, junior officials, and the terrified hordes themselves to form a circle and chant “UK! UK! NHS! NHS! Kill the conspiracy theorists! Kill the foreign saboteurs”. It’s primal.
Lest anyone thinks that’s an exaggeration, recall that there have been many media articles saying basically that “This guy thought he was so clever by refusing his injections. And now he’s dead. Bwahaha!”
If I could give you a bonus ‘like’ for “lardarse” I would! Very funny.
A test with a sensitivity of 80% (i.e. false positive rate 20%) makes it about 50-50 that a person who’s negative who takes three tests will test positive at least once.
I think you are confusing three things:
Sensitivity – the probability that if you have it you will test positive
Specificity – the probability that if you don’t have it you will test negative
The positive predictive value (PPV) – the probability that if you test positive you will have it.
The first two are reasonably stable properties of the test. The PPV depends on the sensitivity, specificity and the prevalence and is highly context dependent.
The probability that a person who is negative will test positive at least once in three tests is a function of the specificity. I am not sure which test you are referring to, but the specificity of both the PCR and LFT tests is very high – in excess of 98%. That must be true because back in the summer last year when we were doing several hundred thousand tests a day we were only getting a 2,000 or so positive results – the vast majority of people who were negative tested negative. So the probability of testing positive at least once in three tests if you are negative is going to be less than (1-0.98**3) = 0.05.
0.02**3 is 8**-5
True. So what?
Just don’t like seeing you make a fool of yourself.
I don’t see how your calculation is relevant to mine?
We’re apparently in the middle of a flu epidemic here in the Netherlands. It’s arrived fashionably late. So we have increasing “cases” in the daily news but how many cases of flu are attributed to Covid? Same goes for the hospitalizations and deaths. The symptoms are much the same and ill-defined for both viruses. This really does muck up the data if you have two respiratory viruses circulating at the same time, and especially if the crappy tests cannot reliably distinguish between them.
“fashionably late” ‘flu.
See the Canadian Covid Care Alliance presentation on the Pfizer clinical trial. Spoiler alert: more people in the experimental group died. 20 versus 14 in the placebo group.
In the dim and distant past, medical treatment which increased your risk of death was mostly frowned upon.
I admire Matt Hancock
(This post is OSB compliant)
I’ve always viewed the business skills and humanitarian approach of the Kray Twins and Al Capone with admiration, so my regard for those similar aspects of Mr. Hancock is unstinting.
Have we got enough, Midazolam Matt
(this comma is not OSB compliant) repent: say 3 hail NHS’s and 5 our Zelenskyys
Deciding a major energy policy, based upon the weather, and most particularly the winds in the North Sea, is “strictly for the birds”. Having spent years trying to get a living out of fishing there, I can safely say that it is completely unpredictable. When the weather forecasters cannot tell what is to happen with any certainty, and the “science is settled” bunch’s postulations seem to contain a large element of chance “weather events”, the whole idea is nonsense. Taking measured wind speeds and averaging them tells you nothing, and ideas such as the regular occurrence of equinoctial gales are equally fallible. For example, tomorrow is the Vernal Equinox, and I see no forecasts of gales for at least 10 days hence, but we did have a good blow or two earlier in the year.
The point about “infection rates soaring in over 70s” is to a large part explained by that age group restarting social activities and testing before they go out each time. In the last week two out of 10 acquaintances, all around 70, pulled out of a dinner because of a positive test they got on the day they were due to go out. No symptoms in either case. One is isolated most of the time, doesn’t shop, is triple vaccinated and wears a surgical grade mask at all times when out, even in the fresh air.
It is all either nonsense or vaccine induced.
My Mrs said Sports Relief was donating 1/2 the money raised to Ukraine, posters here telling us Tesco is raising money from shoppers too, I wonder how much of it will actually make it to Ukraine!
Wost propaganda of the week prize got to… Citizen Brick, A Chicago-based custom Lego store. Get yer lego molotov cocktails here folks <puke>
https://taskandpurpose.com/culture/molotov-cocktail-legos-ukraine/
War In Ukraine Day 23: Russian Forces On Track To Achieve Strategic Goals
https://southfront.org/war-in-ukraine-day-23/
Legion of the damned: Inside Ukraine’s army of misfits, veterans, and war tourists in the fight against Russia
https://taskandpurpose.com/news/ukraine-foreign-legion/
Ukraine backtracks on Mariupol theater claims –
https://www.rt.com/russia/552266-mariupol-theater-civilians-survived/
Russle Bentley mentioned the Azov used this tactic in an apartment building in Donensk, pre-planted explosives in an apartment block were blown as the were retreating, with 200 women and children in the basement.
A fast-spreading, deadly, serious, dangerous virus should have long before two years were up killed or immunised almost everyone in the population.
How is it then this fast-spreading, deadly, serious, dangerous virus is still circulating and causing tens of thousands of cases AND with nearly 90% of the population vaccinated?
Shall we ask The Science™️?
“Covid cases among over-70s hit highest ever levels” – Office for National Statistics finds around one in 23 in the age group has the virus…”
That’s good, surely? If they simply ‘have the virus’ that doesn’t mean they’re infected with CoV, and doesn’t it show that we’re in the endemic stage? (They’re not ”cases” anyway, not sick people, but just positive tests – most false.)