• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Boris Johnson Under Pressure to Boost Defence Spending in Wake of Ukraine War

by Will Jones
6 March 2022 10:05 PM

Boris Johnson is facing political pressure on all sides to re-examine the U.K.’s military spending levels as ex-minister Lord Frost led Tory demands for an increase in the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. MailOnline has the story.

Lord Frost attacked “many years of Western unseriousness about foreign and defence policy” as Labour’s Keir Starmer also demanded a review of policy.

Frost, until last year the U.K.’s Brexit Secretary, said inaction allowed Vladimir Putin to think he could “try it on”. The former minister joined with other ex-Cabinet members including Michael Fallon to back a 25% increase in defence spending.

Their intervention comes as NATO allies look at their own spending and European nations close to Russia geographically consider joining. 

Germany is to plough 100 billion euros into a new defence procurement fund and raise overall spending above 2% of GDP for the first time in decades. 

At the same time Finland and Sweden are said to have begun looking at the possibility of joining NATO. 

Writing in the Sunday Telegraph today, Lord Frost said: “We are going to have to spend more on defence and that will mean tough choices. We need to reform and liberalise so that investment keeps coming.”

Sir Michael Fallon, who was Defence Secretary under David Cameron and Theresa May, added: “In 1999, long before 9/11, before Russian aggression, before Kim Jong-il had nuclear missiles, we were spending 2.7%.”

“[My] only criticism of last year’s integrated review [of security and defence] was that its ambition wasn’t matched by significant further uplift. 

“I absolutely welcome both the review and the previous very welcome increase in 2020. But its ambition wasn’t matched by a further increase building beyond 2.5% by the end of the Parliament. That’s the kind of ambition we need.”

Sir Keir said there needs to be a review of defence policy and spending, with Labour having also previously attacked wasted money in military procurement. 

Speaking on the BBC’s Sunday Morning programme, Sir Keir said: “I think there does need to be a step back and review of defence policy because this has, I think, blown away some of the assumptions the Government was working on.”

Sir Keir said the Labour Party has been critical of the Government for cutting back the army by another 10,000 soldiers, noting “as we have said, we wouldn’t have done that”.

Worth reading in full.

Tags: Conservative PartyDefenceLabour PartyLord FrostUkraineWar

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

People’s Convoy Protesting Against Vaccine Mandates Circles Washington D.C. and Promises to Cause Travel Chaos Until Demands Are Met

Next Post

Reflections on the War in Ukraine

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

65 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
GlassHalfFull
GlassHalfFull
3 years ago

They should save money by defunding the 77th Brigade as they are rather pathetic in their trolling of this site.

67
-3
Beowulf
Beowulf
3 years ago
Reply to  GlassHalfFull

I sense a downvote coming your way.

32
-5
Beowulf
Beowulf
3 years ago
Reply to  Beowulf

A downvote for me too, you shouldn’t have, thank you, that’s very kind.

21
-4
Beowulf
Beowulf
3 years ago

77th Brigade

“WHAT WE DO

  • Audience, Actor and Adversary Analysis 
  • Information Activity and Outreach
  • Counter-adversarial Information Activity
  • Support to Partners Across Government 
  • Collecting media content
  • Disseminating Media 
  • Monitoring the information environment  
  • Evaluating the information environment
  • Advising and training on Human Security and providing support to current operations”

I bet Putin’s shaking in his boots.

46
-2
TSull
TSull
3 years ago
Reply to  Beowulf

In short, anything but real soldiering.

14
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  Beowulf

The “77th” is just a concept made up by paranoid conspiracy theorists.

“They are watching us!” – yeah, right. Does anyone really think there is a paid wing of The Government trying on a site such as this to change the opinions of a few armchair experts?

1
-14
Rogerborg
Rogerborg
3 years ago
Reply to  Emerald Fox

That’s… uh… that’s literally taken from their public profile.

https://www.army.mod.uk/who-we-are/formations-divisions-brigades/6th-united-kingdom-division/77-brigade/

It’s possible that 77th Brigade is no more than a single web page psy-op to make people think we have an entire psy-op brigade.

But that’s a different argument to whether the whole concept is a tin-foil invention.

7
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  Rogerborg

“It’s not paranoia when they really are out to get you!”

Where does it all end? What does concern me is when people are willing to snitch to admin when they don’t like another poster’s comments. This ‘going along with the sheep’, reporting someone when they have an alternative view, is no better than the ‘Covidians’ slagging off the ‘Anti-vaxxers’ for ‘spreading misinformation’.

3
0
Rogerborg
Rogerborg
3 years ago
Reply to  Emerald Fox

Well, one of us could start by apologising for making a false gaslighting accusation that 77th Brigade is nothing more than a tin-foil-hate invention.

It seems that you’d rather just pivot to a fresh rant though. That’s a great way to demonstrate that it’s futile trying to engage with you in a meaningful conversation.

3
0
GlassHalfFull
GlassHalfFull
3 years ago
Reply to  Emerald Fox

I have first hand experience of the 77th Brigade on another site.

Instead of copying and pasting their stock reply from their crib sheet they inadvertently copied and pasted the whole page with details of how to respond to dissenting voices.

They’re real.

7
0
CovidiotAntiMasker
CovidiotAntiMasker
3 years ago
Reply to  Emerald Fox

Tobias Ellwood MP remains a 77th Brigade Lieutenant Colonel : https://archive.ph/DhzTo

3
0
Beowulf
Beowulf
3 years ago
Reply to  Emerald Fox

Then the “paranoid conspiracy theorists” must be the Ministry of Defence because the 77th Brigade has a page on the MOD website. Why don’t you check your facts before typing, Mr. Fox?

1
0
Mumbo Jumbo
Mumbo Jumbo
3 years ago

Since we are heading for thermal armageddon in less than ten years (according to our green friends), it is probably not worth bothering.

17
0
Rogerborg
Rogerborg
3 years ago
Reply to  Mumbo Jumbo

I guess we could spend it all on the Navy, given that we only have 10 years to stop catastrophic sea level rises. I mean, I’ve heard that for 40 years or so, so it must surely be imminent by now.

1
0
Nearhorburian
Nearhorburian
3 years ago

Barbarian invaders continue to flood across the Channel.

If our armed forces can’t stop that, there’s absolutely no point to them.

And it’s 40 years since they did anything other than act in globalist interests.

25
-1
Gregoryno6
Gregoryno6
3 years ago

Too harsh?

How to be Incompetent.png
30
0
J4mes
J4mes
3 years ago
Reply to  Gregoryno6

Too generous. He’s a conspiring crook. His clownish demeanour is a smokescreen.

28
0
Rogerborg
Rogerborg
3 years ago
Reply to  Gregoryno6

I’d be surprised to find that he’s even continent.

0
0
A Y M
A Y M
3 years ago

*sigh*
Now we get on the next corrupt and evil corporatist agenda as the Pharma agenda winds down.
WAR! Let’s be against it while actually ramping up the tensions by wilfully ignoring the truth of how this began and what will make things worse (supplying arms and vilifying Putin) rather than finding a way of minimising death.

Sound familiar?

Thats because the same crony politicians are doing the bidding of the next big corporate group. And they believe they will distract the people and benefit from the war propaganda. Judging by the media BS, they might succeed.

Meanwhile the same lemmings that wore their masks walking around outside are now painting their faces or houses yellow and blue in the naive belief that their virtue will prevent the beautiful people if Ukrain from getting slaughtered.

The reality is that they are sending these people to slaughter in the vain hope that they can win against the Russian army. And they eat up this crap that Putin just invaded out of the blue with no provocation and no basic geopolitical calculus.

We are surrounded by morons, manipulated by liars, and herded into virtual prison cells by psychopaths.

53
0
leek
leek
3 years ago
Reply to  A Y M

Who invaded Ukraine?

1
-21
A Y M
A Y M
3 years ago
Reply to  leek

Russia dip shit.

5
-1
leek
leek
3 years ago
Reply to  A Y M

It’s actually quite rare to see someone acknowledge this fact.

Mostly people say it is NATO or the BBC, or Zelensky who did it.

2
-26
A Y M
A Y M
3 years ago
Reply to  leek

You asked who invaded, not why. That’s your problem.

21
-1
ImpObs
ImpObs
3 years ago
Reply to  leek

The CIA to fund the Nazis you are an apologist for, go away childish troll, adults are talking.

16
-1
leek
leek
3 years ago
Reply to  ImpObs

Now that you have learned the word troll, try another.

Last edited 3 years ago by Stop believing start thinking
1
-17
ImpObs
ImpObs
3 years ago
Reply to  leek

Nazi propagandist

4
-1
MrTea
MrTea
3 years ago
Reply to  leek

Who invaded Ukraine?

In 2022 or 2014?

1
0
Stephensceptic
Stephensceptic
3 years ago
Reply to  A Y M

The West will fight to the last Ukrainian.

Negotiation is the only humanitarian answer as you suggest.

Not crying, painting silly slogans and demonizing Putin.

That will just prolong the suffering and not achieve victory either.

3
0
007point5
007point5
3 years ago

Um… We are not at war in the Ukraine… Or did I miss something? 🤣

7
0
Beowulf
Beowulf
3 years ago
Reply to  007point5

I suspect Liz Truss believes Kent shares a border with Kiev, which explains all the refugees bobbing ashore.

14
0
Rogerborg
Rogerborg
3 years ago
Reply to  007point5

Someone needs to tell Liz Truss that, or alternatively to explain the Foreign Enlistment Act 1870 Section 4 to her in language that she’s capable of understanding. Pictures, or finger puppets may be required.

1
0
Fireweasel
Fireweasel
3 years ago

A recent bout of defence spending by the British army was their advertising campaign to recruit “Snowflakes” and “Me, Me, Me Millennials” and “Class Clowns”.
 
Snowflake [ snoh-fleyk ]
noun

a person who is easily offended, is over-emotional, has an inflated sense of uniqueness, an unwarranted sense of entitlement, and is unable to deal with or tolerate opposing opinions

 
Just the type of voracious soldiers that would have Russian troops shit*ing their pants if they showed up in Ukraine.
 
As if to prove the British army’s drive to recruit the most cowardly and unstable types to be found in any society wasn’t just a one-off error of judgement, the head of MI6 was busy tweeting about his concern for transvestites’ feelings just a few hours after Europe’s biggest country invaded its neighbour.  
 
How would you describe this? Women, children and men are being burned alive in a needless war in Europe and the head of MI6’s most immediate concern is to worry about transvestites having hurt feelings.
 

Paraphilic Disorders:

  • Voyeurism: watching an unsuspecting/non-consenting individual who is either nude, disrobing, or engaging in sexual activity
  • Exhibitionism: exposing one’s own genitals to an unsuspecting person.
  • Frotteurism: touching or rubbing against a non-consenting person.
  • Sexual masochism: being humiliated, beaten, bound, or otherwise suffering.
  • Sexual sadism: the physical or emotional suffering of another person.
  • Paedophilia: sexual activity with a child that is prepubescent (usually 13 years old or younger).
  • Fetishism: sexual fascination with non-living objects or highly specific body parts (partialism). Examples of specific fetishisms include somnophilia (sexual arousal by a person who is unconscious) and urophilia (deriving sexual pleasure from seeing or thinking about urine or urinating).
  • Transvestism: cross-dressing that is sexually arousing and interferes with functioning.
  • Autogynephilia is a subtype of transvestism that refers specifically to men who become aroused by thinking or visualising himself as a woman.
  • Other specified paraphilia: some paraphilias do not meet full diagnostic criteria for a paraphilic disorder but may have uncontrolled sexual impulses that cause enough distress for the sufferer that they are recognized. Examples of such specific paraphilias include necrophilia (corpses), scatologia (obscene phone calls), coprophilia (faeces and defecation), and zoophilia (animals).

 
(I wonder if the Ukrainian people knew how absolutely and distressingly rotten the West actually is, if they’d be welcoming Russian troops with flowers, coffees and hot food?)

Last edited 3 years ago by Fireweasel
10
0
J4mes
J4mes
3 years ago
Reply to  Fireweasel

Maybe the British army is worried about the feelings of Ukrainian leader, Zelensky, as he undoubtedly has more than a few paraphilic disorders…

https://youtu.be/DJaxknSPvvk

8
-1
leek
leek
3 years ago
Reply to  Fireweasel

And all this drivel relates to defence spending? How?

1
-15
Fireweasel
Fireweasel
3 years ago
Reply to  leek

Ah, the resident single mentally retarded down-ticker that used to call it-self “rational” has reappeared with its new handle, “leek”.
 
How long will this bout of ineffectual trolling last until you get frustrated enough to change your handle yet again and retry under a new pseudonym?
 
For anyone that’s interested, leek isn’t your regular type troll, this poor fool actually wants to be taken seriously. He’s highly narcissistic to the point of having a personality disorder, I’d reckon he’s of the type that suffers from a paraphilia and attempts hide it under the guise of being transgender.
 
He really does, though, want to convert people on here to what he assumes are the correct beliefs. His narcissism can’t handle it when he inevitably fails and he then slinks off and creates a new pseudonym for himself. You can tell by the simplistic way he rationalises and responds that he is mentally undeveloped.
 
Anyway, for you to have been on here as “rational” making an utter idiot of yourself and now to be back as “leek” engaging in the same idiocy? It seems you don’t have one shred of dignity or shame.

Adios moron.

6
-1
ImpObs
ImpObs
3 years ago
Reply to  Fireweasel

The fact his tag team of psudonyms is allowed to disrupt all the threads and completely disrupt the forum beyond practical use, with almost weekly changes of name, by the moderation team, just makes this website look like a limited hangout operation. It’s losing more credibility by the day.

1
-1
Fireweasel
Fireweasel
3 years ago
Reply to  ImpObs

I’ve just flagged him and sent this message to the site about him: “This commenter is a troll who very obviously harasses and attempts to provoke other commenters.”

I’ve never before flagged anyone, either in this forum or anywhere else, so I’ll find it interesting to see what happens.

The big problem with this freak is that people keep making serious responses to his obviously trolling comments. This just fuels his tank. Either insult and ridicule him, or make no response at all.  

When someone makes a serious response to one of his comments he gets a double hit out of it. He gets the thrill of having trolled them, and he also gets the secondary thrill of having been so good at trolling them that they didn’t notice they were being trolled.

There should be a way on this site that people can block freaks like this. And as long as there is no way to block trolls, more and more of them are going to show up.   

6
-2
J4mes
J4mes
3 years ago

No, Pfeffel should get out of Ukraine and get back to the UK to face justice for what he and his collaborators did to the British public.

No more propaganda and mind games – whether that be Ukrainian, covid or global warming. We must demand this BS stops immediately.

22
-1
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  J4mes

“We must demand” – no-body has the guts to even go and ring Chris Whitty’s doorbell and have it out with him.
Ivan: “What’s that racket down there?”
Boris looks out of window: “Oh, just some people waving placards, I can’t hear what they’re saying. Now, Ivan, for this knighthood, how much did you say you’d be willing to pay?”

0
-1
CovidiotAntiMasker
CovidiotAntiMasker
3 years ago

To jaw jaw is better than to war war. They should be ramping down the rhetoric not doing a climate and covid rinse and repeat.

Last edited 3 years ago by CovidiotAntiMasker
9
-1
leek
leek
3 years ago
Reply to  CovidiotAntiMasker

Perhaps you have heard there is a viscous invasion of Ukraine in progress.

Putin didn’t want talk..

3
-20
Rogerborg
Rogerborg
3 years ago
Reply to  leek

Putin has tried talking for several decades, while NATO has send nobodies to the table, while pushing military assets closer and closer to his border.

If you thrust your face right into someone else’s and yell “What are you going to do about it? What? What? What?” for long enough, you’ll eventually find out.

11
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago

Increase defence spending?

A euphemism for shovelling more tax payer cash in to a mate’s bank account.

Is Billy involved in the “defence” industry by any chance?

20
-1
CovidiotAntiMasker
CovidiotAntiMasker
3 years ago

Zelensky fueled this conflict, he should have accepted the historical buffer state geo political reality and agreed not to seek NATO or EU membership.

27
-3
leek
leek
3 years ago
Reply to  CovidiotAntiMasker

So it wasn’t Russia that invaded then?

Perhaps you could actually condemn the appalling invasion by Russia.

Interesting to see where the thumbs point on this one.

4
-31
ImpObs
ImpObs
3 years ago
Reply to  leek

Perhaps you should condemn the Nazis you’re so willing to fund and encourage.

This is what you actively promote, you and your tag team of trolls should be ashamed of yourselves.
https://uprootedpalestinians.wordpress.com/2014/05/11/neo-nazi-executions-of-unarmed-civilians-in-odessa-graphic-warning/

14
-2
leek
leek
3 years ago
Reply to  ImpObs

Don’t deflect..

Just say the invasion is wrong.

0
0
leek
leek
3 years ago
Reply to  leek

Well 29 out of 33 refuse to condemn the invasion.

Quite a war-mongering lot you are.

Perhaps you should make some banners with your views and march through the streets. Let people see who you are….

0
0
jennyw
jennyw
3 years ago
Reply to  CovidiotAntiMasker

Zelensky was installed for the very reason to provoke Russia and cause conflict in Ukraine. He is a puppet for the WEF globalists, and was catapulted into power on the back of Ihor Kolomoyskyi’s and global central bankers’ funding. No doubt the US gov chipped in too.

23
-2
leek
leek
3 years ago
Reply to  jennyw

I seem to remember an election. Go look up the results.

0
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  CovidiotAntiMasker

Zelensky is a TV comedian. He probably struggles to fuel a car. His handlers fuelled this conflict.

1
0
Ron Knee
Ron Knee
3 years ago

Whenever a politician says ‘we must spend more on X’ he should be required to also say ‘and to pay for it we must spend less on Y’

12
0
Rogerborg
Rogerborg
3 years ago
Reply to  Ron Knee

Should be the top rated comment.

I’m looking at you, Holy Church of Our NHS.

2
0
rtj1211
rtj1211
3 years ago

Well, no wasting money on over-priced US tat if that is the case. Create jobs in the UK and buy British.

6
0
Rogerborg
Rogerborg
3 years ago
Reply to  rtj1211

Then pay Heckler and Koch to re-engineer it until it works?

0
0
NeilofWatford
NeilofWatford
3 years ago

I’ve given the last 42 years of my life to the UKs defence industry and it saddened me to see factory after factory closed down.
Successive governments cut the Armed Forces to the bone, typified by Cameron’s destruction (using JCBs !) to smash our Nimrods. Late and over budget but technically superb.
Watch Boris squirm now as he tries to appease his WEF Reset Boss whilst spinning the line that climate is real danger.
Johnson – and every member of this traitorous, freedom grabbing cabinet – must go.

6
-1
JayBee
JayBee
3 years ago

Ok, we spent 2.5% of GDP p.a. and still ended up with crap, or as the Germans who spent 1.5% (40bln) p.a. just stated, ‘we are naked’.
What makes anyone think that throwing more money at this moloch solves or improves anything?
This is similar to the NHS in that regard, just more useless in general.
What do these people think they’ll get for their money, if they throw ever more borrowed money at the defense contractors in competition with others, the 100bln one-off of the Germans?
At best, a third goes into bribes, a third into the price increases and a third gets botched equipment.
I despair.
This, like delivering arms to Ukraine, is the complete opposite of what is needed, now, before and in the future.
But it is also the sole motivation and reason for all the Ukraine meddling that now imploded, the latter also as planned and desired by the Western MIC and its blob.
Why can’t/won’t so few people see that?
Another ‘vaccine’ side effect?!

5
0
JayBee
JayBee
3 years ago

If we had had 100.000 soldiers more, we would have still not sent one of them into Ukraine and Biden would still have given Putin the green light to go in, not least because that was exactly what he and the MIC always planned for and wanted.
If we had spent 8% of GDP on ‘defense’, Kim would have still built his rockets.
What do they smoke to think otherwise?!

4
0
Jo Starlin
Jo Starlin
3 years ago

Us white males are useful again now when there’s some dying to be done eh? No thanks.

1
0
Rogerborg
Rogerborg
3 years ago
Reply to  Jo Starlin

It’s “Special train for Atkins” when the trooper’s on the tide.

2
0
JohnK
JohnK
3 years ago

The outcome might depend on whether Rishi listens. There might be a proper “budget” this year!

1
0
Rogerborg
Rogerborg
3 years ago
Reply to  JohnK

And Mila Kunis might be oiled up and handcuffed to my bedposts right now. If we’re countenancing a conservative budget from a WEF/Davos chancellor, anything is possible.

2
0
TheEngineer
TheEngineer
3 years ago

Cancel “Net Zero” and divert the money to restoring our military.

0
0
RickH
RickH
3 years ago

Quelle surprise!

As always – follow the money.

1
0
MrTea
MrTea
3 years ago

We should arm our soldiers with syringes full of all the left over vaccine, that stuff is lethal.

0
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

In Episode 35 of the Sceptic: Andrew Doyle on Labour’s Grooming Gang Shame, Andrew Orlowski on the India-UK Trade Deal and Canada’s Ignored Covid Vaccine Injuries

by Richard Eldred
9 May 2025
4

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest

BBC Quietly Edits Question Time After Wrongly ‘Correcting’ Richard Tice on Key Net Zero Claim

9 May 2025

Electric Car Bursts into Flames on Driveway and Engulfs £550,000 Family Home

9 May 2025

“I Was a Super Fit Cyclist Until I Had the Moderna Covid Vaccine. What Happened Next Left Me Wishing I Was Dead”

9 May 2025

News Round-Up

10 May 2025

Ed Miliband’s Housing Energy Plan Will Decimate the Rental Market and Send Rents Spiralling

10 May 2025

News Round-Up

45

Electric Car Bursts into Flames on Driveway and Engulfs £550,000 Family Home

25

BBC Quietly Edits Question Time After Wrongly ‘Correcting’ Richard Tice on Key Net Zero Claim

23

What Does David Lammy Mean by a State?

27

“I Was a Super Fit Cyclist Until I Had the Moderna Covid Vaccine. What Happened Next Left Me Wishing I Was Dead”

17

Teenage Girl Banned by the Football Association For Asking Transgender Opponent “Are You a Man?” Wins Appeal With Help of Free Speech Union

10 May 2025

Reflections on Empire, Papacy and States

10 May 2025

Ed Miliband’s Housing Energy Plan Will Decimate the Rental Market and Send Rents Spiralling

10 May 2025

News Round-Up

10 May 2025

BBC Quietly Edits Question Time After Wrongly ‘Correcting’ Richard Tice on Key Net Zero Claim

9 May 2025

POSTS BY DATE

March 2022
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
« Feb   Apr »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences