A Muslim cleric given an award for “interfaith cooperation” by the Archbishop of Canterbury has called the October 7th Hamas attackers “freedom fighters”, praised Osama bin Laden and said that men may have four wives, it has emerged. The Mail‘s Guy Adams has the story.
The first female Archbishop of Canterbury in more than 1,400 years kicked off Friday’s awards with a characteristically woke speech.
Standing at a lectern in Lambeth Palace’s magnificent Great Hall, Sarah Mullally told assembled guests that “we live in a world that is not always as we wish it would be”, owing to a combination of “injustice”, poverty, starvation and what she called the “climate emergency”.
Thankfully, she continued, there are those among us who are “determined to make a difference, determined to be hope in this world”. And they were the exact people she was about to celebrate. …
This year, the list included one individual who very much stood out from the crowd.
His name was Hafiz Tahir Ashrafi, a 68 year-old Pakistani cleric. According to the Church, he was given the “Hubert Walter Award for Reconciliation and Interfaith Co-operation”, for having allegedly promoted harmonious relationships between different religious groups.
Pictures of Friday’s ceremony show him posing beside Mullally, who looks faintly uncomfortable, and two other women in the 13th century banqueting hall.
One is dressed head-to-toe in a niqab, the restrictive Islamic veil that covers a woman’s entire head aside from her eyes. She is described as Ashrafi’s “wife”, though the Church of England’s photo captions failed to extend the courtesy of identifying her by name.
The other, who appeared to be wearing a head covering and a black Covid face mask, has not been identified at all.
For an Archbishop who likes to describe herself as a “feminist”, and has pledged to “speak out on misogyny”, it made for a curious and perhaps rather awkward tableau. In fact, the whole thing prompted a minor kerfuffle on social media, where images of the occasion were soon posted.
Yet commentary about the attire of Mullally’s guests was nothing compared to the row that broke out yesterday when the Tory MP Nick Timothy dug up a series of highly provocative comments that Ashrafi had made about Osama bin Laden over the years.
The cleric, who was handed his gong on the 25th anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, turns out to be an old acquaintance and sometime fan of the jihadist.
Specifically, Ashrafi, who once told the BBC that he had met Bin Laden “many times”, gave him the honorific title of “Saifullah, or Sword of God” in 2007. This was in response to the Government’s decision to knight Salman Rushdie.
Explaining the move, Ashrafi told the AFP news agency: “We are pleased to award the title of Saifullah to Osama bin Laden after the British government’s decision to bestow the title of ‘Sir’ on blasphemer Rushdie. This is the highest title for a Muslim warrior.” … Quite how a man who made such remarks (and has since failed to renounce them) ended up being honoured by the Archbishop of Canterbury for services to interfaith harmony is anyone’s guess.
After stonewalling questions for several hours, Lambeth Palace said yesterday lunchtime that it was “urgently reviewing this matter”. Just before 6.30pm, the award was unceremoniously withdrawn.
So ended a turgid day for the newly minted Archbishop and her team, who appear not to have done the slightest due diligence before inviting Ashrafi to London to accept her achingly fashionable award.
The cleric’s remarks about Bin Laden are, after all, entirely in keeping with a host of other provocative and at times deeply intolerant remarks he’s shared over the years, many of which have achieved the exact opposite of promoting interfaith harmony.
We know this because he has for decades chaired Pakistan’s all-male Ulema Council of Muslim scholars, which issues pronouncements regarding whether specific customs and government policies are compatible with Islamic law.
Thanks to the power and influence this role affords, Ashrafi is frequently invited on the country’s TV and radio stations, and transcripts of his regular press conferences are often shared via the government’s official PR department.
To get a taste of his world view, one need only wind the clock back to March, when the Iran war kicked off.
At a conference, the cleric shared an antisemitic conspiracy theory that the US and Israeli missile strikes were part of a plot to eventually take control of his own country. “Under the cover of Iran, the target of the Jews and Christians is nuclear-armed Pakistan,” he said, before praising Iran’s “mujahideen“, or religious warriors, who were “standing like a wall of lead against Jews and Christians”.
According to the Times of Karachi, he also described the assassinated Ayatollah Khamenei, a despotic theocrat who ran one of the world’s most repressive states and was responsible for the death of tens of thousands of his own citizens, as a “martyr”.
The rhetoric was in keeping with Ashrafi’s response to 2023’s October 7th attacks, in which Hamas terrorists murdered roughly 1,200 civilians and gang-raped, sexually tortured and mutilated hundreds of Israeli women. On the day of the attacks, he appeared on BOL, a Pakistani TV news network, to declare the whole thing entirely justified.
“Hamas’s response is an answer to Israel’s atrocities. Israel has been continuously desecrating Al-Aqsa Mosque,” he said. And added in a second interview: “Allah crushed the pride of Israel through the Palestinian freedom fighters.”
Again, this hardly promotes “interfaith co-operation”. …
While the cleric has just one wife, he has also spoken out in support of bigamy. In March 2014, for example, his Council of Islamic Ideology declared a Pakistani law requiring a man’s first wife to provide consent for him to marry a second, third or fourth woman was un-Islamic.
“Islam permits the husband to marry four times and he does not need permission for it,” Ashrafi told reporters.
“Islam clearly says that a man can marry more than once if he treats all his wives fairly.”
Again, what Archbishop Mullally makes of this view is anyone’s guess. As, perhaps, is her opinion regarding Ashrafi’s robust views regarding anyone who has the temerity to criticise his religion.
The cleric is a vigorous supporter of Pakistan’s draconian blasphemy laws, which stipulate the death penalty for critics of Islam.
In 2020, he spoke out in support of the arrest of 100 clerics belonging to different religious sects, with reports saying he “supported the arrest of all those who commit blasphemy of sacred Muslim figures”.
Ashrafi has also long campaigned for such rules to be exported overseas, telling a press conference in 2023: “We hope the European Union will pay attention to the crucial issue and there will be legislation at the international level in this regard.”
In 2015, he responded to the murder of 12 journalists from the satirical French magazine Charlie Hebdo – which had published images of the Prophet Mohammed – in a staggeringly tasteless fashion, by chairing a meeting in Lahore, which “declared the publication of blasphemous sketches by a French journal terrorism and demanded the United Nations enact an international law linking the freedom of expression with respect for religions”.
Those remarks were, it must be stressed, made two weeks after the magazine’s staff members had been murdered by a pair of armed Islamist terrorists.
Some might regard that as ugly. Not so the Archbishop of Canterbury, judging by her decision to honour Ashrafi for being “the hope in the world”.
Worth reading in full.
Bear in mind that this is the same Church of England which sacked and blacklisted a school chaplain for telling pupils they didn’t have to agree with LGBT ideology. So it seems it’s awards for anti-Western Muslims with backward views, punishment for conservative Christians who stand up for the Bible. And the church wonders why it’s held in contempt by so many.


Discussion
Comments
This week across the site:
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
they are both in the same game, talking to their imaginary friend.
Christopher Hitchens prescient statement that “the barbarians never take a city until someone holds the gates open to them, and it’s your own multicultural authorities who will do it for you” is reinforced every day.
Why does the author think it is worth mentioning that the Muslim cleric calls the February Hamas attackers “freedom fighters”? Whatever else could they be but freedom fighters when the Zionists are trying to displace them from their homeland?
Were I a Brit after what might have been (but thankfully was not) a Nazi wartime invasion, and were I subsequently holed up in some far corner of what had once been been England, I would have died of shame rather than not become a Hamas-like freedom fighter. It would have been unthinkable for me not to take up arms to combat the German Nazis whom the Zionists so closely resemble.
My wife’s late father, Moshe Tobias, was Jewish and we still visit his grave in Brighton feeling certain that were he alive today he would be one of the growing number of noble Jewish people worldwide who are joining in the condemnation of the Zionst atrocities in Gaza.
I have no respect for those who pretend speak on behalf of the dead to make a point of debate. Visit whoever’s grave you like, don’t pretend you know what they’d think or say.
Israel pulled out of Gaza in 2005 and evicted 10,000 Israelis, graves included. Hamas had been chucked out of Lebanon prior to that (no complaint from quislings like you) moved in to Gaza, bullied their way to election victory, destroyed the market garden industry, immiserated the people deliberately, fired rockets at Israel continually and butcher and torture their own people in the street, and used the Al Shifa hospital as a torture centre. They deny the people of Gaza democracy, free movement, religion, press, education, sexuality, association, commerce…. but Israel’s the problem? Right.
https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/mde21/1643/2015/en/
P.s If you want to see which side resembles Nazis maybe look up who the 13th Waffen SS. You’ll never guess. And they went to fight in the Arab/Israeli war of 1948
Only an irredeemably brainwashed Zionist could claim that 2005 was a genuine pullout. The murderous Israeli colonists have oppressed the Gaza people by continually “mowing the lawn”.
Just consider:-
Operation Cast Lead (2008–2009): A 22-day military assault involving extensive air strikes and a ground invasion.
Operation Pillar of Defense (2012): An eight-day targeted aerial and naval campaign.
Operation Protective Edge (2014): A 50-day conflict featuring heavy bombardment and a significant ground incursion.
Operation Guardian of the Walls (2021): An 11-day intensive air and artillery campaign targeting underground infrastructure. [1, 2]
This is what the people of Gaza have been up against and the world can see what blind twits cannot.
Every Israeli operation was in response to Hamas firing hundreds of rockets at Israeli cities. If Hamas had any sense rather than being motivated by religious ideology and a desire to wipe Israel off the map, the only thing that isn’t obvious is whether they’d allow Jews to emigrate or try and massacre them all, the wouldn’t attack Israel when there’s such a massive imbalance in firepower.
Do tell us what it is about Islamic fundamentalism you find so appealing?
I do not find islamic fundamentalism appealing. I just find the burial of mothers, babies and children beneath the rubble of Gaza to be a Nazi-like war crime. And any decent person can seeit too.
It is truly tragic that you have been brainwashed to this extent, and equally so that you hold such strong views that are entirely contradicted by the historical record.
Historicl record? Only an irredeemably brainwashed Zionist could claim that 2005 so called withdrawal was a genuine pullout. The murderous Israeli colonists have oppressed the Gaza people by continually “mowing the lawn”.
Just consider:-
Operation Cast Lead (2008–2009): A 22-day military assault involving extensive air strikes and a ground invasion.
Operation Pillar of Defense (2012): An eight-day targeted aerial and naval campaign.
Operation Protective Edge (2014): A 50-day conflict featuring heavy bombardment and a significant ground incursion.
Operation Guardian of the Walls (2021): An 11-day intensive air and artillery campaign targeting underground infrastructure. [1, 2]
This is what the people of Gaza have been up against and the world can see what blind twits cannot.
next time you are in brighton, stay away from the sea, the sea spray is affecting your thinking.
Here we go again with the old “one person’s terrorist is another person’s freedom fighter” bullshit. There’s an obvious and easily understood, to anyone who isn’t an anti-Semite, simpleton or both, difference.
Freedom fighters attack military and political targets. Terrorists murder innocent civilians. This applies regardless of whether or not someone agrees with the cause.
Admittedly the difference between the 2 can become blurred, for example the IRA attacked political and military targets as well as murdering civilians although I’m not for one second suggesting IRA attacks against the British army or the Brighton bombing were justified. Hamas never attacked military targets until fighting for their worthless lives when Israel invaded Gaza to try and eliminate them.
The French resistance during WWII were freedom fighters, they attacked military targets but didn’t cross in Germany and murder civilians, this would of made them terrorists.
Judging by the name Mullally, she is no doubt a Roman Catholic plant who has joined KCIII and is bent on finally destroying the Church of England.
Sarah Whatawally
I’m not CofE but from a distance my impression is that Mullally’s main purpose in life is to destroy whatever little connection her church still has with Christianity.
I was brought up in the C of E but have never been blessed with ‘the gift of faith’. My parents, both deceased, would I believe have been thoroughly embarassed by the Archbishop’s antics. And that, I also suspect is also true of many (possibly all?) of the thoroughly decent and clergy and laity who I know. Possibly it’s time for a breakaway church to organise? A Reformation, so to speak.
What a pity the Archpriestess didn’t feel uncomfortable enough to say, “Who in God’s name decided this man should be put forward to be given this award? The world is not always as we would like it – and I’m not going to like it and lump it by being surrounded by these two female manikins for ultra-conservative religious dress. As if my clerical robes make theirs acceptable by juxtaposition.”
Dangerous creatures like Sarah Mullally don’t investigate properly because they don’t want to know the results of the investigation. What Mullally wants is to express her misplaced mothering instinct, to acquire a pet and mascot, and to indulge her masochistic fantasy of being subjugated by the “other”. These are more important to her than the liberation of Muslim women from the cloth coffin.
She is also disastrously under qualified. How was this allowed to happen? Is it linked to the King’s new title of Protector of the Space for Faith within a Multi Faith Nation?
Corrupt churches allied with the anti-thesis of Christianity – the Muslim Moon Cult.
Maybe this loser expects the Muslims to formally conquer what was once a White Christian country. Grovelling, appeasement and all that. Fighting back would never cross her low IQ neuron-less grey egg.