The Government Should Focus on Cutting the Deficit, Not Policing Apple Crumble

Labour's latest plan to micro-manage school dinner menus is yet more displacement activity from a Government that has proved itself singularly unable to bring down the UK's £3.7 trillion debt, says Alexander McKibbin.

4 min read
Subscribe to Listen

As they say in University Challenge: here’s your starter for 10.

Can you spontaneously name five pieces of legislation passed by either this or the previous government that impacted positively on your life?

Whilst not willing to bet the house on it, I would wager a modest sum that most people would answer negatively. Conversely, I suspect many of those engaged in running small businesses, or those within the hospitality sector, could readily reel off multiple examples of government activity that has been detrimental to them personally.

Yet administrations of every political persuasion busily engage themselves in stupendous amounts of legislation, little if any of which presents any tangible benefit for the ever-dwindling army of taxpayers whose obligatory largesse keeps this increasingly rickety charade on the road. Despite almost endless and increasingly banal soundbites earnestly delivered by a litany of forgettable MPs, nothing really changes – apart from the tax burden increasing, accompanied by the inane expression ‘we have to make difficult choices’.

Of all the moronic utterances, this is the one that sticks chokingly in many peoples’ craw. Increasing taxes is not a difficult choice for spendthrift governments: it is both easy and convenient. No, a difficult decision would be to take a sizeable and razor-sharp axe to the bloated corpse of welfare whilst simultaneously putting the sainted NHS under a financial microscope, peered over by someone who has a least had a passing acquaintance with running a profit and loss account.

Successive Prime Ministers and Cabinets have noisily beavered away in endeavours that could best be described as displacement activity, and disappointingly, it appears that the King of the North will be no different on this score.

In short order, and in a deluge of humbuggery, we have had the bus fare cap (cost), a pledge to end rough sleeping (cost), the VAT cut to electricity bills (cost), free 24-hour bus travel for disabled people (cost), West Midlands Bus Network under public control (cost). Reviewing these, someone medically trained might diagnose our erstwhile PM to be suffering from latent Bus Derangement Syndrome.

The day after the UK debt stood at £3.7 trillion – that’s 110% of GDP, or to put it another way, £46,678 per citizen – what were the electorate served up with?

Well, the Minister for School Standards, Georgia Gould, was doing the media rounds promoting her “exciting” first new school food standards for more than a decade, which would see happy youngsters eagerly queuing up to be handed delicious and nutritious portions of lentils and chickpeas. As Gould put it: “It’s a massive issue for parents. And we want our children to be healthy.”

But if parents were in any doubt of the absurdity of this initiative, Gould didn’t disappoint, remarking that fish and chips “will still be allowed” on menus but baked rather than fried – Hurrah!

At the moment you could have, you know, dessert, apple crumble, ice cream every day. In the new rules, it would be twice a week, but with fruit attached to it. At the moment, you don’t have to have fruit and vegetables in every meal. And in these new rules, you will have to have it in every meal.

Is it just me, or is it really the job of a minister to be policing apple crumble?

Thankfully, the Minister insisted there was money for such changes, with the overhaul phased in “sensibly” to accommodate budgets.

Give me strength, but I suppose Sir Keir’s previous £111 million plan for supervised tooth brushing for pupils aged three to five set an impressively high benchmark in ludicrousness which Gould has striven magnificently to better.

The forthcoming budget – eagerly anticipated by those in the commercial sector – will be a litmus test for whether Burnham is serious about fiscal discipline and determined to take unpopular decisions that would ultimately benefit the United Kingdom. On the evidence so far, I suspect that we will be served a warm hash of Sixth Form student politics with a side order of northern hubris and a healthy portion of sour grapes – enjoy!

Alexander McKibbin is a retired media executive who worked across domestic and international media.

Comments

This week across the site:

Email me alerts for this discussion
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

13 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
shred
shred
9 hours ago

One piece of government regulation which must come near the top position for uselessness is the current placing of signs on motorway and other roads that the bridge under which drivers are passing is an ‘overhead structure’.

JXB
JXB
11 hours ago

Every piece of legislation passed in the last 30 years has negatively affected all our lives.

stafford
stafford
13 hours ago

Just asking, so if there is a crumble topping on any cooked fruit (or is it just apples) then it doesn’t count as fruit? Help

Hound of Heaven
Hound of Heaven
16 hours ago

No one has considered the danger of post prandial chemistry lessons. Just imagine a lab full of youngsters who have had lentils for lunch. Pulses cause severe flatulence which could have an explosive effect when lighting rows of Bunsen burners. I hope teachers are alert to this.

Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
1 day ago

“…and disappointingly, it appears that the King of the North will be no different.”

You expected and hoped for something different?!

lebowski
lebowski
1 day ago

I’m surprised they’re not replacing crumble with Manchester tart. Manchesterism innit.

JXB
JXB
11 hours ago
Reply to  lebowski

Manchester tart? That’s an unkind name to call Andy Capp.

Heretic
Heretic
1 day ago

Great title for this article! Alexander McKibbin has hit the nail on the head with this description:

Successive Prime Ministers and Cabinets have noisily beavered away in endeavours that could best be described as displacement activity.”

NeilParkin
NeilParkin
1 day ago

If you were going into a business that had cash flow crisis, loss of investor confidence, production issues, and you spent your first month getting new vending machines, and putting on Taco’s for Taco Tuesday, everyone would think you were incompetent, and they would be right. Burnham, and indeed all of Labour are obsessed with trivialities. This is because they can’t even frame the problems we have in welfare, immigration, slow economy, loss of manufacturing, police, judiciary prisons and courts let alone tackle them. They are in denial and aren’t going to face up to any of it.

JXB
JXB
11 hours ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

Busying themselves with multiple trivial things is to give the impression of action, achieving things, getting the job done, but it actually gives the impression of not wanting to tackle the big things, and lack of competence to do so.

GasBoy75
GasBoy75
1 day ago

a litmus test for whether Burnham is serious about fiscal discipline”

Can someone help me out here?

DickieA
DickieA
1 day ago
Reply to  GasBoy75

Is Burnham serious about fiscal discipline?

Pro Tip: NO.

JXB
JXB
11 hours ago
Reply to  GasBoy75

The principle of “fiscal discipline” is incomprehensible to Andy Capp as with all Socialists. The part of their brains required to process the idea either failed to develop in the womb or has withered through lack of use.

The aim is to spend more and more without the inconvenience of worrying where the money will come from.

Thank you for reading. Please help us keep the Daily Sceptic going by becoming a donor.