According to Ambrose Evans-Pritchard in the Telegraph, Spain’s catastrophic blackout (apagón) which stopped most of the country in its tracks may have been the result of a disastrous experiment to test how far the nation’s renewable energy sources can be pushed. But it wasn’t the renewables that were at fault, apparently. It was the ruling Spanish Socialist Workers’ Party fixation with rushing renewables in, without investing in the grid:
Sources in Brussels have told the Telegraph that the authorities were conducting an experiment before the system crashed, probing how far they could push reliance on renewables in preparation for Spain’s rushed phase-out of nuclear reactors from 2027.
The Government seems to have pushed the pace recklessly, before making the necessary investments in a sophisticated 21st-century smart grid capable of handling it.
One is reminded of the Chernobyl meltdown in 1986, which began as a test to simulate what happens to a cooling reactor in blackout conditions. Operators ignored warnings that the Number Four reactor had too little power. It set off a cascading failure.
If it is established that the blackout was a controlled experiment that went wrong, and if this information has been withheld from the public for almost four weeks, the Spanish Left faces electoral oblivion for a political generation.
The Government has de facto control over Red Eléctrica through a golden share (in breach of EU norms). It put a socialist politician and party loyalist in charge even though she had no experience in the field and faced withering criticism at the time. Her salary in this plum job is six times higher than the Spanish Prime Minister.
Renewable energy has been blamed for the failures, but the Spanish Association of Electrical Energy Companies (AELEC) claims renewables are being scapegoated by a government whose own mismanagement is chiefly to blame:
AELEC, which includes Endesa, IBM, Iberdrola and Schneider Electric, said the authorities had inverted the likely chain of causality. It was not the generators that failed to deliver stable power to the grid: it was the grid that failed to manage it and then automatically shut down the generators, whether solar, wind, nuclear or gas.
The solar companies in the southern belt of Badajoz, Granada and Sevilla are indignant at the finger-pointing after the blackout, which insinuated that they had supplied too much power or too little power – the story keeps changing – without ever seeing any evidence for either.
AELEC said the authorities had essentially confined the inquiry to a 20-second span on April 28th, wilfully ignoring the elephant in the room: a series of wild oscillations in tension that began days earlier and surpassed ’emergency’ levels across the peninsula for two hours leading up to the blackout.
The voltage spiked from the normal 220 kilovolts (kV) to extremes of 250kV. This triggered safety shutdowns.
Claims have been aired – and denied – that there was a lack of inertia in the grid just before the blackout, causing the frequency to fall below 50 hertz.
But:
Modern systems replicate the inertia through other means, such as ‘grid-forming’ inverters at wind and solar plants. You can install synchronous condensers at substations. Britain has a fleet of flywheels that come to the rescue.
Foes of green energy like to mix up the inertia problem with the separate issue of what happens when the sun isn’t shining and the wind isn’t blowing. The short-term answer is batteries, cryogenic compressed air and interconnectors. Spain lacks enough of any of them.
Ah yes, renewable energy would all work fine, if only everyone had enough batteries and interconnectors. We’ve heard that one before. Just don’t mention how much it would cost to build and maintain enough batteries to power a whole country, the shortage of the necessary raw materials, the fire risk and the problem that interconnectors can’t help much when a whole region is suffering under the same winter dunkelflaute.
Evans-Pritchard’s conclusion is that it’s the fixation with ‘absolutism’ that’s at fault, the obsessive belief that all other sources of power must be eliminated in the pursuit of 100% renewables:
Mr Sánchez might do better to stop waging guerrilla war against his nuclear industry. Foro Nuclear said Spain’s seven reactors have an average age of 47 years and could safely be extended to 60 years or longer.
It is the Spanish Socialist Workers’ Party that ought to be on political trial in this fiasco. Green energy is the collateral casualty.
I’m pretty sure it’s both that ought to be on trial.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
“Will no longer have to do so”
They never had to do so
The letters that some people recieved did read very much like Government Orders to shield.
I was interested to read them because the recipients had similar conditions to mine but I never recieved such ‘instructions’.
I have RA for which I take a an immuno-supressent drug. Been on it for years, probably been in contact with all sorts of infections, colds, flus, viruses, every day of my life, as I go about my business, but I’ve always been careful, and have remained in fairly good health. For the whole of last year, I wasn’t considered “vulnerable” even though my GP “thought” I should “maybe” be on the list, but nothing more was said or done, not that I wanted to shield! The charity that supports people with arthritis even said those taking the level of drug that I’m on, are fine to not have to shield! My shopping deliveries, though, stopped last year, which I needed, due to problems with joint pain – luckily, I had some family help. Even though I questioned it, I wasn’t deemed “vulnerable” enough! So, I just got with my life, no illness, no fears, no mask, just looking after myself, supporting my immune system, shutting down all MSM…Then about a month ago, I got a letter from NHS, telling me I’m suddenly not just “vulnerable” but “clinically, extremely vulnerable!” and that I SHOULD shield for the next three weeks or so! In the letter was the inevitable heavy push to get vaccinated – but no information at all about the “vaccine,” so how am I supposed to give my “informed consent!” Basically, the letter was dumped. They obviously thought I was vulnerable enough suddenly, when there’s a vaccine to push hard!
I spent much of last summer wondering what to do in the event of receiving ‘shield’ instructions, I would almost certainly have ignored them (insurances permitting) and carried on hoping for the best.
I’ve had several government (ie not GP) prompts to take up the vaccine but only once was the phrase ‘vulnerable group’ used and that might have related to age.
Indeed!
Exactly. Disappointing to see the blurring of the distinction between guidance and law perpetuated here. It just shows how pervasive the coronamadness paradigm has become that even sceptics like those writing ATL slip up.
I was out and about as a key worker from day 1 of lockdown 2020 despite having COPD and asthma which were presumed to be bad news re the covid. This was because I took the view that if Covid was gonna get me no amount of shielding at home was going to prevent that.
I have a colleague who does exactly the same as me who has been ‘shielding at home’ for 12 months now, I expect his immune system is shot to hell, ready to fail in the face of the first kiddie lurgey to come his way.
After the first 3 or 4 weeks I ceased to worry overmuch about it, masks had yet to become a thing, sanitizer could largely be ignored and I didn’t need to shop in places with queues.
Not having access to terrestrial TV and ceasing to buy print media no doubt shielded me from the worst of the government generated fear porn that put people into shielding in the first place.
If you used an asthma inhaler, that probably helped you, as well as you maintaining your immune system.
As a general point, more substantial evidence is emerging about highly probable prophylaxis from various medicines.
The almost total neglect of this area seems to me confirmatory evidence that this is a vaccine marketing campaign, not serious evidence-based medicine
I do use an inhaler and learned subsequently about their immune system benefits.
You’re a wise person, kv. And if you lost a lot from the year just passed, as we all did, at least you didn’t consign yourself to living death.
Thank you Annie, I did lose financially entirely due to lockdown but, as you say, I remained a real live human being and not a cowering Covid zombie.
A friend’s sister was out and about during the first lockdown, going to the shops and for walks.
In July (I think) she was told she had to shield for the next fourteen weeks
Her attitiude was “I’ve survived this long”
Important to note that the letters say that shielding has been *paused*. The politicians are clearly leaving it open to reintroduce if it becomes politically expedient.
More fools those who obey.