Since the Supreme Court ruling that in the Equality Act 2010 “sex” means “biological sex”, you may have noticed the same MPs regularly appearing on air to question the decision.
Some of the most prominent critics of the judgment include Carla Denya, co-leader of the Green Party, fellow Green Sian Berry, the Labour Party’s Nadia Whittome, and Clive Lewis, as well as independent ex-Labour MPs Zarah Sultana and Jeremy Corbyn.
To read the rest of this article, you need to donate at least £5/month or £50/year to the Daily Sceptic, then create an account on this website. The easiest way to create an account after you’ve made a donation is to click on the ‘Log In’ button on the main menu bar, click ‘Register’ underneath the sign-in box, then create an account, making sure you enter the same email address as the one you used when making a donation. Once you’re logged in, you can then read all our paywalled content, including this article. Being a donor will also entitle you to comment below the line, discuss articles with our contributors and editors in a members-only Discord forum and access the premium content in the Sceptic, our weekly podcast. A one-off donation of at least £5 will also entitle you to the same benefits for one month. You can donate here.
There are more details about how to create an account, and a number of things you can try if you’re already a donor – and have an account – but cannot access the above perks on our Premium page.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Thought Police. Churchill warned of this in the ’45 election (a Gestapo). Much pilloried of course. Seems prescient to me. I know of a white woman (Catholic of course, never Muzzie or Black etc) who was arrested for tweets opposing the tranny agenda. Police arrested her in front of her 5 children. Other Christians arrested for silent prayers outside of Moloch’s baby-murdering shops. Starmtard’s ‘online speech bill’ will only hasten the demise of thinking and speaking. You might well be arrested for just how you look, or if someone sees that you sport a cross or some symbol they don’t like.
A diabolical situation.
There will be a terrible temptation for politicians to expand the scope of monitoring to any ‘crisis of the week’ that captures their attention. Mission creep for creeps, perhaps?
Absolutely.
Call him mad but Davis Icke warned about all of this decades ago.
The people are the nation, not the government, and particularly not the last two governments who have clearly betrayed their own people and committed treason. The only people that “pose a threat to national security” and are a “public safety risk” are the treacherous elites forcing globalist Marxist policy on the masses.
Hear, hear.
A point I have made time and again, and cannot be over-emphasised.
“analyse social media narratives”.
Another attempt to shut down debate. Some (perhaps many) people will be dissuaded from publicly voicing their opinions. Others won’t be stopped at all. But perhaps many will modify their language to be more nuanced and subtle, to go under the AI radar and avoid plod feeling their collar.
And yet, unless the government and courts become extraordinarily draconian, they will not succeed in shutting down unapproved narratives. When sites like this start producing tame and approved narratives (content and comments), then I will know that the game is up.
The game is never up. If the worst comes to the worst we will resort to the printed word. I imagine every household with a computer will have a printer / photocopier.
Oddly enough, I have been thinking the same thing myself!
“The current focus of beta testing is the influence of foreign states during elections.”
Give it a bloody rest for crying out loud.
We know the establishment consider the plebs to be utter dunces but many of us have seen through this years ago.
‘looking solely for posts “which pose a threat to national security and public safety risk”.
Given that the vast majority of “security and public safety risks” are perpetrated by the ROPers we scumbag whities have nothing to worry about unless we perhaps post some hurty words about Kneel’s mates.
Its our money, by what right do they steal our money to spy on us, to send the Police in, to censor and ruin lives so they can stay in power.
We are the most watched population in the world, and yet our Police are incapable of solving burglaries, Murders, Rapes, abductions. But they can destroy people who write or say anything against the Government or its selected priority communities.
Is this not a possible case that the Free Speech society could bring against the Government.
In what way is Two-Tier substantially different from Eric Honecker?
Our freedoms started to be restricted under Blair
Just think how many more people Stalin could have murdered if he’d had access to this!