Police forces and the courts are allowing criminals to self-identify their gender even if they have not legally changed sex, with criminals who believe they are a different gender routinely referred to by their preferred pronouns by police and judges. The Telegraph has more.
It had previously been revealed that some forces record transgender rapists as female but guidance issued by forces and the courts indicates that criminals of all kinds can self-identify.
It is feared that the self-ID policy – which remains widely in force despite a series of high-profile trans cases – skews crime statistics.
While crime statistics are recorded for males and females, there are no specific records for transgender criminals.
Holding a Gender Recognition Certificate legally changes a person’s gender, but suspects are being recorded under their trans identity even if they do not have one.
Chris Philp, the Shadow Home Secretary, said “men should not be treated as women” in the criminal justice system.
“There are only two sexes, and it is not possible to change sex,” he said. “In matters of criminal law and justice, men should not be treated as women. In Government we were working towards clarifying the Equality Act to prevent public authorities like the police from implementing self-ID policies without legal foundation.”
Judges across England and Wales are advised to refer to transgender criminals in court according to their “chosen gender identity”.
Guidance issued by the Judicial Office says doing so is typically “unproblematic” and can be done “regardless of whether they have obtained legal recognition of their sex/gender by way of a GRC”.
But it also warns that “there will be situations where it is clearly inappropriate”, such as in the case of rape or where a witness knew the defendant as their former gender.
Similar practices are followed by a number of police forces, including the British Transport Police.
The force refers to and records the gender of transgender criminals according to “their preferred pronouns and gender identity” and that usually “records of sex would be recorded in line with their given/self-defined gender identity”, irrespective of whether they have a GRC or not. BTP denied this was the case when approached for comment.
Other forces, including South Yorkshire Police, require transgender suspects and criminals to have first acquired a GRC before they can be recorded under their trans identity.
But if criminals do have one, the force will recognise their gender transition even in sexual offence cases which can only be committed by biological males, such as rape.
Such cases include Isla Bryson, the Scottish two-time rapist who was referred to in court in 2023 with she/her pronouns, and Maddison Wilson, who died last month before being due to appear in court to face rape allegations.
The National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC), which represents senior police officers, advises forces to do the same.
Worth reading in full.
Of course, it might be noted that the Telegraph also routinely uses ‘preferred pronouns’ instead of biologically accurate ones…
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
There they go again with “biological males”. “Male” is an entirely biological term. There is no other way to be “male”.
“Gender” means nothing to me. What is being referred to here is “sex for the purposes of the law” I suppose. You cannot “change sex” but I suppose if the law so chooses it can recognise the right of people to be treated as the opposite sex to what they really are, which may lead to different outcomes where sex is relevant to the case at hand. Probably a good thing – the more idiotic and evil they bastards become, the more ordinary people will wake up to the madness of it.
If gender is anything you want it to be, then it is nothing. Something that is everything and anything is nothing.
Isn’t that the ultimate dream of the proponents of gender equality? That gender stops being a factor or non-existent for any practical purpose?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/bombshell-stats-the-state-doesnt-want-you-to-see/
A first rate article from Matt Goodwin over at TCW in which he makes the blatantly reasonable assertion that British citizens cannot rightly be accused of “mis” and “dis” information if information which should be in the public domain is being kept from us.
“Of the 87 nationalities which have a higher conviction rate for sexual offences than the British population, the British state, last year, gave out nearly 600,000 long-term visas to people from those countries. Is the British state even taking account of this data? Is the state adequately screening people for criminality and prior convictions?
More generally, beyond sexual offences, the new information released by police authorities also shows that foreign nationals are 69 per cent more likely than British people to be convicted for drug crimes, 25 per cent more likely to be convicted for theft, and 39 per cent more likely to be convicted for all crimes.
Those from Albania, Moldova, Congo, Namibia and Somalia are the most likely nationalities to be convicted for crime.”
And it is an absolute certainty that these so-called official figures hide the Pakistani rapists who I don’t doubt will be hiding behind British (yeah right) passports.
It is government itself that are the Champions of “Misinformation”. With their silly Hate Crimes and their Climate Emergency and all the rest of the total crap they come away with in order to manipulate and control us.
So stop quoting the Telegraph …
It covered up the Covid scam, the 2020 Presidential Election steal, shilled for Carbon Zero, had a front page column for Transgender bloke.
There are multiple better sources
I think the motivations for male to female ( MtF ) and female to male ( FtM ) people in turning ‘trans’ are interesting because of their obvious differences, which further highlights the difference between the male and female mind. As previously mentioned, I’m seeing no evidence of females transitioning to males because they want to beat men at sports, infiltrate their single-sex private spaces in order to perv or act in a predatory manner, and I’m not aware of any female equivalent fetish to autogynaephilia. So without this turning into an essay I’d say it’s fairly obvious to most that the sexes wish to identify as the opposite sex for very different reasons and I think it’s not exactly a stretch to conclude which sex is committing the most crimes and is benefiting from exploiting the law regarding gender ideology the most. A clip that’s doing the rounds which better describes autogynaephilia;
”Since 2003, political trans activists and their “allies” have done everything they could to prevent the word and the concept of autogynephilia from entering public awareness. And yet, with excruciating slowness but apparent inevitability, it is doing just that.”
https://x.com/BlanchardPhD/status/1901626337871147301
I think the connection with porn usage is something seldom discussed in the context of men who identify as women and their obvious kinks and fetishes. The very last thing these men are is oppressed victims;
”Creators of the Matrix, the Wachowski brothers, credited porn with their transgender identities and were a part of LA’s BDSM community.
Dominatrix Karin Winslow, aka Ilsa Strix, ran the Dungeon where the Wachowski brothers went for sexual sessions with trans porn star Buck Angel – who she would later leave to marry Larry Wachowski after he “transed” to Lana.
Strix’s speciality was CBT – a form of genital torture that involves inserting needles, constricting blood flow, and causing injuries to the testicles.
Andrew Wachowski, now “Lilly,” has advocated “transitioning” children, ie, chemical and / or surgical castration, and has partnered with the ACLU.
Sadomasochism, pornography, and body modification fetishism is at the core of gender identity ideology.”
https://x.com/WomenReadWomen/status/1800027904858063228
More on the connection between the gender cult and extreme porn, and why it needs to be kept the hell away from kids and vulnerable young people. This is particularly unpleasant and graphic stuff;
”A former queer activist from Norway sentenced to life in prison for launching an extreme body modification website dedicated to streaming “grisly and gruesome” footage of castrations and limb amputations has appealed the length of his sentence. Marius Gustavson, known as the ‘Eunuch Maker’ of London, along with five of his main accomplices, told the Old Bailey that their sentences should be reduced on the basis that their victims had consented to undergo grievous bodily harm.
Gustavson was the ringleader of a “grisly and gruesome” criminal enterprise that sold footage of men being castrated and mutilated as pornographic content. The Eunuch Maker site, which operated on a pay-per-view subscription basis, had amassed over 22,000 registered users and brought in nearly £300,000 before it was shut down by authorities.
Police officers who arrested Gustavson in 2022 discovered the man’s own severed penis kept in a drawer at his home in Haringey, north London, a full four years after he’d had his appendage amputated. During court proceedings, it was further revealed that Gustavson had cooked the testicles of one of his victims, which he ate in a salad.”
https://reduxx.info/exclusive-details-norwegian-queer-activist-who-produced-extreme-genital-mutilation-porn-lodges-appeal-for-reduced-sentence/
Thanks Mogwai,
I wouldn’t have guessed at this depth of depravity. I’m not sure my knowledge has been enhanced by this, but “……he ate in a salad.” ?
With some fava beans and a nice Chianti?
XY Masquerading as XX, testosterone pretending to be estrogen – and seekers after truth, masquerading as law-enforcement and pretending to be judiciary, both fall for it.
You couldn’t make it up if you tried, except criminals do all the time, aided and abetted by state-sponsored masquerading and pretending.
What a total bunch of wimps we are in this country. Where is our TRUMP? Or are we going just keep sinking down into the wokery cesspit?