Ed Miliband’s Net Zero crusade is driving wedges within Labour and raising fears of power cuts that could leave the Government in the dark – literally and politically – says Dan Hodges in the Mail. Here’s an excerpt:
Miliband’s green zealotry was again on display last week after it was reported he was preparing to challenge Rachel Reeves’s – belated – growth strategy. The embattled Chancellor found herself ambushed as the Energy Secretary led the charge against her plan to give the go-ahead to a third runway at Heathrow.
Though he insisted he had no plans to resign over the issue, Eco Ed’s opposition is well documented. In 2018, he voted against the proposals, declaring: “We owe it to future generations not just to have good environmental principles but to act on them. That is why I will be voting against the third runway at Heathrow.”
His principles have obviously become a little more flexible since taking office. But several colleagues are becoming increasingly alarmed at the influence he is having within the Starmer administration.
“Before the Election, Keir basically did a deal with Ed,” another minister revealed to me. “He said, ‘Look, I don’t want you to have too much of a public profile because it’ll remind people too much of the past. But I’m going to give you Energy, and you can have free rein to do what needs to be done.’”
The problem is that Miliband is now exercising that freedom with a vengeance. And as he ploughs ahead with his cherished Net Zero agenda, some analysts are starting to question whether the National Grid can keep up.
Two weeks ago, the National Energy System Operator (NESO) – the body responsible for the operation of the electricity system – was forced to issue an Electricity Margin Notice, essentially warning that the U.K.’s demand for power was coming dangerously close to exceeding supply. Although NESO claimed there was never a serious risk of power cuts, respected energy consultant Kathryn Porter revealed the “near miss” represented the tightest day in the energy market since 2011. …
Last week, the Unite trade union announced it was ramping up its ‘No Ban Without A Plan’ oil and gas campaign. According to General Secretary Sharon Graham: “Labour needs to reverse its irresponsible policy banning all new oil and gas licences irrespective of the impact on jobs.” …
There is no doubt his passion for protecting the environment is real. But if his strategy fails – or can only be delivered by hammering the jobs and livelihoods of working people – Net Zero will become as politically toxic as the Poll Tax or university tuition fees.
I asked one of Miliband’s colleagues if he thought he understood how high the stakes were. He shrugged.
“You have to understand, there are two Eds. Actually, there are three. There’s Ed the former New Labour adviser, who is well aware of the necessity of public support. There’s Ed the former party leader, who thinks he now has the chance to reshape politics. And there’s Ed the minister, who sees himself as the new Greta Thunberg. The question is which one will come out on top.”
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
I love these comedic pieces by IRons.
I do agree on how frustrating it is that so many Covid sceptics are unable to appreciate nuances in the Ukraine war. Wars have never been black and white before, and it’s naïve to think that for some reason this one is a historical exception.
Of course the media is aggressively pedalling a narrative, as they did with WMD in Iraq, and also with support for the Mujahedeen during the Soviet-Afghan war (remember the unbelievably accurate Rambo III).
Russia nor the West is the ‘good guy’ here. Ukraine is the geopolitical destination where they have chosen to do battle. NATO was expanding, Russia was countering by creating a ‘sphere of influence’ (Yanukovych was Putin’s man), and then the CIA decided to engineer the Euromaidan coup.
As if this wasn’t complicated enough, the Ukraine already has diverse demographics with pro-Russian and pro-European elements.
bio labs
one party, no free speech Uke state
Jewlensky and the kleptocracy (send money now or…)
money laundering to the criminal US political elite
endless wars for the criminal US military industry
NWO
Nazi Azov brigade….. but according to LRonHubbard the Uketopia is a democracy and the last hope. I think the Russians should copy all of this in say Mexico.
Oh FFS. Tell me you know nothing about Ukraine in one easy phrase.
Yeah but more importantly, is this Zalensky or has he been ‘deep-faked’? Please tell me it’s the latter because he looks way too comfortable in those stilettos!
Even BoJo couldn’t pull off getting elected if he had this camptastic skeleton lurking in his closet, and he’s a professional buffoon.
https://rumble.com/v1gyrgl-zalensky-bdsm-video.html
Hard hitting post laced with truths. Well done
“Kiev” isn’t the Russian form: they don’t use the same alphabet as us.
It’s the name of the city in English. Just as Florence is the English name for Firenze, and Londres is the French name for London.
I’m 62 and had never seen the city called Kyiv before last February.
Exactly. The Russian Cyrillic form of Kiev is Киев.
Agreed. I’ve used ‘Ukraine’ and ‘The Ukraine’ interchangeably for my entire life. ‘Kyiv’ is just a load of nonsense. Since when do you randomly change the spelling of cities in foreign countries because someone invaded it? Do I start calling Paris ‘Paree’ if someone from Berlin starts firing off a capgun in the middle of the street?
Do we start calling Helsinki ‘Helsingfors’ if a Russian decides to take a dump in one of their bathrooms?
It’s Kiev and it’s always been Kiev, the same as there was Kievan Rus centuries ago (which Putin wants to re-establish.) When the BBC was taking about ‘Harrr-heave’ (with lots of phlegm, I had to look it up. Turns out it’s Kharkov, which I’d always known of.
The Ukraine is the first real social media war with all the imbecilic virtue signalling associated with that particular cultural cancer.
If we’re not supposed to call it “the Ukraine” why does the MSM call it “the Donbas?”
In my experience, Ukrainians are happy to hear “the Ukraine”, because historically it referred to a region defined by purely natural characteristics (as opposed to a purely political entity defined by a disconnected elite). Ukrainians would rather ally themselves to a region to which they feel bound naturally.
I am proud to say I am born and bred in the Yorkshire Dales; in no way do I see the definite article as demeaning to the region or the people therein.
Load of fuss about nothing. Our Rons has fallen for it.
Same. I’m from the South West (of England). We’ve always called it ‘The South West.’ Sure it’s part of the Kingdom of England, which is part of the modern political entity called ‘The UK’, but my real loyalty is to the region.
Why is the West supporting Ukraine?
It’s definitely not because the West opposes armed aggression as a matter of principle, supports democracy and freedom or gives a toss about the horribly white Ukrainian people.
Waitrose still sell Chicken Kievs
And I’ve never seen Mumbai Mix.
Even M&S are calling the bloody things Kyivs.
I buy Birds Eye because they still call them Kiev. I feel pathetic doing it but can’t bring myself to buy the other ones. I guess I’m not more pathetic than all the virtue signalling.
They aren’t diffcult to make yourself …. then you can pick any name!
They’re a handy freezer standby for those ‘can’t be arsed’ days!
Or Mumbai Duck, Sapphire, Cat or aloo.
How is this long war going to end? With compromise? Or when one side totally destroys the other side?
If it’s going to end with compromise, why wait, why not compromise now, and save a lot of lives and destruction?
Yes please.
When the Ukrainian people realise that the West doesn’t care two figs about them and only wants to use their country as a proxy battlefield outside of Western territory to try to take down Russia, they’ll be within their rights to turn on the West. It’s so sad: I’d long hoped to visit Russia and the Ukraine. The hatreds that have been created here will take at least a century to die down
And where is our supranational wannabe-world dictatorship government, the UN, in all of this? They were fast enough to pile into the former Yugoslavia in the 1990s. The two sides should have been dragged to the negotiating table a year ago! Someone or someones are getting rich and powerful from all this…
100% correct
like Eisenhower warned the military industrial complex. me too want to visit russia the ukraine and kiev , i refuse to call it the new way.
Both sides are Soviets. The USSR was not a healthy society.
This war is, essentially, between Gorbachev/Yeltsin Soviets and Brezhnev Soviets.
And if you look at a map, Putin wants to incorporate Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova and the Baltic States into a ‘Union State’ with an iron curtain stretching from Kaliningrad in the west to Izmail in the east.
We know this because he makes no secret of his intentions, supported by leaked Russian government documents.
He is backed, economically, by China and, to some extent, by India, Turkey.
So, essentially, any peace short of the full restoration of Ukrainian territorial integrity promised by this country and the U.S.A. in the Budapest Memorandum of 1994 is a win for Putin and China.
And a win for Putin is the de-europeanisation of occupied Ukrainian territory and de-europeanisation is described by Putin’s mouthpiece, RIA Novosti, as de-nazification.
So where, logically, does such a policy end……maybe a town nearer to you, vicar?
Tomorrow Moldova, a week next Thursday Russian marines arriving on Skegness beach to discover they’ve been beaten to it.
You total tit
You have embarrassed yourself.
Of course” leaked” Russian documents can’t possibly be misinformation, can they?
They certainly can be. And they can also be genuine. That is why individuals who have seen FSB documents before are used to assess their authenticity.
In much the same way that 51 “experts” assessed the Hunter Biden laptop?
The answer will be based on political expedience, not reality
I’m sure you are right.
These documents were, no doubt, fakes as well:
‘……classified intelligence from the Pentagon revealed details of Ukraine’s plans for a counteroffensive against Russia, as well as secret assessments of U.S. allies.
The latest leak includes material from the U.S. National Security Agency, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and the Joint Chiefs of Staff Directorate for Intelligence.
The documents reveal the FSB’s behind-closed-doors accusations that officials in Russia’s Defense Ministry have been underreporting Russian troop casualties in Moscow’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine.
The FSB has also been critical of the Defense Ministry’s death toll not including casualties suffered by the Russian National Guard, the Wagner Group, or fighters under the command of Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov, the leak revealed.
In September, Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu announced that 5,937 Russian soldiers had been killed in Ukraine since the war began. No subsequent death toll from the Russian side has been made public since then.
The FSB “calculated the actual number of Russians wounded and killed in action was closer to 110,000,” one document cited by The New York Times reads.
Official U.S. estimates of Russian casualties over the past year total around 200,000. However, documents made public in the earlier leak put this figure somewhere between 189,500 and 223,000, including as many as 43,000 dead.
While The New York Times was unable to independently verify the documents, U.S. officials consulted on the matter did not dispute the information revealed.
The security breach, which has embarrassed Washington and shaken its allies, has given observers a rare insight into how the Pentagon’s intelligence gathering works in Russia. Most significantly, it appears to show that U.S. intelligence has penetrated nearly every branch of the Russian military including the General Staff, the Defense Ministry, Russia’s GRU military intelligence agency, and the notorious mercenary group Wagner.’
The Moscow Times 13 Apr 23
..not forgetting their third largest customer…the EU…. Who have spent around €40 billion on Russian energy……
Nothing like that was promised in the Budapest Memorandum, no matter how many times you try to pretend it was…or try to twist it to your purpose…
”assurances, unlike guarantees, do not impose a legal obligation of military assistance on its parties. It gives signatories justification if they take action, but it does not force anyone to act in Ukraine…”
The United States refuses to sign or to ratify foundational international laws and treaties that the vast majority of countries in the world have signed, such as the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), ( even though the ‘warrant’ for Putin was issued at their behest… CEDAW (the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women), ICESCR (the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights), CRC (the Convention on the Rights of the Child), ICRMW (the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families), UNCLOS (the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea), PAROS (the Prevention of an Arms Race in Outer Space), the Ottawa Treaty (the Anti-Personnel Landmines Convention), and many more….
There are also a slew of international treaties the United States has signed, but simply violates anyway: examples include the Biological Weapons Convention, UN treaties prohibiting torture, rendition and kidnapping and of course, wars of aggression which are considered ”the supreme international crime”—a crime that the United States engages in routinely at least once a decade, not to mention routine drone attacks, which are in violation of international law. Most recently, the AUKUS Agreement signed between the United States and Australia violates the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) by exploiting a blind spot of the (IAEA).
I could go on, but of course there is no equanimity here..only one is doing something wrong and one is always innocent and right..apparently …..
Both sides are Soviets. One is backed by China. One is backed by the U.S.A.
Which side are you on?
For the past 45 years I have been well read on modern world events and modern history and obtain my information from a variety of “trusted” sources.
I compare this information to the lies, propaganda and omissions from Western governments and their “presstitutes” in the main stream media to formulate a well informed opinion.
I find some of the current Russian media and independent Western alternative media are more trustworthy than the Western main stream media.
Consequently, having been well informed on the situation in Ukraine, I find Russia were provoked by the US and Nato and I support their actions against Ukraine which are more legal and more justified than the US/Nato similar actions against Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria etc. etc. etc.
How will the war end?
Only 200,000 members of the Russian army are currently fighting, and about 400,000 to 600,000 are waiting in reserve for the Ukraine attack. While they wait they are in constant training; so waiting works to Russia’s advantage.
Once the famous “counter-offensive” peters out, Ukraine will be hit with massive force. There will be no negotiated settlement. Only unconditional surrender.
Dead right. The tragedy is the unnecessary deaths of tens of thousands in support of this proxy war.
Another long update last night from a Russian volunteer on the battle situation in and around Bakhmut.
He says the Ukrainians have massive superiority in air recon and “unlimited shell supply”, softening targets before any infantry advances.
He confirms officer kills in the 4th Brigade of the DPR yesterday.
The defensive lines built by Russia are too weak and shallow, some of the trenches only knee deep.
The defensive lines are too wide to be covered by fire across their frontage.
So believe what you will because you will see……
What will we see, Monro? Genuine question, I think I agree with your assertion that Russia is not at all incapable and is quite far from being exhausted.
There are only two options. It is not complicated.
Deluded ranker
You have embarrassed yourself again.
Is this volunteer fighting in the front line? If so, I call bulls**t on his claims. It is impossible for an individual soldier to draw any conclusion about “the situation on the battlefield”, especially in a complex, rapidly changing urban situation like Artemovsk.
He’s been right before.
Go on, when and with what?
‘Of course, the infantry have nothing but the R-159 to communicate with tanks. Tankmen and artillerymen along the whole frontline are frantically looking for at least some portable radios operating in the 30-50 MHz range. Things that the KTsPN [Novorissiya volunteer organisation] brought before 2022 immediately became a drop in the ocean of “things urgently needed yesterday”. And of course, it’s not even about the numbers of the R-159s, but about the amounts of decent batteries for them, and the number of charging devices. Old ones, god knows when made. Replaced by devices such as Imax B6, but these Imax B6 still need to be bought and brought and people taught how to use them.
However, signalmen from the tank battalion called next, and now I realise that no one will survive until the problem with radios actually emerges, since headsets have run out too. And no, dear reader, a headset is not a cloth cap with foam inserts protecting the head of a tankman. It’s a cloth cap with foam inserts in which a tank intercom device is installed, which connects to the intercom via the appropriate connector. And through this intercom the tankman speaks to other crewmen, and if necessary gets into radio contact with other vehicles, infantry or command. Head phones, throat phones, etc. This all has run out. The working “stuffing” of the headsets has run out. Everything possible has already been taken off the winter headsets and put into the summer ones. And that ran out too. And there are no supplies.
You already know everything about the intercom tangents, I covered the topic many times.
So, in principle, there are no doubts about the fate of the remnants of the “tank relics”. Without communications, these miserable remnants will be finished off.’
‘Why is everything so slow and difficult?
A lot of people are wondering why is the war in the Donbass being fought so slowly? Why the offensive in the Donbass has begun, but after taking Pisky it’s not really moving forward? Why did they say ten times as if the enemy was running from Siversk and abandoning it, but Siversk is still not taken? Why so slow?
Fine, I’ll act as an explanatory brigade, although I wrote about this already. Even Strelkov talks about this day after day mentioning the personalities and events of the First World War that are widely known in close circles.
It’s actually pretty simple. Due to presence and constant replenishment of military air defence in the Armed Forces of Ukraine, including MANPADS, there is no complete superiority of our aviation in the air, and it’s unlikely to happen soon. Accordingly, it is not possible to hang in the air over the front line of the enemy and destroy all of their vehicles and all artillery positions. Accordingly, we come to the conclusion that both a successful offensive with a breakthrough of the enemy’s defence, and a successful defence with the ability to stop such breakthroughs come from the presence of artillery, the ammunition needed for it, its controllability, mobility, accuracy, range, and more, more, and more. If you do not conduct encircling operations, then you are not destroying the enemy’s most valuable resource – their experienced military managers, their experienced military signalmen and their experienced artillerymen. If a cauldron is closed then all these people either go for a breakthrough and, with your correct approach to suppressing it, for the most part die or surrender. If you create a threat of an encirclement, but do not close it, these people dump all their metal and leave the encirclement on cars, taking with them the most important thing – their experience.
– What do I need the sights for, son?! – the Colonel interrupted bitterly. – What do I need the sights for, my dear fellow … There will be guns, but not people…
It doesn’t take much time to prepare new infantry, “any infantry”, just to drive them into the trenches instead of those knocked out – two weeks of “training” and a person will be able to play “pow-pow”. He will not resist a competent assault, but how many “competent assaulters” do we have now?
But the new skilful, trained and experienced artillery officers and signalmen do not lie on the road and do not grow on trees in the forest. It takes a lot of time. If you knock them out, degradation of enemy’s speed and quality of control and fire damage will begin. But how to knock them out? Only with encirclement operations, with cauldrons with dense walls, from where the only way out is to the cemetery or to the prisoner of war camp. Do we have such operations? Apart from the capture of “Azov” in Mariupol, we have no such operations. This means that there will be an exchange of infantry in positional battles, and the coefficient of the exchange depends on the quality of control and fire damage on our part.’
Totally incomprehensible.
‘….there are no doubts about the fate of the remnants of the “tank relics”. Without communications, these miserable remnants will be finished off.’
Correct.
‘…there will be an exchange of infantry in positional battles….’
Correct
It will end when USA does another Afghanistan.
Or Vietnam.
Bit of a track record …..
Is Ian Rons there in order to prove that The Daily Sceptic is pro free speech, or do the guys actually take his ad hominem arguments seriously? He never deals in terms of the fundamental issues.
The one thing I am sure of is that I don’t believe any of them.
Not a fan of Putin.
But Zelensky seems dodgier than a nine bob note (did he get to speak at Eurovision by the way?).
I feel for ordinary Russians and ordinary Ukrainians.
The article above has a whiff of protesting too much.
I have a sneaking suspicion that this war, like WW1 and WW2, is essentially about killing and mutilating lots of white Christian men.
Yet more inane drivel Ian Rons
I’m not pro Putin. I am against foreign wars of aggression started by America masquerading as NATO and paid for by me and the rest of the British taxpayers. However if a national leader was to say publicly “mothers are women and fathers are men” I might feel well disposed towards them, as opposed to the snivelling charlatans that sit in the House of Commons.
I’m so pleased the downvoter got around to sneaking in his opinion. He doesn’t seem to be getting much traction.
There’s scarcely anything more unappealing than sanctimony, especially when it is spread over more than 30 paragraphs.
On a different tack, was the fact that Zelensky’s Charlemagne award fell on the floor during his thank-you diatribe an omen?
Thanks, Ian Rons, for another interesting piece challenging the ‘Team James’ view on this topic. I think you’re probably right.
Reading through other comments on this thread, however, I’m perplexed. Having opposed the authoritarianism experienced in the West in recent yrs, what’s the point of then effectively supporting the even worse authoritarianism of Putin’s regime – like so many of the black-pilled nihilists commenting on this thread seem to do?
.
Most of the people you refer to belong to the same organisation, or similar organisations, all adding to the gaiety of the nation!
Thanks, Monro. But what organization or organizations do you mean?
‘That Russia serves as a reliable cash machine for Europe’s far-right political forces has long been an open secret.’
https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/5050/russia-ukraine-war-putin-europe-far-right-funding-conservatives/
‘Britain First’s links to Russia and support for Putin go far beyond what they are now claiming.’
https://hopenothate.org.uk/2022/05/03/putins-british-mouthpiece-britain-first-leader-paul-goldings-long-history-of-pro-putin-propagandising/
A pathetic reply like that could only have come from WEF Wales.. another parasite hanging onto the taxes of English tax payers.. FO..
” It doesn’t seem to occur to Calvin that if a lot of Brexiteering, lockdown-sceptical, free-thinking people like me think differently to him about Ukraine, then maybe we might just have a point – especially when those who know Russia best, like Konstantin Kisin, are pretty adamant about it.”
———–
I didn’t watch Calvin Robinson. Personally, I prefer an arrangement whereby if I want to be preached at, I go to church – where I can listen to the prattlings of people like him, or Welby, based on their biased and very selective extractions from a book compiled several millennia ago by people unknown who also “had an agenda.”
I do take issue with the extract I’ve quoted above. Interesting and intelligent though Konstantin Kisin undoubtedly is, he can’t be included in a group called “Brexiteering, lockdown-sceptical, let alone free thinking when it comes to Ukraine.
He didn’t vote for Brexit, he has stated several times that he voted Remain. His lockdown-scepticism was a little belated and he has made it perfectly clear that his personal family history has (quite naturally) had a major influence on his attitude towards Ukraine, Russia and Putin. That doesn’t mean he doesn’t provide some insight into the conflict, but “free-thinking” it most definitely ain’t.
“The definite article in “the Ukraine” pre-dates the Soviet Union, but it’s been dropped in English and in Russian because it later came to imply ownership of Ukraine by Russia, as Ukraine was “the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic” before it became independent in 1991.”
Wrong. The Russian language does not have the definite article. This is only an issue in English.
And we speak English.
I used to attend Clatterbridge Hospital on the Wirral, as we locals refer to it.
I think I would worry a lot less about anything Calvin says when the goofy royals are virtue signalling like mad. The caped dresses on Kate and her daughter like something from a creepy movie, Kate in her Ukrainian blue dress playing the piano on Eurovision show. The carpeting in the church where the coronation took place, blue and yellow. honestly when your “king” and his handlers virtue signal like this, you better wake up folks, things are going to get messy.
So.. so right.. the bar-stewards are going for it now.. and it needs to be recognised..
I wish you had given us the 20 pence version of that ramble. It would have saved both you and I a lot of time.
Yeah he does go on a bit!
He’s only trying to get his
pointbull across guys..Replace the nouns Covid and EV’s and you have Ukraine. Bombarded with more lies from the media and the elites. 30000 more churches in Russia under Putin, whilst Satan’s acolyte Welby gleefully closes ours.
‘All I said was this war has to stop’
I seem to remember John Lennon (and so many others) singing something similar.
Would be great if it worked…….
The Donald had it spot on.
What a lot of words. Jesus, Trump cut to the heart of it “I want them to stop dying.” Yes there’ll be conditions and it’s pretty obvious what those will be: Crimea stays Russian, Donbas is left ambiguous with low-level violence, Nato gets lost. That may be unjust, especially insofar as those bastard, depraved war criminals don’t receive the justice due to them, but it’s reality. Ukraine isn’t our responsibility because we don’t run the world and shouldn’t want to. Our meddling is anyway prolonging the suffering and raising the risk of direct war.
As a general rule, it appears safer to avoid and ignore religious zealots.
Is ‘the’ or ‘not the’ Ukraine with its chicken Kyiv, or is it chykvin kevov- still the Latest Thing we are all to care so deeply and passionately about? Must I put my flag back up?
I thought is was passé – they didn’t even win the Eurovision Freak Contest this year.
Who is ‘Ian Rons’ ?
A to$$er.. sorry.. but the truth must out..
Today…LOL!
KyivPost
@KyivPost
The National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine has detained the head of the Supreme Court, Vsevolod Knyasev for accepting a bribe of $2.7 million…
Ian artfully skirts over the Euromaidan revolution of 2014, a colour revolution whipped up by television if ever there was one. It transparently served the purposes of the State Department and the European Commission. NATO (oops, The NATO) must expand into the Ukraine to defend it from Russian expansionism. Moreover, The EU (oops, EU I mean) must extend its hard border up to Russia to integrate the Russian and Ukrainian economies with… er what?
Oh, and the television news channels which did the whipping were owned by the oligarch Petro Poroshenko. This is a war for the Blob.
Almost immediately lockdown restrictions ended, the war in the Ukraine started and Archbishop Welby sent his nauseating letter to be read out to all Church of England parishes telling congregations exactly how the conflict was to be interpreted and who was ‘the bad guy.’ Good on Calvin Robinson for presenting a different and more nuanced view. As for the so-called ‘genocidal’ Russian Orthodox church, a read of Solzhenitsyn’s Gulag Archipelago is in order to see how abysmally the Russian Orthodox, its clergy and faithful were treated under the Soviet Regime – a Regime that, according to Anthony Sutton’s extensive research, was backed by Western financial and big business interests. Who’s genocidal?
Rather than taking sides, how about calling out the interests promoting war: the Military-Industrial Complex, the banks financing it, the commercial interests seeking to monopolise Europe’s gas supplies, the Chinese Communist Party to whom Russia, now alienated from the West, is obliged to sell its natural resources, the USA, whose world dominance has historically depended on East-West division between Europe and Asia, governments seeking a distraction from the ongoing financial collapse and effects of their COVID policies, the Biden family looking to cover-up its money-laundering, etc….
I’ve just listened to the debate on this issue between Toby and James Delingpole on London Calling. First of all I would say that there is no good reason for a media service like The Daily Sceptic to take a position on political issues such as the Ukraine war. It’s job is surely to expose the arguments and leave readers to draw their own conclusions. I would support Ian Rons or anyone else making a case and defending it with evidence rather than slurs. There is therefore no need for Toby to attempt to be even handed between his contributors such that each has their say – his editorial job is surely to ensure that anyone contributing is making a proper evidence based case, and not, as the Daily Sceptic, adopting a particular position on Ukraine, Bridgen, the shots or anything else. The evidence will do the job of ferreting out the truth.
Maybe I’m looking at the past through rose tinted glasses, but 40 or 50 tears ago, wasn’t this the way the press behaved? Sure, different papers did have different political leanings but this didn’t mean that all they did was support the political narrative.