Council bosses in Rotherham who were criticised for failing to protect 1,400 young girls from grooming gangs have gone on to become Government advisers, bankers and an “executive coach and mentor”. The Mail has more.
Sonia Sharp
Dr. Sharp served as Director of Children’s Services in Rotherham between 2005 and 2006 and acknowledged her failure to protect girls, saying: “You can’t be the Director of Children’s Services and not take responsibility for what happens to children.'” …
After a period working for Sheffield council, Dr. Sharp moved to Australia, where she became Deputy Secretary for Education in the state of Victoria.
Following the publication of the Jay report in 2014, calls grew on her to resign – which she eventually did in 2015. …
She is now a partner at consultancy EY Australia, with a profile on the company’s website describing her as having “dedicated over 30 years to public service, with 17 years as a senior executive in the U.K. leading education and child and family services, and most recently as Deputy Secretary in the Victorian Government”. …
Jahangir Akhtar
Mr. Akhtar became Deputy Leader of Rotherham council in 2011, also serving as Vice-Chairman of the South Yorkshire police and crime panel.
The Jay report suggested he may have decided to ignore a “politically inconvenient truth” when he claimed not to have been aware of the “deep-rooted problem of Pakistani-heritage perpetrators targeting young white girls”.
He was forced to ‘step aside’ from his role as deputy leader following allegations that he had been involved in a deal to help Arshid ‘Mad Ash’ Hussain, a relative accused of grooming an underage girl.
He then lost his seat to Ukip at last year’s local elections. …
Mr. Akhtar, a former taxi driver who was previously seen posing with Ed Miliband, was suspended from the Labour Party in 2014 and today works for Spanish bank Santander.
He is also the Director of a social enterprise providing “educational support services” and “social work activities” at a Rotherham mosque. …
Mr. Akhtar was also later stripped of his taxi-driver licence after a ‘fit and proper person’ test was introduced by the council.
Ged Fitzgerald
Mr. Fitzgerald was criticised for “missing opportunities” to tackle grooming while CEO of Rotherham Council from 2001 to 2003.
A report commissioned by the authority and released in 2017 was also critical of its former boss, finding that a “more rigorous” approach by the top official to child sexual exploitation could have resulted in a “very different” outcome for victims.
Despite his performance in Rotherham, Mr. Fitzgerald later headed up Sunderland City Council, Lancashire County Council and Liverpool City Council.
He was later arrested in 2017 following a probe into financial irregularities at Lancashire County Council and resigned from Liverpool City Council the next year.
In 2022, he was charged with misconduct in public office and procuring the misconduct of others.
He now advertises himself as an executive coach and is a certified member of the European Mentoring and Coaching Council.
His profile reads: “I am a former Chief Executive of 18 years standing who has moved into executive coaching and mentoring in 2020. I am self-employed.”
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
He is also the Director of a social enterprise providing “educational support services” and “social work activities” at a Rotherham mosque. …
Well there you go. The moon cult regulating the moon cult.
The sex Jihad regulating the sex Jihad.
Your white daughter was raped 100 x by Muslims?
Plod reply: ‘Wait old boy. Hey PC Ahmed, can you and Muhammad-Muhammad-Muhammad check this complaint? Some white slag claims she was fondled by your mosque members? And you, yeah you the Dad, you shut your gob about this or we nick you for racism and hate speech, understand’
Democracy, values, multi-kulti etc etc.
I’ll say it again…SICK BRITAIN!
A bit like the ‘cartoon’ attached that I saw recently, sums it up nicely in a SICK sort of way.
Take a look at British political convict Tommy Robinsons documentary “SILENCED” if you haven’t already.
https://rumble.com/v65jvcd-silenced-tommy-robinson-documentary.html
The release of which cost him his liberty and potentially his life in 2TK’s Britain.
A lady reads her friend’s testimony of how she came to fall prey and subsequently be a survivor of the Pakistani rape gangs. You can see how young girls from impoverished and disadvantaged backgrounds with dysfunctional home lives were the prime targets for these filthy, evil predators. But there are men on this site who will listen to this and maintain it wasn’t rape because it was “consensual” and that 13yr olds aren’t children, which i find utterly sick, to be frank. ( 7mins );
https://x.com/ThePosieParker/status/1878841810598113430
RW&Ron Smith! Knew you’d not be able to resist. Triggered by truth..whatever next? Any adult who is sexually attracted to children and who sees fit to try and minimize or rebrand these heinous crimes as anything other than what they are is sick in the head. Cope.
What truth your truth? Interview with a paedophile:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8SBM-yXULc
You are the only person inhabiting this fantasy universe were organized crime gangs targetting vulnerable girls in order to turn them into prostitutes is somehow ok. Nobody but you ever made this claim and that you’ve chosen to put in into my mouth doesn’t make it any less your claim. I wrote almost the exact opposite of it, namely, that this would no less a seriously evil issue if it hadn’t involved someone who’s legally minor according to some random UK law.
Try to get you head around that: It doesn’t matter if the victims of this are 15 or 16. I guess it matters to you because your phantasies about paedophile rape gangs hang on this specious distinction. But it certainly shouldn’t matter to anyone with an intact moral compass. Forced prostitution (yes, that’s what going on here) is an evil.
”You are the only person inhabiting this fantasy universe were organized crime gangs targetting vulnerable girls in order to turn them into prostitutes is somehow ok. Nobody but you ever made this claim…..”
Maybe re-read your first sentence then talk to me about who’s inhabiting a ”fantasy universe”, because after my many posts on this topic, if I haven’t made my stance crystal clear then it tells me you’re either being deliberately obtuse or just trolling at this point. Because if you have to blatantly lie due to having nothing in the tank by way of a comeback then I think it makes you look a little bit desperate and a lot deranged, actually, because you’re needing to deny reality as reality doesn’t support your narrative.
But feel free at any time to go sift through my previous posts and come back with some evidence to support your above claim, that I’m all the while supportive of said rape gangs doing their rapey thing. All of my posts directly contradict your accusation, you will find, so good luck with that. I won’t wait..
I wrote a post yesterday where I (correctly) pointed out that the grooming part of this may involve so-called statutory rape, ie, an illegal sex act, but usually not a forced sex act. I concluded that with the statement, quoting verbally:
[…] it starts consensual and then slips into drug-heavy teenage prostitution. That’s bad enough on its own and would be equally bad if all victims were sixteen or above.
I don’t really care if you’re too stupid to understand that that’s a condemnation or if you’re just a malicious liar. In either case, you’re not telling the truth and you’d seriously owe me an apology.
Cry harder, liar. The only one ”stupid” around here is the rape-apologist paedo-sympathizer who thinks 11yrs+ girls are consenting to sex and are ”sexually mature women”! And I at least have evidence to support my accusations ( ‘observations’ would be more apt ) that this is what you are because you very conveniently shared your thoughts on this issue with the class yesterday;
”This is not about child rape because it involves neither children nor rape. It’s statutory rape because it’s about sex acts with sexually mature women below the age of consent in the UK.”
Children cannot consent to sex, especially sex with grown adults ( because we aren’t talking about a couple of 15yr olds fooling around and all is consensual ), ergo your ”it starts consensual” is a blatant pack of lies. People, whether kids or adults, do not require groomed prior to giving consent, otherwise that ‘consent’ would not be valid, much like the ‘informed consent’ that never happened when the death jabs were rolled out.
And you still haven’t come along with evidence to support your wild accusation that my Schrodinger self is actually OK with children getting raped and trafficked, so how exactly is it ME not telling the truth? How delusional do you have to be to suppose it’s ME that owes YOU an apology? You really are completely devoid of all self-awareness aren’t you, and I expect introspection is an alien concept to somebody such as yourself..
What a f#cking hideous account.
I am honestly still in shock at the total collapse and utter failure of all the dozens of so-called protections so expensively maintained and the unwillingness of government to tackle this is bewildering.
It’s not bewildering when you start to learn how many “in the Establishment” were actively involved in suppression of knowledge and the cover-up … for decades.
Some names duly named. A wider question is the why, of who, what and how groomed politicians, social workers, law-enforcement officers, judiciary, and sundry educated people who should know better, to groom the institutions of a modern civilised country to overlook what was in plain sight?
Same country in which organised procurement, rape and torture of vulnerable under-age girls of one ethnicity, by adult men of another ethnicity, then became rife.
It’s good to see some of the names. But there’s a wider element here: the Establishment’s deliberate protection of the rape gangs as a matter of public policy. This is the heart of the matter, and why outfits like the Anti-white Party (the Labour Party as once was) are so desperate to avoid a public inquiry.
Most of the other parties are anti-white too
That’s true enough.
Thanks to Will Jones and the Daily Sceptic for that photo of the hideous creep.
Incredible that the Spanish bank Santander actually hired him… to do what, we wonder?
Note that EY are prepared to employ such a disgusting person and advertise it in their website. I always assumed that professional people had to comply with high standards of behaviour at all times.
They’d have no qualms about debanking you for voting Reform of course, but employing a paedo? Strictly business.
It seems the penalty for dangerous failure in your role is another similar cushy role where you can carry on doing damage.
It is almost as if there were a global Bullshit Industrial Complex whose aims were to perpetuate itself and screw the world up, and do the exact opposite of helping the people they claim to be helping.
Meanwhile in Austria…
Austrian School Expels Kindergarten Children After Parents Protest Pornographic Posters
When we were young, we used to pass mental asylums and point at them. Then they closed them and the inmates are now running the country. Lord help us!!!
If it’s now OK to connect Pakistanis with rape, is it going to become OK to connect them with “financial irregularities”?
Failing upwards seems to have become even more common since Tony Blair was elected as PM. No wonder he chose to celebrate his victory with the iconic song “The only way is up” – no matter how low they sink!
It’s predominantly Muslim Pakistani but there are many others involved in this activity as well Muslim and non- Muslim. With no deterence lawlessness explodes. Lack of deterence by authorities has fueled this sickening crime. Punishment laws and investigations need to be strengthened enormously. Not to do so makes authorities and society complicit.