• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Michael ‘Hockey Stick’ Mann Ordered To Pay National Review Over $500,000

by Richard Eldred
12 January 2025 11:00 AM

Michael E. Mann, known for his infamous ‘hockey stick’ climate graph, must pay over $500,000 in legal fees after spending years trying to silence National Review with a baseless lawsuit. Here’s an excerpt from their response:

For more than eight years, the climate scientist Michael Mann harassed National Review through litigation over a blog post — until, eventually, the First Amendment brought an end to his attack. This week, a court in our nation’s capital ordered Mann to pay us $530,820.21 worth of attorney’s fees and costs, and to do so within 30 days. It is time for him to get out his chequebook, and sign on the dotted line.

This restitution is welcome, if incomplete. As was made clear during the discovery process, Mann’s explicitly stated intention was to use a “major lawsuit” as a vehicle with which to “ruin National Review”. Happily, Mann failed in this endeavour. But, while all’s well that ends well, his failure exacted costs nevertheless. Between 2012 and 2019 — with the courts inexplicably refusing to apply legal provisions ostensibly designed to prevent frivolous lawsuits such as Mann’s — we were forced to spend a considerable amount of time and money defending ourselves against his malicious, meritless suit. …

The promise of American law is that there will be material consequences for bad behaviour, and, after twelve years, there finally have been. Mann’s behaviour throughout has been appalling. Now, he must pay up.

Worth reading in full.

Tags: Free SpeechHockey stickJunk ScienceJusticeMichael Mann

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

NHS’s Tech ‘Efficiency’ Adds Layers of Inefficiency and Pain

Next Post

Dozens of British Women Have Seen Their Breasts Grow After the Covid Jab

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

21 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
For a fist full of roubles
For a fist full of roubles
4 months ago

Good to see Mann brought down a peg or two. This is the calibre of the “scientists” the greenists refer to when they claim “scientists say”.

30
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
4 months ago

This decidedly shines a spotlight on the Mark Steyn case which was an appalling example of a corrupt judicial system. I doubt Mr Steyn will receive due reconsideration.

37
0
DickieA
DickieA
4 months ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Spot on.

After Steve McIntyre and Ross McKitrick – over 20 years ago – exposed Mann’s hockey stick as being (the bloke is notoriously litigious, so I shall use the term “inacurrate”), and the subsequent Climategate emails, it is astonishing that he has any credibility whatsoever.

The sooner that the majority of people realise that the whole “CO2 is the primary driver of climate change” narrative is deeply flawed, the sooner that the Net Zero nonsense is crushed. I’m hoping that the incoming Trump administration will be a huge helping hand in bringing that day forward.

Last edited 4 months ago by DickieA
37
0
kev
kev
4 months ago
Reply to  DickieA

It seems those who should be given the least credibility, somehow appear to receive the most.

Thinking Neil Ferguson at Imperial College and his staggeringly poor record.

Thinking Bill gates, who has no medical training or credentials, but is somehow seen as an authority on medical matters.

Thinking Ed Miliband!

Thinking the head of WHO (who’s name I can’t even be bothered to recall).

Thinking Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, who have credibility for what?

We seem to live in the Age of the Charlatans!

Last edited 4 months ago by kev
29
0
DickieA
DickieA
4 months ago
Reply to  kev

Dr Richard North used to write about this very issue over a dozen years ago. He often appeared frustrated that his carefully crafted, well-argued and fully referenced research didn’t reach a wider audience, whereas the views of a politician or journalist “with prestige” seemed to gain widespread acceptance – despite having little evidence backing them up.

How some of these people gained that prestige (despite being complete bufoons), is often a complete mystery.

11
0
Jack the dog
Jack the dog
4 months ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

My thoughts exactly.

5
0
Art Simtotic
Art Simtotic
4 months ago

Thank you God and whatever State judiciary the case against Mann was settled under.

Presumably not the ideologically-bent Washington D.C. court that found in favour of Mann in the case against Mark Steyn’s home truths.

Beggars belief that this disgrace in the name of science has been getting away with making stuff up for nigh on 30 years. Likewise the rest of the climate mafiosos.

25
0
Gezza England
Gezza England
4 months ago
Reply to  Art Simtotic

It is part of the same case involving Mark Steyn and Rand Simberg. As the National Review points out they had asked for $1m in damages from the crooked Mann and have spent way more than even that defending themselves against him. Shame he doesn’t have a house in LA but today there is news that the fire is approaching a house that Cackles Kamala owns as well as a Schwarzenegger property.

14
-1
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
4 months ago
Reply to  Gezza England

Screw your freedoms Schwarzenegger, he was one of the few childhood heroes in the 80s. they say never meet a TV idol, you will always be disappointed.

4
0
stewart
stewart
4 months ago

As has been said before, the process itself of legal attack is so often the aggression or punishment rather than the outcome itself.

And in this case being forced to pay legal costs covers the legal expenses of the aggrieved party but doesn’t compensate for the aggression of the process.

Why is Mann not made to pay an exemplary crippling fine, so that actions like his aren’t repeated?

That is exactly what happened with Alex Jones. His penalty far exceeds the value of the damage suffered by his plaintiffs and is designed to destroy him financially and terrify anyone else who also dares challenge the establishment.

Mann has been let off lightly and clearly continues to have the protection of the establishment.

24
0
Jack the dog
Jack the dog
4 months ago
Reply to  stewart

Quite right.

100 million dollars would seem a reasonable sum.

His rich backers would doubtless bail him out.

Maybe 100 billion would be better – they’d feel that alright.

11
0
john1T
john1T
4 months ago
Reply to  stewart

Punitive damages were awarded against Steyn, but don’t hold your breath for them to be awarded against Mann. This is two tier justice American style.

8
0
Hardliner
Hardliner
4 months ago

Funny – I can’t find this news anywhere on the BBC…

20
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
4 months ago
Reply to  Hardliner

😀😀😀

4
0
Jon Garvey
Jon Garvey
4 months ago

Unfortunately Mann’s case has been massively supported by fossil fuel green industrial complex interests, so he won’t personally suffer.

11
0
john1T
john1T
4 months ago
Reply to  Jon Garvey

My thoughts exactly. Disgusting as he is, he is just a front man, his backers will foot the bill and he will carry on as normal.

11
0
Brett_McS
Brett_McS
4 months ago

Not that he will pay anything. It hasn’t cost him anything to drag Mark Steyn through court after court for over a decade. It’s all covered by ‘supporters’.

8
0
Jackthegripper
Jackthegripper
4 months ago

Mann will not pay a bean, his backers will.
Last year’s disgraceful defamation trial where Simberg and Steyn were found guilty, Mann admitted he was not paying his lawyers and any of his legal teams costs.
But at least this may be the beginning of the end of this odious little man’s lawfare arainst those that disagree with his hockey stick.

4
0
DontPanic
DontPanic
4 months ago

The tab will probably be picked up by those who fund his research or those getting taxpayer subsidies from wind and solar, in other words vested interests

0
0
DontPanic
DontPanic
4 months ago

If someone covers your court fees etc, isn’t that income so the IRS needs to persue the tax.

0
0
Richard North
Richard North
4 months ago

Finally!

0
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

The Sceptic | Episode 38: Chris Bayliss on the Commonwealth Voting Scandal, Sarah Phillimore on the Bar’s Scrapped EDI Plans and Eugyppius on ‘White Genocide’

by Richard Eldred
30 May 2025
2

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Comedian’s Show Cancelled Over Liverpool Parade Crash Joke

30 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

News Round-Up

31 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

Useless Covid Data Analysis Riddled With Basic Flaws

30 May 2025
by Rebekah Barnett

John Rentoul’s Fake Cost of Net Zero

31 May 2025
by Paul Homewood

Basic Physics All at Sea in Sky News Climate Scare Nonsense Story

31 May 2025
by Chris Morrison

Comedian’s Show Cancelled Over Liverpool Parade Crash Joke

58

News Round-Up

35

John Rentoul’s Fake Cost of Net Zero

16

Miliband Attacks Blair Over Net Zero Criticism and Admits He Could Lose Seat to Reform

29

Are Schools Actually Institutionalised Childcare?

12

Basic Physics All at Sea in Sky News Climate Scare Nonsense Story

31 May 2025
by Chris Morrison

John Rentoul’s Fake Cost of Net Zero

31 May 2025
by Paul Homewood

Are Schools Actually Institutionalised Childcare?

30 May 2025
by Joanna Gray

Trump is Handing Africa to the Chinese for the Sake of Social Media Clout

29 May 2025
by Noah Carl

Hooked on Freedom: Why Medical Autonomy Matters

29 May 2025
by Dr David Bell

POSTS BY DATE

January 2025
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
« Dec   Feb »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

POSTS BY DATE

January 2025
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
« Dec   Feb »

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Comedian’s Show Cancelled Over Liverpool Parade Crash Joke

30 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

News Round-Up

31 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

Useless Covid Data Analysis Riddled With Basic Flaws

30 May 2025
by Rebekah Barnett

John Rentoul’s Fake Cost of Net Zero

31 May 2025
by Paul Homewood

Basic Physics All at Sea in Sky News Climate Scare Nonsense Story

31 May 2025
by Chris Morrison

Comedian’s Show Cancelled Over Liverpool Parade Crash Joke

58

News Round-Up

35

John Rentoul’s Fake Cost of Net Zero

16

Miliband Attacks Blair Over Net Zero Criticism and Admits He Could Lose Seat to Reform

29

Are Schools Actually Institutionalised Childcare?

12

Basic Physics All at Sea in Sky News Climate Scare Nonsense Story

31 May 2025
by Chris Morrison

John Rentoul’s Fake Cost of Net Zero

31 May 2025
by Paul Homewood

Are Schools Actually Institutionalised Childcare?

30 May 2025
by Joanna Gray

Trump is Handing Africa to the Chinese for the Sake of Social Media Clout

29 May 2025
by Noah Carl

Hooked on Freedom: Why Medical Autonomy Matters

29 May 2025
by Dr David Bell

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences