Critics have raised the alarm over a loophole in the Government’s new puberty blockers ban, warning it could enable scientists to use children as test subjects for “harmful” gender drugs. The Mail has the story.
A mother whose son said he was transgender and was given hormones to become a woman, a former Tavistock and Portman trust doctor and the Family Education Trust have all spoken out against Labour’s plan.
On Wednesday, Health Secretary Wes Streeting announced an indefinite ban on puberty blockers for children after the Commission on Human Medicines (CHM) said they presented “an unacceptable safety risk for children and young people under 18 years without significant additional safeguards”.
However, this is not a blanket ban. Despite acknowledging there will be some who oppose it, Streeting said plans for a clinical trial would go ahead, meaning children can sign up to have puberty blockers for research purposes.
After the Health Secretary’s announcement, the Government said the CHM recommended that “the planned puberty suppressing hormone trial will recruit children and young people under 18 years who have not had previous exposure to GnRH agonists [another term for puberty blockers]”.
The Government concluded that while “there is evidence of persistent unsafe prescribing practices regarding these medicines”, a clinical trial would offer a chance to safely monitor the effects of puberty blockers and “give government and the NHS the evidence needed to decide whether they can be used as a safe and effective treatment”.
Jane – not her real name – spoke to MailOnline on the condition of anonymity because she fears her son, now 20, might cut her out of his life if he knew how she truly felt. She said the loophole amounted to using children as guinea pigs.
She said: “It’s all making the right noises while not doing very much. Haven’t enough children already been damaged, lives ruined? Do they really need that further evidence?” …
Even with the ban, children are already getting advice on getting around it.
On its website, sexual health charity Brook has already advised that young people can still get puberty blockers “if they agree to be part of a research study that will assess the risks and benefits of these medicines for trans and gender questioning children”.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
“What might be the reason?” – follow the money.
“Has dishonesty become normalised now in medical science?” – clearly, the answer is “yes”.
For most, money trumps morals. Once that is understood everything else makes sense.
“The study is funded by the CDC.”
The CDC that is in bed with big pharma.
The Times muppets might like to put Oliver Wright on the case…
I think you may have misunderstood what they meant.
There clearly is a very high risk – not to infants, of course, we’ve known that from the off.
No, there are nevertheless 2 very high risks: 1) the pharma industry missing out on another market and the ability to rake in even more money – particularly with the knowledge that this garbage messes up immune systems, just imagine what it might do to immune systems that have not even developed yet – the potential for life-long medication on a large scale must have them salivating; 2) if it is correct that once this poison is on the children’s vaxx schedule in the US, that means the drug peddlers are free from liability – that risk speaks for itself. The tide is turning, more and more doctors and scientists are finally speaking out, more AEs are being admitted. The pharma cos. know they will be thrown under the bus, they will be desperate for a liability shield.
This past week there was a lovely crack in the facade. Rep. Jim Jordan was grilling ‘Dr’ Birx, Pfauci’s corona co-star during Trump’s briefings in 2020. When asked whether they knew that the vaxx would not stop infections, whether they had lied or just guessed, her answer was: “we hoped”. This is $cience in 2022 – how the “settled science” was based on “hope”.
As a by the by – I saw the video yesterday on the bad cat’s substack and did a search to find more details. I got a number of directly related items in MSM. I did a search just now, no MSM items re this grilling, only links to old news items regarding Jordan and 6 January. In other words, big tech spent the last 24 hours setting up the algos to turn us away from the proof that the entire charade was based on ‘hope’ rather than science and is trying to steer people toward a negative view of Jordan.
It could be a long term investment for the pharma industry – or it could be a spectacular crash, if they lose their popularity.
As Robert F Kennedy has pointed out, the push to get the vaccine approved for infant use, once approved automatically gives the pharmaceuticals immunity against liabilities. They are currently protected during emergency use but once the vaccines get full approval, they become liable for damages unless the vaccine is approved for infant/child use. It’s so obvious at this point, the CDC has been captured by big pharma.
What might be the reason?
Money, Money, Money
Must be funny
In the rich man’s world.
My son in law was unwell last week, he did a test (his mother is having treatment for cancer) which was positive. Daughter and 10 week old Granddaughter (who was 6 weeks premature) came to us. Baby had slight temperature a couple of days ago, given paracetamol, was settled.Today daughter had a scratchy throat, did a test which was positive (very faint line). Baby has been fine.
Daughter flapping because she might have infected us. We’ve told her not to worry as we’re unlikely to be badly affected if at all. As we don’t test we won’t know in any case.
Iodine nasal & mouth rinse every 4h. That should prevent it, or at least reduce viral load.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ICBBK-d-C0
Senator Rand Paul questioning Fauci….
Plain as a pikestaff, it’s about money and nothing else…..
https://covidmythbuster.substack.com/p/can-vaccines-be-dangerous-to-pregnant
Can Vaccines be Dangerous to Pregnant Women, Babies and Human Reproduction ? – A Credible Mechanism of Action
Interesting article by Marc Girandot.
“Has dishonesty become normalised now in medical science?”
Are you really surprised with people like Gates and Soros around?
Nobody ever listens to us we’re just conspiracy theorists. Think we’re fast becoming spoiler “alertists”!
When a pregnant woman cannot eat “soft cheese” and other foods and supplements, why on earth would any doctor recommend a covid injection, with NO LONG TERM SAFETY DATA FIR MOTHER NOR BABY!!!!!