Mass migration, as we know, causes a wealth of problems.
While migrants are best known for their occasional terrorism and their penchant for perpetrating violent crimes against the locals, they have a wide range of more quotidian and therefore more significant drawbacks. Migrants cost taxpayers billions of dollars; they commit petty crimes like theft far above the rates of Europeans, and in general, they’re poorly calibrated for life in Western society. They are terrible neighbours who catcall women, bother shopkeepers and vandalise public facilities. They make natives more uncomfortable and everyday life more unpleasant.
I can attest to all of this personally. During the height of mass vaccination insanity, I fled my small Munich apartment and the suffocating urban virus paranoia for a place in the upper Bavarian countryside. I moved to a small, idyllic village in the south, with rolling cow pastures as far as the eye can see. I found a new house on the banks of a cheerful stream; most of my neighbours spoke Bavarian. Around the corner from my new home was the local school, which I thought would be nothing but an advantage. It might help with the resale value, and, anyway, the schoolchildren were a cheerful presence every morning.
I could not have been more wrong. When the pandemic restrictions were lifted and the migration wave reasserted itself, the school became a curse. District authorities, desperate to find housing for our new guests, converted the school athletic facilities into refugee housing. Just like that, my village became host to a constantly rotating coterie of unpleasant young men. As I have discovered, it does not take very many refugees to totally change the atmosphere and the demographics of a small town like the one I live in. Our migrants find the silence and order of the countryside offensive, and they do everything in their power to upset it. They mark their territory by playing loud music from cheap, tinny speakers late into the night, they occupy the parks where kids used to play football, smoking and drinking petrol station liquor. They leave trash everywhere. This is a nuisance that you can never fully escape. You might move again, but who is to say when the next real estate investor won’t lease his property to the state, bringing the migrants to your new refuge in turn.
This brings us to Bairawies, a small hamlet in upper Bavaria that resembles my own village in many ways. People have been living here since the Middle Ages; there is an idyllic chapel dedicated to St. Coloman…

…a traditional Schullandheim from the 1930s…

…and, otherwise, various modest houses and farm buildings:

Bairawies has survived the upsets of modernity largely unchanged, but mass migration is a different kind of crisis.
For months now, a property developer named Christoph Hertwig has been threatening to open a container facility to house 128 migrants in this village with a population of 280 people. He’s leased a 6,000-square-metre plot in Bairawies from somebody in nearby Wolfratshausen, and if he can only secure the necessary permissions to station his shipping containers there, he can collect a tidy profit by leasing the facility to the district. Overnight, Bairawies would see its population swell by 46%. Nearly one in three residents would be foreigners – a ratio not seen even in cities like Berlin.
Nobody in Bairawies thinks that this is a good idea, of course, but planning decisions like these are not in the hands of ordinary people. In the Federal Republic, you can change your officially recognised gender once every year, but you cannot vote against the mass resettlement of “refugees” in your ancestral home. All of our notional freedom has been decanted into the most irrelevant and trivial cultural matters, and we have lost all control over the things that really matter.
Municipal planners unanimously rejected Hertwig’s plans for a container facility last October, but this doesn’t mean very much. The Bavarian state government has granted higher-level district authorities in Bad Tölz-Wolfratshausen the power to override local decisions when it comes to opening refugee facilities, and there is a substantial likelihood that they’ll exercise their powers in this case. They are, after all, under enormous pressure to find beds for 100 new asylum seekers every month. As the Bavarian government has cut funding for refugee accommodations, larger, centralised blights like the one planned for Bairawies have become the preferred solution. The district administrator, Josef Niedermaier, ominously praised the planned facility back in October. This, too, makes sense: locating migrant facilities in small rural backwaters promises to alienate the smallest number of prospective voters and to keep migration scandals, like the Tunisian migrants terrorising Regensburg, as much as possible out of view.
Alas, the residents of Bairawies are not entirely innocent in all of this. Like many Germans, they profess to support migration in general, while rejecting it merely in its particulars and when it most affects them. They’ve founded a political association to defend their village. Last Sunday, 170 people turned up to demonstrate against the container facility specifically, while piously expressing their support for asylum seekers in the abstract:
Many citizens flocked to the meadow… in Bairawies on Sunday afternoon… The demonstrators put up four banners, which are to be placed on the main road after the demonstration in order to gain as much publicity as possible, organiser Wolfgang Köster explains. “280 inhabitants, 130 refugees – nothing for refugees, nothing for the village,” the banners say.
Some have brought signs with them: “For our homeland, for a fair asylum policy, against mass accommodation.” Or: “Enough is enough, we can’t do it.”… In his short speech, [Köster] rails against “the ignorance of politics”, the state government and District Administrator Josef Niedermaier… The protest in Bairawies, which was also attended by people from other districts, was a signal to those responsible. “Friends, it’s not going to work, you’re going to destroy our village”. …
The new association announced that they were collecting donations for use in a potential legal battle. “We have nothing against people seeking asylum in our country,” they said in a statement. But they find it necessary clarify to the state government and the district administrator “what madness the high number of refugees means for a small village.”
Köster, the organiser of this demonstration and the founder of the local organisation fighting the migrant pods, turns out to be a member of the Green Party. He tells reporters that he is “convinced we can help the refugees,” that “it’s difficult, it’s expensive, but it can be done”, and that providing “decent accommodation and a functioning support system are a part of it”. The migrants should simply be sent to somebody else’s village, because Bairawies is not a great place for them.
I almost hope they do dump 128 migrants in Bairawies.
This article originally appeared on Eugyppius’s Substack newsletter. You can subscribe here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Ah yes, the increasingly prevalent, ever hypocritical NIMBY ( ‘Not In My Back Yard’ ) people. With their “Refugees Welcome” placards that should really include in that statement, “…just not too close to where I live”, for complete transparency.
We had it all from 1945 to 2020 , by default you could say , it was just a lull in proceedings , unless people are wealthy it’s back to the dark ages we are going !
The politicians engineering (or rather, administrating) this population replacement by the backdoor – It ain’t happening! It ain’t happening! LOOK IN ANOTHER DIRECTION, I COMMAND THEE! – are the most prominent example of this kind of thinking because they’ll never place container villages for housing immigrants in their own backyards. People living in small villages in rural Bavaria who end up being the chosen backyard not so much.
170 people turned up to demonstrate against the container facility specifically, while piously expressing their support for asylum seekers in the abstract.
You reap what you sow. I have little sympathy for these types of attitudes.
That’s basically the same phenomenon which made people vote for the state party and show up to official demonstrations against the enemy in the formerly communist eastern block states. The system doesn’t tolerate open dissent. Hence, an important part of making a statement against changing the demographics of a village such that ⅓ of its inhabitants will henceforth be a rotating set of illegal immigrants claiming refugee or asylm status cannot be made without prominently expressing support for the system. At least if it’s supposed to work and not just lead to some headlines about “far right” street riots the state really needs to do more against.
The Strange Death of Europe by Douglas Murray ! He nailed it ! There is no way this can all be rowed back ! Delingpoles latest guest gives truthful clarity to where we’re at !
What do you expect this guy to do? He can’t publically declare mass immigration a f***ing disaster because this would mark him as far right extremist in the crosshairs of both the state and his own party. Hence, he has to resorts to the tried-and-trusted St. Florian’s principle,
Heiliger St. Florian, verschon’ mein Haus, zünd’ and’re an!
[Most holy saint Florian, please walk past my house and torch another one!]
When safely among themselves, the locals doubtlessly talk in a much different way about this which puts them only a few steps away from the next German prison cell should this ever become officially known.
If this unfortunate situation is ever supposed to end, we must unlearn the reflex to always blame the victims for their own misery. They’re doing all they can. But they cannot do anything. They don’t have a right to “vote” for policies they’d like to see implemented, just the opportunity (or so they believe) to chose the least bad from series of bad choices.
Well those inflicting the misery are of course “to blame” if you want to use that phrase, but they are not going to change their behaviour without some reason to do so. Ideally everyone should stand up for what they truly believe is right – but few of us (and certainly not I) are always courageous and of course it’s wise to choose your battles and live to fight another day. But we’re not quite at the level of Stalin, Mao or Kim whatever his name is, yet, so now’s the time to push back as much as we can muster – starting by voting for parties who say they are going to stop this.
The so-called free state of Bavaria has been governed by the same, nominally Christian, party which always gets a majority, for the last 75 years. And this party is obviously on board with all current things, as demanded by Germany’s American overlords. I wouldn’t be surprised if preachers were demanding that their congregations must not vote for “the Nazis” aka “the AfD” from the pulpit during their sermons. All official German churches are 100% committed to more immigration even against existing law. They claim that’s what all true Christians must support.
People do not work like you believe they should, ie, they never voluntarily become social outcasts, and our sham democracies are not governed by people ticking boxes every four or five years.
Well at some point being against mass immigration was not taboo. It became so presumably because beliefs changed. We are not powerless.
What changed is that the (supposedly) formerly communist babyboomers who made “the sixties” and “the seventies” stopped organizing street marches against “the system” because it had meanwhile become their system.
The German CDU used to be an outspoken anti-immigration party and in favour of defining Germany as the country of the ethnic Germans. This was fixed by former young global leader (WEF programme) Angela Merkel. The concept of ethnic Germans does still exist but only as abusive epithet (Biodeutsche) and it’s unequivocally condemned by the cacophony of officially sanctioned public voices. People are either onboard with that. Or they’re right wing extremists who deserve to be universally shunned and really ought to be persecuted by the state.
Maybe some more context for people less familiar with German domestic politics of the last 25 years: At the turn of the millenium, Germany was governed by a red-green coalition led by Gerhard Schröder. Wrt to immigration, this government made two significant changes which departed from the policy of all past German governments¹. Namely
By that time, the CDU opposed 1) with the memorable slogan Kinder statt Inder! — children instead of immigrants from India, which was supposed to communicate that the CDU wanted support for German families to cause them to get more children instead of reacting to so-called demographic change by expanding immigration. The people who voted Schröder out of office voted for the traditional, pro-German and anti-immigration party.
What they got was immigration on steroids when Merkel opened the German borders for principally unlimited immigration in 2015. To this date, certain people assert that she violated the German basic law when doing so.
This Paul-to-Saul conversion to override what people had voted for in favour of what they were supposed to get happened once. There’s no reason to assume that it will not just ‘happen’ again in future in similar cases, see also the not exactly glorious political career of Giorgia Meloni
in Italy.
¹ This is bit oversimplified. Mass immigration really started with the SPD-led governments in the late 1960s and 1970s who started the large-scale import of foreigners “because workers are desparately needed”, mostly, foreigners from Turkey. Euphemistically, these were called Gastarbeiter, guest workers, to suggest that they’d eventually return to their home countries, despite this was probably never intended.
² Law of the blood. Basically means that someone’s a German if his parents were Germans.
Thanks
I find the whole thing bizarre and depressing
What I sometimes find depressing is how hard this Always blame the victims! reflex has apparently been drilled into people. Whenever one of my German acquaintances is really pissed off with the people controlling “public images” in Germany did, the outcome is always to decry either Germany or the (other) Germans, never the people who are actually responsible for this …. (censored).
That’s also visible in this text. Eugyppius probably didn’t realize that but his position on the topic is virtually identical to that of the Greens guy: Principally nothing wrong with mass immigration of foreigners unwilling to integrate into anything but themselves into the welfare system (German equivalent of the term benefits tourism) provided it only hits the people who deserve no better (They voted for the wrong party!)
On Sunday, I encountered a member of a meanwhile pretty rare specimen, namely, somebody walking through a pub with a face covering (‘the’ cloth mask) he then took off once seated at a table so that he could eat and drink. It’s tempting to ridicule such people for their foolishness. OTOH, the same guy wouldn’t have dreamed of doing something as silly as that prior to April 2020. That was obviously not the brightest guy but he nevertheless didn’t deserve to succumb to a propaganda offensive of hitherto unknown disregard for the truth and intensity. He should never have had to find him in such a situation and the people who engineered this are to blame.
I’m a firm believer in We must all hang together because otherwise, we shall surely hang alone.
I don’t think Eugyppius is at all in favour of mass immigration. At least I have not got that impression from all that I have read from him.
We can argue until the cows come home about “victim blaming” but ultimately those who are most culpable are not going to stop being bastards, so if we want anything to get better, we’d better start saying “no”. I am not saying I would be any better than the next man at doing so, but it’s something to aspire to.
“. They make natives more uncomfortable and everyday life more unpleasant.”
You get what you vote for I guess, not withstanding the Uni-parties (every Western country has them) closing ranks and using ‘Lawfare’ to remove a political opponent.
For crying out loud, Germany, when will it stop?? These stories just keep on coming. It’s basically slo-mo national suicide we’re witnessing. With a reluctance to deport them and a refusal to stop importing them it’s hardly a promising prognosis going forward, is it?
”A Syrian family has committed an extraordinary amount of crime in the German city of Stuttgart, leaving police and judicial authorities at a loss on how to deal with their ongoing crime spree. In total, the extended Syrian family is responsible for at least 154 crimes, while the head of the family, 43-year-old Abd Almudy H., who is also an accomplished criminal, blamed the German Youth Welfare Office for the crimes, claiming the agency “spoiled his children.”
One of the youngest criminals in the family is 17-year-old Khalil H. who has committed 34 crimes in just two and half years. He is now serving actual prison time after brutally stabbing a young woman. However, he has three brothers who are in prison as well. In the most recent case, on Wednesday last week, 21-year-old Mufed committed two violent robberies in Stuttgart’s city center within just minutes of one another. He is accused of threatening two girls, both 16, with a box cutter and then stealing their phones, according to Bild.
He then threatened another young woman with a box cutter and demanded her phone but was this time unsuccessful when she resisted. He was arrested after a local police patrol was alerted.
Mufed had just been released from prison two and half months ago after serving three years in prison in a juvenile detention center, according to Focus Magazine. Despite the massive crime spree among the family members, “deportation is currently not possible,” according to authorities.
The total crime count from the 16-person family only came to light after a parliamentary inquiry from the Alternative for Germany (AfD), which was then released by the German interior ministry of Baden-Wurttemberg. The data shows the family has conducted 47 physical assaults, 11 threats, two robberies, three robbery-related thefts, one case of smuggling of foreigners, and recently, attempted murder charges have also been added. There are various other less serious crimes on the family’s record. However, these are only the crimes the family has actually been caught doing.”
https://rmx.news/article/syrian-family-terrorizes-germany-with-at-least-154-crimes-including-robberies-attempted-murder-and-assault-in-stuttgart/
I know what I would do with this ‘family’ but I had better not post it here.
Did I mention that here in the baron landscape of Mid-Wales I swear I seen an illegal migrant walking on three different roads in my local area, where he was going, or looking for is anybody’s guess. I thought that phone battery lasts well. The last time I saw him walking it was dark FFS.
” You might move again, but who is to say when the next real estate investor won’t lease his property to the state, bringing the migrants to your new refuge in turn.”
Only in the 21st century Europe. People wouldn’t have put up with this in the past and Governments wouldn’t put up with it either. There is a sense of ‘castration’ going on with the Government of the day imposing this on the public. Yes in 2020 the countryside was a refuge against all the madness. All you had to worry about was how many times you were spotted outside, not that I personally cared or followed the “rules” plucked from Public Health 1984 then altered to suit the narrative.
Beautiful houses. Reminds me of a family holiday in Tirol Austria in the Alps around 1990. Me and another family had great adventures there, and a popular Ski resort. They say the people who impose this on communities never have to face the consequences so get to virtue signal and sound nice. We can all take the wrong turn and be in a rush to get away, like a tourist in Rio that has ended up in the favelas.
So which came first – La Rayner’s dispersal of illegals throughout the country or this ghastly proposal? Oh, silly me they’re all in on it together as per “The Plan”.
Reiner Fuelmich continues to be persecuted. Legal shenanigans abound. Here’s a statement from RF, he ends with a note of optimism which I hope isn’t misplaced.
https://truthsummit.substack.com/p/reiner-fuellmich-message-geneva-demonstration-un?publication_id=1565735&post_id=152419383
Good video….The front age of the file doesn’t have fraud on it, it has CORONA on it
“The file: it is about CORONA!!! From page one.”….That explains a lot.
Putting it bluntly, these country people have never encountered immigrants and discovered what scum they really are.
A friend and I who have both worked for big international organisations like to joke that our prejudices are founded on having travelled the world and met a lot of people …