- “Rachel Reeves’s dramatic fall from grace is 100% deserved” – At least Rachel Reeves can now put ‘Britain’s worst chancellor’ on her CV, says Ben Wilkinson in the Telegraph.
- “Farmers aren’t miners” – In the Spectator, Charles Moore argues that comparing today’s farmers to the miners of the 1980s is flawed – farmers aren’t striking, and their plight is rooted in socialist disdain for land ownership and eco-zealotry.
- “Cops must stop wasting time chasing petty tweets while real crimes go unsolved” – Free speech campaigners are demanding an overhaul of laws they say are stifling free speech and tying up overstretched forces, says the Sun.
- “Children in Need chairman quits over payments to scandal-hit LGBT charity” – Children In Need’s chairwoman has quit over £460,000 of grants awarded to a controversial transgender youth group hit by a series of child sex abuse scandals, reports the Mail.
- “Government to relax noise restrictions on heat pumps for Net Zero” – Ministers are set to relax noise rules, enabling heat pumps to be installed closer to property boundaries in a bid to advance Net Zero goals, says the Telegraph.
- “Elon Musk to be summoned by MPs to testify about X’s role in summer riots” – Elon Musk will be summoned by MPs to testify about the role of his social media platform X in spreading disinformation during the riots which rocked England and Northern Ireland over the summer, according to the Independent.
- “Why Elon Musk hates Starmer’s Britain” – Once a fan of Britain, Elon Musk now sees Starmer’s U.K. as a cautionary tale, writes Adam Luck in the Telegraph.
- “SNP makes business ‘virtually impossible’ in Scotland, says Trump son” – Eric Trump has lashed out at the Scottish Government insisting it is only his family’s “love” for the country that has kept them investing, reports the Mail.
- “Useless Europe is sleepwalking into oblivion” – The world is being remade in Silicon Valley’s image while the EU watches from the sidelines, writes Sam Ashworth-Hayes in the Telegraph.
- “If it’s a crime to call a politician stupid, we’re all in trouble” – If you think the muzzling of free speech in Britain is bad, just wait until you hear what’s been going on in Germany, says Michael Deacon in the Telegraph.
- “The absurdity of human rights law” – On Substack, Dr. David McGrogan argues that the absurd ambition of human rights law – to reconcile all rights for all – isn’t a flaw but the driving force behind the expanding power of the modern state.
- “Binyamin Netanyahu faces arrest if he flies into Britain” – Binyamin Netanyahu faces arrest if he enters Britain after Keir Starmer backed an International Criminal Court ruling for the Israeli leader to be put on trial for crimes against humanity, reports the Times.
- “Do no harm: the progressive case against assisted dying” – In the Spectator, Labour MP Gill Furniss explains why she’ll vote against the assisted dying bill, arguing it could harm the vulnerable and shift focus away from better palliative care.
- “Australian councils join call for action over DNA contamination in Covid mRNA vaccines” – Two Australian local governments have joined a grassroots campaign calling for state and federal officials to take precautionary action over Covid vaccine safety concerns, writes Rebekah Barnett on her Substack.
- “Et tu, John?” – On the WATN? Substack, Profs. Norman Fenton and Martin Neil dissect the Stanford professor John Ioannidis’s latest paper, exposing its circular assumptions about vaccine efficacy.
- “Covid vaccine boosters rejected by majority of Americans” – A Pew poll reveals 60% of Americans plan to skip their next Covid booster, according to the Telegraph.
- “The ‘experts’ who enabled RFK Jr.’s rise” – Anti-vax sentiment was a fringe concern until officials began misinforming us about the pandemic, says Matt Ridley in the Spectator.
- “Half of Ukrainians want quick, negotiated end to war” – Gallup’s latest surveys of Ukraine show 52% would like to see the war end as soon as possible.
- “Less than 24 hours to provide submissions on new social media age ban” – Why is the Australian Government rushing through its social media age ban? wonders Rebekah Barnett on her Substack.
- “Matt Gaetz withdraws nomination as Trump’s Attorney General” – Matt Gaetz has withdrawn his name from consideration to serve as Trump’s Attorney General amid accusations he had sex with a 17 year-old girl, reports the BBC.
- “The Maga think tank masterminds shaping Trump’s second term” – Ideas by the influential America First Policy Institute give an insight into how the President-elect will govern, says Tony Diver in the Telegraph.
- “Ellen DeGeneres ‘leaves U.S.’ for Cotswolds following Trump win” – Disillusioned by Donald Trump’s election victory, Ellen DeGeneres has reportedly left the U.S. for her Cotswolds home, reports GB News.
- “‘MAGA cockroaches’: the Left-wing ‘echo chamber’ rivalling Elon Musk’s X” – Bluesky’s rise following the re-election of Donald Trump reveals an increasingly polarised social media landscape, says Matthew Field in the Telegraph.
- “The Trump dance is sweeping U.S. sport – and the Premier League could be next” – The “Trump dance” craze has hit U.K. sports, with Barnsley’s Stephen Humphrys leading the charge, notes Thom Gibbs in the Telegraph.
- “Don’t expect Democrats to give up on wokeness anytime soon” – There are deep structural reasons why it will be very hard for the Left to correct its woke course, says Yascha Mounk on his Substack.
- “Book review: Defend The West; The Culture of Freedom” – Dr. Kevin Donnelly’s new book is a clarion call to anyone who values the culture of freedom, writes Stephen Lacey in the Catholic Weekly.
- “The Emperor’s new ad” – Jaguar’s makeover is a fairytale of naked wokery, says Laura Dodsworth on her Free Mind Substack.
- “How did Wolf Hall escape the attentions of the BBC’s diversity commissars?” – Wolf Hall is one of the few remaining jewels in the BBC’s tarnished crown. Presumably that’s why it was allowed to get off relatively lightly from the attentions of the Beeb’s resident diversity commissars, writes James Delingpole in the Spectator.
- “BBC Royal Correspondent failed to declare extra pay” – BBC Royal Correspondent Jonny Damond has apologised for failing to declare outside earnings from corporate events, reports the Telegraph.
- “‘Strong Eagle Man’ quits Canadian Government after accusations he faked indigenous heritage” – After months of being under fire over his indigenous ancestry and his personal business dealings, scandal-plagued Employment Minister Randy Boissonnault has finally quit, writes Michael Higgins in the National Post.
- “Cormac McCarthy had relationship with 16 year-old ‘muse’ when he was in his 40s” – Cormac McCarthy, one of America’s greatest novelists, reportedly had a relationship with 16 year-old Augusta Britt in the 1970s when he was 42 and married, according to USA Today.
If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Science does not exist. It is all philosophy. Philosophy filters natural experience, data and evidence.
Real mechanical Science ended in the early 19th century.
Now it is contrived ridiculous maths, tensor matrices, jargon, fraud, word salads, AI paper mills, money, propaganda, coercion, censorship, bullshit and violence. All to fit a worldview and philosophy.
$cientism.
Ferd, I disagree as a scientist and engineer. The reality is more nuanced. The science of Mechanics and Mechanical Engineering developed rapidly in 19th Century and continues to do so. Science develops tools, largely mathematical, to explain and predict behaviours of real materials and structures and engineering takes these through to enable real structures to be designed to withstand real environments. Of course there is incompetence and fraud but generally if what one delivers does not meet this criteria one does not get paid.
Of course with politics and corporatism there are plenty of pressures to corrupt this process, for instance the whole climate change edifice and it’s use to bludgeon the masses to pay enormous sums to the elites and their masters with specious arguments. At a Conference in the Netherlands recently earnest scientists and engineers advanced arguments not directly based on scientific fact but political economics, to support a vast ‘emissions’ trading scheme for alternative fuels to enrich the UN to the tune of billions per year. And with descriptions of (say) hydrogen with more colours than the LGBTQ+ flags. And all with different rewards and penalties. Whether hydrogen is an appropriate fuel or not for Diesel engines is an engineering science matter, the rest falls into your category of fraud.
And when engineers create a model it is tested to prove that it is valid and therefore useful. Not something that can be said of the climate science computer games.
“Real mechanical Science ended in the early 19th century…”
…So how come we’ve all got access to physical working embodiments of the proliferation of physical science that took place from the mid-19th century onwards, when the modern world arguably began?
By way of example, in rough chronological order 1850-1950: wireless telegraphy, X-ray radiography, telephony, internal combustion engine, synthetic fertilisers, plastics, antibiotics, jet engines, nuclear power, etc, etc.
None of these technologies came about in the first place in parts of the world not practised in applied physical sciences.
Agreed there’s been an explosion of voodoo science as well over the last two centuries, which politicians have lapped up and taxpayers are funding to this day.
Science is a mode of enquiry that each of us has to undertake in order to understand how things behave. Self selecting pearls of wisdom from the famous isn’t enquiring. That is why passing the information through a ‘non-scientist’ destroys the integrity of the message. Questioning the statement often returns a blank look, at best, or a deligated response, and the end of the conversation. Hence, the inclusion of Arts, Humanities and Social Science graduates, even if they have some intelligence, is likely to degrade the conversation, as has happened with the BBC monopolising and controlling the Climate Emergency discussions.
The West’s initial attempts into Scientific endeavour were very successful, enabling industry to innovative and improve, as well as gaining much understanding of the Physical World. But, as the 19th century progressed, some awkward experimental results started to appear. While “Mechanical Science’ continued to accumulate knowledge, other subdisciplines were producing contradictory evidence. The Mathematical solution, which has left many questions about the Physics unanswered, was derived through inspiration, and a good knowledge of Mathematics:
“Max Planck produced his law on 19 October 1900″
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck's_law
What followed is briefly described under the heading (in the link) ‘Subsequent events’ , and has led to Quantum Mechanics, which is used extensively. It isn’t the ‘final solution’ as the Physics isn’t particularly elegant, and Jacob Barandes is working on a new Stocastic approach, which keeps the Maths nearer to Reality, with no collapsing wave function, and all that it entails. Physics isn’t static by any means.
The problem with many recent experimental results isn’t the Scientific Method; as has already been mentioned, it’s that the Scientific Method isn’t being followed, for whatever reason. Of particular concern is the sloppy Statistics that is frequently found.
No, science exists. That in itself is not a problem.
The problem is that it has been taken over by and turned into a method of exercising political power.
Just like in medieval times religion (which also exists, undoubtably as long as there is at least one person who believes in the supernatural) was taken over and turned into a method of exercising political power.
By the way, science serving political power is much worse than medieval religion was, as science is devoid of any values. It can create nuclear power, for example, but says nothing about whether or not it is morally wrong to use it to incinerate people.
Politicians like to refer to “science” to justify things because people like and trust “science” because they perceive it to have been successful and helpful and amazing. “Scientists” are often happy to be political tools or actors because they need money and like power and prestige.
As always, caveat emptor and cui bono? apply.
What brilliant arguments you’ve all put forward in the comments on this topic, it’s a joy to read!
The real problem with politicised science is the irresistible temptation of neo-Lysenkoism – science as political control. We already see this with the fake climate emergency, where only one particular outcome, climate catastrophe requiring the subjugation of the population, is acceptable. And anyone who doesn’t accept this is tarred with the heresy-designation of “denier”.
Neo-Lysenkoism indeed. But what many ‘uses’ of the Science ignore is that the Scientific Method is self-correcting. And there will be some scientists willing to upset the consensus, if they can, for a better match to reality.
Exactly – that’s my #1 red flag test, when ever the people pushing ‘whatever’ use censorship or bullying or whatever to avoid an open debate, you know their argument is not what it seems… trouble is many people seem to lap it up.
As an example, many people now seem to trust the massive social media corporations, such as during covid, who 10-15 years ago would have disagreed with such corporate entities, no matter what they said, by default… because they hated big business. Maybe they appear more cuddly than big business of old – however we should be more wary than ever given their reach and power