• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Green Blob-Funded Report Calls for Massive Frequent Flyer Levies That Would Devastate International Air Travel

by Chris Morrison
21 October 2024 9:00 AM

A radical new plan to reduce international air travel from Europe to minimal levels over the next few years has been proposed by a group of Net Zero fanatics led by the New Economics Foundation (NEF). Massive charges under a ‘frequent flyer levy’ are proposed, the effect of which could quickly destroy large sections of the international air transportation industry. Some of the money raised – or not as the case may be – will be sent abroad as ‘climate aid’ to less developed countries forced to stay poor by mandated restrictions on their use of hydrocarbons. Needless to say, the work is the product of what Ben Pile recently termed “bog-standard Green Blob fronts”. Writing and promoting the NEF publication involved a number of operations heavily funded by the usual suspects including the European Climate Foundation (ECF) and ClimateWorks.

The fantasy plan calls for large European surcharges to be added to ticket prices for multiple annual trips. Financial details are not provided in the press release but the report suggests €50 for a medium distance trip and additional levies of €100 for long and “comfort” classes. This would appear to suggest an extra €250 charge for long-distance business and first class travel. George Monbiot of the Guardian boasts of the report having been shared exclusively with his newspaper and writes that the €100 levy on both distance and class will rise with each trip. It is hoped the surcharges will raise €64 billion, a sum said to be equivalent to 30% of the entire EU annual budget. This would be spent, at least until the golden goose is killed stone dead, on accelerating Europe to a “fairer, greener economy”. More virtuous bungs can be sent to countries to stop them using hydrocarbons and recompense them for the non-existent climate crisis.

Although the report talks of reducing travel by around 25%, the blow will be much worse in financial terms. Many airlines rely on premium travel to keep economy tickets low and severe reductions would affect the economics of aviation, both in the air and on the ground. Reducing passenger traffic by a suggested 25% and very likely much more, would require massive restructuring across the board including air traffic control, baggage handling, security and border activities and airport management. Yet more lost jobs to be added to the increasing pile of Net Zero casualties.

Not that this is the end of the attack. Air travel has enabled countless millions to travel for pleasure, holidays, education, business and to connect with family over the last few decades. In pursuit of ther mad Net Zero policies, the eco-zealots tell us, further restrictions “would therefore be necessary”. These would include caps on the number of flights, airport slots, night flights, private jets and “limits on the more damaging comfort classes of travel”.

Want to know what is being planned by the Net Zero fanatics – look at what their Blob-funded puppets are writing. In this case, forget about flying within just a few short years.

The New Economics Foundation has been around for a few years pumping out Left wing propaganda. It is no surprise that the hard Left’s favourite money tree the Rowntree Trust has funnelled in cash, although much larger amounts have been supplied by the Laudes Foundation and the ECF. As Ben Pile noted recently in the Daily Sceptic, most of the organisations active in the climate domain in the U.K. are funded by the ECF directly, or by one of the half dozen or so of the ECF’s grantor philanthropic foundations. As Pile also observes, the “hapless consumer” is ensnared by the phantom institutions that represent the green-ideology-addled British Establishment.

The NEF report is co-written by the Stay Grounded Network which, perhaps to nobody’s surprise, is funded by the ECF. The aviation campaigner at this outfit, Magdalena Heuwieser, says that the single trip flyer is paying the same tax as a traveller making 10 trips. Except that the more frequent flyer is actually paying 10 times more tax. Designed to fit a political narrative, Left wing sums often diverge from reality. In his article, Monbiot notes that air travel, heavily taxed as most passengers are aware, is “heavily subsidised” since the fuel is exempt from duties. In Monbiot’s world, a lack of a specific tax is often seen as a ‘subsidy’, while an actual £12 billion annual subsidy loaded onto U.K. electricity consumers to pay for unreliable renewable power is passed off as an ‘investment’. One reason fuel duty is not levied on aviation is that mobile jet aircraft will ‘tanker up’ at cheaper locations.

Monbiot reports on the view of Marlene Engelhorn who states that the “mile-high club of private planet combustion, where wealthy people like me can ferment in our comfort zones, needs to close it doors”. Easy to say of course when you are a wealthy heiress who has inherited a fortune from the BASF chemical operation. Other people who work for a living and need holidays and some modest comfort as they travel to drum up business might take a different view.

According to Monbiot, the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT) reviewed an early draft of the NEF report. Another Green Blob-funded operation of course, mostly it seems through ClimateWorks. This large operation channels considerable flows of money from other billionaire foundations such as Hewlett and Packard. These two latter operations are also direct funders of ICCT. Flying less is obviously the most effective solution to cutting emissions, states Sola Zhang, described by Monbiot as an aviation “expert”. Another operation quoted by Monbiot, More in Common, found that rich people would be most affected by a frequent flyer levy because they fly more. Again such value, such insight – funders ECF, the George Soros Open Society Foundation and Hewlett must be very pleased.

Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor.

Tags: ClimateWorksGeorge MonbiotMarlene EngelhornNew Economics FoundationThe International Council on Clean Transportation

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

Lammy in China

Next Post

SNP Says There Are 24 Genders

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

20 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Hugh
Hugh
3 years ago

not really very surprising, i know someone who insisted there was no significant trend in deaths among sportsmen in 2021, and later stated that if there was a trend it must have been due to “covid”

55
0
Rogerborg
Rogerborg
3 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

Now updated to “climate catastrophe”, and/or “startling whistles”.

37
0
Just Passing Through
Just Passing Through
3 years ago
Reply to  Rogerborg

“startling whistles”.

Ah yes indeed ..

16e90bde416406c78c1e476eeb41e59f.jpg
47
0
Hypatia
Hypatia
3 years ago
Reply to  Just Passing Through

Obvious answer: silent whistles.

Or maybe the ref could just wave a flag or something? Semaphore? Is that still a thing, does anyone know?

Seriously, come on! If anyone believes this old pony and trap, I pity them.

Referees whistles causing heart problems, indeed!

21
0
MrTea
MrTea
3 years ago
Reply to  Hypatia

Are they going to memory hole the history of the refs whistle and claim the whistle was first used in 2021?

9
0
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago
Reply to  Just Passing Through

Seems like anything is plausible, but one thing….

12
0
Jo Starlin
Jo Starlin
3 years ago
Reply to  Just Passing Through

They are just taking the piss now.

23
0
Milo
Milo
3 years ago
Reply to  Jo Starlin

They are – they all are – but sadly, a LOT of people will CHOOSE to believe it – because the alternative is just inacceptable to them

18
0
Milo
Milo
3 years ago
Reply to  Just Passing Through

So, if it is the whistles causing all these heart incidents [as if!!!!!] then how did we manage to play competitive and professional sport for all those prior years, with referees blowing whistles and there were hardly ever any players collapsing and if a fan keeled over in the stands it was a once a year event tops (and prob some codger on his last legs anyway, bowing out watching the team he had loved since he was a boy)?

11
0
Woodburner
Woodburner
3 years ago
Reply to  Just Passing Through

Something fishy here – look at the appalling grammatical and punctuation mistakes!

5
0
John Dee
John Dee
3 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

We’ll shortly discover that these heart problems (even those that predated its onset) have been caused by the war in Ukraine.
Expect to see an informative slide or two to that effect from Whitty.

Last edited 3 years ago by John Dee
35
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  John Dee

Obvioulsy Putin has been putting something in he water.

14
0
MrTea
MrTea
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

No, thats our government (again) this time adding flouride.

5
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  MrTea

Oh yes! Of course .

Now I think of it , what are they putting in the Chem Trails?

6
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

This is why the ‘vaccine’ lies are holding – unbelievably the victims themseves are playing the prinicipal part in sustaining them !

29
0
8bit
8bit
3 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

The data shows criminality to be likely, not just beyond a reasonable doubt, but, beyond any doubt at all. This is now a matter for a grand jury investigation and indictments, and it has been for a year. On the down side, seasoned conspiracy analysts will recognize for a crime of this magnitude, the perpetrators will stop at nothing and spare no expense to keep the truth buried.

28
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  8bit

Problem …all the Institutions have been bought out by the Global Elites and are complicit. (See US Courts and the total ignoring of the mountains of hard evidence of US 2020 Election Fraud)

19
0
BillRiceJr
BillRiceJr
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

That’s my depressing take-away as well. Every important institution in the world is now “captured.”

If someone can name one that’s not, please do. That will brighten my day.

12
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  8bit

“seasoned conspiracy analysts will recognize for a crime of this magnitude, the perpetrators will stop at nothing and spare no expense to keep the truth buried.”

Would these be the kind of ‘conspiracy analysts’ who always walk into dark rooms with a flashlight, instead if having the sense to turn the light switch on?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpqffgak7To

2
-9
8bit
8bit
3 years ago
Reply to  Emerald Fox

An attempted refutation, perhaps?

3
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  Emerald Fox

No …wrong again!

2
0
Dodgy Geezer
Dodgy Geezer
3 years ago
Reply to  8bit

…the perpetrators will stop at nothing and spare no expense to keep the truth buried.

The perpetrators do not need to do anything to keep the truth buried. The victims are happy to do that themselves.

0
0
Grahamb
Grahamb
3 years ago

It is shocking how many people I know developing heart problems. Both people of similar age to me and their children, with a couple of cases of pericarditis.

I recently met someone who I hadn’t seem since he hurled massive abuse at me on Facebook and another platform for attending protests and therefore being “anti vax”
he has just had a serious stroke and it’s not going to end well for society

82
0
Rogerborg
Rogerborg
3 years ago
Reply to  Grahamb

Have you considered that you caused him to have a rage-stroke by stubbornly refusing to die from the most deadliest pandemic ever?

69
0
John Dee
John Dee
3 years ago
Reply to  Rogerborg

It looked like that sort of responsibility-avoidance to me, Rb.

8
0
Gregoryno6
Gregoryno6
3 years ago
Reply to  Rogerborg

Insert evil laugh link here.

7
0
HelenaHancart
HelenaHancart
3 years ago
Reply to  Rogerborg

I have really good neighbours that we have been friends with for many years. Unfortunately our relationship is now somewhat strained due to our opposing views on everything covid (and of course, the “war”.) During a bit of idle conversation the other day, over the fence with Mr H, he suddenly and vehemently blurted out “you two are lucky to STILL be alive!!!” Wow! He knows we are active in opposing it all but they’ve followed the rules rigidly, done the “right thing” 💉 (and still got covid a couple of times) whilst we’ve been fine. He scoffed at us in the beginning and wherever we’ve tried to talk to him, because “Boris is only doing his best”. And now we have the first signs of anger…

Last edited 3 years ago by HelenaHancart
61
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  HelenaHancart

Stop talking to them – you are wasting your time and energy.

40
0
HelenaHancart
HelenaHancart
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

Well, we certainly stopped talking to them about the C and the V’s, and now they’re intrigued as what we do now, as we don’t tell them anything, anymore. But that’s what they wanted! I think curiosity will kill the cat eventually!

26
0
Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
3 years ago
Reply to  HelenaHancart

I have studiously avoided pretty much all contact with neighbours for the last ten years. Now I really know why: too much hassle.

Last edited 3 years ago by Marcus Aurelius knew
28
0
Milo
Milo
3 years ago
Reply to  Marcus Aurelius knew

I’m selective. Covid taught me who to limit my exposure to.

10
0
jingleballix
jingleballix
3 years ago
Reply to  HelenaHancart

He’s obviously a bloody idiot…….trying to convince himself by stating the same thing over and over, each time a little louder and a little more assertively, in the belief that doing so will make it come true.

My advice? Laugh at him.

22
0
Jo Starlin
Jo Starlin
3 years ago
Reply to  HelenaHancart

Talking to my (triple vaxxed) very pleasant and amiable neighbour the other day. Said I hadn’t seen her about recently and she told me she “had that covid, been bad for ten days.”

I was tempted to ask when she was getting her fourth shot but restrained myself.

36
0
For a fist full of roubles
For a fist full of roubles
3 years ago
Reply to  HelenaHancart

People do seem to get angry when they realise that their position has been shown to be wrong, but really they are angry at themselves for being so stupid.

44
-1
HelenaHancart
HelenaHancart
3 years ago
Reply to  For a fist full of roubles

Yes! I see anger a really positive thing. If someone attacks you suddenly without provocation, that’s a reflection on what they are feeling! It says everything about them. Its an inner frustration, and they’re looking to push the blame back on the people who tried to warn them in the first place, rather than face themselves, which is the hardest thing of all to do!

23
0
Alter Ego
Alter Ego
3 years ago
Reply to  For a fist full of roubles

Very wise observation – and a very helpful one!

2
0
watersider
watersider
3 years ago
Reply to  HelenaHancart

My friend’s wife has just had her third (or maybe fourth) dose of Wuhan Flu.
She has refused to socialise with us for over 2 years even though I have played golf with hubby all this time.
Last week when I asked on the phone how she was doing she said ‘I am much better thank you, thank God I have had all my jabs and booster’
She is a retired high school teacher,proving there is really no hope for humanity.

30
0
Alter Ego
Alter Ego
3 years ago
Reply to  watersider

There’s hope for humanity in its disobedient and rebellious minority.

That’s what we’ve become; rather to the amusement or bewilderment of some of us, I suspect.

There’s hope because of those who, despite immense efforts to make them submit, refused to take the jabs or wear the masks or just “go along” for the sake of harmony.

8
0
Gregoryno6
Gregoryno6
3 years ago
Reply to  Alter Ego

‘There’s hope for humanity in its disobedient and rebellious minority.’
Which may be more like a majority in a year or two.

6
0
Milo
Milo
3 years ago
Reply to  HelenaHancart

Oh God HH, to have to listen to someone trotting out “Boris is only doing his best”. 

Sympathy for you.

I’d have been tempted to reply with “doing his best to what?”

13
0
Epi
Epi
3 years ago
Reply to  Milo

Boris has done for the UK.

2
0
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago
Reply to  Rogerborg

I got a friend from Kenya who had the jab, we get in fine. He did have it quite early if I remember correctly because he works in a charaty fit the mentally ill. Considering someone from Africa you’d think he would be a bit more hesitant. I suppose he just thought he was doing the right thing

5
0
Javy
Javy
3 years ago
Reply to  Ron Smith

A lady I sat next to at a recent event told me she’d had COVID despite having had 3 jabs’ but said how bad it was that some of her work colleagues were unvaccinated. I said maybe they were concerned about side effects and she then proceeded to tell me how glands in her neck became significantly enlarged a couple of days after her booster ! Obviously unable to put two and two together……

14
0
Grahamb
Grahamb
3 years ago
Reply to  Rogerborg

Often I think people are angry because you haven’t gone along with “it” rather than the detail involved in reaching your personal decisions.

18
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  Grahamb

It’s not going to end well for your former acquaintance.

15
0
Grahamb
Grahamb
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

I know. It’s all very sad

4
0
MrTea
MrTea
3 years ago
Reply to  Grahamb

Did he find shouting abuse a bit more difficult with half his face paralyzed?

8
0
RTSC
RTSC
3 years ago

I suspect that many reading and contributing to these comments will have anecdotes about blood clots, heart attacks and strokes amongst their friends/families after they’ve had two and particularly three jabs.

I certainly have.

Of course “the authorities” don’t want to investigate. They assured everyone, and continue to insist, that the jabs are safe and effective and they can’t possibly admit they were wrong. Apart from reputational damage, the demands for compensation would sky-rocket.

88
0
TheBluePill
TheBluePill
3 years ago
Reply to  RTSC

My next heart attack funeral is for a 37 year old. At least this one is pending an autopsy, unlike the other victims.

63
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  TheBluePill

A friend of mine died last year less than 24 hours after being “boosted.” No post mortem – according to the Coroner there was no link.

33
0
Milo
Milo
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Saw a video yesterday where John O’Looney recounted the story of a 28 year old otherwise healthy unjabbed young woman in hospital for a surgical procedure. Staff persuaded her to have the jab so that she would be “safer while in hospital”. She was dead 9 minutes after she was jabbed.

19
0
Alter Ego
Alter Ego
3 years ago
Reply to  Milo

I saw that one, too. He’s an impressive witness – a straightforward, completely unpretentious, honest man.

6
0
Milo
Milo
3 years ago
Reply to  Alter Ego

Exactly! And he also said that he is witnessing an unprecedented number of deaths of younger people – he said deaths in that category were formerly rare, due to something like a tragic car accident or an incurable cancer.

I was fascinated by his description of how he was treated when in hospital.

2
0
Rogerborg
Rogerborg
3 years ago
Reply to  RTSC

Indeed. Snake oil salesmen will never tell you that their wares are neither safe nor effective.

One of the few valid functions of government is to investigate such claims and protect the gullible from such predators.

When a government becomes the poison-peddler, quis custodiet?

38
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  Rogerborg

Does the term ‘snake oil’ include the ‘vitamins’ and ‘supplements’ the likes of David Icke, Dr Zelenko, and Maria ‘Zeee’ are trying to flog on their websites?

6
-55
John Dee
John Dee
3 years ago
Reply to  Emerald Fox

They undoubtedly do, but most vitamins (unless you can afford to seriously overindulge) don’t cause harm. The clue is in the ‘vita’ bit.

Last edited 3 years ago by John Dee
25
0
HelenaHancart
HelenaHancart
3 years ago
Reply to  Emerald Fox

Absolutely. I met someone recently who was opposed to all things vax, covid, state control, and all the rest, like we are. But then he tried wrangle his way into my confidence (and others), to peddle a supplement from his mate’s company that would “cure” me of my autoimmune condition. I’d never heard of it before. He started off with a soft approach, and then started to push for me to buy it. I told to him back right off. Why would I not take the V but buy an unknown, unverified product from him? Haven’t seen him since.

14
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  HelenaHancart

You are giving yourself up to the orchestrated campaign by Pharma to discredit vitamins and supplements ( at least 100 years old!).

Clearly some supplements are fake and some are not . We are is an age of massive scams (as the behaviour or Government itself has clearly shown).

The issue, like so many other is in the “Age of Lies”, is judgement by the individual – something now seriously lacking in the population.

Always remember that the core motto of American Capitalism has always been ‘Never give a sucker an even break”

14
0
HelenaHancart
HelenaHancart
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

On the contrary. I have huge faith in natural and complementary health. I was a qualified practitioner in that field for many years. In fact it is the use of herbs, essential oils and supplements that I believe has kept myself and my immediate family healthy. I just don’t want to be pressured into buying something from someone I didn’t know, on whim, who I didn’t really feel i could trust. His first impression left a lot to be desired too. Sorry, but how is that discrediting vitamins and supplements?

15
0
maggie may
maggie may
3 years ago
Reply to  HelenaHancart

It depends on what the people EF mentioned are flogging on their websites. If it’s your unknown supplements, fair enough, but if they are actually recommending Vit D, C, zinc, quercetin etc, then I think they are absolutely correct. I’ve been taking the first 3 of those daily for a couple of years and haven’t even had a cold, despite being surrounded by people who have had colds and covid.

13
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  maggie may

I keep a ‘Tiger Stone’ in my pocket to ward off tigers.
Does it work?
Do you see any tigers?

Last edited 3 years ago by Emerald Fox
2
-14
Milo
Milo
3 years ago
Reply to  Emerald Fox

more fool you

10
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  HelenaHancart

I’m sure you have from reading your valuable comments over many months – I just worry that we need to be very wary of inadvertently adding to what will be seen by some as generalised criticism of ‘alternative medicine’ as a whole and the vital roll of vitamins (especially C and D) in combating both the virus and the vaccines.

Nothing should be given away to be be exploited as tacit support for the Pharma Companies permanent propaganda war on anyone who offers bona fide alternatives to their chemical health monopoly and disgusting exploitative ‘vaccine’ profits, which dwarf the activities of any disreputable ‘snake oil ‘salesmen inevitably to be found on the “Alternative “side.

As I said, individual judgement is the key as is the age old saying ‘caveat emptor’.

8
0
HelenaHancart
HelenaHancart
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

Thank you. Your comments are too. Yes I agree. Discernment is everything. Big Pharma is doing everything to discredit all sorts of therapies, herbs, essential oils and natural supplements. Its been going on for years.They want to muddy the waters as much as possible to make them seem as though they are some form of quackery. But, by the same token, many “New Age” philosophies are actually being actively promoted by the PTB now! We are in very confusing times, and we all have take responsibility for ourselves. I think there is lots going on to destabilise us as much as possible, from the truth. As always, a healthy body, and a healthy mind is what will get us all through this. How we achieve that, is of course, up to us.

11
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  HelenaHancart

We are on the same page!

2
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

Not at all – if you’ve studied Biology and Chemistry (like wot I have) you get some idea of what the human body needs in the way of nutrition. You generally get all you need if you eat ‘properly’, although, of course, it’s impossible to know in what substrate your food was grown in – there could be a lack of any minerals.
There’s probably little harm in taking extra minerals & vitamins now and then to make sure you have everything, but if it’s a regular habit of taking ‘supplements’ then this points to something not quite right.
I’d buy mine from a ‘respected source’ (manufacturer with reputation?) and not from some quack on the Internet who wants to sell you his ‘holistic magic potion’.

When people say they take zinc and Vitamin D3 regularly and that has warded of all evils for the past 20 years, I’m thinking what about all the other minerals and vitamins? You need more than just those two.
Personally I’ve never really bothered with ‘supplements’… we have some vitamin D tablets and fluoride tablets at home, and when I spot them sometimes I might pop one in my mouth “in case it might do something good”.
Nutrition is an immensely complicated subject. My general outlook is that if you eat enough fruits and salads, and various meats, potatoes, rice, and avoid too much sugar, crisps, alcohol and don’t smoke, that’s probably a reasonable approach.

5
-6
ozdocabroad
ozdocabroad
3 years ago
Reply to  Emerald Fox

Sorry EF.
As fluoride is a recognised neurotoxin, similar in its effect to mercury and aluminium, I’m not sure it’s doing your brain any good

0
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  HelenaHancart

The only way to find out is to see where Icke, Zelenko, ‘Zeee’ (as she likes to call herself), and the like get their ‘supplements from’, and you’d have to know what goes on (and see for yourself) where they are manufactured. What do they really contain? Who knows!
Makes you wonder if the T-shirts and hoodies they are flogging are made by enslaved Uighurs… as they say, follow the money!

3
-6
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  Emerald Fox

No

4
-1
djmo
djmo
3 years ago
Reply to  Emerald Fox

Maybe.

Are they just rebranding vitamins that people could buy generic versions of for pennies? That’s not snake oil – just marketing.

Are they making wild and unsubstantiated claims about efficacy (much like the vaccines)? If so, yes, it’s snake oil. If it’s just a case of saying that it’s a good idea to take them… well, then it depends on the answer to the next question.

Has their safety been credibly called into question for some or all groups (like the vaccines)? If so, it’s snake oil. But if you’re just talking about repackaged vitamins (at a dose that is known to be safe), that would be a no.

Finally, are these people using the power of the state to compel the public to buy and use their products? Are they using that same compulsion groups that are at statistically at no risk from covid? Are they engaging in a massive propaganda campaign that includes wielding state power to influence the corporate press and social media and to censor dissenting views, including the views of dissenting experts? Those last questions don’t make the difference between these things being snake oil or not, but the answers do explain why most of us don’t feel the need to mention everybody selling Vitamin D at a markup whenever we’re discussing vaccines.

Last edited 3 years ago by djmo
8
0
Nessimmersion
Nessimmersion
3 years ago
Reply to  Emerald Fox

Wot, like the Vitamin D the Wah!NHS now belatedly recommends in a dosage far too small to make a difference?
Is that what you call Snake Oil?

11
0
John Dee
John Dee
3 years ago
Reply to  Rogerborg

Those last two words should have been Greek, if you’re expecting a response from Bunter.

3
0
John Dee
John Dee
3 years ago
Reply to  RTSC

They started off by assuring us that we couldn’t get or pass on Wu-flu if we got vaxxed. Which proves they don’t mind being caught out in a lie, since it was inevitable that they would.

26
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  John Dee

Their intention is to follow lie with lie so fast that you never know which one you are dealing with ( it was an old Goebbels trick).

Last edited 3 years ago by David Beaton
18
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  RTSC

‘Anecdotes” Do you mean “evidence”?

‘Anecdotes’ cab be dismissed as non- valid exaggerated gossip – dropping dead after the shot and myocarditis in children is not “anecdotal” it is fact – real ‘evidence’ of extreme harm caused by the shots..

The anecdotal “fiction” of ‘success’ ‘is claimed for the ‘vaccines’!

The next question for the moderately curious is why would they want to go to such great lengths to conceal all the harm being cause by the injections – especially as they are even using coercion to totally unnecessarily push them into children?

So many people dare not pose the question because they could not deal with the answer!

17
0
itoldyouiwasill
itoldyouiwasill
3 years ago

When I first heard talk of population control I thought, no way, not in a million years. Not so sure now, given what I have seen and heard anecdotally as well as reading the literature.
Scary thing is, we are only seeing short term effects right now…

51
0
Rogerborg
Rogerborg
3 years ago
Reply to  itoldyouiwasill

2021 birth rates are going to make for interesting – by which I mean horrific – reading.

For 2020:

  • There were 613,936 live births in England and Wales in 2020, a notable decrease of 4.1% from 2019.
  • The total fertility rate (TFR) reached a record low in 2020, decreasing to 1.58 children per woman.
  • Fertility rates decreased across all age groups.
21
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  Rogerborg

Replacements on their way every day!
Apart from half of Africa and the Middle East, there’s 35 million Ukrainians needing a new home, and the UK looks like a nice place. Shift over a bit, will you?

dinghyriders.jpg
33
-5
Rogerborg
Rogerborg
3 years ago
Reply to  Emerald Fox

Indeed, the overall birth rate is plummeting, and when you look at who is having kids, well, demographics is destiny.

27
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  Rogerborg

In which case we no longer have a destiny as our culture is being ruthlessly cancelled all around us.

17
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

Our culture is being trashed.

23
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Trashed. By those we trusted to preserve and protect it – and for the most part who have benefitted most significantly from the privilege is has conferred to them over generations.

It seems it is now time to get rid of the indigenous peasants to restore the Feudal Hunting Grounds!

Those currently being imported as replacements they imagine as being easier to manage with no loyalty to the existing cultural order currently being systematically demolished.

They also give themselves the ‘Colonial option’ of “Divide and Rule”, where chaos and the abolition of Human and Civil Rights merely serves to enhance their increasingly brutalist autocratic power over squabbling minorities.

We see from Ukraine that the ordinary people are merely expendable pawns in their genocidal power games .

So why should they be worried about ‘vaccine’ deaths and injuries, when they have all been cooly projected, gamed and ‘factored in’ ?

16
-1
Mike Durrans
Mike Durrans
3 years ago
Reply to  Rogerborg

Would you want to bring offspring into this mad world- I feel so sorry for those younger than me

20
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  Emerald Fox

Will Johnson be giving asylum and a warm welcome to members of the Azov Brigade – or are they already here?

11
-1
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago
Reply to  Emerald Fox

Gives the human Rights Lawyers something to do, they’ve been sitting idle for the last two years.

4
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  itoldyouiwasill

Yes, we are dealing with stealth, delayed action weapons. Degrading the health of the population seems to be the principal ‘medium term’ aim

16
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  itoldyouiwasill

My conclusion is that the target date for pretty much ALL that Globocrap are doing is 2030, including population reduction.

8
0
Just Passing Through
Just Passing Through
3 years ago

…

carpet.jpg
22
0
stewart
stewart
3 years ago

What we are witnessing is a cover up, but at an unprecedented scale.

Let’s call a spade a spade. Whenever this matter is addressed, it should be referred to as a cover up, to put a bit more pressure. Nobody wants to be seen to be participating in a cover up.

48
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  stewart

Really? Surely they all get promotion and knighthoods for participating in the cover up or ‘keeping their noses clean’?

8
0
mishmash
mishmash
3 years ago
Reply to  stewart

There are millions of people participating in this cover up, those who believed the lie, took the jab/s and refuse to admit it damaged them or their children.

Last edited 3 years ago by mishmash
12
0
John Dee
John Dee
3 years ago

But the Powers don’t want to know.

With apologies to Mark Twain: ‘It’s easier to have a politician mislead you than to have that politician admit he/she misled you’.

20
0
Lockdown Sceptic
Lockdown Sceptic
3 years ago

Naomi Wolf On Pfizer Reporting Record Profits
https://rumble.com/v13g8w5-naomi-wolf-on-pfizer-reporting-record-profits.html
Bannons War Room 

Stand for freedom with our Yellow Boards By The Road
BY DOING NOTHING YOU ARE BUILDING YOUR OWN DIGITAL PRISON

Thursday 5th May 5.30pm to 6.30pm
Yellow Boards  
A4130 White Hill (between Henley Bridge 
& A321 Wargrave Road) 
Henley-on-Thames RG9 2LP  

Saturday 7th May 3pm to 5pm 
Yellow Boards LONDON
Junction Victoria St/Bressenden Place
London SW1E 5NA

Monday 9th May 5.30pm to 6.30pm 
Yellow Boards  
Junction Long Hill Road, 
New Forest Ride & A329 London Rd
(near Mercedes Benz)
Bracknell RG12 9FR

Stand in the Park Sundays from 10am – make friends & keep sane 

Wokingham 
Howard Palmer Gardens 
(Cockpit Path car park free on Sunday) 
Sturges Rd RG40 2HD   

Bracknell  
South Hill Park, Rear Lawn, RG12 7PA

Telegram http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell

12
-6
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  Lockdown Sceptic

Naomi Wolf actually voted for Joe Biden.

3
0
Free Lemming
Free Lemming
3 years ago

We know this, the question is what can be done? How do we enforce the morons in government/public health – the people that are supposed to be our servants not our masters – to complete a non-biased assessment of the health impact of these ‘vaccines’? I noticed that this government petition on vaccine safety (https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/602171) was given short shrift from these idiots – “The Government commissioned a public inquiry into the pandemic and has no plans for a vaccine safety inquiry. Our surveillance strategy for COVID-19 vaccines provides continuous safety monitoring“.

We are being lorded over by people we (supposedly) chose to serve us. Democracy is long dead, just the illusion of it remains.

30
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  Free Lemming

The illusion only remains with the deluded.

13
0
A Y M
A Y M
3 years ago

Will. The first thing you need to realise is that these are not vaccines. Vaccines (theoretically) stop you getting or spreading the target disease.

From their you don’t even get to talk about herd immunity at all.

These things are pointless poisons.

Well not pointless if you are trying to weaken people’s immune systems, drag everyone onto a digital ID system, make Pharma loads of money, normalise injections of gene altering materials….

Last edited 3 years ago by A Y M
31
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  A Y M

We do realise they are not vaccines that has been obvious for two years or more – the problem is that the sheep still believe they are vaccines and are a miracle of modern science and we must be eternally grateful for their successful roll-out!

Three decades of totally dumbing down the population and feeding them with cheap pornography and media garbage has worked a treat!

The critical faculty and power of objective analysis is dead in most brains.

25
0
Hopeless - "TN,BN"
Hopeless - "TN,BN"
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

In sharp contrast to the apathy and compliance about Covid “vaccines” and their mandated or blackmailed use, it is interesting to hear the screeching from the likes of Kamala Harris and the rest of the usual people, both in the USA and here, about the proposed overturning of Row v Wade in the USA.

Irony is dead, when KH sounds off about women’s bodily autonomy and choice on abortion, whilst it’s AOK for her and her government, to force experimental “vaccines” into people by threats and lies. The dichotomy was remarked upon by Hartley Brewer on TalkRadio, and no doubt others may also notice this blatant hypocrisy, including interested groups in the UK; but probably not the BBC.

20
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  Hopeless - "TN,BN"

Greek sirens, part woman part fish, and Harpies and Irish Banshees – totally malevolent female creatures, much feared by the ancients.

The world now appears to be over-run with them.

Last edited 3 years ago by David Beaton
7
-1
Milo
Milo
3 years ago
Reply to  Hopeless - "TN,BN"

Indeed and had to listen to Calvin Robinson last night on GB news going on and on about how nobody was protecting the rights to the bodily autonomy of the unborn babies and how women should stop using abortion as a form of birth control.

Unfortunately Dan Wooton didn’t point out to Robinson that he had no right to sanctimoniously opine about such dogma when it was a dilemma he was never likely to be faced with having been raped by someone at knifepoint or molested by some paedo elderly family member and be left with an unwanted pregnancy.

4
-4
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago
Reply to  Hopeless - "TN,BN"

Definitely not the BBC!

1
0
Milo
Milo
3 years ago
Reply to  A Y M

Thank you AYM.

I have never been able to understand how commentators could have a discussion about the jabs and bring “herd immunity” into it when all the jabs were ever designed to do was to act as a medical treatment to reduce the severity of the illness they related to.

5
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago

The descent into a culture of lies and deflection seems to know no bounds.

Are they actually testing the limits of the success of the psyop in destroying the critical faculties of the sheep? It will seem that like the lockdowns and ludicrous mask ‘complance’ it has had been a success beyond their wildest fantasies!

So what chance have we got? It appears none at all.

16
-1
Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

There are two things you can control: your emotions and your expenses.

True before, true now.

16
0
Nymeria
Nymeria
3 years ago
Reply to  Marcus Aurelius knew

I’ve been struggling to control my anger.

11
0
Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
3 years ago
Reply to  Nymeria

Ditto. But we must. For our own sake!

12
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  Marcus Aurelius knew

Indeed.

4
0
Alter Ego
Alter Ego
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

And ditto again. I must admit I am relieved to learn that you also struggle to control your anger – you seem to me to be doing it very well.

I had no idea of how much anger I’ve been “controlling” until I was (very recently) forced to seek medical attention for persistent pain in my jaw I’ve been advised that it’s probably because I’ve been clenching it in my sleep!

A wise medical friend once told me that the best way to deal with stress was to remove the cause of the stress. Good one – but we can’t remove the causes of all our anger, can we?

We can, however, do more of the things we like – and now that the unvaxxed have been readmitted to social life in Oz, there’s a lot more available.

And there’s DS, which always – amidst the awfulness – has something to make me smile and laugh.

7
0
PhantomOfLiberty
PhantomOfLiberty
3 years ago

This is nonsensical – adenovirus “vaccines” cause clots, and they knew this even before they started

https://www.ageofautism.com/2022/04/british-regulator-stalls-clot-ingredients-covid-injections.html

Relative benefit is not a sensible measure for a product given en masse – sacrificing one lot of people to save others. It is not ‘first do no harm’. I believe this is criminal. The reported Yellow Card deaths for the AZ are far worse than Pfizer.

21
0
John001
John001
3 years ago
Reply to  PhantomOfLiberty

We don’t seem to have all-cause mortality for the AZ trial. We just about do for the Pfizer trial; see Canadian Covid Care Alliance presentation.

Also I think the placebos in the US trials were saline, following one or more court challenges. Probably not in the UK. So another vaccine might have been used in the control group, distorting the results.

4
0
PhantomOfLiberty
PhantomOfLiberty
3 years ago
Reply to  John001

That’s right, the Men ACWY vaccine was used in the AZ trial. They were using the Men B in the children’s trial which may have led to some very confusing results

https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n385/rr-1

In fact to the best of my knowledge no children’s vaccines have been trialled against placebo

https://www.ageofautism.com/2019/12/the-echo-chambers-of-public-health.html

The problem though is that any trial which was against placebo would be self-unblinding. The whole process is hopelessly unscientific..

3
0
PhantomOfLiberty
PhantomOfLiberty
3 years ago

It took Benn’s team nearly 4 decades to present their results for the DPT vaccine:

“Among 3–5-month-old children, having received DTP (± OPV) was associated with a mortality hazard ratio (HR) of 5.00 (95% CI 1.53–16.3) compared with not-yet-DTP-vaccinated children. Differences in background factors did not explain the effect. The negative effect was particularly strong for children who had received DTP-only and no OPV (HR = 10.0 (2.61–38.6)). All-cause infant mortality after 3 months of age increased after the introduction of these vaccines (HR = 2.12 (1.07–4.19)).”

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5360569/

5
0
8bit
8bit
3 years ago

Referee whistles may be cause to (sic) sudden increase in heart problems…

“You gotta be f***ing kidding…”
– The Thing (1982)

11
0
A passerby
A passerby
3 years ago

Since a high proportion of people have been mRNA’ed at least once I’m curious to know the position on blood and organ donations. I’m guessing the guarantee from the NHS will be a guarantee that they can’t give a guarantee of anything now being mRNA free.

15
0
Hopeless - "TN,BN"
Hopeless - "TN,BN"
3 years ago
Reply to  A passerby

The only “guarantee” that you’ll get out of that lot is that the “vaccines” are “safe and effective” i.e. another spin or two of the cracked old 78.

13
0
A passerby
A passerby
3 years ago
Reply to  Hopeless - "TN,BN"

Yes, I believe I’ve now reached the point of already knowing the answers to all my questions in relation to this continuing farce but thought I must put the question on the table, so to speak.

13
0
Alter Ego
Alter Ego
3 years ago
Reply to  A passerby

Likewise. I suspect that’s an issue that will be fought out in the courts, sooner or later.

7
0
John001
John001
3 years ago
Reply to  Alter Ego

If ever …

BTW I was handed a copy of The Light paper yesterday and it’s very good. I only thought two articles were badly proof-read or a bit ‘iffy’, which is much better than an issue I saw 6 months ago. (The BBC or the Guardian are now *worse*.)

I recommend people who have time to help them with distribution, sourcing stories (or proof-reading…)

Presumably being printed media they’re outside the scope of internet censorship and Mad Nad.

http://www.thelightpaper.co.uk.

6
0
Alter Ego
Alter Ego
3 years ago
Reply to  John001

Thank you for your link, and bravo to them!

Re proof-reading, I suspect that the BBC and Guardian are now too busy avoiding the truth and creating “narratives”.

1
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  A passerby

The pathogenic spike proteins are the blood of the “vaccinated” – that has now been clinically demonstrated. So where does that put those non-vaccinated needing a blood transfusion?

Why is blood for transfusion use not being tested? Or is it?

Last edited 3 years ago by David Beaton
11
0
Milo
Milo
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

I’d imagine not being tested – to test would be to have to admit that there was something wrong with jabbed people and their blood – all those people jabbed to “save the NHS”.

Same issue applies to organs for transplant considering it is known that the spike proteins have been found in organs all over the body courtesy of the evidence of the US pathologist, Ryan Cole MD.

0
0
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago

I hope she has good security!

3
0
john g
john g
3 years ago

I’m sure she said “above” 50 years for age, not under. I thought that was odd.

0
0
zners
zners
3 years ago

Doctors for Covid Ethics also just released an excellent paper.

7
0
PhantomOfLiberty
PhantomOfLiberty
3 years ago
Reply to  zners

Here it is

https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/pfizer-moderna-public.pdf

The paper is by two high ranking scientists Michael Palmer and Sucharit Bhakdi and Wolfgang Wodarg the doctor/politician who blew the whistle on Pandemrix in 2009.

Last edited 3 years ago by PhantomOfLiberty
10
0
PhantomOfLiberty
PhantomOfLiberty
3 years ago
Reply to  PhantomOfLiberty

PS My understanding is it has been submit to the European Medicines Agency.

2
0
Rowan
Rowan
3 years ago

Also, the trial mortality data suffer (as Prof. Stabell-Benn herself acknowledges) from small numbers susceptible to freak random occurrences (in one study there are four accident deaths in the vaccine arm versus zero in the control arm) and very short follow-up times.

Why should we accept that the deaths are freak random occurrences rather than effects of the vaccine itself?

Last edited 3 years ago by Rowan
9
0
Vxi7
Vxi7
3 years ago
Reply to  Rowan

Look up her TED talk about vaccines. It’s from 2019.

0
0
Dodgy Geezer
Dodgy Geezer
3 years ago

Professor Christine Stabell-Benn from the University of Southern Denmark added that there is “major pushback” to her efforts to investigate the effects of vaccines on all-cause mortality and many regulators and companies simply don’t want to know.

Listen, dearie, can’t you take a hint?

Let me spell it out for you. The last time anyone in public service did an honourable thing was Profumo in 1963. By the end of the 1970s there was no honour anywhere – only the grasping explosion of greed in the 1980s.

By now there is nothing apart from ‘maintaining the narrative’ – the ‘narrative’ which keeps a few mega-rich people on top of the greasy pole. If you don’t cooperate and maintain the narrative, what is left of your promising career will be in the same place as Profumo’s…

9
0
Alter Ego
Alter Ego
3 years ago
Reply to  Dodgy Geezer

We stumbled on in Oz into the 21st century with a couple of politicians resigning for having misled the House.

Now, nobody remembers. Certainly, nobody has followed their example.

2
0
Superunknown
Superunknown
3 years ago

I think we can comfortably drop the theory part now, this is clearly a conspiracy.
Their lack of transparency and blatant propaganda tipped many of us off in the beginning, using flattery to seduce the stupid into believing “the science™” made them more intelligent than those who were questioning the narrative.
But now that veil of unscientific nonsense is eroding, what will the duped masses do about it?
Probably nothing, maybe project false outrage for five minutes, then they will just revert back to earlier programming, football, soap operas, new phone, new terrorist threat, after all you wouldn’t want to be the black sheep that upsets the flock.

11
0
Hawkins_94
Hawkins_94
3 years ago

Reading “Empire of Pain” about the Sackler family. They were permitted to sanction all sorts of meds on unwitting consumers for decades…well before Oxycontin too. The results are there for all to see.

These scandals always take decades to unravel, sadly, and the fact is the State and the Establishment are so deeply embroiled in this they’ll fight at all costs to hide any adverse reactions. No doubt it’ll come out when everyone involved is retired or dead and very few will be made accountable.

I’ll be lodging a spoilt ballot paper at this election and any future elections until a genuine candidate appears. What else is there to do?

Democracy is completely broken right now and the UK is a shambles

10
0
dearieme
dearieme
3 years ago

She also did a good interview with Dr Sebastian Rushworth recently.
https://sebastianrushworth.com/2022/02/12/non-specific-vaccine-effects-with-dr-christine-stabell-benn/

Hurray for the Scandowegians!

2
0
MrTea
MrTea
3 years ago

Looking at the excess mortality graph it shows the UK having 2000 excess deaths per million from Jan 1st 2020 to Dec 31 2021.

Is it just me or is that a shockingly low number given this was the worst pandemic ‘eva?

(Not to mention this undoubtedly includes people the medics killed through neglect of other aliments, the vaccine induced deaths, along with the deaths of despair)

3
0
MrTea
MrTea
3 years ago

Vaccines are mana from heaven for the pharma companies.
Since the USA granted them immunity from liability for harms caused by their products the pharma companies have pushed out a vast number of new vaccine products safe in the knowledge that no matter how lethal they are they get off scott free.
Vaccines have other major benefits-
they inject them into healthy people no need to wait for people to be ill
the safety testing regime is far more lax than for medicines
State governments force many US citizens to take vaccines in order to go to school

Make pharma carry liability for vaccine harms and watch their offerings disappear.

5
0
rtj1211
rtj1211
3 years ago

It’s actually time to remove blanket immunity from prosecution from vaccine companies across the board. It really isn’t acceptable to privatise the profits and socialise the losses.

7
0
zners
zners
3 years ago
Reply to  rtj1211

well if they are found to be fraudulent they’ll lose that protection immediately.

2
0
Alter Ego
Alter Ego
3 years ago
Reply to  rtj1211

The 1986 US legislation is the killer. Literally.

1
0
MrTea
MrTea
3 years ago

Pfizer etc killed the trials early and we all know why.
If things were looking good they would have let the trials run and shouted about the results day and night.

10
0
BillRiceJr
BillRiceJr
3 years ago

“It is also a bit of a Pandora’s box, I think, for health authorities, because if they start acknowledging these effects there is also the huge problem of potential negative non-specific effects that have actually been brought to the attention of the WHO already 20 years ago, but they haven’t really responded with the investigations. So you can see the potential backlash for the WHO, for vaccination programmes, if it actually comes out that some vaccines have carried these negative non-specific effects.”

What the study author is really saying is that exposing one scandal could lead to other scandals being exposed. Upon learning that something that was said to be true was a brazen falsehood, the public might be expected to ask, “Well, what else have these experts been lying about?”

This fits my recent posting theme: The Establishment can’t let ONE scandal be revealed or exposed. The risk – or the precedent this might establish – would be too great for them.

So this is another reason it’s almost impossible for one fraud to be exposed.

6
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  BillRiceJr

Or optimistically that the exposure of one unprecedented, monstrous and genocidal fraud against all humanity might bring down the whole, stinking, rotten corrupt system and all those involved?

Last edited 3 years ago by David Beaton
3
0
BillRiceJr
BillRiceJr
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

That’s my hope – Expose one and the dominoes quickly start to tumble.

1
0
Milo
Milo
3 years ago
Reply to  BillRiceJr

Said it before, Edward Dowd needs to get a wriggle on with his exposure of Pfizer’s jab

0
0
Richard Noakes
Richard Noakes
3 years ago

 “Vaccine efficacy is generally reported as a relative risk reduction (RRR). It uses the relative risk (RR)—ie, the ratio of attack rates with and without a vaccine—which is expressed as 1–RR. Ranking by reported efficacy gives relative risk reductions of 95% for the Pfizer–BioNTech, 94% for the Moderna–NIH, 91% for the Gamaleya, 67% for the J&J, and 67% for the AstraZeneca–Oxford vaccines.
“However, RRR should be seen against the background risk of being infected and becoming ill with COVID-19, which varies between populations and over time. Although the RRR considers only participants who could benefit from the vaccine, the absolute risk reduction (ARR), which is the difference between attack rates with and without a vaccine, considers the whole population. ARRs tend to be ignored because they give a much less impressive effect size than RRRs: 1·3% for the AstraZeneca–Oxford, 1·2% for the Moderna–NIH, 1·2% for the J&J, 0·93% for the Gamaleya, and 0·84% for the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccines.”
The Lancet Study
Doctors for COVID Ethics
On The accompanying chart:
Pfizer/BioNtech RRR 95.03%   ARR From Jab 0.84%
Moderna (NIH) RRR 94.08%   ARR 1.24% From Jab
Janssen          RRR 66.62%    ARR 1.19% From Jab
Astrazeneca/ Oxford RRR 66.84% ARR 1.28% From Jab
The Lancet

1
0
Richard Noakes
Richard Noakes
3 years ago

Pfizer ARR 0.84%            x3 = 2.52% Covid x3 = 297.48% x4 = 3.36% Covid x 4 = 396.64%

Moderna ARR 1.24%      x3 = 3.72% Covid x3 = 296.28% x4 = 4.96% Covid x 4 = 395.04%

Astrazeneca ARR 1.28% x3 = 3.84%Covid x3 = 296.16% x4 = 5.12% Covid x 4 = 394.88%

So 2 shots plus booster = 3 =1,010,880 Trillion, Trillion, Trillion mRNA and Graphene Oxide/Hydroxide particles in your body?
So 2 shots plus 2 boosters = 4 = 2021760 Trillion, Trillion, Trillion Trillion, Trillion, Trillion mRNA and Graphene Oxide/Hydroxide particles in your body?
Jim Woodgett, former Director of Research at Mount Sinai Hospital (2005-2021)
Answered May 5, 2021
The SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein encodes a 1273 amino acid protein. Multiple by 3 to get the number of nucleotides and add some untranslated regions for directing translational start and aiding in stability it rounds to approximately 5,000 nucleotides. 1 nucleotide of RNA has a mass of (averaged) of 320 Daltons. So an RNA comprised of 5,000 nucleotides has a mass of 1600 kiloDaltons.
There are 30 micrograms of RNA in a Pfizer/BioNTech single dose (in 0.3 ml). That means there are about 11.3 x 10 to the power of 12 molecules of RNA per shot.
(First shot?)11,300,000,000,000 molecules of RNA (11,300 Trillion) approximately.
The Moderna shot typically uses more RNA.
Erwin Claassen, Wetenschappelijk Huurling at Waar Niet
Answered May 5, 2021
(2nd Shot) a shitload… dose is 100µg of mRNA (not all vaccines is mRNA), that is around 505.440.000.000.000.000.000.000 copies… more or less (505,440 Trillion Trillion)
So if you have a 3rd booster that might translate to a further 1,010,880 Trillion, Trillion, Trillion mRNA particles in your body?
Are the spike proteins injected, which are designed to be mass-produced in the bodies of the vaccinated, cause of the clotting?

So, an example:
Pfizer ARR 0.84% x3 = 2.52% Covid x3 = 297.48% x4 = 3.36% Covid x 4 = 396.64%

Using the numbers above, after 3 vaccine shots, you have a 2.52% chance of the vaccines stopping Covid and Covid has a 297.48% chance of infecting you.
So 2 shots plus booster (3) =1,010,880 Trillion, Trillion, Trillion mRNA and Graphene Oxide/Hydroxide particles in your body

After 4 vaccine shots you have a 3.36% chance of the vaccines stopping Covid and Covid has a 396.64% chance of infecting you.
2 shots plus 2 boosters (4) = 2021760 Trillion, Trillion, Trillion Trillion, Trillion, Trillion mRNA and Graphene Oxide/Hydroxide particles in your body

1
0
Richard Noakes
Richard Noakes
3 years ago

Was This the Plan All Along?
To answer the question whether this has been planned, below is a selection of excerpts from infamous individuals regarding gene editing, in their own words. No further comment is required, these excerpts speak for themselves, you decide.
In an interview with Charlie Rose, Klaus Schwab said: “You see the difference of this fourth industrial revolution is it doesn’t change what you are doing, it changes you. If you take genetic editing, just as an example, it’s you who are changing. And of course, this has a big impact on your identity.”
Klaus Schwab on the Charlie Rose Show, 2015 (2 mins)
View more: The Charlie Rose Show, Klaus Schwab
Tal Zaks, chief medical officer of Moderna, stated, “In every cell there’s this thing called messenger RNA or mRNA for short, that transmits the critical information from the DNA in our genes to the protein, which is really the stuff we’re all made out of. This is the critical information that determines what the cell will do. So, we think about it as an operating system. …. So, if you could actually change that, … if you could introduce a line of code, or change a line of code, it turns out, that has profound implications for everything, from the flu to cancer.”
TEDxBeaconStreet: Rewriting the Genetic Code: A Cancer Cure in the Making, Tal Zaks, 8 December 2017 (10 mins)
Read more: Bombshell: Moderna Chief Medical Officer Admits MRNA Alters DNA, 12 March 2021
During an interview with Anthony Fauci on 30 April 2020, Bill Gates said he was particularly excited about pursuing a new approach called ‘RNA vaccine’. Gates explained, “Unlike a flu shot, which contains fragments of the influenza virus so your immune system can learn to attack them, an RNA vaccine gives your body the genetic code needed to produce viral fragments on its own.”
Around this time Gates made a promotional video for his “RNA vaccines.”
Welt: Bill Gates explains Covid-19 and the race for a vaccine, 4 May 2020 (2 mins)
Forbes published an article on 29 November 2021 from Steven Salzberg titled, “Yes, The Vaccine Changes Your DNA. A Tiny Bit. That’s A Good Thing.”  And later retitled the article to “Covid Vaccines Don’t Alter Your DNA – They Help Choose Cells to Strengthen Your Immune Response”.
The author changed the headline to emphasise that the vaccines “don’t alter your DNA” without changing any of the article’s content.
Read more: Forbes Admits mRNA Vaccines Alter DNA Then Changes the Headline, 2 December 2021
The Expose
Me: Synthetic Genetic mRNA = Patented Trans Human – no longer Human – Zero Rights under Human Law

1
0
TheEngineer
TheEngineer
3 years ago

“we still lack that data” and won’t be getting it anytime soon.

0
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

Episode 36 of the Sceptic: Karl Williams on Starmer’s Phoney Immigration Crackdown, Dan Hitchens on the Assisted Suicide Bill and Tom Jones on Reform’s Local Council Challenge

by Richard Eldred
16 May 2025
0

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Chinese ‘Kill Switches’ Found in US Solar Farms

15 May 2025
by Will Jones

Ten Things George Soros is Funding in the UK

15 May 2025
by Charlotte Gill

News Round-Up

16 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

Chris Packham is the New St Francis of Assisi

15 May 2025
by Sallust

‘Trans Toddlers’ Allowed Gender Treatment on NHS

15 May 2025
by Will Jones

Chris Packham is the New St Francis of Assisi

36

‘Trans Toddlers’ Allowed Gender Treatment on NHS

36

Chinese ‘Kill Switches’ Found in US Solar Farms

21

News Round-Up

13

Ten Things George Soros is Funding in the UK

21

The Folly of Solar – a Dot on the Horizon Versus a Blight on the Land

16 May 2025
by Ben Pile

Renaud Camus on the Destruction of Western Education

15 May 2025
by Dr Nicholas Tate

‘Why Can’t We Talk About This?’

15 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

Daily Mail Misses the Real Story About Long-Term Stable Antarctica Ice in Dumb Quip About Climate ‘Deniers’

15 May 2025
by Chris Morrison

Ten Things George Soros is Funding in the UK

15 May 2025
by Charlotte Gill

POSTS BY DATE

October 2024
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
« Sep   Nov »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences