- “Keir Starmer faces Cabinet backlash over budget cuts” – Ministers including Angela Rayner may revolt over plans to slash departmental spending by as much as 20%, reports the Times.
- “Ryanair threatens to axe hundreds of U.K. flights if Reeves raises taxes” – Ryanair has warned it could axe hundreds of U.K. flights if Rachel Reeves raises aviation taxes in her Budget, according to the Telegraph.
- “Starmer poised to grant more than 60,000 people asylum after scrapping Rwanda scheme” – More than 60,000 migrants will be granted asylum in the U.K. in the next year after Keir Starmer scrapped the Tories’ Rwanda scheme, according to an analysis by the Refugee Council, the Telegraph reports.
- “Meloni’s migration strategy is working – and the rest of Europe is watching” – Giorgia Meloni’s Italy has become the first European nation to successfully offshore illegal migrants to a non-EU country, and the rest of the EU is taking note, says Nicholas Farrell in the Spectator.
- “David Lammy’s disdain of the West is degrading Britain on the international stage” – The international order is under siege from the destabilising agendas of authoritarian regimes and diluting Britain’s influence by expanding the UN Security Council will not help, says Samuel Ramani in the Telegraph.
- “Keir’s landed Foreign Sec in quicksand over reparations” – Sir Keir Starmer has landed his Foreign Secretary David Lammy in Caribbean quicksand by ruling out paying slave reparations, says the Mail‘s Ephraim Hardcastle.
- “Labour to send 100 party staff to U.S. to help Democrats in swing states” – Republicans described Labour’s plans to send dozens of volunteers to help the Democrats as an “outrage” and warned they would damage the U.K.’s relationship with the U.S. should Donald Trump win the Presidency, the Telegraph reports.
- “Councillor’s wife jailed for inciting racial hatred online” – Lucy Connolly, the wife of West Northamptonshire Conservative councillor Raymond Connolly, has been jailed for inciting racial hatred on X on the day of the Southport attacks, the Mail reports.
- “Bungling Keir Starmer calls Rishi Sunak ‘Prime Minister’ again at PMQs” – Keir Starmer has repeatedly appeared muddled over whether the Tory leader is still in power since his crushing election victory in July, says the Mail.
- “Who won the Tory leadership hustings?” – The result was clear. It’s Badenoch who will allow Tories to once again feel good about themselves, says Tim Stanley in the Telegraph.
- “It’s Kemi Badenoch’s to lose” – Were Kemi Badenoch not to be unveiled as the next Conservative party leader in a couple of weeks it would now go down as a very notable upset following Thursday’s GB News leadership special, says Patrick O’Flynn in the Spectator.
- “Kemi Badenoch is wrong about Labour and race” – The Telegraph‘s Michael Deacon says Kemi is wrong to suggest Labour won’t call a black woman prejudiced: the identitarian Left loves nothing more than hounding a “race traitor”.
- “Liberals are starting to panic. Donald Trump is going to win in a landslide” – It’s becoming increasingly clear that Democrats are getting desperate, says Roger Kimball in the Telegraph.
- “The real reason black and Hispanic voters are abandoning Kamala for Trump – driven away by the Democrats’ delusional obsession with race” – The first flutter of panic is beginning to grip the Harris-Walz presidential campaign, writes Andrew Neil in the Mail.
- “Kamala Harris’s Fox interview: our experts are united in their verdict” – Harris’s Fox interview with Bret Baier was a disaster, say the Telegraph‘s pundits.
- “Yahya Sinwar’s killing is an immense victory for Israel” – The impact of the Hamas leader’s death cannot be underestimated, says Limor Simhony Philpott in the Spectator.
- “We need to be far more sceptical of Hamas’s propaganda” – Horrific viral footage from Gaza is not by itself evidence of Israeli war crimes because it often doesn’t tell the full story, says Andrew Fox in Spiked.
- “Ukraine’s NATO fantasy” – Zelensky is understandably hankering for NATO membership, but legally and politically it’s impossible, says Owen Matthews in the Spectator.
- “The strange timing of Jacinda Ardern’s damehood” – It’s standard for ex-New Zealand PMs to be knighted, says David Cohen in the Spectator. But Ardern’s investiture comes as New Zealand is knee-deep in a Royal Commission of Inquiry into her Government’s controversial response to the pandemic.
- “Jacinda Ardern deserves scorn, not a Damehood” – The former leader of New Zealand is a stout republican. So why is she accepting the honour, asks Patrick O’Flynn in the Telegraph.
- “‘Debunking’ Port Hedland Council” – On the Dystopian Down Under Substack, Rebekah Barnett is not impressed by journalists who claim, without citing any evidence, only authority, that vaccine cancer worries have been “debunked”.
- “Does passive smoking cause lung cancer?” – A recent American Cancer Society study reports a negligible risk from passive smoking, shedding new light on the uproar over a 2003 paper, writes Geoffrey Kabat in Reason.
- “The U.S. state will regret waging lawfare against Elon Musk” – Making the ability to play the Left’s political games a condition for enjoying economic success will backfire, says Sam Ashworth-Hayes in the Telegraph.
- “The rise of anti-Elonism” – In the Spectator, Douglas Murray says he finds anti-Elonism to be a fascinating trend, because it seems mainly to affect people who have really never done anything very much with their lives.
- “Elon Musk is a ‘promoter of evil’, says EU official” – Věra Jourová, a Czech politician who is in charge of the European Commission’s work on online “misinformation” and “hate speech”, called Elon Musk a “promoter of evil” and X “the main hub for spreading antisemitism”, the Telegraph reports.
- “Poor at risk of being coerced into assisted dying in Canada” – Assisted dying is used by patients in Canada because they are poor and lack housing, a major official report has found, the Telegraph reports.
- “‘Not all suffering can be relieved’: A debate on assisted dying” – The former Justice Secretary Lord Falconer and the Spectator’s Chairman Lord Moore debate assisted dying.
- “English cricket to ban transgender players at elite level – but not community game” – Transgender women are to be banned from professional and semi-professional women’s cricket in England – but controversially not from the grass-roots game, the Telegraph reports.
- “ECB’s dismal transgender fudge makes you want to scream” – The England and Wales Cricket Board has on the one hand banned players who have gone through male puberty from competing as female, but on the other, restricted this rule only to the elite level, leaving the grass-roots game as a dangerous self-ID free-for-all, says Oliver Brown in the Telegraph.
- “Should we prioritise the LGBTQI community when disaster strikes?” – Following Hurricane Milton, Rod Liddle ponders one of the pressing questions of Left-wing disaster management in the Spectator.
- “Conductor sacked over his ‘use of pronouns’ wins unfair dismissal case” – A veteran conductor whose student complained about his “use of pronouns” has won an unfair dismissal case after he was sacked following a bullying investigation, reports the Mail.
- “Iranian border guards ‘massacre’ dozens of Afghans trying to enter country” – Iranian border guards have reportedly killed dozens of Afghans in a massacre as they attempted to enter the country, reports the Telegraph. I imagine the Left-wing protests over this atrocity will hit the streets any day now…
- “Labour MP pushes for new laws to ban fireworks louder than a lawnmower” – Sarah Owen, a former Shadow Minister, claimed a change to the rules around fireworks was “long overdue”, the Mail reports.
- “OMGAWD these just keep getting better!” – If the thing missing in your life in a video of Trump surrounded by cute kittens, you’re in for a treat.
OMGAWD these just keep getting better! pic.twitter.com/l5TUDSYoMq
— Karli Bonne’(@KarluskaP) October 16, 2024
If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
I wrote a story today about Pfizer becoming a “corporate sponsor” of the Southeastern Conference (14 well-known colleges). In the story, I mention how ridiculous it is this sports league continues to push vaccines for student-athletes. I linked to two myocarditis studies (one showing 1-in-1000 risk, the other as low as 1 in 3000). I guess I need to go back into the story and add a link to this story/study.
I don’t think the 14 colleges of the SEC have thought enough about what this partnership could mean to them in the future. The potential liability is vast and they are not doing anything to improve their credibility with prospective future students.
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/the-southeastern-conference-is-now
So, is the mRNA technique flawed across the board, for any “vaccine” drug, or just the Covid-19 one? Does anyone actually understand the biology of it (yet)? It wouldn’t be the first time that the company involved made serious mistakes.
What are the other mRNA drugs?
Genuine question.
You can find drug research reports on TrialSite News, SciTechDaily, Cnet Science, and sometimes even Interesting Engineering, to name but four…
Thank you. One has become far more curious of late…
They had ones to treat things like cancer a while back. But there were apparently a lot of problems with it.
Far more likely to cause cancer it seems….
Funny how that works. Whether it’s cancer or covid, mRNA gene therapy really seems to be gasoline on the fire!
Robert Malone has gone into detail about this. He asserts that the mRNA technology is sound, but the problem less with the genetically engineered spike protein and the delivery mechanism (e.g. lipid nanoparticles for Pfizer).
Personally, I have a fundamental problem with the idea of genetic treatment. Prefer nature to take its course and what will be will be.
So other than the delivery mechanism and the stuff inside the delivery mechanism, it’s sound?
The delivery mechanism and the spike protein inside it is pretty much the whole thing, isn’t it?
What else is there left?
Th delivery mechanism into the cell, not the delivery mechanism from the cell into the body i.e. the translation of the mRNA. Listen to Robert Malone.
Hey, I’m not promoting this sh*t, I’m just repeating what I’ve read/heard.
“What else is there left?”
The 5G chemicals?
Aside from ‘unknown’ substances related to the adjuvants, the information for which is currently withheld for commercial reasons, it contains yummy things like:
Polyethylene glycol: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8251011/
Incomplete RNA which is still biologically active – and with unknown effects: https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/mrna-vaccines-the-cia-and-national?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email#play
Mould: https://khn.org/news/article/pfizer-new-vaccine-plant-persistent-mold-issues-history-of-recalls/
Metal fragments: https://www.riotimesonline.com/brazil-news/modern-day-censorship/international-research-groups-find-sharp-metal-objects-in-covid-vaccines-very-frightening/
Toxic metals: https://rumble.com/v1npo1k-dr.-mark-trozzi-toxic-metals-in-covid-shots.html
Other particulate contaminants: https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/failure-to-scale-covid-19-injection-vials-must-be-independently-tested-for-conformity-to-label.-9a77eba4
Others report such wonderful things as E coli, glass fragments, fibres, other diverse fragments – and a fly leg. Dr Hughes summarises some of the data here: https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/52/96
To quote Alexandra Latypova – it really is a toxic garbage soup. https://rumble.com/v1p69bf-c-19-injections-regulatory-and-manufacturing-fraud-tessa-lena-tallks-to-ale.html
Thank you for submitting all these links.
Do you remember the scene from Disney’s Fantasia where the apprentice sourcerer is mixing up a spell? The list above shows that it is still about witch craft but using a lab rather than a cave, a white coat rather than a black cloak and pointy hat…
Good comparison: most people will remember The Sorcerer’s Apprentice scene in Fantasia.
Nature, by way of our immune system, is definitely not keen on any foreign body hijacking our body cells and rearranging their chemistry and function which is what virus and thecmRNA junk do. At the first sign, it sends T cells and cytotoxic agents to kill such cells. (And if those cells are in muscles, like the heart…)
That alone should tell us not to do it deliberately.
As I understand matters, and I do so in simple terms only, mRNA gene therapy was initially and still is used as a delivery system for cancer treatment by way of immunotherapy. Basically it seeks to turn on, or off, and thereby amplify, the activities of targeted cancer seeking cells, to enable them to destroy cells which have become cancerous. Look at CTLA-4, Jim Allison and Coley….Books, not google!
Used in this manner mRNA has great potential, but the downside is that it has to turn off elements of the immune system in order to work.
It didn’t take long for bigphama’s vaccinators/genetic engineers to realise mRNA would be the perfect delivery system for a new generation of “vaccines”.
However, the problem is they know next to nothing about how the immune system actually works (mind you, no one does) and, disastrously for the jabbed even less about the long term effects.
This paper gives a clue though:-
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027869152200206X
The paper also explains the inevitable blood clot risks.
Thanks for your response (and those from the others as well). The linked article is interesting, and I’m glad I didn’t accept the offer in March 2021. Then I said that I might change my mind when it becomes as established product. Not much chance of changing my mind now, given the emerging evidence.
Dr Palmer and Dr Bhakdi think it is. A quote from the article linked above: –
‘We note that the damage mechanism is which emerges from the autopsy studies is not limited to COVID-19 vaccines only but is completely general—it must be expected to occur similarly with mRNA vaccines against any and all infectious pathogens. This technology has failed and must be abandoned.’
Dr Bhakdi said at a recent MD4CE meeting that the human immune system is already perfect & adding anything to it will displace the balance. Good health, good diet, clean water, sunshine, fresh air & exercise are the best things to promote a healthy immune system.
And now they are trying to make mRNA flu jabs and RSV jabs and God only knows what else?
If it is getting into the bloodstream and producing an immune response there, that would suggest it’s a flaw in the design, clearly other vaccinations into the arm are not triggering a response like this.
Or a flaw in the administration of the stabs – the individuals who have been fast tracked into the role of “stabber” have not been aspirating the needle to check for blood to ensure the tip has not entered a vessel.
Probably both. The spike protein itself is toxic, and the mRNA technique goes everywhere in the body and makes it produce whatever protein it is designed to produce, ad infinitum.
Professor Sukharit Bhakdi posted on his Telegram group that it is now possible to distinguish the spike protein generated via the jab and the spike protein from the virus. He calls it a game changer.
Why is it a game changer?
Pathology.
The dead can’t lie… Hence the push & rush to destroy the evidence via cremation.
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/10/10/1651
The autopsy in Dresden of the 76yr old which Will described seems to be the first instance where this method was applied and this result obtained.
Hence a game-changer to Bhakdi.
Not sure whether he doesn’t know about the one of the 55yr old, or whether that was later, then used the same method etc..
As I understand it SARS Cov-2 is a respiratory tract infection therefore the only exposure is ‘air side’ so it’s not clear to me how it would get into the blood stream. The disease attacks the lungs not the circulatory system.
The injection on the other had goes into the shoulder, it was supposed to remain local but we now know for a fact that it does not, so it’s reasonable to assume it is reaching the blood supply (unless there is some plausible other route around the body that bypasses the bloodstream).
So given the above two statements, it’s not clear how a natural infection in the respiratory tract would cause an immune response in the circulatory system (it’s this immune response which causes the clots I believe), however it is very clear how a jab would cause this.
It seems too obvious to be true in all honesty, would anyone like to comment on my reasoning?
You are right. It is idiotic to inject someone in the deltoid for a virus which attacks your respiratory system. Blood poisoning is the only result. Akin to cutting off your hand to save your foot from gangrene.
All of these quacksines contain poisons, that most people can’t pronounce or spell. They don’t do anything against a virus, hence the quacksinated making up the 90% death rate ‘from’ rona. Follow the money is what they mean by follow the science. The speed of science means the velocity of money which can be made.
Indeed, there is no plausible mechanism for how an injection in the deltoid can induce mucosal immunity in the respiratory tract. That is why a nasal vaccine would theoretically make more sense than an injectable one, but so far no successful one has emerged yet.
“The speed of science means the velocity of money which can be made.”
I do hope John Campbell calls in here because he really did not understand ‘the speed of science’ and I am sure your explanation will help him and many others. It has certainly enlightened me.
Many thanks.
Look at any development project. The balance between development itself and testing, fixing, certification, obtaining approvals etc is probably in the ratio of 20%:80%. The “speed of science” was only possible because they didn’t follow all the testing and certification stuff.
The virus can sometimes enter the circulatory system VIA the lungs, of course, but usually it does not do so in quantities anywhere near large enough to even approach the level of spike protein from the jabs.
Wow, just lovely. But it couldn’t be the “safe and effective” jabs, no. It MUST be the virus, climate change, working too hard (per Billy Joel), or maybe even karma. But not the jabs!
There’s even some blaming artificial sweeteners!
There are swathes of people I believe who should definitely take the booster without delay; yup!
Does that make me a good person or a bad one?
Blessed are the unvaccinated, for they shall inherit the earth. Or at least the west.
Peace of mind – not having to worry about every little twinge: blessedness indeed.
I’m feeling pretty blessed at the moment
Does anyone know why MPs continue to,think the covid vaccines are safe and effective when the data says otherwise. I continue to get responses from our Mp Simon Jupp to say the vaccines are safe and effective. Isn’t it the responsibility of the MPs to be current on their information about covid vaccines as they are being doled out to every Uk citizen despite not having an efficacy or safety data and certainly no long term data.
I have to admit, if I were an MP I sure would like to be on the right side of this debate when certain people are dragged into court and found guilty of criminal negligence, wouldn’t you?
Just lovely. Today I found out that one of my FB friends has congestive heart failure and was told she could die suddenly. She just turned 38. Kinda young to have something like that. Sure enough, she was jabbed about a year ago, then got a really bad case of Omicron shortly after that put her in the hospital. And now this. So much for “safe and effective”, right?
Why hasn’t anyone addressed the fact that the very nature of mRNA vaccines means that they will cause automatic damage to the body?
Consider this, the mRNA vaccines function by causing healthy cells to present pathogenic spike proteins on their surface so that the immune system will respond. What is the immune response? The destruction of that cell!
Therefore, ANY cell that takes in that mRNA material and starts to make spike proteins will be targeted for destruction by the immune system! Whether it is heart calls, blood vessel cells, organ cells, or nerve cells, if they present the spike protein, they will be destroyed!
So at BEST these shots make your immune system target arm muscle cells, and at worst your own immune system will be targetting what would normally be healthy cells all through out your body!