• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Earthquakes, Leakage, Expense, Death by Asphyxiation – Is There No Beginning to the Advantages of Carbon Capture?

by Chris Morrison
11 October 2024 11:00 AM

If carbon capture and storage (CCS) was fracking for gas, it would have been banned years ago. Both processes can cause earth tremors – equivalent to a man falling off a chair in the case of fracking, but potentially much greater with carbon capture. This is because it involves millions of tonnes of pressurised carbon dioxide being pumped into rock cavities possibly compromised by prior drilling holes. Waste water from pressurised oil and gas projects has been known to escape from degraded drill plugs causing geysers 100-foot high. Such a catastrophe on land with millions of tonnes of CO2 waiting to escape is not a good prospect. On August 21st, 1986 the sudden high pressure release of magmatic CO2 from the bed of Lake Nyos in Cameroon led to heavier-than-air CO2 suffocating all living beings in the surrounding villages including 1,746 people.

CCS divides a green movement riven with disagreements as its climate crisis grift starts to fall apart in the face of reality. Capturing CO2 and burying it in the ground has been described by one influential green think tank as a “colossal waste of money”. Wasting taxpayers’ money is not something most greens lose sleep over, but they dislike CCS because it allows a role, albeit limited, for future hydrocarbon use. As we recently reported in the Daily Sceptic, the penny has finally dropped in the U.K. that there is no backup to a 2030 renewable energy grid except gas, so the Mad Miliband has authorised a £22 billion CCS black hole. It is a colossal waste of money, but it provides a fig leaf to cover the continued use of hydrocarbons.

If governments in the United States and Europe are going to pump many billions of tonnes of pressurised gas into the substrata beneath our feet heavily pockmarked with thousands of filled drill holes, it might be a good idea to look into the wisdom and safety of this course of action. Such a task cannot be left to mainstream media, although they were quick to run stories of earthquakes and tap water catching fire in the cause of demonising gas fracking (yes really, check it out).

First some geology. Natural gas is found next to oil fields near the surface but it also accumulates at much deeper levels. It is held in place by a layer of sedimentary rock such as limestone or sandstone. In the U.S., the Permian basin runs across west Texas and south western New Mexico and its rich deposits have been drilled for over a hundred years. The area is riddled with hundreds of thousands of drill holes. Location records and safety checks on some of these holes are now non-existent.

In 2016, a group of Penn State researchers observed that when CO2 is stored underground in a process known as geological sequestration “it can find multiple escape pathways due to chemical reactions between CO2, water, rocks and cement from abandoned wells”. There are concerns that CO2 could leak into groundwater drinking aquifers or dissolve into saltwater deposits. As a result, the high acidity saltwater-CO2 can dissolve certain types of rocks as well as cement casing on abandoned wells. There are fears that a plume of CO2-saturated brine could break free to the surface, with presumably millions of tonnes of pressurised gas looking for a chance to follow.

Engineering professor Mary Kang of McGill University claims she has seen “countless instances” of plugged oil wells failing to hold. Cement is no match for earthquakes, heat and time, notes Eric Van Oort, an engineering professor at the University of Texas-Austin. “You have tectonic stresses, high temperatures – things are changing and shifting in the subsurface,” he said. He was of the view that plugged holes may start leaking in the future.

Current plans in the UK are to bury the CO2 under offshore waters. Hence some of the staggering costs involved. But nowhere is safe from the forces of nature and the British Geological Survey recently said that CCS needed to be “vigorously monitored” to provide an assurance of long-term storage integrity. That would be vigorously monitored for the thousands of years it is planned to keep the CO2 underground. Good luck with that one. Regulatory frameworks governing geological CO2 storage are being developed worldwide with issues of leakage and long-term stewardship being addressed. Again, good luck with asking future generations thousands of years hence to keep coughing up £22 billion (note to reader: feel free to invent your own very large figure at this point) to ensure vast quantities of highly pressurised gas are safely stored beneath the surface.

DeSmog was recently topped up with £400,000 from the Left-wing money tree Rowntree Foundation to continue promoting fracking scare stories and its notorious ‘blacklist’ of so-called climate deniers. On October 4th, it reported that a blowout in the Permian basin had created a 100-foot tower of oily water. Drilling and fracking uses millions of gallons of water a day in the area, noted DeSmog. “It’s a ripper,” said Hawk Dunlap, a libertarian candidate for the Railroad Commission. “It could be coming from anywhere and it’s not going to be an easy fix,” he said. DeSmog reports that Dunlap said the region where the geyser erupted has been plagued by earthquakes amid record wastewater production.

DeSmog is all in on the invented climate crisis and a fervent supporter of the political Net Zero fantasy. It obviously hates all hydrocarbon use and has reported on the problems of carbon capture. For its part, mainstream media just sticks with demonising fracking. Donkey nodding politicians in many jurisdictions accept the need for huge quantities of money to be poured down the CCS hole but are obviously uninformed about the risks involved.

Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor.

Tags: Carbon captureDeSmogEd MilibandLake NyosMary Kang

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

Walz’s COVID-19 Legacy

Next Post

UNRWA Implicated in Hamas Terror Attacks Shortlisted for Nobel Peace Prize

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

17 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Atticus
Atticus
7 months ago

Ah yes, Utopia, where we are able to breathe the pure air free from the dreadful pollutant gas, and all at the insignificant cost of a few billion, or perhaps trillion, pounds. Still, what is a billion or two between friends. Why does the journey to Utopia always end up causing so much devastation and hardship? Why, oh why, have we allowed the feeble minded to take control?

22
0
DickieA
DickieA
7 months ago
Reply to  Atticus

The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

5
0
john1T
john1T
7 months ago
Reply to  Atticus

Hardship is the plan, to end what they see as excessive consumption. Starmer’s Labour is already just a few points ahead of the Tories. If the Tories are the solution, just how bloody awful is Starmer?

10
0
Purpleone
Purpleone
7 months ago
Reply to  john1T

REALLY bloody awful

4
0
RW
RW
7 months ago
Reply to  john1T

Excessive consumption is a quite telling term. It’s usually supposed to mean “People spend too much money on stuff they don’t really need.”, more generally “People are just too rich for their own good!” If we now add “Imagine how much good we could do with this money if only we had it instead!”, the result is climate change politics in a nutshell: Take other people’s “excess money” away from them to use it for something the people taking it rather want it to be spent on.

[I hope this is comprehensible. I spent quite some time working on it.]

Last edited 7 months ago by RW
11
0
RTSC
RTSC
7 months ago
Reply to  RW

You omitted to mention “how much better things would be if we had fewer useless eaters.”

3
0
RW
RW
7 months ago
Reply to  RTSC

That’s another story (of the so-called American right) I don’t believe in. Less people would mean less money to take away from them.

In my opinion, the whole point of this exercise to feed useless eaters sitting on UN subcommittees for the speculative assessment of the climate effects of a 0.1% increase of the CH₄ share in farts of Brazilian cows due to unsuallly wet weather lavishly (or useless eaters like Frederike “atttribution” Otto) who are a net drag on mankind as they’re adamantly opposed to ever doing something useful, yet want to live “ins style”, explicitly including jetting to “Booze & Prostitutes!” climate happenings all over the globe.

Last edited 7 months ago by RW
1
0
peter crossley
peter crossley
7 months ago
Reply to  Atticus

What a terrible era in which idiots govern the blind.’ William Shakespeare

7
0
Steve-Devon
Steve-Devon
7 months ago

In North Devon this year the wet mild (temperate rainforest) conditions have lead to verdant lush vegetation everywhere. All that vegetation is full of carbon, now that is what I call acceptable Carbon capture. As far as I can see as atmospheric CO2 rises a bit, the lush growth of plants will tend to use it up and the whole thing will balance out. If CO2 has an effect on the climate it is a logarithmic effect not an arithmetic effect, any small increase on present levels is unlikely to have much, if any impact.

Consequently, this whole thing looks to be a scam, an insidious anti-human, puritanical witch hunt with Carbon as the ludicrous, trumped up chief demon.

13
0
Jack the dog
Jack the dog
7 months ago
Reply to  Steve-Devon

Co2 keeps people fed.

6
0
Jack the dog
Jack the dog
7 months ago

The only question is at what point will this insane proposal collide with reality in the halls of power and be duly abandoned with or without fanfare, how much taxpayers money will have been spaffed up the wall in the mean while, and whether milliband will still be around for some appropriate punishment such as impalement.

9
0
Purpleone
Purpleone
7 months ago
Reply to  Jack the dog

Fancy a job in the justice department? I could see your very clear focused approach to punishment work well there! 🙂

6
0
Sceptic Paul
Sceptic Paul
7 months ago
Reply to  Jack the dog

The real problem is not the colossal waste of money – although that is bad enough*. A society can recover from an awful misallocation of resources. What will kill us, and end the hope for future generations, is that some of the decisions being taken now to de-industrialise the UK are irreversible.

The last fertiliser plant in the UK closed last year. The Grangemouth oil refinery will close soon. Port Talbot is now closed. Try re-starting these plants.

Try interesting investment in North Sea oil and gas fields in 5 years time, after the Mad Milliband has ended new licences.

  • I fail to understand why people aren’t outraged, and are not taking to the streets with torches and pitchforks to protest about the squandering of money that could be used to help people in the here and now. The Hospice Movement in the UK is in trouble, and needs about £70 million to keep going. Why can the Government find £22,000,000,000 for CCS – yes, spread over 25 years, but that is still about £1,000 million per year – to solve, using untried technology, a hypothetical problem that may occur in 30 years time. But it cannot found 1 / 14 of this amount to spend alleviating the suffering of dying people. Real people. Right now. Why aren’t people outraged by this simple fact?
9
0
allanplaskett
allanplaskett
7 months ago
Reply to  Sceptic Paul

I recall asking the same question in 2008 when a few hundred banksters made a train wreck of the world economy and walked away from it with their pockets stuffed. It was quite obvious they had made a wild boom out of snipped-up dodgy mortgages, pocketed the gains on the rise, and charged the loss to the public on the fall. The scale of public outrage was mystifyingly slight. The miscreants should have been dangling from lamposts all over the western world, yet no one cared. I think that’s the explanation. It was then, it is now. No one cares.

4
0
Jabby Mcstiff
Jabby Mcstiff
7 months ago

Sophia doesn’t like her carbon being captured and she will get back at you. You can’t tamper with the weather when you don’t even look like you could find your arse with both hands.

4
0
Jabby Mcstiff
Jabby Mcstiff
7 months ago

Don’t even try it. Auden said that a man has to be careful about his handwriting lest he comes to like it in the same way as he likes the smell of his own farts. This is where these people are at.

2
0
coviture2020
coviture2020
7 months ago

This project only captures only a fraction of Britain’s emissions.

1
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

The Sceptic EP.37: David Frost on Starmer’s EU Surrender, James Price on Broken Britain and David Shipley on Lucy Connolly’s Failed Appeal

by Richard Eldred
23 May 2025
3

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Doctor Who Star Ncuti Gatwa “Axed” and BBC Show to be “Put on Pause” Amid Falling Ratings and Woke Storylines

23 May 2025
by Will Jones

News Round-Up

23 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

The Tweets Cited by the Judge to ‘Prove’ Lucy Connolly is “Racist” Do Nothing of the Sort

23 May 2025
by Laurie Wastell

Spanish Scientists “Were Experimenting with How Far They Could Push Renewable Energy” Before Countrywide Blackout

23 May 2025
by Will Jones

We Were Too Polite to Stop the Woke Takeover

23 May 2025
by Mary Gilleece

The Tweets Cited by the Judge to ‘Prove’ Lucy Connolly is “Racist” Do Nothing of the Sort

39

Doctor Who Star Ncuti Gatwa “Axed” and BBC Show to be “Put on Pause” Amid Falling Ratings and Woke Storylines

25

Trump Slaps 50% Tariffs on EU – as He Tells Starmer to Get Drilling for Oil

24

News Round-Up

25

We Were Too Polite to Stop the Woke Takeover

20

We Were Too Polite to Stop the Woke Takeover

23 May 2025
by Mary Gilleece

The Tweets Cited by the Judge to ‘Prove’ Lucy Connolly is “Racist” Do Nothing of the Sort

23 May 2025
by Laurie Wastell

Starmer Has No Intention of Cutting Immigration

22 May 2025
by Joe Baron

UK Welcomes South African Activist Who Chants About Killing White Farmers But Excludes French Philosopher Concerned About Demographic Change

22 May 2025
by C.J. Strachan

The BBC’s Mark Poynting Shows How to Spread Climate Alarm

22 May 2025
by Chris Morrison

POSTS BY DATE

October 2024
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
« Sep   Nov »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

POSTS BY DATE

October 2024
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
« Sep   Nov »

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Doctor Who Star Ncuti Gatwa “Axed” and BBC Show to be “Put on Pause” Amid Falling Ratings and Woke Storylines

23 May 2025
by Will Jones

News Round-Up

23 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

The Tweets Cited by the Judge to ‘Prove’ Lucy Connolly is “Racist” Do Nothing of the Sort

23 May 2025
by Laurie Wastell

Spanish Scientists “Were Experimenting with How Far They Could Push Renewable Energy” Before Countrywide Blackout

23 May 2025
by Will Jones

We Were Too Polite to Stop the Woke Takeover

23 May 2025
by Mary Gilleece

The Tweets Cited by the Judge to ‘Prove’ Lucy Connolly is “Racist” Do Nothing of the Sort

39

Doctor Who Star Ncuti Gatwa “Axed” and BBC Show to be “Put on Pause” Amid Falling Ratings and Woke Storylines

25

Trump Slaps 50% Tariffs on EU – as He Tells Starmer to Get Drilling for Oil

24

News Round-Up

25

We Were Too Polite to Stop the Woke Takeover

20

We Were Too Polite to Stop the Woke Takeover

23 May 2025
by Mary Gilleece

The Tweets Cited by the Judge to ‘Prove’ Lucy Connolly is “Racist” Do Nothing of the Sort

23 May 2025
by Laurie Wastell

Starmer Has No Intention of Cutting Immigration

22 May 2025
by Joe Baron

UK Welcomes South African Activist Who Chants About Killing White Farmers But Excludes French Philosopher Concerned About Demographic Change

22 May 2025
by C.J. Strachan

The BBC’s Mark Poynting Shows How to Spread Climate Alarm

22 May 2025
by Chris Morrison

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences