If carbon capture and storage (CCS) was fracking for gas, it would have been banned years ago. Both processes can cause earth tremors – equivalent to a man falling off a chair in the case of fracking, but potentially much greater with carbon capture. This is because it involves millions of tonnes of pressurised carbon dioxide being pumped into rock cavities possibly compromised by prior drilling holes. Waste water from pressurised oil and gas projects has been known to escape from degraded drill plugs causing geysers 100-foot high. Such a catastrophe on land with millions of tonnes of CO2 waiting to escape is not a good prospect. On August 21st, 1986 the sudden high pressure release of magmatic CO2 from the bed of Lake Nyos in Cameroon led to heavier-than-air CO2 suffocating all living beings in the surrounding villages including 1,746 people.
CCS divides a green movement riven with disagreements as its climate crisis grift starts to fall apart in the face of reality. Capturing CO2 and burying it in the ground has been described by one influential green think tank as a “colossal waste of money”. Wasting taxpayers’ money is not something most greens lose sleep over, but they dislike CCS because it allows a role, albeit limited, for future hydrocarbon use. As we recently reported in the Daily Sceptic, the penny has finally dropped in the U.K. that there is no backup to a 2030 renewable energy grid except gas, so the Mad Miliband has authorised a £22 billion CCS black hole. It is a colossal waste of money, but it provides a fig leaf to cover the continued use of hydrocarbons.
If governments in the United States and Europe are going to pump many billions of tonnes of pressurised gas into the substrata beneath our feet heavily pockmarked with thousands of filled drill holes, it might be a good idea to look into the wisdom and safety of this course of action. Such a task cannot be left to mainstream media, although they were quick to run stories of earthquakes and tap water catching fire in the cause of demonising gas fracking (yes really, check it out).
First some geology. Natural gas is found next to oil fields near the surface but it also accumulates at much deeper levels. It is held in place by a layer of sedimentary rock such as limestone or sandstone. In the U.S., the Permian basin runs across west Texas and south western New Mexico and its rich deposits have been drilled for over a hundred years. The area is riddled with hundreds of thousands of drill holes. Location records and safety checks on some of these holes are now non-existent.
In 2016, a group of Penn State researchers observed that when CO2 is stored underground in a process known as geological sequestration “it can find multiple escape pathways due to chemical reactions between CO2, water, rocks and cement from abandoned wells”. There are concerns that CO2 could leak into groundwater drinking aquifers or dissolve into saltwater deposits. As a result, the high acidity saltwater-CO2 can dissolve certain types of rocks as well as cement casing on abandoned wells. There are fears that a plume of CO2-saturated brine could break free to the surface, with presumably millions of tonnes of pressurised gas looking for a chance to follow.
Engineering professor Mary Kang of McGill University claims she has seen “countless instances” of plugged oil wells failing to hold. Cement is no match for earthquakes, heat and time, notes Eric Van Oort, an engineering professor at the University of Texas-Austin. “You have tectonic stresses, high temperatures – things are changing and shifting in the subsurface,” he said. He was of the view that plugged holes may start leaking in the future.
Current plans in the UK are to bury the CO2 under offshore waters. Hence some of the staggering costs involved. But nowhere is safe from the forces of nature and the British Geological Survey recently said that CCS needed to be “vigorously monitored” to provide an assurance of long-term storage integrity. That would be vigorously monitored for the thousands of years it is planned to keep the CO2 underground. Good luck with that one. Regulatory frameworks governing geological CO2 storage are being developed worldwide with issues of leakage and long-term stewardship being addressed. Again, good luck with asking future generations thousands of years hence to keep coughing up £22 billion (note to reader: feel free to invent your own very large figure at this point) to ensure vast quantities of highly pressurised gas are safely stored beneath the surface.
DeSmog was recently topped up with £400,000 from the Left-wing money tree Rowntree Foundation to continue promoting fracking scare stories and its notorious ‘blacklist’ of so-called climate deniers. On October 4th, it reported that a blowout in the Permian basin had created a 100-foot tower of oily water. Drilling and fracking uses millions of gallons of water a day in the area, noted DeSmog. “It’s a ripper,” said Hawk Dunlap, a libertarian candidate for the Railroad Commission. “It could be coming from anywhere and it’s not going to be an easy fix,” he said. DeSmog reports that Dunlap said the region where the geyser erupted has been plagued by earthquakes amid record wastewater production.
DeSmog is all in on the invented climate crisis and a fervent supporter of the political Net Zero fantasy. It obviously hates all hydrocarbon use and has reported on the problems of carbon capture. For its part, mainstream media just sticks with demonising fracking. Donkey nodding politicians in many jurisdictions accept the need for huge quantities of money to be poured down the CCS hole but are obviously uninformed about the risks involved.
Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Ah yes, Utopia, where we are able to breathe the pure air free from the dreadful pollutant gas, and all at the insignificant cost of a few billion, or perhaps trillion, pounds. Still, what is a billion or two between friends. Why does the journey to Utopia always end up causing so much devastation and hardship? Why, oh why, have we allowed the feeble minded to take control?
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Hardship is the plan, to end what they see as excessive consumption. Starmer’s Labour is already just a few points ahead of the Tories. If the Tories are the solution, just how bloody awful is Starmer?
REALLY bloody awful
Excessive consumption is a quite telling term. It’s usually supposed to mean “People spend too much money on stuff they don’t really need.”, more generally “People are just too rich for their own good!” If we now add “Imagine how much good we could do with this money if only we had it instead!”, the result is climate change politics in a nutshell: Take other people’s “excess money” away from them to use it for something the people taking it rather want it to be spent on.
[I hope this is comprehensible. I spent quite some time working on it.]
You omitted to mention “how much better things would be if we had fewer useless eaters.”
That’s another story (of the so-called American right) I don’t believe in. Less people would mean less money to take away from them.
In my opinion, the whole point of this exercise to feed useless eaters sitting on UN subcommittees for the speculative assessment of the climate effects of a 0.1% increase of the CH₄ share in farts of Brazilian cows due to unsuallly wet weather lavishly (or useless eaters like Frederike “atttribution” Otto) who are a net drag on mankind as they’re adamantly opposed to ever doing something useful, yet want to live “ins style”, explicitly including jetting to “Booze & Prostitutes!” climate happenings all over the globe.
What a terrible era in which idiots govern the blind.’ William Shakespeare
In North Devon this year the wet mild (temperate rainforest) conditions have lead to verdant lush vegetation everywhere. All that vegetation is full of carbon, now that is what I call acceptable Carbon capture. As far as I can see as atmospheric CO2 rises a bit, the lush growth of plants will tend to use it up and the whole thing will balance out. If CO2 has an effect on the climate it is a logarithmic effect not an arithmetic effect, any small increase on present levels is unlikely to have much, if any impact.
Consequently, this whole thing looks to be a scam, an insidious anti-human, puritanical witch hunt with Carbon as the ludicrous, trumped up chief demon.
Co2 keeps people fed.
The only question is at what point will this insane proposal collide with reality in the halls of power and be duly abandoned with or without fanfare, how much taxpayers money will have been spaffed up the wall in the mean while, and whether milliband will still be around for some appropriate punishment such as impalement.
Fancy a job in the justice department? I could see your very clear focused approach to punishment work well there!
The real problem is not the colossal waste of money – although that is bad enough*. A society can recover from an awful misallocation of resources. What will kill us, and end the hope for future generations, is that some of the decisions being taken now to de-industrialise the UK are irreversible.
The last fertiliser plant in the UK closed last year. The Grangemouth oil refinery will close soon. Port Talbot is now closed. Try re-starting these plants.
Try interesting investment in North Sea oil and gas fields in 5 years time, after the Mad Milliband has ended new licences.
I recall asking the same question in 2008 when a few hundred banksters made a train wreck of the world economy and walked away from it with their pockets stuffed. It was quite obvious they had made a wild boom out of snipped-up dodgy mortgages, pocketed the gains on the rise, and charged the loss to the public on the fall. The scale of public outrage was mystifyingly slight. The miscreants should have been dangling from lamposts all over the western world, yet no one cared. I think that’s the explanation. It was then, it is now. No one cares.
Sophia doesn’t like her carbon being captured and she will get back at you. You can’t tamper with the weather when you don’t even look like you could find your arse with both hands.
Don’t even try it. Auden said that a man has to be careful about his handwriting lest he comes to like it in the same way as he likes the smell of his own farts. This is where these people are at.
This project only captures only a fraction of Britain’s emissions.