The theory that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery is about to be formally tested in a Japanese court of law. The big news for gaming fans of late is that the Kyoto-based video-gaming giant Nintendo has just instituted legal proceedings against the far smaller rival publisher Pocketpair over the content of its hit recent title Palworld, often described as being “Pokémon with guns”. As Nintendo own exclusive rights to the Pokémon series, Pocketpair’s bright idea of handing over Kalashnikovs and Mausers to Clefairy and Psyduck was unsurprisingly deemed by Nintendo’s lawyers to breach the firm’s intellectual copyright.
Yet this is far from the weirdest such lawsuit Nintendo has ever been involved in. If you don’t know, the incredibly popular games in question involve players wandering a cartoon world and capturing cute little animal-like creatures called Pokémon inside magical balls, before tooling them up to fight one another in battles against competing Pokémon trainers. It is now 25 years since the original Japanese GameBoy titles in the series were released in America, an occasion celebrated earlier this year by the ‘Pocket Monsters’ making the front cover of Time magazine, the excuse being that, so popular are the critters, they are now the highest-earning global media franchise ever, raising $100 billion in revenue up to 2021.
To read the rest of this article, you need to donate at least £5/month or £50/year to the Daily Sceptic, then create an account on this website. The easiest way to create an account after you’ve made a donation is to click on the ‘Log In’ button on the main menu bar, click ‘Register’ underneath the sign-in box, then create an account, making sure you enter the same email address as the one you used when making a donation. Once you’re logged in, you can then read all our paywalled content, including this article. Being a donor will also entitle you to comment below the line, discuss articles with our contributors and editors in a members-only Discord forum and access the premium content in the Sceptic, our weekly podcast. A one-off donation of at least £5 will also entitle you to the same benefits for one month. You can donate here.
There are more details about how to create an account, and a number of things you can try if you’re already a donor – and have an account – but cannot access the above perks on our Premium page.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Dr Phil knocking it out of the ballpark with this 5min speech.
Question: Just how deranged does one have to be to support mass-murdering, death-worshipping terrorists who would murder you and your family in the blink of an eye?
Answer: Exceedingly.
https://x.com/DrPhil/status/1843320452963533059
This lady speaks the truth. Well said;
”Assita was born a Muslim and has been fighting against Radical Islam and Terrorism for a long time.
We need more Assitas in this world.”
https://x.com/K0sher_C0ckney/status/1843409070533042556
“Assita is fighting against radical Islam.” Good on her.
But is there any other Islam?
Genuine question.
Is there a soft, forgiving, tolerant version?
If so, where?
How do they interpret certain verses in the Quran that call for the subjugation or killing of infidels?
Deuteronomy 13:6-10
6 If thy brother, the son of thy mother, or thy son, or thy daughter, or the wife of thy bosom, or thy friend, which is as thine own soul, entice thee secretly, saying, Let us go and serve other gods, which thou hast not known, thou, nor thy fathers;
7 Namely, of the gods of the people which are round about you, nigh unto thee, or far off from thee, from the one end of the earth even unto the other end of the earth;
8 Thou shalt not consent unto him, nor hearken unto him; neither shall thine eye pity him, neither shalt thou spare, neither shalt thou conceal him:
9 But thou shalt surely kill him; thine hand shall be first upon him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people.
10 And thou shalt stone him with stones, that he die; because he hath sought to thrust thee away from the Lord thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt, from the house of bondage.
Deuteronomy 21:18-21
18 If a man have a stubborn and rebellious son, which will not obey the voice of his father, or the voice of his mother, and that, when they have chastened him, will not hearken unto them:
19 Then shall his father and his mother lay hold on him, and bring him out unto the elders of his city, and unto the gate of his place;
20 And they shall say unto the elders of his city, This our son is stubborn and rebellious, he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton, and a drunkard.
21 And all the men of his city shall stone him with stones, that he die:
Leviticus 24:16
16 And he that blasphemeth the name of the Lord, he shall surely be put to death, and all the congregation shall certainly stone him: as well the stranger, as he that is born in the land, when he blasphemeth the name of the Lord, shall be put to death.
Sure, I am familiar with the Old Testament.
But Jews don’t live like that. When did they last stone anybody?
I suspect godknowsimgood’s point is that all sorts is written, in all sorts of books, but we should rather judge individual people by their actions above everything.
They have bombed a few. Not sure which is better.
I have travelled to Tunisia, Egypt and Turkey, and only experienced kindness. Better not to drink the tap water, though …
Somewhere along the way wading through this rubbish, I lost the will to live before encountering any reference to Gaza.
Losing the will to live.
Well, it was written by Kamala Harris. And that is what she does to us all.
How do I know she wrote it?
Here is one of her trademark points right in the middle of it:
“it is within this topic’s very unimportance that its true importance really lies“.
True Kamala at her best.
Here is ridiculous meaningless nonsense she is famous for:
“‘What can be, unburdened by what has been”.
Which also means Kamala is unburdened by any knowledge of history so will make the same mistakes all over again.
And another example: