Being vaccinated against Covid sharply increased the risk heart attack patients would die or suffer heart failure after heart attacks, a major new peer-reviewed study in leading journal Vaccine shows. Alex Berenson has written about the study on his Substack, Unreported Truths.
Over a six-month period after their heart attacks, Covid vaccinated patients had nearly double the risk of unjabbed ones. The risk appeared concentrated in patients who were both vaccinated and had had Covid before their heart attacks.
The researchers examined outcomes from almost 1,000 heart attack patients from March 2020 through March 2023 in a Madrid hospital. They found vaccinated and previously infected patients had an over 50% higher risk of death or heart failure than unvaccinated people who had also been previously infected – and a 90% higher risk than those who were unvaccinated and previously uninfected.
The gap remained even after researchers adjusted for risk factors such as smoking, blood pressure and age. “The combination of vaccination and natural immunisation against SARS-CoV-2 may predispose to the development of severe heart failure,” they wrote. Most patients had received the mRNA jabs from Pfizer and Moderna.
The paper may help explain why post-Covid death rates remain persistently high in heavily vaccinated countries, belying the predictions of epidemiologists who expected death rates to fall below normal after the epidemic ended.
Heart attacks remain the top cause of death in most wealthy countries. Even a small increase in their long-term lethality would be enough to push overall mortality up notably.
The paper does not prove the Covid vaccines caused the extra deaths or cases of heart failure. But the researchers found that heart attack patients who were vaccinated and had recovered from Covid had about 31 times more anti-spike protein antibodies than unvaccinated patients who had been infected and recovered.
That vaccine-driven increase – or as, the researchers called it, an “enhanced serologic immune response” – could produce more inflammation and damage to the cardiovascular system, the researchers wrote.
They noted the vaccinated and immunized patients tended to present with more heart severe attacks on admission, and the link between severity and vaccination status was particularly notable in patients under 65.
Worth reading in full.
The study provides important support for the theory, long highlighted in the Daily Sceptic, that both vaccines and Covid may be contributing to ongoing excess cardiovascular deaths, with the vaccines playing a major role.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
So it does. And it demonstrates that those of us that declined the offer on the basis of “wait and see” how safe it might be made a wise choice at the time.
A very wise decision! I’ll go further and state we have never had the flu vaxine nor the shingles vaxine nor anything else they were trying to inject the population with – and we are staying well clear of our GPs too as a result we have never been healthier!
I had vaccines as a kid, nothing since.
For me it wasn’t really “wait and see”. I never expected a “vaccine” to be made available so quickly, and when it was I never seriously considered having it. You’d really need to wait several years, until long term trials were finished, at which point if “covid” exists you’ll have already had it probably more than once so there’s no point having a “vaccine”.
Just to add that: the so-called vaxxes are not *ready* even today, as the Trials are still ongoing. Official.
All we have are [Emergency Use Authorisations], and are in ‘Phase 2’ of 3 I believe, Phase 3 ending 2025 at the earliest, shifting to 2027 depending upon results. ‘Phase 2’ supposedly being the open Public testing, again supposedly restricted and with voluntary full and explained risk consent.
But, as all trials seems to have been ‘unblinded’, they can never end in reality as the procedure was corrupted.
Yup, trials unblinded, I wonder why…
All we have now are the kinds of studies covered in this article
I couldn’t see any good / logical reason for the unblinding at the time – however there are some nefarious reasons you’d do that…
This is very interesting: Covid-19: Should vaccine trials be unblinded? | The BMJ
The “vaccine” makers wanted to give the placebo the “vaccine”, for “ethical” reasons (to save them from the certain death of “covid”). The FDA were worried that this would compromise the value of the trials, so a certain Mr Fauci proposed that the placebo arm be given the vaxx and vice-versa, so it would still be “blind” but there would be no control group. Apparently that would preserve some of the scientific value of the trial – goodness knows what.
I can see how someone who genuinely thought that a medical product was going to save lives would feel conflicted about keeping an untreated control group, but in simple terms I think if the study if worth anything you surely have to stick to your guns.
Thus logically there can be no valid results, without a proper test regime.
PS. To add further to your “already-exposed” point, worth remembering that in the USA the measles vaxx was introduced after trials, at which time the number of cases was at an all-time low, for that reason.
Good point.
The other consideration of course is that “covid” is not a serious illness for most people, and vaccinating against it may not actually be that great an idea, even if the “vaccine” was “safe” – who is to say that exposing the body to mild viruses isn’t actually good for it in the long term?
I worked with the FDA in the USA in the noughties on a medical device. Their timeline for approval was a minimum of 10 years following safety and efficacy clinical trials. This is why I have never and will never take this experimental jab.
Thanks for that information
10 years sounds reasonable.
Good for you. Same here.
Same argument from me as JohnK with the further expostulation that imo all quackcines are poison and we can go back to the quack Jenner in 1796 and use demonstrable proof to completely validate that true assertion.
Why the hell would I allow criminal governments and criminal pharma to load poisons into myself and my family over a fake flying virus from a ‘bat’ in ‘Chyna’? The stupid hurts
Very sad case of a pharmacist who was severely vax injured from the Covid jab and couldn’t get the vaccine injury scheme to pay out any compensation as he was deemed not disabled enough so he took his own life. This is 100% democide, from start to finish. Not only was there no pandemic or ‘novel, deadly virus’ that was indiscriminately killing people all over the world, but nobody needed this damn injection in the first place, I don’t care how immunocompromised some people were. Taking this thing was like playing Russian Roulette with your life and health. How many others are out there suffering silently? Their only crime being naive and scared as they were suckered in by the military grade PsyOp ‘TPTB’ unleashed on a global scale, although there’s no doubting the UK got MKUltra’d with knobs on;
”RIP John I hope you have peace
I battle suicidal thoughts daily due to the severe pain and disability I experience. I am one of thousands.”
https://x.com/oneadds/status/1837074912403673343
Yes but it has saved 8 million lives worldwide.
(Sarc for those with an irony bypass – mainly our US democrat friends…).
The Daily Sceptic, and all its cousins, have saved many more in reality. The 25%?
How long before the paper is “retracted”?
What a surprise. Who could ever have forecast these unexpected effects.
This original of this paper is now over 3 years old. –
Paras, 10 and 14 –
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027869152200206X
Nasty little weapon they created. It has an affinity for the cells of your upper palate and the lining of the heart. Why do you think they take tonsilitis more seriously than you would expect. And there is no way for us to get rid of it or for nature to get rid of it. It has been optimized to get worse and worse and possibly forever save some major breakthrough in consciousness. It is the crowning achievement of the forces of this Kali Yuga. Malevolence magnified by malevolence and way beyond the control of its creators now.
‘Support for the theory, long highlighted in the Daily Sceptic, that both vaccines and Covid may be contributing to ongoing excess cardiovascular deaths.’ ‘Covid?’ What evidence does the DS have that Covid is a real thing? If you read the work of Denis Rancourt, James Roguski and many others the conclusion is there was no Covid 19. Check the global all cause mortality figures and the timing of the rise in death.
“[vaccines had] … about 31 times more anti-spike protein antibodies than unvaccinated patients” but, no, the vaccines weren’t the cause!? Yeah, right.
Just reading this after reading Daily Telegraph “Tripledemic” article
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/09/23/millions-urged-to-get-covid-and-flu-jabs-tripledemic-fears/