There’s a future world in which I fancy myself an old-style crime boss. I infiltrate the organisation, climb to stand at the leader’s right-hand side and when the moment comes ruthlessly snatch power.
I didn’t used to have such ambitions but then what is Sir Keir Starmer if not an inspiration to us all? Forget your party allegiance. If you want to see victory, whole and unblemished, then model yourself on Keir Starmer versus the Labour Left. It’s hard not be impressed, although it would be more gripping as a drama if the bodies along the way hadn’t been so carefully hidden from public view.
Impressed as I am with Starmer, I therefore felt quite hopeful for the country on July 5th. The Government could be brave, it could afford to risk its popularity in the service of good governance, it could fulfil its technocratic promise.
Two months in, I’m not so sure. In concrete term there isn’t much to go on. A reasonable place to start might be the flagship policy of imposing VAT on private schools fees. Is this going to lead to an increase in the number of people receiving a good education over the course of this parliament? Or will it merely cause financial pain to families at the bottom of the top decile of income earners? What is the aim? It can’t all be envy, electoral signalling and class warfare, can it?
Or maybe it can. This policy is aimed at extracting money from parents who already pay twice for their children’s education, once through their taxes and again in fees to private schools. Shouldn’t the willingness of some families to pay twice for education be enough for a party that wants to lift up the less well-off rather than punish the successful. Today’s Labour Party, however, reveals itself in its actions.
My worry is this tax raid won’t only punish the well-off. When the policy is enacted there will follow a migration of pupils from the private to the state sector. Unless your parents are both train drivers, a 20% increase in fees will be unaffordable. Where will these pupils go? At the good comprehensive school where I work, the only reason we’re not entirely serving the local middle classes is because our admissions policy sets aside a certain number of places for children from disadvantaged backgrounds. Before this policy was put in place, the school was following the typical trajectory of successful schools with an inverse relationship between improving results and the number of low-income pupils getting in. Most successful comprehensive schools do not set aside any places for disadvantaged pupils. That will mean the refugees from the private sector will inevitably take places from less privileged children at the best comprehensives. The only way to remedy this would be to create additional places at outstanding state schools, but the Government has no intention of doing that.
Two months in, then, are the tea leaves of early decisions enough to place Starmer in the firmament of the most successful Labour leaders? Only four have won overall majorities since 1906: Attlee, Wilson, Blair and Starmer. But will he make good on this promise? Did Starmer win a huge majority so he can impose VAT on private school fees, take away the winter fuel allowance and pretend that the national electricity grid will soon be carbon neutral? Did Starmer say very little in the election campaign because he actually has very little to say?
After his leadership campaign in 2019, I had Starmer down as a dissembler par excellence and now he has won power I’ve seen nothing to change my mind. He seems to offer more brave words than he does brave actions. He has ruthlessly dealt with his enemies in his party, but to what end? He comes across as a ruthless dissembler with nothing substantial at his political core. At the back of my mind lingers one final question: is Keir Starmer just Boris Johnson but with more hair gel and less testosterone?
The author is a teacher at a London comprehensive.
Correction: An earlier version of this article incorrectly referred to “the Tories’ tax raid” rather than Labour’s in the headline.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Tories? Shome mishtake shurely, or am I missing something?
Indeed – mistake now corrected. Though taxes in general went up under the Fake Conservatives.
This attack on private education has nothing to do with raising money because it will inevitably cost taxpayers more. The real purpose is destruction of institutions and a way of life that once was a sort of backbone to traditional England.
Kneel’s savage attack on fee paying schools will cause anger, frustration and upset. The national educational infrastructure will be badly disrupted and taxpayers will once again be left to pick up the tab. Still, Kneel will have the satisfaction of knowing that he has helped to undermine in one more small way the nation state and ticked another box for the Davos Deviants.
It is difficult to summarise my contempt for this grotesque insult of a human being. Traitor though he unquestionably is doesn’t come close.
2TK Kneeler isn’t just an ordinary dissembler, though – he’s a man with an agenda. The current attack on private schools is only the beginning. The madleft view is that the state owns society’s children, and that parents have no right to determine their children’s upbringing. The ultimate intention is that the state will determine, in detail, the upbringing of all children, and that parents will be reduced to being the state’s agents in the home. Those parents who refuse to go along with this will be designated at “far right”. Parents with independent opinions will lose their children.
“The madleft view is that the state owns society’s children, and that parents have no right to determine their children’s upbringing.”
Yes, a very Orwellian view but more than plausible. This is the ultimate direction at least for those not considered to belong to the elites.
Starmer might have defeated what one might call the “old left” – he’s much worse and much more extreme though. Like Blair.
It’s been reported that Surrey LA are looking at paying for places at local independent schools to place children leaving those very same independent schools. The LA has a legal duty to fund a school place & the only ones available would seem to be the ones vacated in the independent sector.
It really is the politics of envy
In view of the VAT raid on private school parents, I concluded that Starmer is a mean-spirited, visionless vindictive bastard
A substantial number of pupils in private schools are from abroad; China, Singapore, India etc. Would their parents be exempt from / able to reclaim the VAT on their places?