We should all worry about how Starmer’s Government will impoverish us with its economically-suicidal obsession with Net Zero, its open-borders, immigration free-for-all and its crusade to tax anything which might create increased employment and wealth. But perhaps the most disturbing aspect of our Government’s attitude to us is the way the Government is using the police to stamp on anyone daring to criticise Government policies. We’ve all seen Two-Tier Keir’s two-tier justice system in which anti-immigration protesters were arrested, prosecuted and jailed within just a couple of days while our normally incompetent police manage to achieve convictions on fewer than 1% of burglaries and only 1-2% of reported rapes.
But here’s yet another example of Two-Tier Keir’s corruption of our justice system which you won’t see reported by the BBC or any other mainstream national media. You’ll all remember the incident at Manchester Airport when two gentlemen just arrived from Pakistan attacked police officers, breaking the nose of one female officer. Well, rather than trying to prosecute the two attackers, we now learn that, “a criminal investigation has been launched into who gave Manchester Airport CCTV footage to the Manchester Evening News following the police ‘stamp’ incident.”
This ‘shoot-the-messenger’ policy seems to be just another example of how Starmer intends to browbeat us all into craven submission so that nobody will dare criticise any aspect of his Government’s demolition of our once great country.
And in case you don’t believe me about the police choosing to prosecute the person who passed the film of the multicultural enrichers attacking the police to the Manchester Evening News rather than prosecuting the enrichers who actually attacked the police, here’s a link to the Manchester Evening News article.
To its credit, the Manchester Evening News has refused the police’s demand for the name of the person or persons who passed the film of the Manchester Airport attack to the newspaper. At the moment our laws permit the media to refuse police requests to name their sources except in rare and exceptional cases when there is a serious threat to human life. However, one might be forgiven for suspecting that our former Director of Public Prosecutions and now Prime Minister, Two-Tier Keir, will soon have the law allowing media to conceal the identity of their sources changed. If he does this, no doubt he will claim that he’s only making this change to protect us from harm.
David Craig is the author of There is No Climate Crisis, available as an e-book or paperback from Amazon.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
A few years back, I’d have just said “unbelievable” and presumed the rag was sensationalising to sell copies. Nowadays, there’s little doubt that this is true.
One of the reasons for casting doubt on the conviction of Lucy Letby, for example, is that (alledgedly) colleagues who wished to give character references on her behalf or testify about conditions on the neonatal unit at The Countess were “discouraged” to come forward.
How does seeking to persecute whistleblowers help the search for truth and justice? Perhaps we should write to Kier to see if he knows a competent and trustworthy lawyer who could answer this for us.
Truth and justice? No, we don’t allow that any more.
It allows cover up by state entities. The state is always a dangerous thing and that is why we must never allow them to run things. This is why we are suffering so much incompetent behaviour by state organisations.
What? Which planet are you on? ‘We’? ‘Allow’?
You have no idea who runs things have you?
is that any of the nurses could have “done it”.
It depends on which deaths are included in the charge sheet and which ones are omitted.
There was a choice of deaths.
The police cherry-picked the deaths to fit one nurse – which happened to be autistic Letby.
Great accuracy David Craig.
I guess we can discount this DS article in its entirety if you cannot get basic facts like that right.
The two guys live in the UK. The early reports were they were meeting their mother off a plane. She had been visiting Pakistan and was on her way back home to the UK.
And the reason the two guys have not been charged is because if you watch the video closely you will see they have a defence of self defence.
Why do all the bozos who complain they have not been charged with a crime fail to take account of the evidence of the video?
It suggests the Manchester police were at fault dumbos.
Having watched the video, I can’t see the police officer who had her nose broken attacking anyone. I can see two lads getting extremely heated and ignoring commands to calm down though. If you think the police have no right to respect then my friend, you are part of the problem.
Not necessary. She was there with the other officers with a common purpose of arresting the two men – as the video shows – by surprise, without any explanation being given and the men were defending themselves against the officers.
Clear from the video. Watch it again.
And why shouldn’t they in the circumstances shown in the video of unlawful arrest?
I neither saw nor heard on the video ‘commands to calm down’ unless you mean getting tasered is a ‘command to calm down’.
If you want to make stuff up fine but don’t expect anyone to believe it.
Police officers who break the law are to be respected?
I have no respect for police officers who kick repeatedly a helpless man in the head who is immobile having just been tasered.
They deserve to go to goal for several years IMHO.
You are certainly part of the problem.
But if you are OK with having your head kicked in by the police by all means go on and let it happen.
“the men were defending themselves against the officers”.
So they were resisting arrest? Do you understand how the law works in this country? Even if you believe you are right, it is against the law to assault police officers.
Your argument is extremely weak.
I do understand how the law works in this country and so do the police which is why neither of these men have been charged with any offence.
When a purported arrest is unlawful as this one appears – from what the video shows – to have been, anyone is entitled to defend themselves.
As such as there was no lawful attempt at arrest they are not committing an offence by defending themselves against an unlawful purported arrest.
You do not understand how the law works in this country.
There are procedures to be followed and these officers did not follow them.
You can’t just come up behind someone grab their arms and try to slap cuffs on them. Due process must be followed. And it was not AFAIAC from the evidence of the video.
The problem for these officers is the entire event was captured on video. Otherwise they would have got away with it and no-one would be any the wiser.
‘Living’ in the UK doesn’t mean they are legall residents. The mother story wasn’t publicised. They all seem to arrive back together with a while of luggage. The initial report said one of the attackers had concealed something illegal, and the police were called to interview and search him. The ‘leaked’ footage showed clearly the aggressors and attackers were the two guys. Not the police.
Wow. Suddenly these two men who live in Manchester one of whom had applied to join the police and both who have relatives in the police are illegal aliens.
You really take the biscuit.
Yes it was. In detail by the mens’ solicitor. Her sons were at the airport to meet their mother and bring her home after an holiday in Pakistan.
Keep making it up.
‘The initial report’ – which one? That is not what I heard and read reported.
There had been an altercation in the terminal.
It later transpired it was with a man who allegedly had been abusing and harassing constantly the mother on the flight from Pakistan.
Look again.
The police came up behind the man from behind. He was facing the machine. They immediately tried to get his hands behind his back presumably to cuff him.
It seems there was no dialogue so he would not have known what it was about.
Neither the men nor the officers have been charged with anything so it would seem no one is going to face criminal proceedings.
I find that surprising but that is how it is.
Yep even GMP confirmed to the BBC it occurred because of an attempted arrest and it seems from the video – without any warning. And the reports of an altercation in the terminal are confirmed and nothing about anything concealed with is made up nonsense.
Police filmed stamping on man’s head at airport 25 July 2024 BBC News, Manchester
He’d probably suggest Cherie Blair
How very Soviet of Comrade Starmer.
“when two gentlemen just arrived from Pakistan” I don’t think that’s true. As I understand it, the people in question arrived at the airport to pick up their mother, who had indeed arrived on a flight from Pakistan. The fuss was started because the mother complained to her sons about abuse she’d suffered on the plane and in Arrivals by a Qatari fellow traveller and the police were called because the brothers were having a go at him. It’s pity the filming didn’t start earlier. May not affect the conclusions but for accuracy’s sake …
From their own account their mother was unable to press the call button during the flight despite suffering hours of abuse from a male passenger seated behind her. This male passenger was not identified, but not thought to be white.
I have recently travelled long haul on Qatar Airways. Business Class was quite civilised but standard was packed to the gunwhales with Alan’s Fishbar supporters, and if you didn’t get out of business in time you were swamped by a tide of very pushy (in two senses) passengers who clearly didn’t adhere the the niceties of orderly queuing.
It does appear that Comrade Starmer is deliberately trying to provoke a civil war.
A civil war? Kneel won’t rest until he starts one. Evil Next Tuesday.
Sorry I don’t understand the legality of it.
As far as understand, taking pictures or video recording at a public space is not illegal.
What has it got to do with the police?
It appears to be off of official cctv footage I’d guess, therefore someone downloaded and shared that with access?
Whoever done it deserves a pint. They could at least pretend to Police without fear or favour!
One on UK Column’s new presenters is ex army and ex copper, I think it was him that resigned in disgrace and he put it in a letter how the Police have become the Woke Paramilitary.
Do they understand the concept of ‘journalism’, or what is left of it.
So no search for the real truth. Only an attempt to find out who exposed the real truth because it is uncomfortable for the Political Class and their multicultural, mass immigration dogma that we are not supposed to challenge incase we get locked up for 3 years.—–This is a diabolical disgrace.
Just the past week the minster for housing or whatever refused to give the costs of refurbishing a hotel to house over 300 illegal / legal migrants. If we don’t know how much, where is the scrutiny? Who gets to ask the questions and how do we know if there was a bidding process? Cronyism? We need to find out.
Leaking the video clearly falls under “misinformation” spread by the Far-Right, led by the EDL and is racist.
That the authorities want to intimidate those who reveal the truth about the wonderful people imported by the Establishment shows only how serious the Anti-White Party (the Labour Party as once was) is about The Great Replacement.
The Brits are a good people in some ways. Good sense of humour and they don’t take themselves too seriously. On the downside they are very timid and have a culture of covering their own arses even when higher principles are at stake. Funny and jolly and witty people but a bit cowardly as well and a bit money-grubbing in recent times. You just have to work with that.
Our Labour communist government is led by filthy communists. Two tier Stalin (TTS) visited communist Czechoslovakia (as it was then) back in the cold war what was he up to and who did he meet, ans who got access to him? Thw Czech secret police and intelligence agency was highly regarded by the KGB for their effectiveness at turning westerners. I suspect TTS is a dictatorial commie bstard at heart.
You’d think the GMP would be a bit more worried about the fact one of their own officers had her nose broken. They seem.to have thrown her and her colleague under the bus.
That is how the law works. If you are part of a group with a common purpose you are all treated as at fault for the wrongs of one of the group – as joint wrong-doers.