The parents of a young woman who tragically died after receiving an AstraZeneca Covid jab have slammed the NHS for not passing on crucial safety warnings about the vaccine. The BBC has the story.
Marina Waldron, 21, visited hospital with excruciating headaches three times in the week before her fatal collapse from a brain haemorrhage in March 2021.
Max and Liz Waldron said that despite her deteriorating condition, A&E doctors had seemed unaware of the emerging side-effects associated with the jab and warnings that had been issued.
Another family whose son, Oli Akram Hoque, died from the same complications a few days after Marina, are also calling for lessons to be learned. …
Marina, from the Forest of Dean in Gloucestershire, was just starting her career in film when she was given her first dose of the AstraZeneca jab on March 11th, 2021.
She had developed a headache and sickness by March 22nd and went to a London hospital only to be sent home with migraine tablets, despite mentioning she had had the jab recently.
Mrs. Waldron, 64, said Marina deteriorated the following day and was this time discharged by an A&E department, again with a migraine diagnosis and no brain scan.
On March 27th, her parents were so worried they took her to A&E in Gloucester. She died on March 31st at Southmead Hospital, Bristol, after suffering a heart attack and brain haemorrhage.
“We weren’t able to go in. We weren’t able to say, ‘Don’t you understand she hasn’t drunk or eaten?’ They [the hospital] just sent her back,” said Mrs. Waldron.
“But the next day it was worse and she started having issues with her arm – she was lifting up her arm and holding it, and that’s when it all went mad.”
At Marina’s inquest in December 2023, a coroner determined her death had been caused by a combination of factors: intracerebral haemorrhage, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis and vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis due to the AstraZeneca vaccine. …
The Waldrons want to know why medical professionals were not informed about the risks associated with the vaccine earlier when other countries were putting a halt on the vaccine and why appropriate diagnostic measures were not taken promptly.
They believe that earlier awareness could have made a significant difference in Marina’s case.
Mrs. Waldron said: “It was only after a couple of days in hospital that they took us to one side and said, ‘We think it’s the vaccine,’ and we said, ‘We’ve been banging on about this vaccine right from the beginning, and every single person said it wasn’t anything to do with that.’”
“They didn’t even bother to scan her.
“There was a possibility, a chance she could have been saved.”
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Thanks for spotting that. I saw that item yesterday evening, and plonked a link to it on here today. I wonder if the beeb will delete it after a while.
We all know the manifold answers to that.
First, the MHRA is corrupt. It is not a regulator but a republisher of drug industry misinformation claiming drugs are safe and a rubber stamper for the drug industry with ex drug industry people in key positions which guarantees this.
Then the medical professions represent a branch of medicine – allopathy based on drug treatments – which is dominant because of the efforts of the pharmaceutical industry to wipe out all other forms of medical practice. This started with John D. Rockefeller and the Flexner Report in 1910 as recounted in the book Cancer – Step Outside Box.
Rockefeller needed to “re-educate” the medical profession to prescribe more pharmaceutical drugs, so he hired Abraham Flexner to travel the country and assess the success of American medical schools. In reality, there was very little “assessing” going on by Flexner; the results of his study were predetermined.
Eventually, Flexner submitted a report to The Carnegie Foundation entitled “Medical Education in the United States and Canada.”
Not surprisingly, the gist of the report was that it was far too easy to start a medical school and that most medical schools were not teaching sound medicine. In other words, they weren’t pushing enough drugs.
Flexner reported that it was necessary to install a “doorkeeper” to determine which medical schools were allowed through the “medical door” and which ones must remain outside. The report was presented to Congress, and they swallowed it hook, line, and sinker.
The American Medical Association became the new doorkeeper and was empowered to determine which medical schools were properly following the standards of conventional medicine and which ones were not. The AMA is the allopathic medical physicians’ trades union.”
Steadily competing forms of medical practice were forced out of business.
And that is how we have ended up with the corrupt form of the practice of medicine – allopathy – which with its prescription drugs – is one of the leading causes of death in the developed world.
And the third main reason is that allopathic medical doctors don’t know much about vaccines. The most time spent in medical school on vaccines is at most 45 minutes.
They are all told repeatedly the false claim vaccines are the greatest development in medicine aside from antibiotics and also the gross misinformation that vaccines have saved millions of lives when they have not. See for example: Vaccines Did Not Save Us – 2 Centuries Of Official Statistics
The fourth main reason is that many medical journal papers contain the claim that vaccines have saved millions of lives. But when you attempt to trace back through the references there is no factual scientific basis for the claim beyond citing prior papers which make the same claim. Commonly one might find claims to WHO ‘estimates’ or estimates from some other tainted organisation.
Why estimates? Because it is a claim which is impossible to substantiate.
And my my, the BBC running an item criticising vaccines – OMG shock horror.
Why? It is the power of unelected officials in Whitehall who have since the Thatcher years have been allowed to develop personal contacts with external interests including in the drug industry. Prior to Thatcher that was not allowed because of the scope for corrupting Whitehall.
But now we have had 40 years of it.
Before Thatcher of course it was already going on unsanctioned and unofficially in the smoke filled rooms of London clubs.
The article on the BBC News concludes:
Gaslighting.
It’s not acceptable for a young woman not susceptible to death from a disease to die from a vaccination she should never have had, and whose side effects were consistently hidden from her. “Safe and effective” does not mean “kills fewer than it saves in a different, more vulnerable, age cohort.”
If it has such a good safety profile, why has it been withdrawn not only round the world, but in its country of origin?
But since we all live by lies on a daily basis, what point in pointing that out?
“Gaslighting” is far too polite.
Outright lies and propoganda would be more appropriate.
“According to independant estimates over six million lives were saved in the first year of use alone “.
Quite so. And I’m the Queen of Scotland.
That said.
Do not let anyone throw AZ under the bus at the expense of Moderna, Comirnaty etc.
Because these Modified mRNA jabs are far far worse.
And they’re coming for you and your kids soon.
The best way to end the “pandemic” is to end the BBC!
I guess that’s why it was pulled, all over the world. UK much later, of course.
I’m surprised they didn’t just say “The ends justify the means.”
I think they may have using other words, but they definitely acted in that way.
Who was Prime Minister at the time this wholly unnecessary death occured?
It’s OK, Astra Zeneca are still proud of it
To add to the head in sand attitude on the increase on young male myocarditis now the same is occurring with the increase of colon cancer in the young
To be fair, the stats suggest an increase from (if I remember) around 2010. There may well be an iatrogenic cause, but mRNA ain’t to blame for the whole of that one.
And, being a 21 year old, she was at zero risk from Covid anyway.
A heartbreaking tragedy.
AZ are proud of their fucking vaccine which saved no one and killed and maimed thousands.
Sick sick bastards.
And that woman got applause from clapping seals at Wimbledon.
It is too late for Marina and her family. But thousands of kids are damaged each year by the multiple jabs given to them as babies and young children because it is cheaper for the State to jab Mumps, Measles and Rubella in one go than seperate jabs. Get real folk and realise Dr Wakefield was run out of the Country, not because he was wrong but because he dared to speak the truth.
And some in the trade might use his loss of reputation as a mode of defence for other issues, like the one under consideration here. Perhaps as a way of undermining criticism; we’ll see – if it ever comes up in an Inquiry.
Bless you for being one of the very few boldly speaking up for the heroic, much-reviled Dr. Andrew Wakefield.
History will honour him, as his own countrymen did not.
“The Waldrons want to know why medical professionals were not informed about the risks associated with the vaccine earlier”
Considering medical professionals are highly intelligent and motivated individuals they were/are perfectly capable of being on top of any related information from around the planet, without needing to be informed. This also applies to those that should have done any informing. Any individual that is truly passionate about a subject will find stuff out and question.
Below are all the vaccines/’vaccines’ that were developed for the Wuhan Flu. There were 28. The UK used three different mRNA variants and China used six virus based vaccines. China used no mRNA ‘vaccines’.
The NHS in its full glory
The NHS had one job…
Nice one— What a find!
People are starting to repent at leisure now but, with a bit of independent research, it should have been obvious that the mRNA jabs were unsafe and ineffective.
I am really sorry for the parents of this poor young woman. But why on earth did a healthy young woman (or her parents) think she needed the jab in the first place? My husband and I (in our mid-70s) haven’t had the Covid jabs (and my husband was supposed to be shielded) – we didn’t think it was safe, we did our own research, took responsibility for our own lives.
Please don’t be so naive.
Millions were jabbed believing it to be necessary.
On top of that there are other pressures including some extremely nasty people who got a majority to gang up on and personally vilified those of us in the minority with the sense to avoid the bloody dangerous injections.
Our esteemed Prime Minister called us anti-vaxxer nutters which is hate speech but no one will ever be prosecuted for using that terminology because those of us who can read the science are of course complete nutters to be ignored and gas-lit.
Yes, millions! And who was being naive – to implicitly trust what they were told without ever checking? Sorry, that won’t wash with me.
No one cares what you think or whether you wash at all.
Government used behavioural science to manipulate millions.
And the same things happened in countries around the world apart from Sweden.
Who were they to check with? Government, health professions and legacy media were all singing the same tune and anyone off melody was piled upon like the authors of the Great Barrington Declaration.
Maybe you should get a better brand of soap and trying washing again.
Or follow Chris Packham’s advice for Barclays customers.
Well you obviously do care what I think! It was perfectly possible to find out more about the jabs – how do you think we did?!
Anyway, we’re obviously not going to agree but it would be nice if we could retain some courtesy!
You started out saying the girl who died and her parents were stupid for her to get the jab.
Then you pour petrol on the fire you started by claiming to be so much smarter than millions of others not to have had the dangerous injections.
You then complain about a lack of courtesy.
Wow!!
Chris Packham’s advice might be the most appropriate.
Why are you picking a fight with Pilla? Aren’t you on the same side of the ‘fence’? And, you are not being courteous.
Wow. What is your concept of courtesy?
Is this courtesy?
Pilla comes to DS to claim the girl who died and her parents were stupid for her to get the jab.
Then she pours petrol on the fire she started by claiming to be so much smarter than millions of others not to have had the dangerous injections.
She then complains about a lack of courtesy.
What is there about that to like?
I suggest you might like to take a day off before replying.
Sadly the Milgram experiment and Solomon Asch Conformity experiment showed that around 80% of people (the majority) will do what they are told and conform to what everyone else is doing. Perhaps these characteristics are for survival of the group except the group is no longer 30 that all know each other personally but millions loosely associated by culture. The despots and tyrants understand this and have taken full advantage, the pandemic and Climate Change being obvious examples. I understand the Soviets made use of Pavlov’s behaviour studies of dogs. The only upside to recent events is that those wanting lockdowns was only 60% (still a majority) but not the 80% of the Milgram/Asch experiments and those experiments were binary and obvious. The social pressures in the pandemic (and Climate change) were/are much more complex and varied compared to agreeing which straw is the longest – A, B, or C.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYIh4MkcfJA
Asch Conformity Experiment
As far as the pandemic the WHO, CCP, Gates have used the same techniques as Pavlov, Milgram and Asch to gain conformity. We will blame our leaders but they conformed to the pressures from mass formation which was driven by alarming CCP imagery of a supposed major virus outbreak and how China ‘successfully’ dealt with it and we should all follow China (according to the WHO and Bill). In this case all sovereign nation governments were now captive and mere passengers. Bill insisted everyone on the planet needed to be vaccinated and the CCP/WHO asserted that going back to our old lives won’t happen until we are all vaccinated. The WHO changed the definition of immunity so that natural immunity was not a possibility – see below.
And the WHO changed the definition of a Pandemic.
Thank you for all the interesting info. I agree with what you say except that I think our leaders are/were culpable; it seemed as though they were only too delighted to carry out their orders from on high.
Yes, on 2nd thoughts they are culpable, especially Trudeau, Sturgeon, Drakeford, Biden, Ardern, Macron, Merkel, Daniel Andrews and a few others. However I didn’t think Trump or Johnson were part of the WEF crowd, but appeared to have been got at by the blob? – Johnson has proved he has no backbone. Also all these leaders are expendable if there is a global Communist revolution taking place – national governments are an obstacle, so it helps the ’cause’ if the citizens blame not only their leaders but their national institutions.
“While the State exists there can be no freedom; when there is freedom there will be no State”
Lenin
“By psychopolitics create chaos. Leave a nation leaderless. Kill our enemies. And bring to Earth, through Communism, the greatest peace Man has ever known”
Beria
“If we can effectively kill the national pride and patriotism of just one generation, we will have won that country. Therefore we must continue propaganda abroad to undermine the loyalty of citizens in general and of teen-agers in particular.”
L. Beria
The Director of the WHO is a Marxist, The Director General of the UN is a Marxist, K. Harris will put in place Communist policies, Starmer is putting in place Communist and Soviet policies.
They somehow got to Johnson. He is weak – as you say, no backbone. Not sure about Trump – remember he pushed the Covid jabs (operation Warp Speed and all that).
Those quotes are good, especially the second Beria one. They are certainly trying to kill national pride and patriotism, if they haven’t already succeeded.
Starmer and most of his colleagues are members of the Fabian Society which, I believe, is Marxist.
The future is bleak ! But I strongly believe in God and ‘they’ haven’t factored him into their plans. God’s will be done!
Interesting.
So how is the worm persuaded to turn?
What does it take for the proles to take over?
And what do they need to do it?
Just questions of course but I am will be fascinated to know if anyone as any answers.
They have taken over. Isn’t it clear?
Because they believed the nonsense being spouted across the Establishment that “it was the right thing to do;” joined the herd and did no basic research of their own.
Exactly!
“The BBC has the story ……”
That would be the disgusting, Government propagandist which gas-lighted people foolish enough to watch and believe it for YEARS.
Where are Johnson, Sunak, Whitty, Vallance and Van Tam ….. to declare that the jabs are “safe and effective?”
Funnily enough the evil bastards have all gone very, very quiet.