I have never had anything to say about Elon Musk. In our house he is called ‘Ellen Musk’ – nothing to do with Ellen Degeneres or Ellen/Elliot Page (which would, I admit, be controversial) – but simply because our eldest son, who is fond of saying ‘I pronounce it like this’ when everyone pronounces it another way, originally pronounced the name ‘Ellen’. In other words, he is susceptible to the sorts of ‘mind virus’ which are just a normal part of being the son of a father prone to facetious remarks.
But perhaps Elon Musk does deserve credit for something besides being the richest man in the world. I was not very interested in the phrase “two-tier policing’”, but I found the phrase “two-tier-Keir” very amusing. (Musk did not invent it: but he has exploded it.) It is amusing because of the rhyme: nothing can come between an English speaker and his appreciation for a bit of casual rhyme, especially in a doublet. But also the phrase forces us to spell the name ‘Keir’ correctly (as the Guardian failed to do shortly after the election: I am sure I saw ‘Kier’ there, though I did not make a note of the exact article). In addition, it has brought to our attention the possibility that the police in England are rainbow-complacent about protected ideologies like Black Lives Matter and Antifa and Just Stop Oil but rather truncheon-brutal about unprotected ideologies like Nazism and, er, the Liberties of the Englishman. About this, all I will say is that there is no particular reason for us to be shocked that accepted ideologies, even when expressed vulgarly or violently, are policed in a different way to unaccepted ideologies – even if these include old pagan, tribal and religious ideologies which one might have thought have deserved some respect since they have been here for a thousand years.
The point here, however, is that the phrase “two-tier-Kier” illustrates one of my favourite dicta: the dictum that “Two is the political number par excellence”.
Anyone who seeks to analyse politics must continually reflect on twos, and the evident failure of the number two to resolve easily into the number one.
The number one is what everyone wants. A system, with me in power – one king, one law, one word, one truth, one taste, etc. – and no argument, no opposition, no rivalry, no dispute. It is what Charlemagne wanted, and Napoleon – but it is what all politicians want, even the ones who are forced by circumstances to prate about diversity. It is what Sadiq Khan wants. God is great, Diversity is great, and Khan surely fits in a treat in the middle somewhere. It is what Nicole Sturgeon wanted: Scotland the Slave. It is what Boris Johnson wanted: an Eton mess of conformity with a Boris-shaped strawberry on top.
The number two is what we get. Opposition. Difficulty. Something else. An argument. A brother. A rival. A usurper. Prime Minister’s Questions. Gove on manoeuvres. Trouble. Fate. The thing Machiavelli called the goddess Fortuna. Bad luck. Failure. (“Every politician’s life ends in failure”: Enoch Powell, on Joseph Chamberlain, and himself, of course.) And as we struggle to impose ourselves on those who engage in dispute or disagree with us, we find that we may have to use force, or some other form of power: controlling the agenda, say, or actually injecting one’s ideas into the heads of others so that they think they want various things (Net Zero, etc.) when in fact they don’t. In a world of twos, the politician, though he hopes for one, has to fight: and he has to lie: since along with force goes fraud.
Here is where we get the litany: the coups d’état by state against people which I wrote about in an earlier piece, also Goebbels or Hancock type propaganda, and, of course, ‘nudge’.
The entire established and educated system which rules over us is continually drawn into a cognitive dissonance. This dissonance is:
- Politicians are the guardians of a system and have to prevent force and fraud within that system.
- Politicians, in order to do this, have to engage in force and fraud.
I am making a general point.
At this specific moment we have two sorts of serious claim. The first is the position of Starmer, the BBC, the Guardian, The Rest is Politics, etc. all complaining about how “far-right thuggery” is spreading through “disinformation”. This is probably true, at some level, but is emphasised as if it is a sole cause when it is in fact merely one detail in a greater and more complicated story. The second position, therefore, is the one which recognises a greater and more complicated story. Here we have the responsible commentariat who are saying “Well, this misdescribes the situation”, including Ross Clark in the Spectator and Stephen Tucker in the Sceptic. Here we try to establish what the actual problems are (as if they have been caused by government policy over decades), and how they are being deflected and distorted by social media, if anything. (This is where we have the interesting point, emphasised by Tucker, that the Establishment tries to generate a moral consensus against a not-quite-existing-enemy by creating via “controlled spontaneity” a loud and noisy opposition to that enemy.)
I, too, think that the government and Establishment are irresponsible. But against this I have to insist on the general point, especially since I don’t see it said very often. This is that, “The government is engaging in misinformation.” And further: “It has to: it is an inevitable part of government that it misleads the people.” (I would not say a priori, “necessary”, though this may be the case; but certainly I think we can say a posteriori, “inevitable”. In other words, it might not always be the case, but it certainly has always been the case.) No government has ever existed which has not attempted to limit the information available to its subjects. No politicians have ever entirely escaped the temptation of the belief that the people cannot handle the truth. No people, therefore, has entirely escaped the tendency to distrust government and even believe in conspiracies about it. We sometimes think ‘conspiracy theory’ is something new: well, we only named it because it came as a shock to those of us who had fallen for the enlightened discourse of ‘democracy’ (almost all of us) that our new shiny political orders were as corrupt as any older ones.
Keir is two-tier. Of course he is. He is a politician. He has to be two-tier. On one tier, the insiders, and the rivals. On another tier, the outsiders, the audience, the population. It is awkward nowadays to separate the two tiers because of the alternative media which has slipped the Leviathanic leash and keeps trying to tell each side the truth about the other. But the two still exist, and still exist in a heavily conventionalised system of separation which is not the less separated for being continually talked on both sides about as if it isn’t. On the second tier we have the claim that Keir is concerned with law and order, harmony: this is a world in which some supposed ‘we’ is innocent and unpolitical and simply good Englishmen and women going about their law-abiding business. But back on the first tier we have the political Keir, using the discourse of neutrality and law-abidingness to benefit his allies and do down his enemies, which include his Machiavellian rivals operating within the system but also the innocents like Mr. Dick (from David Copperfield) or Aloysha (from Brothers Karamazov) or Tony Last (from A Handful of Dust) – that’s you and me – who form the demos and operate outside the governmental system of elites, experts and time-servers and yet exist within the greater system guided by the government. Any politician has two sets of enemies, or opponents, or antagonists: one is explicit, the rival politicians; the other is implicit, the entire mass of the people. Most politicians find that they pay too much attention to one, and lose all sense of the other. By and large, ‘populists’ are simply the politicians who pay attention to the people. The other lot, whatever we want to call them – constitutionalists, I call them – are the politicians who pay attention to their rivals and the system within which they live with their rivals.
I keep saying and will doubtless keep saying – I think the point worth repeating for the edification of everyone – that politics is always duplicitous, for one, innocent, reason: and this is because everything exists on two tiers at once. Keir is a good man, safe pair of hands, respectable figure, has the interest of the nation at heart, etc.; but he is also a one-eyed and one-handed exhibit of the will-to-power, shaking his spear at his enemies and sticking a dagger through the arras at his friends. Everything in politics is two-tone, two-tier. Everything in politics is on stage and off stage – all at once. Every politician comes off stage at times. But not in front of the audience. The fourth wall is broken, occasionally, but is mostly respected. Politicians speak in a ‘political’ way in front of an audience; and this political style of speech is bland, accommodating, inclusive, and then they speak in another ‘political’ way backstage, in front of rivals and allies, and this is more obviously edged with poison, or expressed in swordplay (or knife crime, as we should say nowadays), where the blade is sometimes turned outwards, sometimes inwards. And, more than this, every utterance exists both as a signal to the bewildered audience and as a signal to rivals and allies. At both levels it is political, but political in a different way: pompous and pretentious and studiedly neutral in one, not-coming-off-it-at-all, ‘on guard’, actorly, even, while in the other it is deliberately and sometimes fraudulently confessional, but requiring a much subtler, more believable, less RADA style of acting, in order to sound coming-off-it while certainly never entirely coming-off-it. It is all very Hamlet, play-within-a-play stuff. And everything is politics. Everything is the play. But the play is not one simple thing.
Is this clear? Politicians speak on two tiers. But everything they say is heard on both tiers. And on each tier it has a different signification. All political analysis begins with acquiring a sense of this. Most journalism is simply responding to one aspect of any particular exhibition of this fundamental property of the political system.
Dr. James Alexander is a Professor in the Department of Political Science at Bilkent University in Turkey.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Are we seeing the birth of Canada’s Gilets Jaunes?
If the ancien regime refuses to give any concessions, and resorts in the end to either waiting the pro-freedom protesters out or to police violence, will the result be a bitter, long lasting campaign of protests like the ones that ultimately forced Macron to make superficial concessions, but no real changes?
In France, so far the regime has been able to basically put up with the anger of the disenfranchised and demonised indigenous working classes, while it has partly petered out in hopelessness for now (a dangerous situation, no doubt), and perhaps been overshadowed for now by covid panic protests..
The rise and fall of France’s Yellow Vests – what remains after two years?
I think in this case the truckers are leading the nation – predominantly people are on their side. A lot of truckers on the move across Europe though the great convoys touted for the UK yesterday don’t seem to have materialised.
Too .many borders, Police check points and vehicle weigh in hubs throughout the EU (always part of The Plan despite ‘Freedom Of Movement’).
Not enough stretches of motorway giving 10 miles of clear views in either direction.
How many stationary articulated lorries can squeeze into 1 mile/1 kilometre 3 lane motorway/autobahn/schnelweg, Aftokinitodromos/ motortrafikledenand etc?
Piece of piss to divert leading 30 trucks into the mean backstreets Naples, Paris or Bratislava.
The Convoy To Canberra movement, inspired by the Canadian truckers, has delivered tens of thousands of unhappy Australians into the national capital.
With a federal election due in the first half of the year, the movement can effect real change here. The Liberals are starting to panic.There is talk about a leadership change and dumping Scott Morrison for Peter Dutton. This is not likely to reverse the swings towards secondary parties such as One Nation, Liberal Democrats, and United Australia.
Labor federally is keeping a low profile, but the Labor state governments are doing plenty to foul their chances of a win.
Come off it you collaborating
bastardsrotters.All these foreign truckers are nazi Russian child traffickers selling adulterated heroin to Our Kids to raise funds for ISIS pedo orgies right here in Gods Own Country.
Those 10s of thousands of unhappy Australians will be even unhapier when they wake up in a Whiguir slave labour camp.
Your readers reserve the truth.
Concerned £10.00 Pom.
Elizabeth N.S.W.
There’s one in every crowd!
“Labor federally is keeping a low profile“
I did notice they weren’t above dobbing in their rivals:
Most of United Australia party’s videos pulled from YouTube
“Three out of every four video ads the United Australia party has posted on YouTube since late September have been pulled by Google for allegedly violating the tech giant’s advertising policies, according to Google’s transparency report.
…
Labor has previously raised concerns that the UAP was using its platform to undermine confidence in Australia’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic, citing videos in which Kelly questioned the safety of Covid vaccines or promoted the drug ivermectin.“
Presumably even under a PR system a shift of votes from the “Liberals” to smaller freedom parties must initially benefit Labor?
Well good luck to the cowardly schmuck waiting it out in his weasely hidey hole. Once the millions that were snatched away by Go Fund Me are given back to the donors and resent via the non-fraudulent Give Send Go site ( often with interest as people are actually pledging more that their original donation now ) then the truckers have enough to theoretically keep them in situ for up to 4 years. This was based on the 10 million raised before it was shut down. So there’ll be a lot of redirecting of funds, they’re getting a hell of a lot of support locally and worldwide and they’re inspiring truckers in other countries to get going with similar efforts. They actually have a lot of support from the police, the tow truck firms have sided with them, as have the farmers, and the military have said they won’t be getting involved to evict anyone. Polls show the majority of Canadians now want all restrictions lifted. If this Freedom convoy doesn’t prove the catalyst of change then nothing will. They’re all doing great out there and it’s a lot more impactful than the regular protests happening every weekend because this effort brings max disruption, whereas peaceful protests do not.
Was flagged to this the other day – seems to be an intended hit on Sir Desmond Swayne, given the misleading title:
Furious Swayne savages code: You’re not gonna tell me what to say! I hold people in utter contempt!
What he actually said was: “I believe that I’m quite entitled to hold certain things and people in utter contempt. I’m not required to respect them.”
And he’s absolutely correct – an MP should be accountable to his electorate for his views, and to nobody and nothing else.”
What;’s amusing is the total, dogmatic incomprehension of Swayne’s point, on the part of the responding elite bigots in the extract.
Absolutely, I behold Queen Elizabeth II with absolute respect while m.hindley (ms.) is worthy only of universal contempt and ignominy, obloquy is not too strong for her.
In keeping with DS Guidelines I do not wish her dead but only so I can witness her daily humiliation by other old women legs.
Everybody else lies somewhere along the QE2-Hindley spectrum. Often that place is of their own choosing.
I have no respect for Queen Tin Lizzie now that she’s called me selfish for wishing to decide what needles are and are not rammed into my body. She can go dance the Covvicult death dance with Bozo and Smarmer.
Completely agree Annie. Let’s not forget that Charlie is up to his neck in this reset shite and thick as thieves with Klaus, Bill and the rest of the Davos Deviants.
The Windsors have to go. Way past their best before.
I haven’t seen the responses from the elite bigots but I expect some of them comprehend very well, they just choose to pretend they don’t. They know people like Swayne are a threat to them because he represents a block of the public who oppose their dogmas and is relatively unafraid to speak truth to power.
Father, 35, is arrested after leaving his 11-year-old son at a hotel to go out and celebrate his team’s FA Cup win – as police say the ‘unhappy mum is on her way to collect him’
“A GMP spokesperson told MailOnline: ‘In the early hours of Saturday 5 February 2022, police received a report of concern for the welfare of a child.
‘Enquiries established that an 11-year-old boy was asleep alone in a hotel room in Trafford.
‘A 35-year-old man has been arrested on suspicion of child neglect. He remains in police custody for questioning.’ ”
The horror!
Some might disagree, but as the father of four (now adult) offspring, and as someone who was raised to be perfectly capable of spending the night alone in a hotel room at the age of 11, I can say with complete confidence that a normal 11 year old should be perfectly capable of spending the night alone in a hotel room.
Yes, we can all conjure up fantasy scenarios in which he might have fallen foul of some predator or freak accident, but frankly I was in a lot more danger at that age cycling 6 miles to school through Manchester traffic, and that never stopped me slipstreaming the buses.
Applying these standards, both my parents, and myself and my wife would probably have been imprisoned repeatedly for “child neglect”, and I think both I and my offspring are the better for it.
And that’s before going into the snitching, and the big brother, and the wasting of police resources aspects of this.
People just seem incapable of minding their own business these days!
o tempora! o mores!
Is this unrelated to the success of the nannying fearfulness of the covid panic?
So, a responsible parent would have taken his young son down to the pub?
I’m trying to figure out what actually happened here:
Dad takes his son with him from Middlesborough to Manchester to support their team at an away game. (Possibly mum and dad are divorced, there is some disagreement over custody.) Stays at a hotel to avoid having to drive home afterwards. Decides to celebrate win by meeting a few mates at a pub later that evening. At some point the mother of the child calls him on his mobile. Establishes that a) dad is at pub and b) son is at hotel. Furious row erupts. Enraged mother then takes revenge on dad by means of calling Manchester police. Who “make enquiries” (how?) that the child is asleep alone in hotel room.
Seriously, how do you do that? Have the hotel staff unlock the door, possibly scaring the crap out of the little guy as strangers creep into his room, in the dark, to see that he is alone and asleep?
Thanks for sharing the story.
As always we are left to speculate about what is left out of these stories. My initial response was the same as yours – that this was probably abusive snitching by a divorced mother. But the story doesn’t mention any divorce.
My other guess if it wasn’t the mother was that it was some busybody member of staff at the hotel.
More likely the latter. My son was questioned by a train guard as to why he wasn’t at school on 15th December last year, when he was travelling over by train to stay with me for half the Holidays. He was 15 at the time, but only 10 days short of his 16th birthday. The guard claimed that schools hadn’t broken up and he shouldn’t be on the train. My son ‘had’ to give the guard either my or his mother’s phone number so that it could be checked. He gave his mother’s due to my hearing problems.
It was none of her (the guard was female) business. It’s not the law to go to school. It is the law to be educated and some schools had broken up. My son was quite upset by it all.
I wrote a strong letter of complaint to East Midlands Railway. They agreed it shouldn’t have happened and the staff member would be spoken to (hmm) and offer to provide a complimentary ticket.
Why do people feel it necessary to interfere, particularly when they are factually incorrect?
Some “people” and I use the word lightly would sell their mother for an armband and would gladly slaughter their whole family for a nice bright shiny uniform.
Insecurity takes many forms.
This story actually made me look up the law on leaving a child alone.
There is no legal minimum age. The law only states that you mustn’t leave a child alone if so doing placed them “at risk.” And the UK.gov website says not to leave a child under age 16 alone overnight. Which seems reasonable enough.
But leaving an 11 year old in a hotel room for a couple of hours, even at night, doesn’t strike me as particularly “risky.” It depends a lot on the 11 year old. If it’s possible the boy is going to drink the shampoo or play with the matches and lighter fluid you’ve left on the dresser. Possibly “risky.” Otherwise – not so much. Unless the hotel itself is the sort of place where armed robbers roam the hallways, kicking in doors and assaulting guests.
What was the father in question to do? Hire a previously-vetted babysitter, I suppose. But that’s not going to be easy for an out-of-town visitor to do. Teenage girls (a frequent source of babysitting labour) are probably not too thrilled to be asked to come spend a couple of hours in a hotel room by a strange man.
Watch out for Penny Mordaunt now said to be threatening to resign over Boris Johnson. A former Microsoft employee she wrote a book ‘Greater: Britain After the Storm’ last year with an introduction by Bill Gates – a glimpse of the text on Amazon shows her singling out Britain’s partnership with Gate’s global vaccine alliance GAVI as the exemplar of our national destiny.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10480891/Penny-Mordaunt-latest-MP-resignation-watch-Partygate-scandal.html
https://www.ageofautism.com/2020/06/british-prime-minister-channels-churchill-as-he-surrenders-to-gates-and-the-vaccine-cartel.html
Apparently (some pundit said earlier) one of the reasons she’s potentially going to resign was Johnson’s supposedly oh so shocking comment about Starmer.
No respect for any MP pretending to be “outraged” by that.
Agree, and if she was so outraged why did she not resign there and then? Definitely opportunism rather than principle.
Sounds like her resignation can’t come too soon!
Truckers are starting a working-class revolution — and the left hates it
“So we’re finally seeing a genuine, bottom-up, working-class revolution. In Canada, and increasingly in the United States, truckers and others are refusing to follow government orders, telling the powerful that, in a popular lefty formulation, if there’s no justice, there’s no peace.
Naturally, the left hates it.
For more than a century, lefties have talked about such a revolt. But if you really paid attention, the actual role of the working class in their working-class revolution was not to call the shots — it was to do what it was told by the “intellectual vanguard” of the left.
A working-class revolution led by the working class is the left’s worst nightmare because the working class doesn’t want what the left wants. The working class wants jobs, a stable economy, safe streets, low inflation, schools that teach things and a conservative, non-adventurous foreign policy that won’t get a lot of working-class people killed. It’s not excited about gender fluidity, critical race theory, “modern monetary theory,” foreign adventures and defunding police.
Worse yet, a huge part of the lefty self-image revolves around feeling superior to the working class and openly expressing disdain for it. One need spend only a few minutes tuning into left media like NPR, CNN or MSNBC to hear the disdain for working-class Americans, inhabitants of “flyover country,” people who live in the middle of nowhere.
……”
Good article – see also
Attack of the Transphobic Putin-Nazi Truckers! – OffGuardian (off-guardian.org)
Someone the other day felt the need to let us know that Babylon Bee is actually a satirical site. I now understand why as at first I thought this was another example of the same. But no, he actually said it.
How the £%)!£^%*!)* can the leader of a supposedly first world country actually spout such complete and utter “£%)*!£)*?
I’m reminded of the great Philip Larkin (that well known right wing bigot):
““Oh no, I’ve never been to America, nor to anywhere else, for that matter. Does that sound very snubbing? It isn’t meant to. I suppose I’m pretty unadventurous by nature, partly that isn’t the way I earn my living—reading and lecturing and taking classes and so on. I should hate it.
And of course I’m so deaf now that I shouldn’t dare. Someone would say, What about Ashbery, and I’d say, I’d prefer strawberry, that kind of thing. I suppose everyone has his own dream of America. A writer once said to me, If you ever go to America, go either to the East Coast or the West Coast: the rest is a desert full of bigots. That’s what I think I’d like: where if you help a girl trim the Christmas tree you’re regarded as engaged, and her brothers start oiling their shotguns if you don’t call on the minister. A version of pastoral.””
This is from an interview probably at least 40 years ago.
Does anyone at DS know anything about Free West Media? They’re running a very interesting story but I can’t find any other sources to support it.
Red Cross withdraws from ‘Austria vaccinates’ campaign
Their article is a translation of the article they reference from the regional Austrian newspaper Wochenblick, which German Wikipedia characterises as right wing, a source of misinformation blah blah. https://www.wochenblick.at/brisant/rotes-kreuz-steigt-aus-oesterreich-impft-kampagne-aus-regierung-steht-bald-allein-da/
// The question for us hardened sceptics – the Spartans, the Immortals, the Originals, the Old Guard – is what to do with these prodigal sons and daughters. //
Watch them and continue to learn about human nature.
Hmm, I keep thinking about how collaborators were dealt with after WWII!
France: Yellow Vests rally against COVID vaccine pass in Paris
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HUTfKsBW54s
Ruptly
We need far more people at all our events here
If we want the tyranny to end for good
Tuesday 8th February 2pm to 3pm
Yellow Boards By the Road
A329 junction London Road & Oak Avenue
Near Oakingham Belle pub
Wokingham RG40 1LH
Stand in the Park Sundays 10am make friends, ignore the madness & keep sane
Wokingham Howard Palmer Gardens Cockpit Path car park Sturges Rd RG40 2HD
Henley Mills Meadows (at the bandstand) Henley-on-Thames RG9 1DS
Telegram Group
http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell
It’s surprising to see the British Brainwashing Corpse giving a voice to four vax refuseniks – without much attempt to insult and denigrate them.
But then, they are NHS. Sacred Cow versus Holy Snake Oil.
For once, I’m mooing with the sacred cow.
Why has the Zoe app been telling us that “omicron is rising again” if cases have been falling?
The case count is very dependent on testing, which is down by 1/3 since the testing peak on 9 January.
Tim Spector discusses this here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUfjJ1z-a6s and essentially says that it’s down to testing, in particular a large drop in PCR tests. He claims that most cases are in the unvaccinated, although how he knows that is not explained because he no longer has many unvaccinated volunteers in the Zoe programme.
Reiner Fuellmich’s opening statement. It’s finally kicking off. https://rumble.com/vu5e9x-grand-jury-the-court-of-public-opinion-dr.-reiner-fuellmichs-opening-statem.html
Can anyone tell me where this is taking place? I have been following this enquiry closely for as long as they’ve been compiling evidence but where this case is actually being heard has escaped me.
I’ve no idea where he’s permanently located, I just presumed somewhere in Germany, but it appears the trial is going ahead in Brussels. Just going off of this link anyway. https://tapnewswire.com/2022/01/reiner-fuellmich-in-brussels-pre-trial/
Thanks for that, M.
WOW; can’t wait to see that reported on The BBC website…
Most of the covid deaths have been under Sleepy Joe, and he had the perfect vaccines to save the US.
The White House throws Dr. Fauci under the bus. Asked about Johns Hopkins study that shows lockdowns failed, Psaki disavows them. “We’ve not been pro-lockdown — most of the lockdowns actually happened under the previous President.”
In the psychology of mental abuse this is known as Gaslighting … a period of time when the abuser causes the victim to question the validity of their own thoughts, perception of reality, or memories.
Psaki is attempting to Gaslight the public – it’s intentional and its evil.
It’s only took two years before I’ve come across people who claim to have actually got ill with convid.
My fully jabbed uncle has “caught it” twice in the last few months, and now my fully jabbed cousin has “caught it”.
A board meeting at work last week was totally dominated by a colleague sharing her fascinating experiences of having “caught it” twice despite being treble jabbed.
She bemoaned having only just recovered from what she thought was the flu to catching what she thought was a common cold a few weeks later. Only clue it was allegedly convid is that she tested positive on the dodgy kit.
Ironic that in the early days while the crooks told us to be scared of the claimed avalanche of cases and deaths, I never met anyone who had tested positive or showed symptoms. Now we’re told “the virus” is in retreat, suddenly everyone around me is getting ill.
Yet this was all predicted by the actual experts who warned about the dangers of the fake vaccine. Either the treble-jabbed are suffering from spike protein or they are suffering from boughts of flu and cold and suffering more because they have weakened immune systems.