When you are running a brainstorming session, you create an atmosphere where every idea is welcome and insist that nobody shoots down even the most hare-brained notion, because there might be the kernel of brilliance buried in there somewhere. The objective is to foster an environment of free-thinking to stimulate innovation. However, at the end of the session, or afterwards, someone goes through all the Post-it notes and applies a reality filter so only the best ideas get further investment of time and money.
Well, when producing the latest Future Energy Scenarios (FES) report, the National Grid ESO (NG ESO) seems to have come up with a way to shoehorn in every wacky energy idea but has failed to apply the economic and thermodynamic reality filters.
The report’s authors have subtly altered the report now to discuss “Pathways” instead of “Scenarios”, but confusingly the report is still called “Future Energy Scenarios” not “Future Energy Pathways.” These new pathways are supposed to provide a narrower strategic range of outcomes and instead of being “cost agnostic” they are supposed to bring in “additional economic modelling”. Said modelling is conspicuous by its absence. They are also supposed to have considered “whole system optimisation fundamental to finding the most efficient future energy system across all energy vectors”. Although this latter objective is reserved for future iterations, so we must assume that what they have produced is not the most efficient energy system.
Let us see how well they have done exploring “a narrower range of outcomes to drive more strategic, credible routes to Net Zero”.
Energy Demand
Despite brainstorming every single energy supply technology, they have not extended this thinking to their estimates of energy demand in 2050. They are still projecting per capita energy use to be halved by 2050 (see Figure 1).
As part of that, energy consumed by the residential and transport sectors falls by nearly two-thirds in two of their pathways. As I never tire of saying, halving energy use is extremely dangerous. According to Our World in Data, there are no rich countries with such low energy use (See Figure 2).
We are already using 61.8% less energy per capita than the USA and 16.8% less than the EU27. We are even using less energy per capita than China. Halving our per capita energy use would mean consuming less energy per capita than Mexico, Brazil, Algeria and Uzbekistan use today. All those countries have GDP per capita much less than half of the U.K., with Algeria less than a quarter of ours.
Surely, the first reality test of any energy plan should be that it delivers a growing and prosperous economy.
Deindustrialisation Built In
The economic decline inherent in their energy plan is further illustrated by the amount of energy they think will be used by the Industrial and Commercial (I&C) sector. The headline figures show a 14-17% reduction in energy use by the I&C sector, but the headline figures mask what is going on beneath the surface (see Figure 3).
In their Holistic Transition pathway, as overall I&C energy use falls from 390TWh to 331TWh, the energy consumption of data centres rises from 5TWh last year to almost 62TWh in 2050. So, by 2050, data centres will consume 19% of all I&C energy (and 24% of I&C electricity). This effectively means that the energy consumption of other industrial users like steel, automotive, fertilisers and chemicals will have to fall even more dramatically. However, with such expensive electricity, it is unlikely these data centres will arrive. They are more likely to locate in countries with low energy costs.
Hydrogen Bubble
We know that deindustrialisation will be the outcome because all the pathways utilise considerable amounts of hydrogen (see Figure 4).
The planned use of hydrogen is particularly evident in I&C and in power generation. They plan to make this hydrogen primarily from two sources: steam methane reformation (SMR) with carbon capture (CCUS), otherwise known as blue hydrogen, and electrolysis using otherwise curtailed electricity from renewables, also known as green hydrogen (see Figure 5).
There are many problems with this idea. First, SMR is only about 60-65% efficient. SMR with CCUS is unproven and is bound to be even less efficient because of the extra energy required to capture the CO2 emissions and pump them underground. If we are generous and say the overall process is 50% efficient, then hydrogen produced by this method must cost at least twice as much as the gas it is made from. At the time of writing, U.K. and continental European gas costs about 4.5 times more the gas in the U.S. (see Figure 6).
This means that blue hydrogen would be at least nine times more expensive than U.S. gas. No energy intensive industry will want to locate in the U.K. if their main input cost is nine times more expensive than in America.
It is an even worse story with green hydrogen. Late last year, the Government announced the results of its Hydrogen Allocation Round and agreed contracts for green hydrogen at £241/MWh. This is more than nine times the cost of U.K. gas and some forty-two times the cost of gas in the U.S. Yet, NG ESO claim “a fast rollout of clean hydrogen production capacity and adequate network could catalyse industrial decarbonisation”. With such an energy cost differential, industries are going to dematerialise to cheaper locations rather than decarbonise here. Again, the economic reality filter has not been applied. Of course, this commitment to hydrogen was published just as billionaire Andrew Forrest scaled back his ambitions for green hydrogen with the loss of 700 jobs.
As can be seen from Figures 4 and 5, all three of the pathways that achieve Net Zero envisage significant power generation from hydrogen, and significant amounts of that hydrogen to be blue hydrogen made from methane. They are proposing to take methane, lose at least half the embedded energy to make hydrogen and then burn the hydrogen to make electricity. Of course, it is far more thermodynamically efficient to simply burn the methane to produce electricity. Clearly, the thermodynamic reality filter has not been applied either.
High Electricity Costs
We also know electricity costs are going to soar because of the vast amounts of curtailment they envisage. Curtailment means that wind farms are turned off, or curtailed, when the wind is blowing because there is insufficient demand for their output. Wind farm operators will either demand to be paid for this curtailed electricity or will adjust the prices they bid into auctions to take this curtailment into account.
Figure 7 shows that two of their Net Zero pathways envisage curtailing over 60TWh of electricity in the late 2030’s, or over 20% of generation last year.
These curtailment levels are presented after allowing for some of the surplus electricity is used to make hydrogen and capture CO2 from the atmosphere using Direct Air Capture.
Carbon Capture Unicorns
Despite all the spending, the carbon reduction measures set out in their pathways do not get us to Net Zero. There will be residual emissions in sectors such as aviation and agriculture. They are planning to offset these emissions by spending even more on unicorn technologies such as Bio-Energy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS), BECCS enabled hydrogen and BECCS for biofuels. As discussed elsewhere, BECCS is the process of chopping down trees in North America, pulping and drying them into pellets, then shipping them to power stations like Drax to be burnt to produce electricity. It is enormously costly and the Royal Society of Chemistry produced a report that suggested BECCS using willow pellets from Louisiana in America would have an EROI of less than one, making the whole process a net energy sink. Moreover, the supposed negative emissions arise because the CO2 emitted by burning the trees is not included in the calculations. Both the economic and thermodynamic filters have not been applied again. They also plan to utilise Direct Air Carbon Capture and Storage (DACCS) to capture CO2 from the air and pump it into permanent storage. They plan to use industrial waste heat and renewable electricity when the wind is blowing too hard and supply exceeds demand.
They also plan to use something called, LULUCF, which means Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry to sequester more CO2 out of the atmosphere. Basically, this means planting more trees and restoring peatlands. It is rather odd that they plan to chop down loads of trees for BECCS to produce negative emissions and also plant more trees under LULUCF for even more negative emissions.
Collision Course With Labour Policy
There are some clouds on the horizon for NG ESO now the new Labour Government is in place. First, Labour have committed to decarbonise the grid by 2030, however, all of the FES pathways show there will be significant CO2 emissions from the electricity system by 2030 (17-44 Mt, compared to 55Mt last year). Presumably, NG ESO does not believe Labour’s plan is a “credible route to Net Zero”.
Second, Ed Miliband is stopping further exploration of the North Sea, meaning our domestic gas supply will fall faster than anticipated. However, NG ESO forecast that we will still be using gas beyond 2050 on all Net Zero pathways and we will be importing almost all of it. Something must fuel those gas plants with CCS and make all that blue hydrogen. Figure 8 shows the annual supply and import dependency for the Hydrogen Evolution pathway.
The scale of the import dependency shows the stupidity of stopping new North Sea exploration and development and banning fracking.
Another source of friction may be what Miliband might see as a lack of ambition about the installed capacity of renewables. In their manifesto, Labour promised to double onshore wind, triple solar and quadruple offshore wind capacity by 2030. As Figure 9 shows, all the pathways miss Labour’s target except for onshore wind under the holistic transition pathway.
This further illustrates that Miliband’s targets are not credible.
Big Brother Controls
The report also recommends widespread use of time-of-use tariffs (TOUT) stating: “consumers need to be rewarded for turning down demand at peak times and turning up demand when there is excess generation”. In other words, consumers need to organise their lives around the grid rather than the grid being designed to meet the needs of their customers. They also call for appliances to be controlled automatically to “optimise” demand and coordinate with price signals in the TOUT tariffs.
Totalitarian control of energy use is bound to be a feature of an energy scarce environment, not a bug.
Demands for Even More Subsidies
The FES 2024 report claims they will “deliver a future where everybody has access to clean, reliable, affordable energy”. They also claim that solar, onshore and offshore wind “remain one of the lowest cost options to meet our energy needs”.
However, the document makes a direct call for subsidising the cost of hydrogen and makes further demands for policy support, financial support, incentives, price signals, business models and market mechanisms. These are all code words for subsidies. They also make the explicit demand for levies on electricity bills (another word for the renewables subsidies) to be “rebalanced” on to gas. In other words, most of the proposals they have put forward are not viable without subsidies and the true cost of those subsides must be shifted from electricity on to gas. We know that if any technology needs a subsidy, it is not cheaper than the alternative, now we have NG ESO implicitly acknowledging that reality.
It is clear our bills are going up, and NG ESO has not applied an economic reality check to its work.
Conclusions
Despite claiming their new pathway approach has created “credible” choices to propel us on the route to decarbonisation, it is clear the opposite is true. This is a report where all technologies must have prizes regardless of the technical or economic viability. Many of the technologies they are recommending are unproven at scale and woeful economics.
They have clearly simply brainstormed all the potential technologies and shoe-horned them into their pathways without applying any kind of economic or thermodynamic reality filters.
They are obviously somewhat concerned about energy scarcity and intermittency because of their emphasis on TOUTs and automatic control of appliances. Instead of re-thinking and coming up with a plan for energy abundance, they continue down the path of expensive, scarce energy and Big Brother controls.
If this were just another think-tank spouting nonsense it would not matter very much, but the National Grid Electricity System Operator (NG ESO) is transforming into the National Energy System Operator (NESO), where they are supposed to be planning the entire energy system. If this is the best they can do, we are in big trouble. And now Labour is in power, things can only get worse.
David Turver writes the Eigen Values Substack page, where this article first appeared.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Every other MP whose name is not on this list is a traitor.
Or a member of the government
..but you repeat yourself.
Yep, wrote to my traitorous MP yesterday about this. No doubt he’ll ignore this letter like he did the last one (s). Also going to send him the The Together Declaration, for him to ignore too. https://www.togetherdeclaration.org/mp-letter/
You are of course aware of a certain popular definition of insanity (attributed by some to Einstein)?
True enough but far more important is he who laughs last. A disaffected voter will never vote for the party again. A voter who has been treated as a human being in a cordial manner will, perhaps, vote again simply because he has respect. Do unto others as you would have done to you.
With our anachronistic fptp voting arrangement – coupled with the stranglehold of a two and a quarter party system – most UK voters have long become used to being disaffected and pinching their noses when voting. The only alternative is being disenfranchised.
”Vote”? There’s optimism…..
The Together Declaration is controlled opposition. They have funds from Open Society as do Big Brother Watch
There’s many slip ‘tween vote and list – mainly into the abstentions lobby.
There isn’t – by definition – an abstentions lobby. To abstain, the person entitled to vote (in this case the MP) just doesn’t vote.
Continuing the literal interpretation theme, how can a non-material thing such as a vote be an object that a person can “slip” anywhere near?
Colon. Hyphen. Close round brackets.
But in parliament a vote IS a physical thing, defined by the presence (or non presence) of a person in a particular defined space at a particular time. If the person who has announced they will vote NO deliberately fails to enter the NO lobby they thus physically ‘slip’ (surreptitiously) into the (de-facto) abstentions lobby; which, as PB pedantically points out, is not an actual lobby, but rather the failure to enter either the Aye or Nay divisions.
I quote the Cambridge Dictionary’s relevant example:
That’s not a physical thing – that’s an action. As I understand it, movement is required (past the tellers at the far end) rather than mere presence. Anyway I was trying to take your side. “Abstentions lobby” was a perfectly OK and even amusing usage, not literal but that doesn’t matter. I was trying to reduce to the absurd the insistence on only literal usage.
The act of voting requires a physical action that results in one physically being present (or not) in a defined space. But again, as in PB’s criticism of ‘abstention lobby’ (and I do appreciate your support on this), ‘many a slip twixt ones stated voted intentions and the actual act of voting’ takes us dangerously into Mr Logic territory.
Yeah, I know, but you have to grant a certain artistic licence in the interests of brevity.
I suspect my SNP MP will be in that group…
Instead of a list of those voting against vaccine passports a list needs to be circulated very publicly of those who vote for. They need to stand down and hang their heads in shame and eventually all of them need to be criminally prosecuted.
Have you compiled a list of their names & addresses? How about their bodyguards – are they traitors too? And what are their names & addresses?
All my phone calls and emails this week have been fruitless, then.
Yours and millions of others!
Wonder if it’s worth looking into the backgrounds of the traitors and see where the money leads, in the style of the Sheep Farm? BTW if you haven’t found those fellas yet, pls have a look at their stuff, amazing work.
Yes, they are excellent.
Oh, like Tim Yeo with wind farms? I bet parliament is crawling with them. These big pharma crooks know how to keep people sweet. Probably the best practitioners of winning friends and influencing people today.
Worthy people no doubt and brave enough to challenge the Johnson regime, but not enough at the moment I’m afraid. More needs to be done e.g. no confidence vote against Johnson.
What I would like to see is a list of the people who were at the Downing Street parties.
They probably know as well as we do that someone like Gove or Stabbit jabit would replace him. Now if the likes of Redwood and McVey had a genuine chance, we ‘might be getting somewhere
Changing the politician nominally in charge will do nothing. The unelected technocrats pulling the strings will still be in place and a repalcement will be an even softer target.
Ferguson, who has never been right in any of his predictions, has to go, permanently and absolutely out of any position of influence. As an example to the others.
The Mad Modellers also should be required to produce ‘most likely’ predictions, not their beloved ‘worst case’. The worst case ‘we are all going to die’ isn’t very helpful whilst being 100% accurate in the long run.
39 out of the 45 are men, I notice. Wat means ? Well I know what it means: the future is female, and not in a good way
Only 70 out of 261 Conservative MPs are women, and you may not have a full list of those who will rebel yet. Some may not want to be known too much before the vote, so the statistics aren’t that indicative as yet.
Sorry 70 out of 331, (the 261 being the men), so women to be proportionate should be just short of a fifth of the total, so 8, or at most 9, whereas there are 6. Not sure that 2 short could be called statistically significant, especially given the general greater reluctance of those given ministerial responsibility to vote against the government, and the fact that it isn’t a final figure
Ah, and then there is the fact that there are actually 9. Siobhan is a female name, as is Dehenna., and Jackie is also a female; perhaps these 3 confused? If anything they are slightly disproportionately over-represented.
Whoops, only just had coffee, they are just over a fifth of the total. Statistically 10 would be proportionate, and there are nine, which is within the + or – of statistical insignificance
‘Ministerial Responsibility’ – that is career and personal gain against public duty, principle and the protection of our basic Human Rights and freedoms guaranteed under Common Law- an insight into the ‘character’ of most of those we send to Parliament to Govern us and a reminder for any future elections ( if there are any!).
Absolutely. I was assuming an equality of potential for corruption by high office!!
Looking around the world and at those who are now ‘in charge’ of so many of our Institutions I share your concern.
Pandora ought to have obeyed and never to have opened the box.
Maths suggests there should be 12 women out of 60. There are 9. (I worked on 50, not 60, forgetfully and since there were 50 last time, and I need more coffee!). Statistically this is of little to no significance, and it is rather improper to suggest that it is.
Turning this into a battle of the sexes is a wasteful distraction from the real problem. Is that your intention?
I am wondering what proportion of Conservative MPs with a science degree are on that list?
I think it is somewhere between around 66 and 100%.
Shame the rest don’t “follow the science” then!
There are some Jedi like mind tricks going on right now.
I am cautiously optimistic that the tide is turning.
My Mum went to the market yesterday and talked to the fish seller there who has believed the government propaganda all the way. He told her that he was not getting the booster, another seller on the market had been very ill after it and “thought she was dying”. He now thinks the government is trying to kill people.
And that was before she told him that the booster had almost killed her too!
So the truth is slowly getting through to people.
Our market traders, especially the fruit and veg boys, have been brilliant. Not only have they sold lovely produce at a great price, throughout this woeful shit show, they’ve been really friendly and we’ve always had a good laugh with them. We haven’t talked about covid much, apart from a few shares eyerolls but their attitude and ability to just get on as normal says everything!
After nearly two years and the crying out of warning by so many of the world’s leading scientists, doctors and virologists – now banned, threatened and persecuted by dark forces – those not sold out to Big Pharma and Gavi or serving a censored, bought-out media – isn’t it about time?
However, isn’t it now already too late for millions approaching their 4th jab ? Each jab increases the spike protein production, which Mc Cullough says lasts for 15 months – doing its work.
The media are still solidly behind the Great Reset conspiracy, as is government and opposition, all the public sector, most large businesses. It will only be stopped via mass non-compliance or more.The ballot box cannot stop this.
“You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious”
Yawn, seen it.
Conservative MPs threaten to revolt, a few do, most don’t, Labour abstains or supports, the measures go through.
There is about as much tension in this story as there is in the plot of Police Academy IV
What we now know is that the names on this list are all that is left the real Conservative Party and the grouping of decent Tory MPs.who deserve to be called “Conservative” Any “Tory” MP whose name is not on this list ought to be deselected by their local Associations and cashiered for betrayal of the voters and the country for their naked self-interest and self advancement- there is no defence.
It is a total disgrace to Parliament that there are only 60 names on this list not 250. This rotten, corrupted, sleaze covered ,fake Tory party needs to split to rid itself of the taint of these craven MPs not fit to represent citizens whose lives and basic Human Rights they seek to at best to compromise and whose livelihoods they seek to destroy in order to serve the ‘satanic’ ambitions of an aspiring Globalist Oligarchic Tyranny- without precedent in human history -now fully exposed by brave commentators like RFK Junior in his devastating book “The Real Dr Fauci”.
Tory MPs have no excuse for not knowing what is going on
The level of contempt I feel for the nationally embarrassing ‘Labour’ Party and its “Leader”( sic) has no words. I knew it was rotten – but now it is simply putrid and ‘stinks to heaven’ .
( US vaccine deaths now officially at 20,000 – (VAERS stats) most likely because of underreporting five or ten times than figure -including many children – EU is over 20,000 , UK at least 7,000 admitted on the (massaged) Yellow Card – but underreporting and failure to identify the vaccines as cause means most likely many, many more- myocarditis reported at levels never seen by doctors- especially the young.
The body continues to produce pathogenic Covid spike protein for 15 months after each injection, according to highly respected Dr Peter McCullough )
The EudraVigilance figure was almost 30,000 on the 6th November:
The Real Fauci is seriously frightening, the power of these creatures is mind-blowing. It reads like a bad novel with Bond villains galore but it is actually all true. It’s seriously hard to convince anyone because what they are doing is so audacious and immense.
Have you seen Ronald Bernard’s youtube videos? He was a top level financial operative in the Dutch finance system, very good at what he did. To the extent that he was invited behind the curtain. He declined and his tale is chilling. He knows not to name names if he wants to avoid sleeping with the fishes.
Part 1 of a 5 part series
Politically, it is clear that only mass resignations from within the Conservative Party can put a stop to this insanity. In particular high-level resignations need to happen.
Do I expect it happen? No. But the alternative could be catastrophic for civil society.
We wait in anticipation…..don’t hold your breath!
Well the proof of the pudding is in the eating thereof, not in the fine words of the chef or the tempting list of ingredients. Let’s see how may of them are bought off, intimidated etc by the time the vote comes.
That said. it’s nice to see a greater degree of surliness and anger on the “Conservative” benches at last.
Politically, though, the nightmare scenario at the moment is the awful prospect of the execrable, contemptible covid panicker Gove as PM.
I can think of one other horror scenario – Jeremy Ccccchunt
A colleague at work was gutted their mates don’t want to go to an away match with them this weekend. They want no part of the discrimination. The same colleague is also trying to pressure their child to ‘get jabbed’. The same colleague is also a Union representative. Another colleague has a season ticket, but is willing to give it up as they also want no part of the discrimination. Some people are wide awake, others are still fast asleep unfortunately.
That makes sense. A union representative, ergo a leftie. The left are much more on board with this tyranny than the right are.
Union rep? He must be used to this sort of game and sees nothing wrong with it.
I have written to my MP (Greg Smith) to thank him for his stand. I also asked him to sign the ‘Together Declaration’; he said he thought he already had but did it again.
I also had written to him about the cynical sham of consultation earlier in the year and said that the Government would press ahead with this evil scheme. Courteously, he replied at greater length saying that ‘Just in case’ does not cut it for restrictions. He is still rather (too much in my view) pro-vaccine however.
I did plead with him to resign the whip and join one of the new parties; no response to that, neither yes nor no. I also asked him to join the demo on 18 December in London.
He’s my MP too and I have had similar exchanges with him. He has told me categorically he is voting against this week.
Here’s what my MP said to me in June. He’s Labour btw. I’ve just written to him again reminding him what he said back then and setting out 10 questions he must ask (which I stole from Julia Hartley Brewer when Javid didn’t turn up for an interview this week). It sickens me how fickle the opposition and I yearn for a Margaret Thatcher figure to emerge and take control of these f-wits!
“We are nearly at that tipping point, where restrictions cannot be justified by the public health risk. The country have done so well at coming forward to be vaccinated that the government needs to be clear on a different communication strategy going forward; we have broken the link – by vaccine – between cases and deaths, so absolute cases becomes less of a useful measure of public risk than before. We are in interesting times and I do have sympathy with your position”
Some small signs of hope
p.s. But I shall of course vote as Starmer tells me.
My MP (Labour) replied to me, saying he is against vaccine passports, but thinks vaccines and masks are a A Good Thing And The Way Out Of This Thing. He has also recently been awarded a place on the Labour front bench, so I can’t see him going against his Dear Leader.
Cowards the lot who did nothing for months and will no nothing now. I’d rather embrace Palpatine. These are fake rebels trying to claim moral high ground in the eyes of history just as everything starts turning, without ‘firing a shot’ and no risks taken.
Anyone who votes for this should spend the rest of their life in fear.
Labour probably won’t oppose the government on Plan B, and since the plan is only for the England that they hate so rabidly, the SNP won’t either. That’s a truly shameful position for so-called “oppositional” parties, but it’s only what we’ve seen time and again since last March.
Sixty is a lot, though, to come out in public like this. In particular, it’s more than the 55 needed to force a confidence vote among Tory MPs.
This is quite aside from the fact that the night is still young as regards tomorrow’s newspapers.
It’s easy to imagine Boris Johnson losing the Tory leadership the same way Iain Duncan Smith did – with ample MPs supporting him in public, but when the votes are actually counted, whaddayaknow, he’s out on his arse.
Any word on what the feeling is among Tory constituency chairmen? They probably think he’s a bit of a pinko, right? I mean that’s what they usually think of their party’s leader.
The undertaker has another video out:
https://brandnewtube.com/v/MSa7hx
According to R4 news the scare brigade are warning of ‘1,000s of deaths’ from Omicron. Tell me, have the MSM in any country yet reported any deaths from this severe cold and if there are some are any in ‘healthy’ people, i.e. metabolically healthy?
I am puzzled that we are now all forecast to get it, whereas in May 2020 Whitty said in that well-known clip ‘ … most [or possibly ‘some’] people will never get it’, thus admitting the reality observed on the Diamond Princess.
Even after all this time, the Diamond Princess is still the one and only piece of uncorrupted, authoritative data we’ve been allowed to see. And its message couldn’t be clearer: Covid? So what?
Yes it is and we are the only ones mentioning it – the media remain stumm on the subject.
Amnesia is more prevelant than covid, so it seems.
Not as common as stuffedwalletitis.
It’s a bizarre situation, where voting Conservative is the only effective way of signalling your opposition to the Conservative government. If you vote Labour, you’d be signalling your support of the government’s policies.
It’s quite genius when you think about it.
But that would depend which constituency you are in – I’m in a Tory one (safe seat) and the MP is always fully on board with the government when it comes to Covidbollox.
So fuckin what it will pass, token resistance, counts for fuck all why are we going around in circles.
Makes no difference as labour have said they’ll support it.
Fair play to them for standing up for their constituents. But the so called opposition will, bizarrely, support the government so it really counts for nowt.
Why is it always about 60 ????
“Pissing in the wind”, the title of a new xmas song to be released jointly by the uk governments
Covid: Omicron study suggests major wave in January – BBC News
So, let’s just double check….
Its winter, so the flu, etc spreads rapidly. Congratulations for working that one out.
Oh, the virus does in fact spread easily amongst the vaccinated. So, what is the point of passports, etc. Don’t tell wales, austria, etc.
Yes indeed, “the experts behind the study said there was still uncertainty around the modelling.” In other words, we don’t actually know (as evidenced throughout the last 18 months), but best frighten the life out of everyone to keep the gravy train of funding going.
Show me the way to go home…..
Show Me The Way To Go Home _ And Evening With Richard Dreyfuss – YouTube
That BBC article seems to contradict the recent Reuters article which said that Omicron is spreading mostly in the jabbed.
Now I really am confused.
I slightly suspect that one is intended as ‘news’, or as close as the Trusted News Intiative gets to this nowadays, and the other is blatant propaganda.
I’ve written to my MP to urge him to join the lobby against these measures. Additionally I asked him to kindly let me know why he decided to back them, if he does so, in order that I can print it out and deliver it to every local household when I am campaigning for Reform.
your be in the clink by then but nice idea
PFIZER… is this is what they wanted hidden for 55 years..
Go to page 30 of this 38 page PDF.. read the last 8 pages..
APPENDIX 1. LIST OF ADVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST
https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf
That’s shocking. ‘They’ know it is seriously bad stuff…
And more importantly the truth if being hidden for 75 not 55 years!
That is a fairly generic list of just about everything that could happen. On 22 October 2020, the FDA (US drug regulatory agency) had an online conference regarding expected adverse reactions from the ‘vaccine’ candidates.
Guillain-Barré syndrome
Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis
Transverse myelitis
Encephalitis/myelitis/encephalomyelitis/meningoencephalitis/meningitis/encepholapathy
Convulsions/seizures
Stroke
Narcolepsy and cataplexy
Anaphylaxis
Acute myocardial infarction
Myocarditis/pericarditis
Autoimmune disease
Deaths
Pregnancy and birth outcomes
Other acute demyelinating diseases
Non-anaphylactic allergic reactions
Thrombocytopenia
Disseminated intravascular coagulation
Venous thromboembolism
Arthritis and arthralgia/joint pain
Kawasaki disease
Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children
Vaccine enhanced disease (VER = ADE)
I am pleased to note that death is only an expected adverse reaction and not something to worry about.
The ongoing COVID-19 nonsense here in the United States exists solely and exclusively because our governments have failed to use the correct treatment. They used so-called “vaccines” when Japan has just proven, in less than ONE MONTH, that Ivermectin can wipe out the disease. IVM was awarded the Nobel prize for medicine in 2015. One of the 3 most important drugs in human history: Aspirin, Penicillin, and Ivermectin. Get your Ivermectin today while you still can! https://ivmpharmacy.com
Get Robert F Kennedy’s book, The Real Fauci (2.99 on Amazon), and by 10% of the way through you will know why America refused to treat anyone. You’ll find why Ivermectin was demonised (Fauci was promoting a replacement that kills people). You’ll find out the truth about Derisiver (it kills people and did when it was used for Ebola). You’ll find out how 150,000 Americans died from the “vaccines” and how it was covered up (they do the same as the NHS: call anyone who dies within 14 days of a jab “unvaccinated”). I’m only a third through the book and the whole thing already links up all the things I’d worked out. Gates, Fauci, Soros.
Lee Rowley better get his name added…
Well at least 4 out of 8 of the County’s MP’s in my area will vote against.
That’s if they actually vote. A lot say they will and then abstain or cave in.
Seems to me the Tory party has two choices: hang on and die, get rid of Johnson and die. Such is the mood across all platforms I genuinely doubt they will see power again. The time is right for Reform to step up.
Doesn’t that actually depend on our having a general election? Does the C’virus Act allow for the suspension of elections?
Wrote to thank Anthony Mangnall, my MP, after a brilliant interview on TalkRADIO with Julia Hartley Brewer. Hes changed his tune, as he supported the Coronavirus Bill. Ive emailed him at least once a month me over the last 20 months, sending him video links opposing the narrative, by eminent scientists and medics. Maybe at last he listened, certainly seemed so in the interview. He really impressed me with his strong stand.
Christmas is coming, is that star in the sky getting brighter?
https://www.thrivetribehub.com/videos/view/2/nuremberg-case-filed-for-the-uk?fbclid=IwAR2f7S4OhYtsYRUmuLP9oCvw-ImyTl9CpK9jl4rfkg3x6URefCMf1XWKOCE
Direct link to the deposition
https://hannahroselaw.co.uk/icc-complaint-uk/
Unlike Biden in USA who stole an election, Johnson had an 80 seat majority with a strong supportive base encouraging him to carry out Brexit properly, create a framework for business to thrive and to stop immigration.
He did none of these things. Instead he married an extreme Soros funded socialist, tore the country apart to feather his own nest and put the final nail in the coffin of mistrust for the Establishment.
We now must make the most of his failures and take back control of our own country. We must use this opportunity to ignore this corrupt cabal. Support businesses and encourage them to stay open. We must carry on our lives, communicate with friends, advertise the scam that is Covid, stop vaccination, and prosecute those who have facilitated this terrible two year war on ordinary people.
I have been in constant contact via email, with my MP. I am thrilled to see his name on this list. He did correspond to say that this was his intention. Write to your MP today, please.
I have been writing to my MP for 2 years and when she deigns to reply its a round robin letter from Conservative HQ. She is a Rs crawling politician who puts her career first so she will vote for what she is told to do.
My MP Ms Davison has made the correct stand and i have emailed thanking her. I have offered to canvas for her if she switches to Reform by next election but have told her that i will never vote .Tory (or Labour) again.
Richard Holden MP for NW Durham is a f**king disgrace and will tell him so when he drops by one of the local pub events again, if it is still in business.
Letter sent to Jeremy Wright, my MP
But Vaccine Passports are nothing to do with health. They are the Trojan horse to introduce Digital IDs to be followed by CBDC. Come on, Toby, call it out for what it is – we are headed for a Bio-surveillance State. It’s no secret anymore, surely you can see it?
I keep doing that and he (Ian Liddell-Grainger) keeps ignoring me, and anyone else around here who writes to him on the subject. He isn’t on the list of 60. But we will continue to waste the effort.
Just watched our East Devon MP Simon Jupp interviewed on SW BBC. He is against vaxx mandates
Until he votes in secret.
I live in Scotland and have an MP who is SNP. I have no idea how she’d vote – quite possibly the SNP will abstain. I can only apologise…
To my surprise, my MP is on the list in spite of doing rather well out of the lockdown etc.