• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

The Worst Political Word is ‘Delivery’

by James Alexander
15 July 2024 1:00 PM

The worst political word of our time is ‘delivery’. Starmer and Sunak talked about what they would “deliver” in 2024. Johnson talked about what he would “deliver” in 2020. May talked about what she would deliver in 2017. I have made critical noises about this before: my standard line being that postmen deliver things (‘deliver’ is a transitive verb: it requires an object) while politicians do something else: in fact they don’t deliver things and don’t just deliver, period, either. The word ‘delivery’ is curiously insubstantial. Then we have the fact that delivery, in relation to speech, is not what one says, but how one says it. “He has good delivery” means he speaks well, not that the words are good, or that he composed them, or that they serve any serious purpose. You know, Jeremy Irons, Richard Burton: they had good delivery. They were voice men. All this makes the current political use of the word very odd. Especially when the new Prime Minister has such poor delivery.

Isn’t ‘delivery’ part of the smoke and mirrors of modern political language? It is as if by the word ‘delivery’ politicians are trying to substitute doing something intermediary (delivering an envelope while know nothing about the contents) for doing something original (like writing a letter).


To read the rest of this article, you need to donate at least £5/month or £50/year to the Daily Sceptic, then create an account on this website. The easiest way to create an account after you’ve made a donation is to click on the ‘Log In’ button on the main menu bar, click ‘Register’ underneath the sign-in box, then create an account, making sure you enter the same email address as the one you used when making a donation. Once you’re logged in, you can then read all our paywalled content, including this article. Being a donor will also entitle you to comment below the line, discuss articles with our contributors and editors in a members-only Discord forum and access the premium content in the Sceptic, our weekly podcast. A one-off donation of at least £5 will also entitle you to the same benefits for one month. You can donate here.

There are more details about how to create an account, and a number of things you can try if you’re already a donor – and have an account – but cannot access the above perks on our Premium page.

Tags: Conservative PartyDeliveryDemocracyLabour PartyLeft-wingMarxismPolitics

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

Why Are European Leaders So Averse to Diplomacy?

Next Post

Immigration Fuels Biggest Population Rise On Record

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

22 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
MizakeTheMizan
MizakeTheMizan
3 years ago

Evil.

Nothing more to add.

228
-1
Mike Durrans
Mike Durrans
3 years ago
Reply to  MizakeTheMizan

What moronic parent would let this happen

124
0
Alter Ego
Alter Ego
3 years ago
Reply to  Mike Durrans

I have an unpleasant suspicion that what we’re looking at is virtue-signalling by parents more interested in looking good (as they see it), than looking after their children.

At some point, large numbers of people lost interest in being good, and decided instead to create an impression of goodness by doing whatever current advertising suggested. This appears to have permeated all aspects of life.

Does having a “transgender” child make you look “progressive”? Look for “the signs” in your child and proclaim proudly that you are helping your child transition.

Does taking your child to be injected by one of those magical new “vaccines” show that you’re responsible? Line up and ignore all those weird people who say they’re dangerous.

127
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  Alter Ego

Free fall decline, dissolution and moral chaos ( see Rome 370-470)

33
0
Hester
Hester
3 years ago
Reply to  Alter Ego

For many now Children are just the equivalent of those little dogs you see put in outfits, and used as props for facebook and instagram etc, they are nothing more than accesories to the vanity of the parent

9
0
PatrickF
PatrickF
3 years ago
Reply to  Mike Durrans

The moronic parents I saw on my train this morning, with their masked children.

107
0
Corky Ringspot
Corky Ringspot
3 years ago
Reply to  PatrickF

It’s physically painful looking at them, isn’t it. The stress of stopping myself from saying something – arguing with them, shouting at them, swearing at them – grows by the day. Useful idiots.

16
0
chris-ds
chris-ds
3 years ago
Reply to  PatrickF

Clearly they all had covid and where doing everyone else a favour by minimising it’s spread as they talked together.

at least they aren’t hiding in their cave.

0
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  Mike Durrans

If Johnson and the Gates Who get their way, parents will soon have no say.

39
0
Think Harder
Think Harder
3 years ago
Reply to  Mike Durrans

A surprising number if the BBC says they should.

17
0
ComeTheRevolution
ComeTheRevolution
3 years ago
Reply to  MizakeTheMizan

Its pure evil and it is rife in OUR government. We have to do something about this. Our country is being run by the most despicable and criminal people. All institutions are contaminated but as Brendon O Connell says, there are also good people in the system. Cant Toby or someone with some clout start lobbying heads or higher ups in the media to start blowing the whistle properly and call his peers to account, ask them to admit they were wrong, but now this is carrying on like this, the people in the media can make up for some of their sins against themselves and their own families by disowning and calling out this evil in a big way.

Gene therapy clinical trials for six year olds for no valid reason is so ugly, even according to their own metrics there is zero rationale for injecting these kids.

Its also time for the Police and Military to do their job. They either serve a purpose which benefits the people of this country, or they are musclemen for a bunch of child raping occultist scumf&&ks. They need to decide which role they wish to play on this Earth, and they need to think about their own kids being injected with this crap. This is happening on their watch, its their job to intervene now, the British government has gone full NAZI on the children and people of this country, and those who are paid by the people need to do something about it.

110
0
loopDloop
loopDloop
3 years ago
Reply to  ComeTheRevolution

It’s way past any of that. This is demonic, pure and simple. The gates of hell have opened, and the devils are flooding into this dimension. We have gone beyond the point of no return.

59
0
B.F.Finlayson
B.F.Finlayson
3 years ago
Reply to  ComeTheRevolution

Cant Toby or someone with some clout start lobbying heads or higher ups in the media to start blowing the whistle properly and call his peers to account

Toby point blank refused to allow ‘Lockdown Sceptics’, as was, to oppose the government’s vaxx roll narrative out last year – especially as it began encroaching on the under 18s. In the light of growing opposition to this editorial fence sitting by some (but by no means the majority of) commenters BTL he published an editorial stating that LS would not oppose the vaxx roll out to under 18s. The slightly edited wording of this article became the renamed Daily Sceptic tag line:

‘Unlike with lockdowns, we are neither pro-vaccine nor anti-vaccine; we see our job as reporting the facts, not advocating for or against a particular policy.’

In the end, Toby’s loyalty to his chum Boris in particular and the Tory Party in general (especially given his position at The Spectator) seemingly prevailed over any sense of journalistic ethics. The damning facts on the vaxx roll out were out there, but LS chose to hide behind occasional and ambiguous stat & graph fests (dressed up as vaxx updates) and adherence to the MSM pro-government propaganda that actively demonised and discriminated against all those questioning vaxx safety.
Much the same as he is now doing with Ukraine, Toby is a sceptic only until it becomes inconvenient for his career and/or his social network.

51
-4
RW
RW
3 years ago
Reply to  B.F.Finlayson

He’s a member of some initiative sueing the government because of the vaccine-rollout to children.

12
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  B.F.Finlayson

nothing works anyt longer under an Emergency Rule dictatorship. Lord Sumption warned of the dangers of riding down and suspending the Rule of Law and Parliament and replacing them with diktats from the Health Tyranny.

Well here we are!

30
0
Draper233
Draper233
3 years ago
Reply to  ComeTheRevolution

“the British government has gone full NAZI on the children and people of this country”

Yep, and they’re helping their fellow Nazis in Ukraine as well

51
-1
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  ComeTheRevolution

Good people ij the system? Rare as Hens’ teeth!

10
0
Nymeria
Nymeria
3 years ago
Reply to  MizakeTheMizan

Seconded.

13
0
watersider
watersider
3 years ago
Reply to  MizakeTheMizan

Yes may I beat this old drum once more, and ask the site mods to PLUESE stop showing needles, especially child abuse ones.

2
0
JXB
JXB
3 years ago
Reply to  MizakeTheMizan

An evil done in the name of good is the most pernicious and carried out by the most wicked.

3
0
crisisgarden
crisisgarden
3 years ago

These people must be arrested.

90
0
TheGreenGoblin
TheGreenGoblin
3 years ago
Reply to  crisisgarden

Private criminal prosecutions are still possible in the UK. It could be done, with or without the police’s assistance.

42
0
Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
3 years ago
Reply to  TheGreenGoblin

Who would bring the prosecution? The child? Obviously not. The parent? Obviously not.

Buckle up for a repeat of PPI Compensation, only a million times bigger.

Last edited 3 years ago by Marcus Aurelius knew
30
0
TheGreenGoblin
TheGreenGoblin
3 years ago
Reply to  Marcus Aurelius knew

I had in mind some kind of misfeasance in public office charge for the leaders of the pack. Any citizen could proceed with such a prosecution.

17
0
Star
Star
3 years ago
Reply to  TheGreenGoblin

What sometimes happens is that the Director of Public Prosecutions takes over a private prosecution in order to stop it. You can read about it here

https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/private-prosecutions

Section 6(2) of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985:

6 Prosecutions instituted and conducted otherwise than by the Service.

(1) Subject to subsection (2) below, nothing in this Part shall preclude any person from instituting any criminal proceedings or conducting any criminal proceedings to which the Director’s duty to take over the conduct of proceedings does not apply.

(2) here criminal proceedings are instituted in circumstances in which the Director is not under a duty to take over their conduct, he may nevertheless do so at any stage.

11
0
TheGreenGoblin
TheGreenGoblin
3 years ago
Reply to  Star

They would have to show it was vexatious, I believe.

8
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  TheGreenGoblin

This ha already been presented with mountains of evidence by lawyers and Mark Sexton – an ex-Police Officer .

Met Police Hammersmith closed down the investigation and claims as ‘unfounded’ and warned off those involved.

13
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  TheGreenGoblin

Yes … but you need an independent Judiciary for this to succeed.

10
0
Sforzesca
Sforzesca
3 years ago
Reply to  crisisgarden

Forget it.
We are living in Clown World deliberately created by TRPTB.

23
0
Alter Ego
Alter Ego
3 years ago
Reply to  crisisgarden

The people likely to be arrested at the moment are those who would make any physical attempt to protect children by preventing the injections from taking place. Anyone doing this would not only be treated as a criminal, but as someone “mentally disturbed”.

32
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  Alter Ego

We are through the looking glass – back in Occupied Europe ,1941.

14
0
Nymeria
Nymeria
3 years ago
Reply to  crisisgarden

And yet they won’t be.

6
0
RW
RW
3 years ago
Reply to  crisisgarden

Yep. Especially as they’re obviously just reading out boilerplate statements provided by somebody else (wording is always identical so far).

7
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  crisisgarden

Away you go then! Take some ‘Common Law Constables’ from the Guardians300 with you, they know their stuff.
Start at Neil Ferguson’s house?

The truth is, no-one is going to ‘get arrested’. It’s like saying Tony Blair will be going to prison… howling at The Moon.

11
-9
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  Emerald Fox

Six downticks from those who find reality a hard concept. In their fantasy land Tony Blair will be going to meet the Devil….

0
-1
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  crisisgarden

By whom?

“Nothing to see here. move on” is the onlly answer you will get.

5
0
Richard Austin
Richard Austin
3 years ago

Sick, sick, sick. None of the not a vaccines have actually passed full testing. Where is the Emergency in children? I think we know what the Emergency will actually be when they grow up with heart defects. Any “parent” who subjects themselves to these things is a complete moron but any parent who subjects their child to them? How do you describe them?

87
0
TheGreenGoblin
TheGreenGoblin
3 years ago
Reply to  Richard Austin

If you stick to the mainstream media then why should you be aware of any problem? It’s a vaccine for a dangerous disease, it’s safe and effective, what’s not to like?

36
-2
Mike Durrans
Mike Durrans
3 years ago
Reply to  TheGreenGoblin

It is neither safe nor effective.

33
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  Mike Durrans

They have actually admitted as much but Gates has said multiple “vaccines” will help reduce world population by 15% ..so there we are!

15
0
B.F.Finlayson
B.F.Finlayson
3 years ago
Reply to  TheGreenGoblin

If you stick to the mainstream media

Even if you were reading Lockdown Sceptics this time last year you would find an editorial team in denial of the damage already being done by experimental gene therapy. Nevertheless despite inaction ATL, many excellent commenters BTL provided much needed links to key websites that were reporting FACTS about the even then damning VAERs and MHRA figures. Add to this unwavering websites such as UK Column (which commendably made the MHRA weekly adverse reaction statistics both understandable and able to be cross referenced) that millions of people began to see through the government/MSM propaganda.
At this point its arguably too late for most, the key decisions were made and the lifelong damage was done. And now the WHO and respective national governments’ sights are set on mopping up the under 11s right down to Biden’s promise to jab all newborns while people are distracted.

23
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  TheGreenGoblin

The Sheep are really the ones responsible for where we are. .

19
0
Star
Star
3 years ago
Reply to  Richard Austin

How to describe them? They are utterly lazy swine who are too busy picking their mobile phones to form an opinion for themselves about what’s been happening since 2020 and in particular to notice what the rulers have done and will do to their children.

41
0
B.F.Finlayson
B.F.Finlayson
3 years ago
Reply to  Star

They are utterly lazy swine…

But that still doesn’t excuse their complicit ‘rulers’, their compliant family and friends, their political representatives, their pay per jab nurses and doctors, their children’s teachers (and these teacher’s trades unions), their bosses at work threatening jobs, their taxpayer funded impartial media for providing a disingenuous daily diarrhoea of WEF/WHO propaganda etc, etc.

20
0
Alter Ego
Alter Ego
3 years ago
Reply to  Richard Austin

How do you describe them?

If there were only a few of them, it would be relatively easy. But millions of parents are doing this. There’s no mass movement against it, as much as it horrifies the people who visit and post here.

This eagerness to inject children with an experimental concoction, apparently in order to prevent them from getting a disease which is extremely unlikely to cause them any serious illness, is the surest sign (to me) that something is very wrong in our societies.

Perhaps that’s what the “Covid” crisis has done in all sorts of ways. It’s exposed terrible weaknesses in our entire social structure: our governments, our media, our health and education systems, our sense of personal moral responsibility and of community.

51
0
Banjones
Banjones
3 years ago
Reply to  Alter Ego

It’s a hard thing to be a grandparent who can see what’s going on, yet are powerless to stop their own children doing this to the little ones. To have to stand by and see this appalling abuse of their grandchildren is beyond painful.

8
0
Annie
Annie
3 years ago
Reply to  Richard Austin

Ripe for infanticide?

16
-1
Banjones
Banjones
3 years ago
Reply to  Richard Austin

How? By the word ”unbalanced”, literally. It strikes me that anyone in thrall to the ”covid” narrative is triggered by any criticism of jabs, and get angry at the suggestion that they just might not be a good thing. Just as if they’ve been subliminally brainwashed.
As GG below says, those who only listen to what the BBC tells them won’t look into it any further.

5
0
Fraser Nelsons Underpants
Fraser Nelsons Underpants
3 years ago

Public health institutions have lost all credibility. I won’t ever trust them again. The damage will last decades and perhaps never be repaired.

100
0
TheGreenGoblin
TheGreenGoblin
3 years ago
Reply to  Fraser Nelsons Underpants

No restoration is possible without some kind of mea culpa.

Settle in and make yourself comfortable. Looks like we have a few years to wait.

31
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  TheGreenGoblin

Nobody knows what mea culpa means without having to look it up on Google.

1
-22
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  Fraser Nelsons Underpants

What are you going to do if you fall ill, or fall over and break your hip?
Ask the NHS to help, ask a private quack/fraud to help, ask no-one and have a go at fixing it yourself with some pine needle tea and zinc supplements?

0
-25
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  Fraser Nelsons Underpants

Health Care has it seems been withdrawn from a significant percentage of the population. – the Social and Health ‘contract’ and the ‘duty of care’ promise of Government and our Institutions has been broken by the willing servants of the Globalist Elites as they begin to assert quasi feudal powers over the peasantry.

Beware their “Bill of Rights” which in this contrary Wonderland of immorality means we will have none that cannot be just over-ridden at their whim!

Over-riding the Nuremberg Code and the sacred principle of Bodily Autonomy is one of the key targets of the Gates ‘owned’ WHO with its new ‘treaty’! It is an Open Secret that Gates wants to force “vaccinate” the world!

18
0
myrtle
myrtle
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

The Joint Committee on Human Rights has just criticised the draft Bill (for its erosion of our human rights) and the government now has two months to respond. A glimmer of hope in dystopia maybe?

8
0
Banjones
Banjones
3 years ago
Reply to  myrtle

Perhaps it’s just another ploy. Hopeful people, like fearful ones, are easier to control. It’s the cynical ones who cause the problems.

3
0
Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
3 years ago

Natural Selection at work, people.

If the parents allow this, what more is there to say? A parent who delegates their due diligence and duty of care for their children to the authorities deserves everything their child gets.

A sad, sad day for those children.

Last edited 3 years ago by Marcus Aurelius knew
66
0
TheGreenGoblin
TheGreenGoblin
3 years ago
Reply to  Marcus Aurelius knew

I doubt there are any on the forum who have not taken prescribed medicine without question. Now I’m wondering, what was really in those antibiotic pills I swallowed?

I’m not sure we can be too harsh on the parents.

12
-15
Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
3 years ago
Reply to  TheGreenGoblin

A parent without scepticism for the sake of their child is missing a few brain cells.

This isn’t stuff that’s been around for decades. It hasn’t been tested, anyone should see this. Even a modicum of doubt should be enough to think, “I’ll pass on this one, for now, for my child, thanks.”

Last edited 3 years ago by Marcus Aurelius knew
55
0
crisisgarden
crisisgarden
3 years ago
Reply to  Marcus Aurelius knew

To be fair I think many, many parents will think exactly this; nowhere near enough, but if you were the kind of person that paid no attention whatsoever to how the world works you could easily come to the conclusion that these things were safe. Around me, the vaccine injuries continue to mount. As well as a life threatening blood clot in an otherwise young and healthy female family member, another acquaintance blacked out and fell down some steps last weekend. It’s starting to look to me anecdotally like most people have had a serious adverse reaction.

28
0
Alter Ego
Alter Ego
3 years ago
Reply to  crisisgarden

if you were the kind of person that paid no attention whatsoever to how the world works you could easily come to the conclusion that these things were safe.

I think that’s the problem in a nutshell: people who are not paying attention to the way the world works. For whatever reasons, they don’t think about that at all.

When I point out to people that the manufacturers insisted on full indemnity for any injuries resulting from their product (a deal-breaker, you would think), they look at me as if to say, “So what?”

23
0
Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
3 years ago
Reply to  Alter Ego

Perhaps they can’t admit they don’t understand “full indemnity’?

15
0
Alter Ego
Alter Ego
3 years ago
Reply to  Marcus Aurelius knew

Don’t know whether to laugh or cry – gave an uptick instead.

8
0
Banjones
Banjones
3 years ago
Reply to  Marcus Aurelius knew

Yes – AND it’s actually something physical being done to their child, something that they KNOW is new and untried. They wouldn’t let their kiddies take sweeties from a stranger, even in their presence – why on earth would they allow THIS?

5
0
John Dee
John Dee
3 years ago
Reply to  TheGreenGoblin

I was personally convinced that I’d be lining up along with others when the vaxxes arrived, since at that time I still believed that the health authorities were more or less interested in our health.
Then, I learned that, while the shots were touted as ‘safe and effective’, the vax makers all insisted on full immunity against damages, and it all went downhill from there. The more I learned, the more I appreciated that early scepticism.
At this juncture, I’d never, while still ambulatory, let any of these medical monsters anywhere near me if brandishing a needle.
They can stick even their flu jabs where the UV rays don’t reach.

94
-1
Nymeria
Nymeria
3 years ago
Reply to  John Dee

I was personally convinced that I’d be lining up along with others when the vaxxes arrived, since at that time I still believed that the health authorities were more or less interested in our health.

So was I, John. I kept thinking “hurry up and get a vaccine sorted so that we can quickly resume normality.” It quickly became apparent that returning to normal was, and is not, the plan. It’s painful but necessary to know that our best interests are not at heart.

44
0
Banjones
Banjones
3 years ago
Reply to  Nymeria

I agree. At the beginning of the ”roll out” I thought I’d wait and see (hoping a more conventional type of jab would come along). I thought I’d be a jabbee eventually. As time went by it was obvious this was NOT going to happen – neither my taking it nor a better option. And the confirmation that SARS CoV2 really WAS of no danger to most of us.
When Dr Barody in Australia spoke of his excellent research into Ivermectin (in August of 2020, I think) and how his government showed no interest, I remember feeling a mixture of optimism and doubt. After that, the darkness grew.

6
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  Banjones

I wonder how many people come back to yesterday’s articles to sail all the way through to see if there have been any additions.

0
-2
crisisgarden
crisisgarden
3 years ago
Reply to  John Dee

😂 Quite.

12
0
crisisgarden
crisisgarden
3 years ago
Reply to  John Dee

I was personally convinced, before they even started pretending to invent them, that I would at some point be in hiding with my family to avoid them. Things haven’t quite got to that point, thankfully! Yet!

30
0
simonov
simonov
3 years ago
Reply to  TheGreenGoblin

You take prescribed medicine to address an illness of mild or greater severity.

WTF are children taking this vaccine? What are they supposed to be protecting against? Even if the vaccine was safe and effective (which is doubtful, but that’s another story), there is no reason to give it to children.

37
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  simonov

Astonishingly we now live in a country where these most basic of questions are regarded as “inappropriate” by our entire Ruling Elite all our Institutions and our Media.

What is really shocking is the total disregard for the health and welfare of the children to be inflicted with an untried product that provides no benefit or protection for them from anything whatsoever!

This cynical disregard for the lives and health of children is outside our experience.of the last 130 years.It seems all our most basic moral values have simply been trashed.

So, why? What is this product really for?

18
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  TheGreenGoblin

Antibootics contain nanobooties. A team of scientists in some far flung place discovered.

1
-17
Annie
Annie
3 years ago
Reply to  Marcus Aurelius knew

The beastly parents may deserve an evil outcome. Not the children. Unless you believe in a God who literally does visit the sins of the fathers upon the children.

12
0
RW
RW
3 years ago
Reply to  Annie

I share this sentiment, except for one bit: The beats are those who market useless medications with possibly lethal side effects, ie, the MHRA and the shady entities behind it.

10
0
DanClarke
DanClarke
3 years ago

As the MAJORITY in this age group would be VERY UNLIKELY to fall ill from ‘covert’, why, I understand they want to program the children for their Covert Passports from a young age, but having to be jabbed with some unnecessary substance is sinister

36
0
PhantomOfLiberty
PhantomOfLiberty
3 years ago

Yes, well spotted Will Jones, they are making a claim of net benefit – in itself dubious – because the products are neither effective or safe. This was another goalpost moved by the WHO with their malaria vaccine early in 2020.

https://www.bmj.com/content/368/bmj.m734/rr-1

I don’t personally believe that the benefits were always so overwhelming with vaccine products in the past but they are disgustingly lowering the threshold. So, if a product kills 9 for every 10 it saves it would – on this basis – be a success.

In that case you should find some other way of intervening if there is any necessity at all: we are light years away from first do no harm.

Last edited 3 years ago by PhantomOfLiberty
31
0
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
3 years ago
Reply to  PhantomOfLiberty

if it saves 40, 80 year olds yet kills 1 10 year old it’s a massive QALY failure.

13
0
Nicholas Britton
Nicholas Britton
3 years ago

We should remember that for the MNHRA “safe and effective” means big pharma is “safe” from liability and the jabs are “effective” at generating massive profits for them

52
0
John Dee
John Dee
3 years ago

They’ve obviously decided that the Great Reset won’t apply to them.
It’s hard to believe that any research showed the ‘benefit risk balance’ as positive, given the tiny risk from Wu-flu to 99.9% of children.
Keep those tumbrel axles greased…

17
0
No-one important
No-one important
3 years ago

This is child abuse, pure and simple.

Any parent who subjects their child to this procedure without investigating the possible adverse reactions should hang their heads in shame.

43
0
Lockdown Sceptic
Lockdown Sceptic
3 years ago

The Gates funded MHRA Approves the Gates owned Moderna Covid Vaccine 
What angers me is so many in the “freedom movement” are acting as if it’s all over.

26
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  Lockdown Sceptic

Whille the Gates funded WHO nods in approval!

7
0
John001
John001
3 years ago

It seems that Valneva has only been approved in people aged 18-50. Why … do they want to give children, the early retired and pensioners GM jabs which raise all-cause mortality?

The raised mortality comment is based on the Pfizer trial. I’m unaware whether the AZ raised or reduced total deaths.

18
0
Steve-Devon
Steve-Devon
3 years ago
Reply to  John001

I am on the Valneva trial and I think the approval age range represents the general age of the people on the trial. I am 68 and I was by far and away the oldest trial participant that I saw, they were very pleased to have someone as old as me on the trial but I am guessing there were not enough of us to push the approval age above 50?
If it is of any interest I have had 2 injections of Valneva with no side effects, no adverse reactions and so far, no covid. No vaccines are ‘safe’ but to date with me, Valneva is looking OK.

10
-14
Nymeria
Nymeria
3 years ago
Reply to  Steve-Devon

I don’t care how ok it is. The government wants me to take a jab which is all the reason I need not to. I won’t compromise on my principles for the sake of a holiday. I’ve had all the childhood vaccinations and so have my kids; this one, Valneva, or any of the other snake oil they’re trying to push on us, is out of the question though.

40
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  Steve-Devon

But aren’t you worried about getting your veins and arteries slashed to ribbons by the graphene tubules, and the sharp corners of the nanobots?

2
-14
John001
John001
3 years ago
Reply to  Emerald Fox

It might depend whether Valneva is collaborating with Pfizer, Moderna, J&J and AZ on the ‘bad batches’

Besides, I’ve had the ultra-mild cold that is ‘BA2’, so I clearly don’t need a ‘safe’ vaccine. Valneva seems a bit late to the party, even if it is less dangerous.

7
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  Steve-Devon

Placebo?

9
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  John001

What was that?…..’raise all-cause mortality”? Ah……!

6
0
Free Lemming
Free Lemming
3 years ago

Sadly most people still buy into the narrative. Wife works at GP surgery and says that most people are still champing at the bit to have different types of this muck injected into them. You’ve got to give it to government and MSM, they’ve done an absolute number on the majority of the population. At least now though we know who our friends and family really are. A rude awakening.

67
0
TheGreenGoblin
TheGreenGoblin
3 years ago
Reply to  Free Lemming

I’m not quite ready to ditch friends and family because of their healthcare decisions, As long as they don’t force anything on me.

20
-3
zners
zners
3 years ago
Reply to  TheGreenGoblin

Tough one. I personally see them as enablers of the intent government has. If I didnt have kids of my own I’d be fine remaining friends. But these people are potentially ruining my children’s future with their ignorance. The more people refuseto go along, the better their chances of a less dystopia future.

Last edited 3 years ago by zners
30
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  TheGreenGoblin

“Healthcare”! If only1

6
0
No-one important
No-one important
3 years ago
Reply to  Free Lemming

I have quite an extended – and very close until recently – family. It is just myself and a brother-in-law, previously dismissed as a bit of a funniosity, who have declined the offer of the “vaccine” in all its hellish incarnations. The rest, many of whom I would have thought to be analytical, healthily sceptical people of common sense, have been totally convinced by the government, Sage, and various other bought-and-paid-for “scientists” about the deadliness of the Covid/cold virus.

It’s a lonely place to be sometimes.

Last edited 3 years ago by No-one important
53
0
loopDloop
loopDloop
3 years ago
Reply to  No-one important

Better to be lonely that in league with pure evil.

31
0
JayBee
JayBee
3 years ago

https://bit.ly/3vaoP0U
Pfizer&co: Enemies of the people.

16
0
Sforzesca
Sforzesca
3 years ago

Hitler Youth incarnate.
Catch them young.
I hope they all swing.
And in Hell.

25
-1
bfbf334
bfbf334
3 years ago

Pure (murderous) EVIL

26
0
Alan M
Alan M
3 years ago

Sadly though, if it becomes a requirement for the kids to be vaccinated to go on next winter’s skiing holiday, people will do it.

24
0
oblong
oblong
3 years ago
Reply to  Alan M

Friends got their son jabbed for skiing holiday and he stayed night in hospital with heart palpitations.

29
0
Nymeria
Nymeria
3 years ago
Reply to  oblong

I have a friend whose daughter got jabbed for a holiday. 1st jab, ended up in hospital, still having heart palpitations and awaiting a further consultation with a ‘specialist’.

24
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  Nymeria

Myocarditis in the young as a consequence of the Pfizer injections is well documented …but of course simply ignored.( as of course are the deaths it has caused).

12
0
Nymeria
Nymeria
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

Her father (one of us) was furious. He’d tried to dissuade her, but the promise of a holiday won out.

4
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  oblong

And he died? Or did he get to go ski-ing?

1
-19
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  Emerald Fox

15 downticks from people who know he went ski-ing after all. They wave their walking sticks at the telly-vision and hate it whilst they are stuck at home whilst others get the jabs and get on with enjoying themselves and not dying from the Bill Gates’ Depopulation ‘Gene Therapy’.

0
-4
PaulMac66
PaulMac66
3 years ago

‘The U.K. medicines regulator, the MHRA, has approved the Moderna Covid vaccine for six to 11 year olds, describing it as “safe and effective”‘

’safe and effective’ for what?

32
0
The old bat
The old bat
3 years ago

How many parents deliberately turn a blind eye to any misgivings they might have, because going abroad for two weeks in the sun with the family is more important?
I know someone over 80 who recently had a 4th jab. She was saying how swollen her arm was and how poorly she felt, WITH PRIDE! Aargh….

35
0
JaneDoeNL
JaneDoeNL
3 years ago
Reply to  The old bat

This reminds me of comments I was reading in the DM approximately a year ago, when the first lot of jabs were going on (back when people thought they’d be done after 2). There were lots of comments, all apparently trying to outdo each other with comments of how poorly they felt after the jab, how long they felt poorly – some even said they had ended up in hospital for several days – all of them proud of their suffering and saying it was worth feeling dreadfully ill and even ending up in hospital – because otherwise they might get the lurgi and feel dreadfully ill and end up in hospital…

It was liking reading a Monty Python skit

50
0
chris-ds
chris-ds
3 years ago

that’s abuse on the scale of letting known attackers like Saville having keys to children homes and hospitals and also letting catholic priests/nuns etc abuse those they should have been protecting the most.

why is the state sanctioning this muck?

why is a conservative government who stopped last xmas’s lockdown permitting this to happen?

24
0
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago
Reply to  chris-ds

Boris was going to go ahead with Plan B but the back benchers stopped him.

12
0
Draper233
Draper233
3 years ago
Reply to  Ron Smith

The fat war criminal also wanted to “have a conversation” on mandatory vaccinations

15
0
John001
John001
3 years ago
Reply to  Draper233

Because, as Sir Humphrey said in ‘Yes Minister’, that signals that the policy has already been decided.

11
0
CovidiotAntiMasker
CovidiotAntiMasker
3 years ago
Reply to  Draper233

He gets everything wrong.

3
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  chris-ds

What “Conservative Government?

9
0
Freecumbria
Freecumbria
3 years ago

Not a coincidence is it that MHRA rearranged is HARM?

34
0
DanClarke
DanClarke
3 years ago

The million dollar question, WHY?

22
0
Francis64
Francis64
3 years ago
Reply to  DanClarke

We would all love to know the answer to that question.

10
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  Francis64

Ask Mr Gates, he has all the answers!

9
0
PatrickF
PatrickF
3 years ago

Hello chicken. Would you like to come round for dinner?
You’re not going to eat me, are you?
Of course not! I’m a fox and a fox never lies.

17
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  PatrickF

Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner.

7
-3
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago

Now they want to introduce Biometric face recognition checks in Schools:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7EWXEG7hkVU&t=1s

8
0
Annie
Annie
3 years ago

Nice to know that shoving a full-sized muzzle on to a child’s face, with yawning gaps all round the edges, will keep the adults saaaaaaafe.

19
-1
twinkytwonk
twinkytwonk
3 years ago

What the hell are these people on? We have the highest inflation for 30 years, fuel bills are through the roof and we have arsehole politicians and the MSM trying to push us into world war 3. Meanwhile these clowns are passing regulations for vaccines ( that pregnable work as well as the last lot) that is for a virus that has been and gone.

27
0
DanClarke
DanClarke
3 years ago
Reply to  twinkytwonk

For Experimental vaccines

9
0
RW
RW
3 years ago

A feature of the inactivated Polio vaccine is reportedly, that the viruses may reactivate themselves and then cause Polio cases in people who aren’t vaccinated. That is, incomplete Polio vaccination campaigns literally end up spreading Polio. Reportedly, 2017 was the first year when the Polio vaccination campaign caused more cases of Polio than the virus itself.

Will this also be a feature of the Valneva vaccine?

Source: Wikipedia article on Polio, last section of the Vaccine paragraph. The frequency is given as about one case in 750,000, hence, there’s no realistic chance of catching this during a COVID vaccine trial.

8
-1
Stephanos
Stephanos
3 years ago

At our prayer group the other night I mentioned the demo that will be taking place in London on April 30. The difficulty I ventilated was ‘what are we protesting against?’. One member said ‘child stabbing’ and I think this suggestion was prescient.
That must be our one focus at the forthcoming demo.

24
-1
Michaelangelo
Michaelangelo
3 years ago

‘Safe and effective’, has been the mantra for vaccines as long as I can remember, but has anyone ever defined what it actually means?
A general phrase which suggests completely safe and totally effective but could just mean that it doesn’t immediately kill you and does do something effectively but that could be something insignificant.
The phrase is completely meaningless if it is not defined but it is used continuously without any comeback. Handy!

23
0
RW
RW
3 years ago
Reply to  Michaelangelo

It’s not supposed to mean anything, it’s a nudge. People are supposed to remember the phrase whenever the topic comes up.

17
0
Ron Smith
Ron Smith
3 years ago
Reply to  RW

Repeat a lie enough times….

11
0
RW
RW
3 years ago
Reply to  Ron Smith

This is literally mind programming. It doesn’t matter if the statement is actually true or false. It’s sufficient that the brain is taught to associated COVID vaccines with this phrase. Afterwards, when the trigger is present, Safe and effective will come up as a memory. In theory, at least. I first noticed this effect when my father presented election statements of his preferred party displayed on posters all over town as his own ideas about the mentioned topics, apparently completely unaware of the real source.

10
0
Nymeria
Nymeria
3 years ago
Reply to  RW

That’s similar to what my soon-to-be-ex-mother-in-law does. She reads stuff in the newspapers and then presents what she has read as her own views and ideas. As an aside, if we hadn’t already stopped speaking three years prior to this shit show, we most certainly wouldn’t be on speaking terms now. It almost makes me giggle to think about all of the disagreements we’d have had over masking and vaxxing.

Last edited 3 years ago by Nymeria
15
0
Michaelangelo
Michaelangelo
3 years ago
Reply to  RW

We need a reverse spell, like ‘risky and unnecessary’ maybe.

7
0
Banjones
Banjones
3 years ago
Reply to  Michaelangelo

Risky and irrelevant.

3
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  Banjones

Clotty and Clouty.

0
0
Michaelangelo
Michaelangelo
3 years ago
Reply to  Ron Smith

And the bigger the lie . . .

2
0
Banjones
Banjones
3 years ago
Reply to  Michaelangelo

No doubt there is a stock of these patronising phrases still in their closet. Think of all the ‘S’ words that came about at the beginning of this madness: safe, shielding, social distancing, self isolation, super spreader, surging, spike, space, etc.

2
0
loopDloop
loopDloop
3 years ago

We’re now in pure Satanic territory. On the eve of Good Friday, 2022, this is the rising of unparalleled evil. The children. What did Christ say, it would be better to hang a millstone around their neck and thrown into the sea. All of them will pay the price, be certain of that. The darkness is here, now. All around. They have all lost their minds. The demons are swarming. Pray, read your bible, and resist.

21
0
Alter Ego
Alter Ego
3 years ago
Reply to  loopDloop

Over the last two years, crimes have been committed against the vast majority of humanity – on a breathtaking scale.

But what has been done to children is unspeakable. What are we if we don’t defend them? What are we if we allow people to use them as experimental creatures from which to profit?

However difficult it seems to bring those responsible to a reckoning, it has to be done.

20
0
Banjones
Banjones
3 years ago
Reply to  loopDloop

Take a look at the Book of Job, chapter 34, verses 16-33. Let’s hope it comes to pass.

3
0
J4mes
J4mes
3 years ago

I see there’s a new kid on the block called the Zika virus which attacks pregnant women and their unborn baby.

What’s the betting these “platinum standard” fake vaccines will also provide immunity to this?

15
0
Annie
Annie
3 years ago
Reply to  J4mes

Zika has been around for ages.

8
0
J4mes
J4mes
3 years ago
Reply to  Annie

It has, but it wasn’t previously weaponised until now.

BBC has been running scare stories about the chance of it becoming the ‘next big thing’ for the last week or so, and now, unsurprisingly, Sky News is scaremongering about it too.

6
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago

Hang on… I thought people were saying it’s all over, the wheels of the bus were falling off, and the house of cards collapsing.

Everyone knew the 5-11 year olds were next in line to be ‘vaccinated against Covid’. And, guess what, Boris is still the Prime Minister. Well, obviously, we mustn’t get rid of him because we could get someone worse….

All we need now is another pointless on-line petition so we can do the virtue-signalling by telling everyone we’ve signed it and “done our bit”!

The Covid Show must go on! There’s oodles of money to be made still.

I went to a shopping centre here in Helsinki today…. you’d have loved it. 95% face masks. A world gone mad.

14
-10
Hopeless - "TN,BN"
Hopeless - "TN,BN"
3 years ago

It’s cocktail time again. Have a Moderna Blood Curdler, or perhaps a Valneva Violation.

17
0
Draper233
Draper233
3 years ago
Reply to  Hopeless - "TN,BN"

I’m not so sure Moderna’s marketing team aren’t actually trying to warn people against it – “Spikevax” ffs! It even sounds lethal.

14
0
Draper233
Draper233
3 years ago

June Raine….what can I say?

A monstrous reptile of a woman.

I really, really hope she doesn’t face a long, agonizing death…

17
0
Banjones
Banjones
3 years ago
Reply to  Draper233

Does she have children of her own? Will they be jabbed? Puh.

2
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago

Frightening News – so the evil continues.

10
0
Freddy Boy
Freddy Boy
3 years ago

Absolute Chunts !!… Mengele would be proud !!

9
0
Phil Shannon
Phil Shannon
3 years ago

Well, here in Australia, we are ahead of the pack on vaxx mania (as we have been on so many things Covid) and our wise regulator (the TGA) had already given the tick of approval for “two primary doses” of the magic goo for kids aged 5 to 15 years (“including those who may have previously had COVID-19” – just so the now-naturally-immune don’t feel left out!).

But TGA approval for two original jabs is sooo last month! Adolescents aged 12-15 years are now on the conveyor belt for a Pfizer booster (to make sure they are well and truly Pfucked) even though “current data suggest that COVID-related serious illness is very rare in adolescents aged 12-15” (so why do it, then?).

The lucky young teens, however, have been given a stay of vaxx-execution by the expert advisory group, ATAGI, which stumbled over some remaining shred of scientific integrity and said, against the Australian government’s desire, that that is not on and the booster plan is now in limbo (except for the “severely immuno-compromised” who will get the full three-course menu of triple-jabbing with a goo which further harms what immune system they have).

ATAGI’s decision will not sit well with the sponsors of Australia’s ‘independent’ regulator which receives all its funding on a user-pays basis and there is no prize for guessing which industry is the biggest user of Australia’s pharmaceutical regulatory services. Whatever happened to conflict of interest!

14
0
Banjones
Banjones
3 years ago
Reply to  Phil Shannon

It was from your own Dr Thomas Barody that I heard of Ivermectin (in August 2020), and how his research showed that its use against ‘covid’ was very effective. The government didn’t reply to his communication at the time. I wonder how they subsequently silenced him? Or is he still trying to be heard?

3
0
Susan
Susan
3 years ago

Jonestown on a global scale. Sick, sick, sick!

7
0
imp66
imp66
3 years ago

How can anyone trust anything June Raine says?

13
0
TheEngineer
TheEngineer
3 years ago

MHRA are dangerous idiots at best as are most other organisations related to government.

4
0
SAGE LIARS
SAGE LIARS
3 years ago

June Raine an utterly useless, EVIL, corrupt piece of sh*t!!

10
0
Banjones
Banjones
3 years ago
Reply to  SAGE LIARS

But doubtless a wealthy one.

4
0
DevonBlueBoy
DevonBlueBoy
3 years ago

Repeat after me, they are not vaccines, they are prophylactics with a dubious record of both efficacy and safety. A bit like a Durex with a hole in it. (Other brands of condoms are available).

5
0
philipat
philipat
3 years ago
Reply to  DevonBlueBoy

Valneva is a vaccine, at least by its mode of action. Whether it lives up to the original definition of a vaccine in terms of prevention from infection and transmission or not, still remains to be seen. As does its saftey profile.

Last edited 3 years ago by philipat
2
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  DevonBlueBoy

The thing is, 55 million people are not listening to you.

0
-1
rtj1211
rtj1211
3 years ago

What I’m waiting for are vaccines developed against non-spike proteins. It would tell me that the biotech industry wanted to save lives not get paid billions for killing people.

I’m not holding my breath, you understand.

0
0
AethelredTheReadier
AethelredTheReadier
3 years ago

‘Spikevax’ – what a charmingly named poison. What could possibly go wrong? Totally evil.

3
0
flyingjohn
flyingjohn
3 years ago

Child abuse. Why aren’t there prosecutions?

3
0
philipat
philipat
3 years ago
Reply to  flyingjohn

You will have noticed that Governments are keen to “move on because the “vaccines” have been so successful”. The real reason, of course, is that want to move on before more people start to understand the available data which shows that the “vaccines” have beena ccomplete failure and have only done harm. WIth that realisation could potentially come calls for accountability – so “better” to “move on”….

2
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  flyingjohn

There are prosecutions – Boris & Rishi got fined £50 for breaking lockdown rules. What more do you expect?

0
-2
bowlsman
bowlsman
3 years ago

This and will remain child abuse.

2
0
philipat
philipat
3 years ago

Just a personal opinion but no way would I give an experimental gene therapy to my 6 yo – and that applies even more so to Moderna.

Regarding Valneva, I agree that potentially it could be a safer option but I still have several questions as follows:

  1. They say that the vaccine is made from an attenuated live virus. Yet, so far as I am aware, the SARS-CoV-2 virus nowhere in the world has been isolated and purified. So where did Valneva obtain its “live virus”?
  2. In the very early material available on Valneva, there was talk of in some way “accentuating” the spike content. Since then, that has all gone very quiet. Is it the case that the spike content was :”accentuated” or not?

Given the lack of any usage in a real clinical setting, the very limited amount of trial data submitted and the performance of the “Regulators” over the Covid episode, I think the burden of proof is on Valneva regarding safety and I still don’t think it wise to rush into taking either it or Novavax on the largely unsubstantiated promise of (even short-term) safety.

Last edited 3 years ago by philipat
4
0
philipat
philipat
3 years ago
Reply to  philipat

Of course, all of the above is academic only. The real question is why, for a “disease” with a survival rate of 99,7% (or 99.95% for those below age 70) ANY vaccine is required for other than those over age 70?

In terms of conventional medical ethics, the risks far exceed any beenefits, as is quite clear from the HSA data for infection, hospitalisation and death by the avrious vaccinted and unvaccinated groups (/100K). These Covid gene therapies have killed more people that all previous vaccines ever used combined.

5
0
Banjones
Banjones
3 years ago
Reply to  philipat

And not even for those over 70, if they are fit and reasonably well. If this poison is somehow ”okay” for people over 70, or 80, then it will give carte blanche to those who want to be rid of the ”dead wood” as soon as possible.

The only sensible words Wittery spoke were in May of 2020, when he said that ”covid” was ”harmless to the VAST MAJORITY of people” and that included the elderly.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adj8MCsZKlg

5
0
Judy Watson
Judy Watson
3 years ago
Reply to  philipat

I think you mean attenuated

1
0
philipat
philipat
3 years ago
Reply to  Judy Watson

If you mean me, that’s exactly what I said – attenuated when I referred to the claimed Valneva “Live attenuated virus” vaccine. Later I also referred to something entirely different which was an earlier claim in published reports that Valneva had “accentuated” the spike content in the vaccine. Two entirely different issues..
So I’m not entirely sure what what you mean? Kindly elucidate.

Last edited 3 years ago by philipat
0
0
Banjones
Banjones
3 years ago

June Raine said ”I am pleased to confirm….” I bet she is. Shouldn’t we hear more about conflicts of interest and other questionable things?

7
0
Hester
Hester
3 years ago

June Raine, everyone remember that name she is the person who has signed the death and injury warrant for possibly millions of children, for a virus that they are at no risk from.
One can only hope that she is given the appropriate sentence for a mass murderer when the trial happens

8
0
RTSC
RTSC
3 years ago

Orwellian language. “Safe and Effective” now means “Unsafe and Ineffective.”
And that’s before we get to the FACT that children do not need to be protected from Covid.

7
0
JohnnyDollar
JohnnyDollar
3 years ago

Sinister & Evil . Prison . Prison . Prison .

5
0
decuman
decuman
3 years ago

Poor kids getting the ‘snake venom’

2
0
mishmash
mishmash
3 years ago

Safe and effective.

StudentAthletesVaccine.png
2
0
ozdocabroad
ozdocabroad
3 years ago
Reply to  mishmash

I’m surprised they got away with that

0
0
Epi
Epi
3 years ago

June Raine needs locking up she’s a menace.

3
0
barrywinn
barrywinn
3 years ago

This just goes to show that those that comply have not bothered to do their own research. Is this all an intelligence test?

1
0
wantok87
wantok87
3 years ago

The minimal trials excluded those with previous infection- 85% of children have antibodies hence and parent who lets their child have a vaccine is experimenting on them. This bunch of experts need holding personally to account when the vaccination data is eventually exposed.

2
0
Newman20
Newman20
3 years ago

These scientists are criminal and would not have felt out of place in the Third Reich.

I hope they receive the severest punishment available for their child abuse.

2
0
Grumman
Grumman
3 years ago

So Valneva is approved only for 18 to 50 year olds, yet Pfizer states on it for 16 years and over, yet is allowed for children. Yet more evidence that Pfizer control the show. What an odious little oaf Javid is remember him stating Valneva broke their contract and would never get approval? It’s not a Johnson government it’s a Pfizer government. Treason.

4
0
ozdocabroad
ozdocabroad
3 years ago

Totally and completely unethical. I am ashamed to be a member of this profession.

0
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

In Episode 35 of the Sceptic: Andrew Doyle on Labour’s Grooming Gang Shame, Andrew Orlowski on the India-UK Trade Deal and Canada’s Ignored Covid Vaccine Injuries

by Richard Eldred
9 May 2025
1

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest

BBC Quietly Edits Question Time After Wrongly ‘Correcting’ Richard Tice on Key Net Zero Claim

9 May 2025

Electric Car Bursts into Flames on Driveway and Engulfs £550,000 Family Home

9 May 2025

“I Was a Super Fit Cyclist Until I Had the Moderna Covid Vaccine. What Happened Next Left Me Wishing I Was Dead”

9 May 2025

What Does David Lammy Mean by a State?

9 May 2025

News Round-Up

9 May 2025

Electric Car Bursts into Flames on Driveway and Engulfs £550,000 Family Home

23

BBC Quietly Edits Question Time After Wrongly ‘Correcting’ Richard Tice on Key Net Zero Claim

21

What Does David Lammy Mean by a State?

20

The Sugar Tax Sums Up Our Descent into Technocratic Dystopia

26

“I Was a Super Fit Cyclist Until I Had the Moderna Covid Vaccine. What Happened Next Left Me Wishing I Was Dead”

13

Ed Miliband’s Housing Energy Plan Will Decimate the Rental Market and Send Rents Spiralling

10 May 2025

News Round-Up

10 May 2025

BBC Quietly Edits Question Time After Wrongly ‘Correcting’ Richard Tice on Key Net Zero Claim

9 May 2025

Electric Car Bursts into Flames on Driveway and Engulfs £550,000 Family Home

9 May 2025

“I Was a Super Fit Cyclist Until I Had the Moderna Covid Vaccine. What Happened Next Left Me Wishing I Was Dead”

9 May 2025

POSTS BY DATE

July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
« Jun   Aug »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences