Welcome to episode five of the Sceptic. On the show this week, host Laurie Wastell speaks to the following Daily Sceptic contributors:
- C.J. Strachan, Daily Sceptic regular and the founder of the Fair Job initiative, on how Equality, Diversity and Inclusion took over the workplace – and how he’s fighting back;
- Andy Collingwood, writer and co-host of the Multipolarity podcast, who gives us a deep dive into Labour’s radical social agenda;
- And for those donating £5 a month or more to the Daily Sceptic, Laurie speaks to journalist and Daily Sceptic regular Ben Pile, on how the BBC is trying to smear a Kenyan farmer as a shill for big oil and the menace of the Green Blob.
Donate to the Daily Sceptic to access our donor-only content. Follow Laurie on X. Read C.J. Strachan’s articles on the Daily Sceptic here and here and find out about his Fair Job initiative here. Read Andy Collingwood’s article here. And read Ben Pile’s article here. Produced by Richard Eldred. Filmed at the Westminster Podcast Studio.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Thanks for having me on the podcast, Laurie.
CJ I thoroughly approve your 6 principles but you are mistaken about the Equality Act. It is a complete misconstruction of what equality and diversity should be based upon, which should of course be something more like your 6 principles. Distinguishing between public basic rights and private diversity ones would seem to me to be the key to sorting it some of the conflicts, but no-one has worked out that this is a fundamental distinction yet.
The Equality act introduces the fundamentals of critical theory in via the back door and in that sense is irredeemable. The fact that it still allows some of the defences you speak of does not alter this fact that the act enable confusion and division. People should never have needed to go to court to make the defence in the first place – but the equality act sets up one characterstic group against another, rather than setting out basic rights for the individual which should always be respected.
I probably didn’t contextualise here – personally I think that the EQ should be scrapped, along with the EHRA and the Supreme Court – it is a foreign infection on our Common Law system.
The point I was – clumsily – making was that the EQA is ironically the only shield that we have from the attacks on GC women and others by the radical woke. The employment tribunals that are being fought and won are through using the EQA.
The challenge that we have is that unfortunately DEI is going to be with us for some time yet, and the tories did nothing about the EQA for 14 years and with Starmer likely to win tomorrow, it isn’g going anywhere quickly so we need to understand how to use it to defend people’s rights to their beliefs, opinions and faiths.
Ironically one of the most effective defences you can play at the moment is to object over faith grounds –
This is a huge problem – all of it needs to be dismantled but we are stuck with it – therefore we need to teach small businesses how to protect themselves from employees weaponising the Act and employees how to ensure they can use the Act to protect themselves from bullying employers – which is all too common these days – we estimate that upwards of 230k have been fired for their opinions over the last 4 years or so and that most of these will have been fired unlawfully.
we are stuck with this nonsense for the foreseeable and we need to learn how to use it,. Opting out unfortunately – results in unemployment or business insolvency – it’s that serious
It like the small boats problem, the problem was that the conservatives did not tackle the root of the problem the ECHR. So although the ECHR might defend some injustices it is also the cause of a whole bunch of others.
Another point for you to consider is that data protection laws are also used to throw the book at whistle blowers on employer unlawful behaviour. Instead of tackling the unlawful behaviour the employer throws the data protection and reputation clauses at the employee instead. This is a deflection from the main event and now says you are not allow to know and pass on that we are unfair and incompetent. You need a lot of money to fight this kind of thing. This is why we need a new basic bill of rights and a free court to defend it against the executive, big business and other interest groups.
Does you estimate include the number of NDAs in force to hide the mess?
EDI done on the cheap is bad? Any EDI training is terrible.
Workplace relations were not broken before all this. A person’s abilities were the only measure and a company with suitably skilled individuals usually thrived and profited.
So if people will have the right not to be poor then what will happen to those that have lost employment because of their civilised views and values?
When the majority of people become aware that their unnecessary poverty has been caused by ideological activists then it will not be a good time to be an ideological activist.