There was consternation among many when Baroness Hallett’s team announced in January 2024 that Module 4 (Vaccines and Therapeutics) of the COVID-19 Public Inquiry, due to be held in July 2024, was inexplicably being postponed until January 2025, after the General Election. In addition, in the recent Module 4 preliminary hearing on May 22nd (which can be viewed here and here) there was an update on the scope of the module, clarifying that there would be no investigation into the efficacy of the Covid vaccines and that a detailed investigation of safety concerns regarding specific vaccines was not within the scope of the inquiry. The new Module 4 dates are January 14th-30th 2025 – a total of 13 working days.
In response to the news of the postponement, several expert groups who had been invited to submit witness statements to the COVID-19 Public Inquiry Module 4 (under a Rule 9 request from the inquiry solicitors), and others with relevant expertise, took matters into their own hands and decided to convene a People’s Vaccine Inquiry, to be launched as soon as possible and before any General Election.
Having already personally written and submitted a 50-page, fully referenced witness statement to the Covid Inquiry Module 4, documenting the work of the U.K. Medical Freedom Alliance since 2020 in challenging unethical Covid vaccine policies and highlighting the multiple ethical violations of the Covid vaccine rollout and serious safety concerns, I was delighted to be involved in the People’s Vaccine Inquiry. I was keen to get this and other important evidence into the public domain under one umbrella, to educate and inform the public and healthcare professionals.
The professionals who have taken part in the People’s Vaccine Inquiry believe it is in the public interest to urgently facilitate access to expert opinion and relevant clinical observations to allow informed consent and protect patient safety. The main groups and spokesmen involved in the People’s Vaccine Inquiry are:
- HART co-chairs Dr. Clare Craig and Dr. Jonathan Engler
- Children’s Covid Vaccine Advisory Council (CCVAC) lead, Dr. Ros Jones
- UK Medical Freedom Alliance CEO, Dr. Elizabeth Evans
- Perseus Group spokesperson, Nick Hunt
- Doctors for Patients U.K. (DfPUK) spokesperson and consultant cardiologist, Dr. Dean Patterson
- Behavioural Science Consultant, lecturer and Sunday Times bestselling author Patrick Fagan
The participants have all submitted fully referenced witness statements to The People’s Inquiry and have recorded short video presentations to summarise the key points they have made in their statements. The central message of the People’s Vaccine Inquiry is that the Covid vaccines are neither safe nor effective, and serious harm has resulted from the unwise, rushed rollout of an inadequately tested new technology. There was also a failure of public health to ensure the public had a full picture of the potential known and unknown risks of the Covid vaccines to enable informed consent, and the insufficiently tested Covid vaccines were rolled out in a way that violated fundamental principles of medical ethics.
The People’s Vaccine Inquiry website is launched today, where you can read up-to-date, detailed and fully referenced statements from experts from the medical and scientific fields on many aspects of the Covid Vaccines, including; safety, efficacy, ethical violations, clinical observations from doctors of vaccine injuries in their patients, and the psychological and marketing techniques used by public health bodies to nudge people into accepting vaccines they may not have wanted or needed. The short video presentations contain evidence and data that have been heavily censored in the mainstream media, but which is in the public domain.
We are asking the public to get involved with several calls to action on the website. Firstly, please follow us on X (@PVI_2024) for important news and updates and retweet our material. Secondly, we are asking members of the public to send a letter to their GP using a template we have prepared to inform him or her of The People’s Vaccine Inquiry and raise awareness of this important public health resource. We are also asking doctors, other healthcare professionals and the public to sign the medical ethics-based Hope Accord, calling for an immediate suspension of the Covid mRNA vaccine rollout, a full investigation into the harms caused, and immediate recognition and support for those who have been harmed by the vaccines.
The People’s Inquiry is leading the way and we have been encouraged by several previously pro-vaccine public figures who have recently acknowledged that the Covid vaccines were not as safe or effective as previously claimed. These include Robert Redfield, the former CDC Director who oversaw the beginning of the Covid vaccine rollout in the U.S. In this interview with Chris Cuomo last week he made a number of startling admissions, including that there has been a lack of transparency from public health leaders and the pharmaceutical industry; that the shift from vaccination being focused on the vulnerable to covering everyone was driven by the “huge influence” of the pharmaceutical industry; that there are serious side-effects from the vaccines and he has seen many of his patient’s lives “turned upside down” as a result of vaccine damage; that up to two thirds of his Covid infected patients were vaccinated; and that the spike protein is immune-toxic but we do not know how much spike protein a vaccinated person will make or for how long. This public health scandal can no longer be ignored, the tide is turning, and the truth is coming out.
Endorsing the People’s Vaccine Inquiry, Professor Paul Goddard said:
Doctors against vaccination have been struck off or suspended when they have spoken out or refused to take part in the vaccination programme whilst those in favour have received vitriol online. That is not how science can progress. Pfizer wanted the data on reactions to be kept secret for many decades. If the vaccines cannot be tested, they are not science, they are simply untested and potentially dangerous technology.
This statement from concerned healthcare staff shows the bravery and deep compassion of the people taking part. They are in danger of losing their employment and damaging their futures but still they feel obliged to register their concern. Read on but do so with an open mind and please ignore the propaganda fed to you by the Government.
Watch the promo vids on X here and here.
— People's Vaccine Inquiry (@PVI_2024) June 8, 2024
COMING JUNE 10 – THE PEOPLE'S VACCINE INQUIRY
1. RETWEET
2. FOLLOW US
Censored Facts and Hidden Harms: Keeping you informed pic.twitter.com/snPRkmADwl
— People's Vaccine Inquiry (@PVI_2024) June 4, 2024
Bringing together experts called to give evidence in Covid Inquiry Vaccine Module
The Independent Inquiry has postponed the vaccine module until 2025
The public deserves to be kept up-to-date with the evidence NOW, not in 2025 pic.twitter.com/YoY8Ku0nET
Dr. Elizabeth Evans is CEO of the U.K. Medical Freedom Alliance. The People’s Vaccine Inquiry website can be found here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Great and thank you for fighting. The Globalist-Medical Nazis will be back. Rona was just a pilot project. I don’t know anyone who died of the fake flying ‘virus’ (intracellular parasite? yeah whatever). I do know plenty dead and injured post stabbination, almost all of them too stupid to understand what really happened. The problem with the low IQs of the sheeple is that they drag all of us down to their level ie lockdowns, poisons, diapers. $cientism. All quackcines are junk for profit. 200 years of death and misery.
That is not how science can progress. Pfizer wanted the data on reactions to be kept secret for many decades. If the vaccines cannot be tested, they are not science, they are simply untested and potentially dangerous technology.
Not holding my breath until I see this reported in the mainstream media!
The fight back is starting with the young people in the EU.
Time to target TikTok and why the young were forced to take an experimental jab for a virus that was 98% survivable in order to go to College & keep their jobs.
You are being very generous with your survivability rate. My understanding is that the infection fatality rate of the original strain was around 0.15%, implying a population-wide survivability ratio of 99.85%, and this would be much higher for healthy young people.
Quite agree with your figures Michael
According to an online gadget run by a branch of Oxford University in winter 20/21, the fatality risk to that age group was virtually zero. I played with that back then – here’s what the result was for age <25.
Well done to all involved.
The Establishment aren’t going to be able to keep the lid on their stinking pile of sh!t for 40 years this time.
Agreed but the next big problem is the multi billions which they’re intent on making from the next generation of modified RNA GMO’s “vaccines” which are in the pipeline and of which joe public has no inkling of.
And there’s the teeny problem of mRNA/rogue DNA contaminated blood banks which the idiots are only now apparently realising.
Hopefully more and more are awakening to the dangers inherent in all jabs as well –
http://vaccinepapers.org/
TPTB threw the ordinary people of the World to The Wolves with Covid & still wherever you look various governmental bodies continue to rub our noses in it . The UK covid inquiry so far has been a costly Farce !
Well done to all concerned. It should be borne in mind that not only were the “vaccines” not “safe and effective” but that they were forced on people who were at no risk from “covid”, and not even the manufacturers claimed it would stop people spreading “covid”. Because “covid” was not a serious threat to public health, there was indeed no justification for emergency use authorisation, and in my view no “vaccine” was or will ever be required or desirable for “covid”.
Indeed. Another matter is that the use of Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA) was based on the belief that there was no alternative. If it becomes understood that there were, and still are, other (perhaps more appropriate) ways of reducing the risk of similar respiratory infections, it could be demonstrated that the EUA was never valid. It should never have been issued.
100%
Ivermectin and HCQ
Even that CNN guy is taking it.
And vitD.
Yes there seems to be an ongoing and long standing lack of interest from “public health” authorities and the medical industrial complex in low cost, practical ways to enhance health.
And in the supermarket trade quite high strength vitamin D products are on the shelf now, and also at more specialised traders, like Holland & Barrett.
All the best; I hope it delivers value eventually, but we’ll see if it is actually effective (to coin a term I read somewhere). Here is what I wrote to the usual suspects back in early 2021, when the product was on offer.
Spot on
Did you get a reply?
Yes. Less than 24 hours:
“Thank you for your letter addressed to Dr xyz regarding the Covid-19 vaccination programme. We have noted in your records that for the time being you are declining the Covid-19 vaccination. This will prevent the surgery from contacting you to offer the vaccine when it becomes available locally.
If you change your mind at any time and decide to have the vaccine please let us know and we will update your records and put you back on the waiting list.”
At the time they did not do it locally – a group of them got together and rented a hall from the local council and they did all the work there for several months. I don’t know what happens now. They did not try to sell it to me after that.
‘in the recent Module 4 preliminary hearing on May 22nd… there was an update …. clarifying that there would be no investigation into the efficacy of the Covid vaccines and that a detailed investigation of safety concerns… was not within the scope of the inquiry.’
Er, nothing about efficacy or safety? Well, what are they going to do then?
‘The new Module 4 dates are January 14th-30th 2025…’
Seems like they are planning to take 13 working days off.
It‘ll be about whether the rollout was efficient enough as 100% vaxing of the people was not achieved
Is this why Sunak and Macron are bailing out as fast as they can?
It is going to blow the door right open to the truth, corruption and harm of the toxic Covid injections.
Main Stream Media, the Medical Fraternity, Western Governments, all complicit in this crime against humanity.
Fishy might well decide he’s given it all he can, nothing left in the tank, burnt out, leaving the ship in good hands etc etc and bail out before the election.
California I believe is nice this time of year.
lot of people bailing out of California – toxically woke and no long a safe or nice place to live – drugs, homeless, lawless…US friends tell me that the optimum now is a Democrat county/city (ie good social and educational policies) within a republican (ie business-like) state. Think ‘Austin, Texas’
A massive Thank You to all those involved. I will certainly do my best to spread the news.
I hope the PCI will seek the input of Dr Robert Clancy of Austrlalia. He was ahead on many of the jab-harm issues. 18 months ago he did a podcast with Dr J Campbell. I made the following notes at the time:
‘These Mrna jabs have never been put into humans before, a massive experiment is going on.
Several years on they are still on emergency approval.
No evidence exists that mRNA jabs are better than traditional vaccines.
No control exists over where the injected material goes, over the amount of antigen generated by it, or over how long the generation continues.
How then do you obtain informed consent?
We also have the danger of reverse transcription into DNA and no idea of the attendant risks of cancer or even of trans-generational expression. In this light, the mass rollout is reckless in the extreme.
Dollar signs are doing the moving and shaking. The amount of money involved, the potential for corruption, is staggering.
UK data show the period of relative protection against hospital-admission-severity infection gets less with the number of boosters given. People with booster after booster are turning off their immune response.’
As I say, Prof Clancy was ahead.
Brilliant, all power to you.