There was consternation among many when Baroness Hallett’s team announced in January 2024 that Module 4 (Vaccines and Therapeutics) of the COVID-19 Public Inquiry, due to be held in July 2024, was inexplicably being postponed until January 2025, after the General Election. In addition, in the recent Module 4 preliminary hearing on May 22nd (which can be viewed here and here) there was an update on the scope of the module, clarifying that there would be no investigation into the efficacy of the Covid vaccines and that a detailed investigation of safety concerns regarding specific vaccines was not within the scope of the inquiry. The new Module 4 dates are January 14th-30th 2025 – a total of 13 working days.
In response to the news of the postponement, several expert groups who had been invited to submit witness statements to the COVID-19 Public Inquiry Module 4 (under a Rule 9 request from the inquiry solicitors), and others with relevant expertise, took matters into their own hands and decided to convene a People’s Vaccine Inquiry, to be launched as soon as possible and before any General Election.
Having already personally written and submitted a 50-page, fully referenced witness statement to the Covid Inquiry Module 4, documenting the work of the U.K. Medical Freedom Alliance since 2020 in challenging unethical Covid vaccine policies and highlighting the multiple ethical violations of the Covid vaccine rollout and serious safety concerns, I was delighted to be involved in the People’s Vaccine Inquiry. I was keen to get this and other important evidence into the public domain under one umbrella, to educate and inform the public and healthcare professionals.
The professionals who have taken part in the People’s Vaccine Inquiry believe it is in the public interest to urgently facilitate access to expert opinion and relevant clinical observations to allow informed consent and protect patient safety. The main groups and spokesmen involved in the People’s Vaccine Inquiry are:
- HART co-chairs Dr. Clare Craig and Dr. Jonathan Engler
- Children’s Covid Vaccine Advisory Council (CCVAC) lead, Dr. Ros Jones
- UK Medical Freedom Alliance CEO, Dr. Elizabeth Evans
- Perseus Group spokesperson, Nick Hunt
- Doctors for Patients U.K. (DfPUK) spokesperson and consultant cardiologist, Dr. Dean Patterson
- Behavioural Science Consultant, lecturer and Sunday Times bestselling author Patrick Fagan
The participants have all submitted fully referenced witness statements to The People’s Inquiry and have recorded short video presentations to summarise the key points they have made in their statements. The central message of the People’s Vaccine Inquiry is that the Covid vaccines are neither safe nor effective, and serious harm has resulted from the unwise, rushed rollout of an inadequately tested new technology. There was also a failure of public health to ensure the public had a full picture of the potential known and unknown risks of the Covid vaccines to enable informed consent, and the insufficiently tested Covid vaccines were rolled out in a way that violated fundamental principles of medical ethics.
The People’s Vaccine Inquiry website is launched today, where you can read up-to-date, detailed and fully referenced statements from experts from the medical and scientific fields on many aspects of the Covid Vaccines, including; safety, efficacy, ethical violations, clinical observations from doctors of vaccine injuries in their patients, and the psychological and marketing techniques used by public health bodies to nudge people into accepting vaccines they may not have wanted or needed. The short video presentations contain evidence and data that have been heavily censored in the mainstream media, but which is in the public domain.
We are asking the public to get involved with several calls to action on the website. Firstly, please follow us on X (@PVI_2024) for important news and updates and retweet our material. Secondly, we are asking members of the public to send a letter to their GP using a template we have prepared to inform him or her of The People’s Vaccine Inquiry and raise awareness of this important public health resource. We are also asking doctors, other healthcare professionals and the public to sign the medical ethics-based Hope Accord, calling for an immediate suspension of the Covid mRNA vaccine rollout, a full investigation into the harms caused, and immediate recognition and support for those who have been harmed by the vaccines.
The People’s Inquiry is leading the way and we have been encouraged by several previously pro-vaccine public figures who have recently acknowledged that the Covid vaccines were not as safe or effective as previously claimed. These include Robert Redfield, the former CDC Director who oversaw the beginning of the Covid vaccine rollout in the U.S. In this interview with Chris Cuomo last week he made a number of startling admissions, including that there has been a lack of transparency from public health leaders and the pharmaceutical industry; that the shift from vaccination being focused on the vulnerable to covering everyone was driven by the “huge influence” of the pharmaceutical industry; that there are serious side-effects from the vaccines and he has seen many of his patient’s lives “turned upside down” as a result of vaccine damage; that up to two thirds of his Covid infected patients were vaccinated; and that the spike protein is immune-toxic but we do not know how much spike protein a vaccinated person will make or for how long. This public health scandal can no longer be ignored, the tide is turning, and the truth is coming out.
Endorsing the People’s Vaccine Inquiry, Professor Paul Goddard said:
Doctors against vaccination have been struck off or suspended when they have spoken out or refused to take part in the vaccination programme whilst those in favour have received vitriol online. That is not how science can progress. Pfizer wanted the data on reactions to be kept secret for many decades. If the vaccines cannot be tested, they are not science, they are simply untested and potentially dangerous technology.
This statement from concerned healthcare staff shows the bravery and deep compassion of the people taking part. They are in danger of losing their employment and damaging their futures but still they feel obliged to register their concern. Read on but do so with an open mind and please ignore the propaganda fed to you by the Government.
Watch the promo vids on X here and here.
Dr. Elizabeth Evans is CEO of the U.K. Medical Freedom Alliance. The People’s Vaccine Inquiry website can be found here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
The i’s article reads like it a press release from Big Pharma. You get the feeling the article was run past AstraZeneca and Pfizer’s lawyers first. The implication is: ‘We’re reporting this, but we’re still on your side! Honest!’
Does this mean Dame Sarah Gilbert won’t be getting a standing ovation from the crowd at Wimbledon this year?
Or a Barbie doll from Mattel. (Klaus?)
Or make millions of pounds from sales of shares in Vaccitech?
People won’t want to strain their hearts getting out of the seats!!
Of course the police should be launching a major criminal investigation.
Stand in the Park Make friends & keep sane
Sundays 10.30am to 11.30am
Elms Field
near Everyman Cinema & play area
Wokingham RG40 2FE
They only investigate social media posts nowadays
Peter Todd has an impressive record and his interview on UK column by Debbie Evans is available on their Website.I am confident the claims will succeed but it is likely that there will be a settlement so unfortunately a full public hearing is unlikely. Nevertheless good news.
The latest from New Zealand;
”DATA from the New Zealand Ministry of Health has revealed a massive 103 per cent increase in hospitalisations among 12 disease categories measured in 2021 following the mRNA rollout. This calls into serious question the safety of medical interventions such as mRNA vaccines which penetrate the cell wall and re-program activity in the cell cytoplasm.
NZ had very few cases of Covid in 2021 due to draconian restrictions. Therefore the only reasonable cause of the disease increase is mRNA vaccination.
There were 38,178 extra hospitalisations in 2021 across the 12 categories compared with 2019 figures. The Ministry of Health tracks 37 disease categories, and figures for the remaining 25, including cancer, have not yet been released. These figures alone mean that New Zealanders had greater than a 1 in 90 chance of hospitalisation within one year of Covid vaccination. You can read a longer discussion of the figures here.”
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/hospital-admissions-double-and-its-got-to-be-down-to-the-vaccines/
Glad I said no to all the pharma firms products on offer. I can’t help but contrast it from normal claims for damages caused by other physical injuries. As an experienced litigant in that situation, I know it takes a long time, and the outcome is very variable financially. It seems to be related to the potential loss of income into the future, as a major factor.
I did successfully win a case in the County Court she years back, following a road injury, and ended up with a cheque paid for by the defendants insurer, about 4 years later. If the Treasury is, in effect, the insurer for Astra Zeneca, or the other culprits, no doubt it will be a rough ride for the claimants. All the best!
It is indeed a lengthy process. I was involved as a treating clinician in a case for a gentleman who sustained a severe brain injury following a hit & run accident. He was awarded £6million which sounds huge until you factored in his life expectancy (~30 years) & that he needed full time highly specialist care for life. With the way care costs have shot up since then (2012), it may not last his lifetime.
The mainstream media are now starting to at least talk about vaccine damage: the Daily Express and the i, and this BBC Radio 4 programme this morning which was not the usual type of BBC propaganda but a genuine attempt to be fair to all sides, in which Spiked’s Brendan O’Neill talked a lot of sense about free speech, and Andrew Bridgen was praised with faint damns and at least receiving some publicity now.
The whole series of the BBC’s AntiSocial programmes are very good, on various controversial issues, definitely a cut above the rest of the BBC’s output on these issues:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m001k837
60% disablement? It’s enough to make you weep.
In June 2021, Gilbert received a standing ovation at the 2021 Wimbledon Championships.
How do you even calculate how disabled you are?
“I don’t care that you can’t walk. It’s just left-side paralysis which means you’re only half disabled and therefore below the (entirely arbitrary) threshold. So sling your hook you chancer and enjoy your life…”
A part of Dr Mike Yeadon’s comment on a substack ( Metatron ) today, referring in particular to the mRNA gene therapies;
”When I looked at these so called vaccines, I saw several unquestionably toxic motifs. Here are some of them. Do note we cannot predict the magnitude of adverse events because no one has previously calibrated dose (or concentration) vs adverse effects. Time (duration of exposure) is another variable. There will be other variables we’re not smart enough to discern. So what we can say with confidence is that “we can see rational expectation of harms A, B, C & D, because…”. Whether that will not occur or occur in almost everyone awaits clinical dosing.
A. The mRNA technology is inherently very dangerous and this cannot be circumvented. It prompts your body to synthesise whatever protein is encoded in the mRNA sequence. When that happens, your body having made NON-SELF proteins, your immune system will recognise it’s foreign and so it’s level best to destroy the affected cells. Depending on where the injected material goes and how well it’s taken up and translated into protein and for how long, we’ll see autoimmune mediated injury, which could include deaths.
B. They’ve chosen to have the product encode virus spike protein. This protein is known to be directly toxic, for example, it indirectly causes blood coagulation. This is in addition to autoimmune issues as in A above.
C. They’ve wrapped the mRNA in a complex lipid mixture. Some of those lipids are known to be toxic. Additionally, the lipid nanoparticles are known to accumulate in various tissues, including ovaries. The manufacturers knew fhis. The regulators knew this. It is in the peer reviewed scientific literature from at least a decade ago.
D. Spike is very strange and contains sequences which are just similar enough to some of our own gene sequences to make me concerned for autoimmune reactions interfering with processes which depend on things just similar to spike. One of these is syncytin, an essential protein of pregnancy. Immune responses to syncytin after vaccination have been reported.
The “vaccines” could never have worked as advertised. They’re injected & mostly result in blood antibody responses. But blood antibodies are too large to exit the blood vessels and get into the air side of the lungs.
I conclude that these injections have been designed with the deliberate intention of causing injury, maiming some & killing others.”
Throughout this whole enormous crime I have never had any reason to doubt Dr Mike Yeadon.
And yet MPs left the chamber when Andrew Bridgen spoke on this topic. It sickens me that it was so empty in the first place, but the deliberate walkout made my blood boil.
Yes it was intended to relay a message and it did so loud and clear. And then we have our Toby, presumably playing ‘Devil’s Advocate’, suggesting that those who figuratively gave Andrew the ‘V’ sign, by their hugely disrespectful walk-out, only did so because they might have had another engagement elsewhere. Gawd, if you believe that then you really are beyond help! They treat Andrew B like he was one of those manic street preachers you get in town on a Saturday afternoon that everyone walks on by and ignores.
When I challenged my MP on this last week he replied uncharacteristically promptly; ignored my question about vaccine harms and the government’s failure to investigate, and instead explained why AB had had the whip removed. (I hadn’t mentioned this; perhaps MPs have an algorithm that springs into action with a cut-and-paste response at the mention of the name) Oh, and MPs apparently were not shoo-ed out by Mitchell: they can choose which speeches to listen to …
He awaits more evidence of harm, at which he will support an investigation (clearly, the government’s own data isn’t enough) meanwhile misinformation about vaccines is a problem; they have been lifesaving and helped us move beyond the pandemic.
Jeez – what a prat.
“Safe and effective”
Boris Johnson
Rishi Sunak
“…who suffered very rare [sic] but severe reactions to the vaccine.”
They never say that ‘very rare’ thing about CoV 2 do they?
“Many have gone from being fit and healthy to being left struggling to walk and talk, with little hope of getting better…”
And they can’t say that about CoV 2 either can they?
Sue the doctors who administered them without the “informed” bit of informed consent.
We are seeing an expose of the dangers of Ahrimanic consciousnrss. The reduction of everything to ones and zeroes in order to cntrol. I see this in a positive light: that when mass aweness grows of the horror of the situation then there could be an ascendance to a higher plane within a short time. But the hour is getting late. I would wager that within five years we will see a religious revival in this country and I have faith that it will contain a renewed understanding of the Christ energy.
“While the vaccine is widely credited with protecting many millions of people from the virus”
Only by absurdist lying shills for the pharmaceutical industry like i journalists. The rest of us know this is one of the most demonstrably false claims in the history of medicine.
If you look at your friends and family you will have to admit that most of them are easy to scare and so you tread carefully. The fact is that people are like that; The question that is asked is given that we live in the realm of predators, how do we respond to them. There is no ppint pretending that there is an easy response because there isn’t.But a predatory system doesn’t exist for long because it destroys itself. With a few small changes we could make this a good place to live even in difficult circumstances.
What do you think it is going to be like in April and May when they reset their books. Honestly just get with the right people and care for those you need to.We can sort out the small print afterwards once we affirm ourselves.
You poison yur own people and now you want to use depleted uranium on Europe. Believe me the British establishment is about to crash and most of ud will go with it. Talk to me when you’re human again and I might help you.
Due to ethics committees approving covid-19 vaccine trials including people not seriously at risk of the virus, billions of people around the world not at serious risk of covid-19 have been set up to have covid injections potentially for life, with their own effective natural immune response being disrupted by these covid injections.
This is seriously unethical!
How on earth could an ethics committee approve vaccine trials that could lead to this outcome, did they not think this through?
See my email on this matter to Andrew Pollard, chief investigator on the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine trials, and also the chair of the UK Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation, a huge conflict of interest…
Who initiated the plan to vaccinate the entire global population against SARS- CoV-2? 30 June 2021.
My email to Andrew Pollard includes reference to my correspondence raised initially with the Berkshire Research Ethics Committee.
It was known from the beginning the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine didn’t prevent infection nor transmission, this was evident from the monkey trial.
Knowing this, why did they proceed to human trials?
Why were these defective ‘leaky vaccines’ spread around the world?
See my email on this matter to Graham Brady, chair of the 1922 Committee: Were ‘leaky vaccines’ deliberately spread around the world? 10 January 2022.
PS: I didn’t receive responses from Pollard or Brady…
Is this gross negligence, failing to engage with these important questions relevant to millions/billions of people being injected with ‘leaky’ Covid jabs, against a disease it was known from the beginning wasn’t a serious threat to most people?
I admire you so much for your efforts to get answers Elizabeth.
Thanks RTSC.
It goes to show how rotten the system is, that we have to struggle so much for accountability.