- “Tories face election wipeout with Labour set to gain a 416 majority” – A new Mail on Sunday poll predicts a potential Labour majority of 416 seats, signalling potential catastrophe for the Tory Party.
- “‘Mark my words: Reform will be the next opposition, then government awaits’” – Something remarkable may happen on election day. We are on the verge of shifting the tectonic plates of politics, writes Nigel Farage in the Telegraph.
- “We need a revolt against the uniparty” – The BBC election debate exposed the dire state of mainstream party politics, says Tim Black in Spiked.
- “Nigel Farage’s Tory manifesto” – As Nigel Farage ends his first week as leader of Reform, it’s worth noting his message: Toryism without the Tories, writes Fraser Nelson in the Spectator.
- “Farage’s army is on the march” – In Great Yarmouth, a rebel force is stirring, says Tom McTague in UnHerd.
- “Tice fury as Reform candidate pulls out of race and backs Tories” – Reform chair Richard Tice has accused the Tories of “dirty tricks” after one of his party’s candidates withdrew from the race and endorsed the Conservatives, reports the Independent.
- “Conservative MPs defy party bosses to take cash from Laurence Fox’s funder” – Four Tory MPs have defied party bosses and accepted a donation of £5,000 from the donor behind Laurence Fox’s Reclaim party, says the Telegraph.
- “Labour official reveals party’s goal is to restore freedom of movement” – A senior Labour figure has said the party will bring back freedom of movement in bombshell comments seen by the Mail on Sunday.
- “‘We’ve come to take you home’: Noa Argamani’s 245 days of captivity are finally over” – The plight of an Israeli woman who spent 245 days held hostage by Hamas ended on Saturday with the words “It’s the IDF. We’ve come to take you home,” reports the Telegraph.
- “‘Huge relief’ to see rescue of four hostages by Israel, Rishi Sunak says” – Israeli forces have rescued four captives in the Gaza Strip in the largest such recovery since Hamas’s assault triggered the conflict, says Perspective.
- “Book festivals accused of discrimination after dropping sponsor ‘linked with Israel’” – Literary festivals have been accused of “discrimination” over the decision to drop a major sponsor in a row over Gaza, reports the Telegraph.
- “Anti-Israel fanatics are leading Britain’s cultural industry to ruins” – Unless we begin to stand up to business and culture destroyers – however small fry they seem – we will have nothing left to defend, warns Zoe Strimpel in the Telegraph.
- “BBC defends interviewing retired general who called October 7th attacks ‘month of victory’” – Samir Ragheb has been interviewed by BBC News Arabic nine times since the war in Gaza began, despite sharing antisemitic material and pro-Palestinian posts online, reports the Telegraph.
- “The BBC is an Orwellian, Kafkaesque nightmare” – Dishonesty and obfuscation are now part and parcel of the Beeb’s editorial policy, says Julie Burchill in Spiked.
- “‘It was incredibly satisfying’ to watch Fauci grilled over lockdowns” – GB News star Bev Turner says watching Dr. Anthony Fauci’s intense questioning from Republican lawmakers over his Covid measures was an “incredibly satisfying” experience.
- “The Rand Paul interview: part one” – On Substack, Alex Berenson sits down with Sen. Rand Paul to discuss what Dr. Fauci knew about the likelihood that SARS-CoV-2 had leaked from a Chinese lab, and when he knew it.
- “Covid severity not affected by viral load upon first infection: study” – According to a recent JAMA Network Open study, the viral load or quantity of SARS-CoV-2 in the nasal cavity does not predict disease severity, says the Epoch Times.
- “The week in numbers (to June 7th)” – Prof. Carl Heneghan and Dr. Tom Jefferson take a numerical look back over the week’s healthcare-related stories.
- “Sunak’s mask slips” – In the New Conservative, Frank Haviland has a bone to pick with Rishi Sunak.
- “Brief encounter with an immigration zealot” – In TCW, Niall McCrae details a recent encounter with an open borders fanatic while on the campaign trail in Sussex.
- “Don’t flirt, Cambridge tells students as it bans sexual relationships with professors” – The University of Cambridge has told students to stop flirting with staff under a new policy banning sexual relationships with professors, according to the Mail.
- “Labour’s Net Zero plans ‘risk blackouts and public unrest’” – The Energy Secretary says Labour’s Net Zero plans risk leading to blackouts and public unrest, reports the Telegraph.
- “Half-ton electric bike poses latest threat to London pedestrians” – Thousands of half-ton electric cargo bikes that look like “small articulated trucks” are set to arrive in London despite concerns over public safety, says the Telegraph.
- “Why being anti-car is a luxury belief” – The anti-car movement is idiotic – a luxury belief shared by deluded metropolitans, writes Rory Sutherland in the Spectator.
- “Science of heat waves reveals blaming CO2 is a scam!” – To blame heat waves on rising CO2, alarmists must use statistical attribution tricks, says Jim Steele in WUWT.
- “Net Zero by 2050 is simply not happening” – We haven’t even reached Peak Wood, let alone Peak Oil or Peak Coal, writes David Blackmon in the Telegraph.
- “Drill, baby, drill: Trump raises $12 million in Silicon Valley, by promising cheap energy to power the AI revolution” – Big Tech is openly rebelling against Biden’s roadmap for energy destitution, says Eric Worrall in WUWT.
- “Why the Dutch are euthanising physically healthy young adults – and could the U.K. be next?” – The Netherlands was the first country to legalise assisted dying, but critics are starting to worry about the consequences, writes Abigail Buchanan in the Telegraph.
- “White men have least chance of getting on BBC trainee scheme” – Non-white applicants to the BBC’s flagship journalism training scheme were almost two and a half times more likely to get in than their white counterparts, reports the Telegraph.
- “U.K. gender critical charity permanently banned by Instagram” – Sex Matters, a high-profile charity that speaks out against gender ideology, has had its Instagram page permanently deleted in what appears to be a platform-wide clamp-down on critics of transgenderism, according to Reduxx.
- “Gender-critical Newcastle fan launches legal action against police ‘political’ trans activism” – A Newcastle fan, banned from matches for her gender critical views, has launched a High Court bid to stop Northumbria Police from endorsing trans ideology, reports the Telegraph.
- “Exeter University staff ‘feel coerced’ to sign Stonewall anti-transphobia pledge” – Staff at a top university say they feel coerced to subscribe to a Stonewall agenda by signing a pledge to oppose transphobia and demonstrate “allyship” by sharing their pronouns, says the Telegraph.
- “Chasing rainbows” – Dissident civil servants have been risking their careers to fight a losing battle against burgeoning Whitehall wokery, writes Steve Edginton in the Critic.
- “Why Scotland’s ‘witches’ fought back” – In UnHerd, Julie Bindel reviews a new book that reflects on the past five years of fighting gender ideology.
- “Canadian Cancer Society issues apologetic note for failing to refer to female anatomy as a ‘front hole’” – The Canadian Cancer Society has affixed an apologetic note to a page on cervical cancer addressed to trans-identified females, assuring them that men can have cervixes as well, reports Reduxx.
- “Can a Government dating app solve Japan’s birth crisis?” – The Tokyo Metropolitan Government has announced that it will soon be in the online matchmaking business, says Philip Patrick in the Spectator.
- “Swiping right in real life: young singles seek offline dating” – Young people are turning to in-person events to meet partners, spurred by waning interest in dating apps and a rise in speed dating, according to Axios.
- “Some news and an invitation” – On X, Tim Montgomerie contemplates voting for Farage and ponders the creation of an advisory list to direct voters towards competent, Right-wing MPs standing in their constituencies, whether Reform or Conservative.
If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Contempt of court.
seems if they won’t exert left in any party can’t get through their evil policies or find it inconvenient to do do using Parliament they can use the judiciary to deliver.
Now it is clear they over ride even their left wing judges when the answer is inconvenient.
Any decent, honest, law-abiding, patriotic Prime Minister would have forced the resignations of all those engaged in this juvenile plotting.
That sums up the state of this country today.
I am ashamed to think of this man as our Prime Minister.
Why is this Trans Craziness so important to the Uniparty?
Is it just part of the general Satanic Destruction of God’s Creation?
Or is it a convenient Distraction from the Invading Muslim Army still swarming in every day?
Small boat arrivals: last 7 days – GOV.UK
Good question. The most obvious explanation for me is that it’s part of a divide and conquer strategy. I doubt that Starmer cares much about trannies or any of the other “oppressed minorities” he pretends to champion, beyond they are useful to him.
He doesn’t care much about anything. He’s so self obsessed and enamoured with globalism he sees being PM as a stepping stone to an EU/WEF job so he’ll let the country go to ruin, that’s what globalisation wants, the end of nation states.
It is a vital item in the ‘Progressive’ policy agenda being pushed as hard as possible around the world in recent years. I call it the ‘smash society’ agenda. See Canada under Turdew, see USA under Biden and of course see the EU, supporting it to the hilt. Anything to help to ‘smash society’.
Starmer told us serfs, back in July last year, in his speech in the ‘Rose Garden’, after the summer riots, where he said … ‘The Labour Government will continue to introduce progressive policies in order to combat populism and right-wing extremism.’ That’s why he will not do anything to stop the boats.
When the Government circumvent the Courts the whole thing is close to collapse.
I hope.
What rights do trannies want that they don’t already have?
The right to decree that humans must not have a sex would be my guess.
Yet again, another article that avoids to.mention Starmer’s vested interest in the issue.
I recognize that ‘hate crime’ of a skirt! Someone ring the police.
Look at them, hanging round the bogs like a bad smell.
If only more men agreed, James. Imagine stating that women wanting to keep their toilets as female only is somehow a ”privilege”…
”I’ll tell you something for nothing…
If I was with my mother, or my sister, or my aunt, or my nieces, or any of my female friends, & I witnessed them being intimidated, harassed & hectored by this rabble, as they attempted to use THEIR OWN SPACES…
I’d be having words.”
https://x.com/DreyfusJames/status/1914321320235483442
Look at these mingers. Adam’s another decent man unafraid to stand up for women’s rights and protect his female loved ones from this insane ideology. Much respect for the real men out there;
”It is my f*****g business, because my loved ones will be in women’s single sex spaces with you lot & stats suggest that 96% of you still have full male genitalia.
This is a cult.”
https://x.com/EssexPR/status/1914286426453160200
The State Loves Useful Idiots
If he’s no careful this issue will bring him down.
It us SO ludicrous and he is so egregiously on the idiotic side of it…
You can understand them not wanting to offend the muslim vote, but the trans lobby? Purely from cynical self-interest, it makes no sense – can they be motivated by sincerely held principle!
“Principle?”
Not one of Kneel’s mob could define principle.
The Supreme Court was one of Blair’s wondrous pieces of legislation…now it doesn’t suit the new Labour PM.
Arise Sir Kneel stop grovelling to the twisted cult, you absolute hypocrite.
Two-Tier regards “The Law” as the equivalent of Holy Writ. So he can’t condemn this judgement. But he can change “The Law.”
However, McSweeny knows that the vast majority of the electorate agrees with the Supreme Court, so any attempt Two-Tier makes to change “The Law” will get a severe electoral backlash.
So I expect they will “reach out” to the ECHR who will declare what “The Higher Law” is … and Two-Tier will claim that he is obliged to follow “The Higher Law.”
We’ll see ….
I am not left wing biased myself, but I know people who are, and many of them are not in favour of trans ideology. I don’t understand what branch of the left the Labour Party is part of that is against the correct ruling by our judges that Trans “women” are not women. I’m pretty sure many genuine socialists would not want to be part of it.