Like all of the best ‘quick drink’ catchups, ours ended in the small hours with a drunken row about whether Robespierre regretted his actions. “Surely,” I slurred, “committing 17,000 to Madam Guillotine would have given him pause: think of all those severed heads leering at him.” My friend, the rationalist, laughed, “Oh naïve simpleton, it’s never about the people, it’s always about the idea.” She insisted the Robespierre, top monsieur at the ‘Committee of Public Safety’ went to the block convinced he’d pursued the correct public policy of: “speedy, severe and inflexible justice”.
Our conversation began in response to Freddie Sayers’s already much-commented-upon interview with one of the lockdown architects, Lee Cain, where Cain proudly asserts: “One of the great things he [Boris] did was deliver a lockdown and save a huge amount of lives.”
“But that is so demonstrably untrue,” I explained furiously to my chum. I took another glug and ranted about how, that day, I had seen a 19 year-old woman whose Mum kept her largely inside during lockdowns, who completely fell out of school, lost what few friends she had, has no qualifications and is now ‘not fit to work’. Like the headless corpses of The Terror, this young woman – and thousands of others like her who stopped bothering going to school – ought to stand in grim reproach to the lockdown policies championed by Lee Cain. “And nevermind the 7.6 million NHS waiting list…” I banged on.
“Ah, but it’s never about the people,” my friend responded, “Only the idea.” She shook her head sadly and wondered why I hadn’t understood any of this before.
And in that marvellous way the vino can help you see the veritas, I realised she was right. The idea of lockdown is understood by Mr. Cain to be correct, so no matter how many individuals were figuratively guillotined in pursuit of it, he sleeps easy.
My friend explained, as if to a class dunce, that ideas trump human suffering in all of the great horrors of our age: lockdown, transgenderism, infected blood, the Post Office scandal, Net Zero, EDI. It matters not a jot the numbers of individuals who are harmed in the unrolling of the ideas, those causing the harm will continue so long as the idea holds – or as in Robespierre and Boris – until the wickedly flawed idea consumes its own.
Paula Vennells believed in the infallibility of her ‘systems’ over the false imprisonment of her sub-postmasters; health professionals believed in the technical superiority of plasma innovations over ill humans in front of them; Net Zero enthusiasts welcome decarbonisation no matter how many humans are thrown into fuel poverty, and so on. I once sat next to a No.10 policy adviser at a dinner party who said, “I mean, I love candle light, I don’t see why we can’t all return to it.”
So firmly and unswervingly held are the orthodox beliefs by the majority of politicians (lockdowns, Net Zero, the NHS, the Green Energy Revolution) that it is asks too much of them to accept that these ideologies are based on completely wrong premises.
I may have slumped so far over my wine glass I banged my head on the table. “But how can we ever convince them their ideas are rotten if they ignore the evidence of human suffering their beliefs cause?”
We had entered the drunken stage where we thought we could quite lucidly sort everything out.
“Oh that’s easy,” my friend said pouring another glass, “We just have to destroy the idea.”
Merely pointing out individual tragedies or presenting swishy data graphs, or engaging in long form podcasts to politely raise the idea that there may be other sides to the issue will not do. Instead, the rotten idea needs to be entirely dismantled. It needs to be pointed out consistently and persistently that such ideologies as Net Zero, EDI, Big State Welfare and the NHS, are based on completely wrong premises. They are wrong. They will never work. They harm people. We don’t respect alternative points of view; instead, we explain relentlessly and consistently why the ideas are wrong.
The Cass Review succeeded in ending despicable harm to confused teenagers because it dismantled the idea at the heart of transgenderism. Dr. Cass simply asserted the biological truth that there are two sexes. Without that alternative idea of gender, the whole edifice of medical interventions collapses.
The same methodology applies to all of the other rotten ideas polluting public discourse. Reveal their inherent and fundamental error and let everything crumble. In Robespierre’s case: revolutionary purity is unachievable.
Our evening ended with a clumsy search for Robespierre’s conscience. He either shot himself before his execution or was involved in a pistol fight. Either way, Robespierre died with his lower jaw hanging off its hinges, screaming in agony.
Joanna Gray is a writer and confidence mentor.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
If there’s any justice or such thing as an unrigged election in the U.S Trump will cruise into the White House, it’s surely a foregone conclusion, because if this ultimate DEI hire is who he’s now going up against then it’ll be a cake walk. The woman showed us all not just how insufferable she is, but her proven ineptitude as VP doesn’t exactly give even the most hardcore Leftards a whole lot of confidence. Also, this isn’t exactly going to be winning her any votes either;
”A reminder of why DEI Kamala polled at only 3% before dropping out in her previous Presidential campaign.
“Kamala Harris put over 1500 people in jail for marijuana violations and then laughed about it when she was asked if she ever smoked marijuana.
“She blocked evidence that would have freed an innocent man from death row until the courts forced her to do so.
“She kept people in prison beyond their sentences to use them as cheap labor for the State of California.
“And she fought to keep a cash bail system in place that impacts poor people in the worst kind of way.”
https://x.com/BillboardChris/status/1815142351154667579
The gap between the Don and Kamala is so wide that there is no credible way to cheat a win. Not that it will stop the Dems trying, but The Don should have enough, especially with Musk and others funding a legal presence in every counting location.
Unless they find an excuse to cancel the election. Something like a major war, Scamdemic ll or the inevitable financial crash.
When Kameltoe appears in public she’s either pissed or High on wacky baccy.
Or Colombian Marching Powder.
https://x.com/leokearse/status/1815288158478639429?s=48
This clip of Harris is even better than the above embedded. All 22 seconds of it. Seriously
When a candidate seeking election makes your skin crawl with embarrassment for them when they speak, they’re probably not the best person for the job… watching this my shin is crawling the equivalent of the Sandakan Death March.
“Labour goes to war on nail bars in fight against illegal immigration”
…and Turkish barbers, Labour. Turkish barbers…
One in three. And, regardless of the techniques used to identify untruthful answers, I believe this number is higher – anecdotally, I would say more like one in two. And this brings me to the debate about free speech and democratic ‘jokes’ in which the ‘joke’ is that they wished Trump had been killed. They’re not jokes. Anyone that thinks they are have seriously underestimated the unhinged hatred the left have for Trump and for the right-of-centre beliefs Trump voices. Trump is a figurehead for a set of beliefs that many people hold; in other words their hatred and wish for his death is also hatred and wish for death of millions of others.
If Trump had been killed the ‘jokers’ would show no embarrassment, no remorse, no regret. Quite the opposite – they would be genuinely pleased and celebrate. So, should these comments be seen as crass jokes or should they be seen as incitement? In a world where we have no common moral playlist which guides commonsense, we have to differentiate between reasonable free speech and unreasonable free speech. Incitement to assassinate a president doesn’t seem that reasonable to me. And, I’m afraid, we’re not going to win this culture war by always playing nicely; the left fight dirty, very dirty, it’s well past time we also smashed some bottles.
I suppose in the day, You would have probably found similar numbers of Labour voters feeling the same way about Margaret Thatcher. Certainly there was a palpable sense of indifference to the Brighton bombing. It seems to be the way that if you have a political ideology that everyone must ascribe to, in all its details, anyone who sharply goes against it will be viewed as an enemy to be destroyed.
I’m reminded of the celebrations of her death…
Coming from the Notts coal mining area I realise the people hated Thatcher personally for what she did to the miners, not democracy itself!
The Dematwats hate democracy, If it doesn’t allow them to win, they would argee to any apponent being ‘removed’ by any means nessasary.
I think that’s a critically important distinction.
You’re playing into their hands if you think bottle-smashing is a good idea. As you observe, Trump represents real, decent people. We should be very careful not to descend into the madness of the left but call it out and laugh at them. Ordinary people still mesmerised by their nonsense ideology don’t want civil war and will wake up eventually.
And where has playing nicely got us? Playing into their hands is exactly what we’ve been doing for the last decade or two. Whilst we still insist on fighting under the Queensbury Rules, they’re biting ears and gouging eyes. And this has been the case for so long that we’re at the cliff edge of complete and total defeat with no ladder to climb back. Every actions needs an appropriate reaction, and that reaction has to be considered within the context of circumstances and environment of the action. It’s not where I want to be, believe me, but I’ve become 100% certain that appealing to their sense of decency will never work; for the simple reason that they have a polar opposite belief of what decency is. By stubbornly sticking to our sense of right and wrong, and doing nothing else to combat the hysteria, we empower these people and allow them to grow.
I always want to fight fairly, but if someone wants to fight a different way then I’m happy to oblige. After being imprisoned with socialist chains, I’m not going to look my kids in the eye and say ‘Pity. Well, I was always polite”.
Civil war would suit the Davos Deviants admirably.
Many of Trump’s opponents accuse him of being a threat to democracy, yet democracy thrived throughout his previous presidency.
The real threat to true democracy has come through the actions of Biden’s administration, especially with green and DEI legislation and the failure to control the southern border
Also, use of censorship, propaganda and the power of the state (FBI, CIA, DOJ) to intimidate political opponents and their supporters.
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-says-it-wont-accept-ultimatum-type-invitations-second-ukraine-peace-2024-07-18/
‘They prepared for the ‘deal of the century’ for quite a long time, but it did not end in anything, and under Biden, on the contrary, a colossal historical tragedy happened’
Maria Zakharova
What’s really going on?
Trump’s plan for Ukraine is simple.
Freeze the conflict with an immediate ceasefire.
Haggle about how much of Eastern Ukraine Russia keeps.
Haggle over Ukraine/Georgia neutrality
His levers?
On Russia: Massive support for Ukraine particularly air power, air defence and de-restricted use of long range weapon systems, build up of Ukrainian defence industry.
On Ukraine: Withdrawal of U.S. financial and military support.
On Europe: U.S. withdrawal of all land forces from Europe.
So, essentially, Minsk 3 with bells on.
Three problems:
A frozen conflict requires a buffer zone patrolled by peacekeeping forces. The buffer zone will be one thousand kilometres in length. The green line in Cyprus is 180 km in length and requires two brigades to police it. Five divisions, essentially, two army corps will be required, forward located to police a Ukraine/Russia buffer zone. Where will that Army come from? Russia will not accept a NATO Army on its border. Ukraine will insist on at least one division from the United Kingdom, which does not possess such a deployable formation.
Ukraine may accept the loss of Crimea, packaged as some kind of ‘special status free zone’, but Atesh local resistance is active and unlikely to cease activity in such a scenario, pushing for Crimean nationhood; likewise the rest of Eastern Ukraine. Russian (Army) ‘little green men’ are likely to once more deploy.
The Minsk agreements resulted in a second Russian invasion.
The reality is that the Ukraine situation cannot finish as Black or White. It has to end as some shade of grey. Enough lives have been lost trying to draw lines on the map. It has to stop…
It had stopped 1994-2014.
Minsk 1 and 2 were shades of grey, resulting in a further invasion in 2022.
Any endgame will, realistically, require a policed buffer zone in order for Ukraine to have any confidence in a new settlement..
Who will police it?
Serious question.
There wasn’t an invasion in 2014, although there was a coup, initiated and supported by the USA.
What resulted in a “further” invasion in 2022 was 2 things – shelling and persecution of ethnic Russians living in eastern Ukraine for 7-8 years in massive contravention of the Minsk Accords; and continuing insistence by the USA that Ukraine would join NATO, contrary to Russia’s legitimate security concerns.
‘“In order to block and disarm 20,000 well-armed [Ukrainian soldiers], you need a specific set of personnel. And not just in numbers, but with skill. We needed specialists who know how to do it,” Putin said in the documentary.
“That’s why I gave orders to the Defense Ministry — why hide it? — to deploy special forces of the GRU (military intelligence) as well as marines and commandos there under the guise of reinforcing security for our military facilities in Crimea,”
Putin, March 2015
‘Strelkov was quoted as saying. However, by early August, Russian servicemen supposedly on “vacation” from the army had begun to arrive, he said.
According to Strelkov, the assault on the Black Sea town of Mariupol in September, which prompted concerns in Ukraine and the West that Russia has entered the conflict on a large scale, was conducted mostly by the Russian military “vacationers.”
This war has thus become a testing ground for the Kremlin in creating new tools of population management. It is developing a new type of biopolitical imperialism to manage the crisis in social reproduction.
‘And, if you believe the forecasts and the estimates are based on actual work, the real work of people who understand this, who have devoted their whole lives to this, in 15 years, there may be 22 million fewer Russians. I ask you to think about this figure: a seventh of the country’s population. If the current trend continues, the nation’s survival will be in jeopardy’ (Putin 2000)
As a result, the Kremlin accumulates cheap labor power, appropriating Ukrainian state investment in the birth, care, and education of its former citizens; their reproductive labor; and even their personal relations that allow them to survive in Russia without state support. This — together with the appropriation of companies and the devastation of territories now to be redeveloped — is a typical process of imperialist accumulation by dispossession.
Failure by the West and Ukraine to honour the last Minsk agreement and Kiev agression against Donbas resulted in Russia inervening to protect Donbas residents.
The fourth problem is that Russia has little incentive to freeze anything, unless of course you believe Western disinformation.
“English schools to phase out ‘cruel’ behaviour rules as Labour plans major education changes”
First of all, the ‘consequences’ systems run by many schools with increasing isolation from school life for wrong-doers clearly doesn’t work. It especially doesn’t work for boys. Boys and girls respond differently to different punishments. Sitting quietly for 30 minutes personal reflection, isn’t going to do the trick.
Secondly, and I’ve noticed this with all leftie thinking, why do all their proposals appear to hurt the majority in favouring often tiny minorities. If you have a disruptive child in class, why wouldn’t you want them kicked out so the 29 who want to learn and behave can do so.
Which brings us to…why are we still trying to force all kids down academic routes, when they could be electricians, plumbers and cooks. A lot of bad behaviour is down to boredom. Teach them to read and write, then gather the bright ones together to polish as fine gemstones. The rest, teach them something practical they can enjoy and earn a living doing.
Watching the programme about Daley Thompson it struck me how he said his school for difficult children did sports every single day. And that’s what disruptive children need. Use up energy, channel it into a competitive discipline or teamwork. Schools should do more sports…if their playing field hasn’t been built on.
“Third of Democrats wish Donald Trump had been killed”
So they agree with Putins answer to democracy then?
I thought the Dematwats were the protectors of democracy?
“Moderna was more deadly than Pfizer”
That’s like saying strychnine is more deadly than arsenic! F@#k all of them!
Damned with faint praise.
I don’t like Harris – she just seems to be one of life’s idiots to me – but am I the only one that doesn’t think this is as comical as it’s being made out to be? I mean, it’s not exactly cryptic – by understanding the past, I see the potential for a better future. Maybe I’m missing something?
How long before the female agent “shielding” Trump accuses him of groping her?
Is it me or were the women in the detail chosen for the thickness of their torso..?
And short legs.
“Police hunt for ‘hate crime’ suspect after Pride flags vandalised”
Meanwhile in other news, England burns with riots in Leeds and London , police responded strongly by leaving the areas quickly!
Spot on Dinger.
Personally I find Pride flags grotesque and insulting.
“Trump Is now certain to win…”. Has Jake Wallis Simons done well at betting on the horses then?