Comedy environmentalist Jim Dale and Dale Vince have both suggested that climate ‘denial’ should be a criminal offence. It gets them clicks and attention on cable and mainstream news, and it plays into a wider push by green billionaire-funded lawfare outfits using the courts to enforce Net Zero industrial shutdown. But it begs the question: what are the climate ‘deniers’ actually denying? Dale is a climate campaigner who points to bad weather as evidence that the climate is collapsing before our very eyes. But the evidence suggests no such thing. Data since 2000 show that there has been no increase in extreme weather, no increase in loss of life and no increase in economic costs.
The Emergency Events Database (EM-DAT) is a U.S. Government-supported tracker of mass disasters as well as health and economic impacts. It lists 26,000 disasters worldwide from 1900 to the present day. Dr. Matthew Wielicki, a former Geology Professor, has compiled data from this source and they provide no evidence to support the claim that ‘extreme’ weather is on the rise.
Dr. Wielicki suggests that the recent decrease in perceived climate urgency and importance among the American public, especially young adults, as shown by the recent Monmouth University poll “may be influenced by an observable lack of escalation in the direct impacts of climate change”. Such data can lead to scepticism or reduced concern, he adds.
It seems that the lack of evidence drives the alarmists further and further away from scientific reality in their desperation to promote Net Zero. Last week’s absurd survey of 380 “top scientists” by the Guardian found climate modeller Ruth Cerezo-Mota wailing that it was almost impossible not to feel “hopeless and broken” after all the flooding, fires and droughts of the last three years. Biologist Camille Parmesan was so fearful she almost gave up what she called climate science 15 years ago to become a nightclub singer. Now she says all the scientists she works with are at the end of their rope “asking what the fuck do we have to do to get through to people how bad this really is”. Engineering Professor Jonathan Cullen states the climate emergency is already here because just 1°C of heating has “supercharged the planet’s extreme weather”. Millions of people have “very likely” died early as a result, he claimed. Lorraine Whitmarsh is an ‘environmental psychologist’ at the University of Bath, and worries about the future her children are inheriting since climate change is an “existential threat” to humanity.
The Guardian article was written by Damian Carrington, one of the green billionaire-funded lobby group Covering Climate Now’s three journalists of the year in 2023. This operation pumps out ready-to-publish climate catastrophe copy to media outlets worldwide. Carrington polled over 800 lead authors or review editors of all reports from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) since 2018. He received replies from 380 authors, but as with all IPCC (and Guardian) reports, the definition of ‘climate scientists’ is very broad. Carrington describes Professor Lisa Schipper as an “expert on climate vulnerability”. Schipper notes that she is “particularly interested in socio-cultural dimensions of vulnerability including gender, culture and religion, as well as structural issues related to power, justice and equity”. Ralph Sims of Massey University says extreme weather events will escalate and there will be environmental refugees by the millions. Sims’s first job in academia was as a lecturer in agricultural machinery.
Meanwhile, back to the science, and the problem – the giant elephant in the room no less – is that the IPCC gives almost no credence to talk of a climate crisis based on observable bad weather patterns in the past and looking forward to the end of this century.
The above table published in the latest IPCC assessment report reveals this clearly. It shows there is little or no evidence that the following have been, or will be by 2100, affected by human-caused climate change: river floods, heavy rain and pluvial flooding, landslides, droughts (all types), fire ‘weather’, severe wind storms, tropical cyclones, sand and dust storms, heavy snowfall and ice storms, hail, snow avalanche, coastal flooding and erosion, and maritime heatwaves.
Far from living in a time of climate collapse, we appear to be enjoying a benign spell in an interglacial period. A little extra carbon dioxide, rescuing the Earth from possibly dangerous denudation, and a gentle rise of 1°C in temperature from the Little Ice Age, has boosted plant growth around the world. Evidence continues to be produced showing substantial CO2 greening of the planet including desert areas. A recent paper Chen et al. 2024 found that CO2 greening had actually accelerated over the last two decades.
The people spinning the tale of climate collapse – some of them advocating jail time for dissenters – are hysterical, but deadly serious. Ask Gianluca Alimonti, an Italian Physics Professor, whose paper stating a climate emergency was not supported by the available data, was recently retracted by Springer Nature after a year-long campaign by activist scientists and journalists, including Graham Readfearn of the Guardian. The Alimonti paper, which also included the work of two other physics professors, found that rainfall intensity and frequency was stationary in many parts of the world, and the same was true of U.S. tornadoes. Other meteorological categories including natural disasters, floods, droughts and ecosystem productivity showed “no clear positive trend of extreme events”.
Only a fool would consider arguing that climate contrarian scientists should be sent to jail, as Dale did with Andrew Doyle last Sunday on GB News’s Free Speech Nation. Alas, the transcript of Dale’s comments does little to clarify his argument – it’s just word salad gibberish for the most part. But his intention is clear. Time for ‘deniers’, whatever they are supposed to be denying, to be marched off to jail. The sad thing is that he is not alone – Dale says it is “common sense”, which, as Doyle observed, is the refrain of every tyrant in history who’s wanted to jail his opponents.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
“Once the dictators realize that their plans are failing, they will turn to purely destructive pursuits, both to save face and to exercise revenge on the social order that resisted their brilliance.”
What’s behind BoJo’s most recent lockdown endorsement and in store soon.
Ludwig van Mises from the latest piece by Jeffrey Tucker.
Alistair Cavendish would probably agree.
His piece is a must read.
I suspect it will be an alternating cycle now: vaccination drives to raise hopes of ending Lockdowns, leading to slight loosening and reopening, followed by thrashing the vaccines and discovering mutations to institute new Lockdowns.
The main and real driver and gauge will be hairdressers: How long will people keep quiet without having had the opportunity for a haircut.
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/weasel-words-and-broken-promises-on-the-road-to-endless-lockdowns/
The most recent one on CW, very good too.
Excellent summary of this duplicitous governments behaviour over the past twelve months.
How they’re ‘nudging’ us into tyranny in CW is a vital read. Tavistock?
Like they ‘nudged’ us into buying diesel cars for twenty years even though they knew them to be carcinogenic (they discussed on Newsnight and such like at the time).
Then when their climate change priorities changed we were all accused of deliberately wanting to give cancer to children.
One interesting aspect is that they have pushed us to be hyper risk averse of covid – ‘if it saves one life’ and haven’t contextualised the data within normal deaths of other things – especially similar colds which take off 100,000 a year
And now they want us to contextualise vaccine deaths – ‘its only a few – for the greater good etc’
They can argue for zero covid deaths and I can argue for zero vaccine deaths. Given that covid deaths are an act of God and vaccine deaths are a man-made intervention you can be sued for – I think the latter argument is easier to make.
Your last paragraph might explain the unexpected notification that my GP Surgery will not be giving vaccines to 18-49s, the realisation that they might get sued in the event of misadventure.
I think its also why they want to coerce instead of force vaccinations on people.
They can always say ‘you knew it was only emergency licensed and you chose to take it’.
Although with vaccine passports etc the line between coercion and mandation becomes muddied. Add that to the lies about it being ‘safe and fully tested’ etc.
cf. ‘Nobody was forced to wear a mask, we provided plenty of options for self declared exemption so your mask induced respiratory disease is your own fault’.
yes – its almost like the whole pandemic has been designed by the lawyers to keep them in work for the next 50 years
This! Said it at the time, the guidance is so vague to cover Bozo’s arse.
I am pretty sure that there must be an important, not publicized, legal reason for the UK’s ‘soft’ mask mandate, or rather the unique self-exempt possibility and option and, obviously, for the strict acceptance of businesses of it due to the disability act.
They are an experimental medical intervention, not without side effects and, IMO, an assault on one’s bodily autonomy.
The same is true with regard to the gene therapies deliberately misleadingly called vaccines, which are even officially only approved temporarily and as experimental.
Mandating them would most certainly also assault and infringe upon one’s bodily autonomy, which is why it can’t and won’t be done by government even if/once fully approved.
The interim legal angle to prevent the outsourcing of the mandate and coercion from government to businesses is likely the experimental nature, certainly in the USA where that is already in front of the courts, brought on behalf of a teachers union.
It should though also be deemed illegal in general, as businesses simply have no right to infringe upon one’s bodily autonomy and as the possible restriction of access by businesses of the unvaxxed without a prior law being made falls foul of the disability act again, as with masks, and this principle should be deemed unacceptable anyway in a democracy- a country that accepts this, that businesses are above the law and can make their own ones in such matters, should abolish its then useless and superfluous legislature and judiciary as well.
I also think that any form of mandatory invasive testing, like oral or nasal swabs or blood tests, are an assault and infringement on one’s bodily autonomy and that they are also simply illegal- in particular again as the PCR and LFT tests are also only approved under emergency authorisation for another year as well, and as they are useless due to not being standardized, leading to arbitrary results and ‘punishments’ (the latter applies to non-invasive aka spit LFT tests as well).
As for the refusal or result then ensuing access denial by businesses, see above.
I am pretty sure that the government is fully aware of all this and just tries it anyway.
It is a scandal and indicative of an either corrupted or completely incompetent legal profession in the UK that no one has brought these cases and arguments to the courts yet.
Perhaps that is why the ‘vaccines’ are being given free of charge.
If we had to pay for them one might sue under the Trades Description Act since they are clearly not ‘vaccines’ at all.
I can never for the life of me understand why anyone without symptoms who feels well would even consider having a test let alone queuing up to have one.
‘The free world died of COVID 19’
‘Covid Mania has turned the world’s sovereign states into one tyranny after another.’
https://www.aier.org/article/the-free-world-died-of-covid-19/
And, not least, this sovereign state…….turned into a totalitarian fascist dictatorship run independently of parliament by the panjandrums of the NHS socialist enterprise.
This country and its health service is in more in need of fundamental reform now than at any time, arguably, since the reign of Charles I
‘Aneurin Bevan, the minister responsible for its creation, suffered from no such timidity. He described the National Health Service as “a piece of real socialism,” and spoke of how it stood “opposed to the hedonism of capitalist society.”
https://tribunemag.co.uk/2020/07/aneurin-bevan-on-the-socialist-ambitions-of-the-nhs
What has happened over the last twelve months in Britain has been a long time in the making….and now requires a swift and radical unmaking…..
“socialist enterprise”
Once again a moron strikes : “It’s all socialism!”
This sort of nonsense gives Johnson a run for his money in the rubbish stakes.
This is far too serious a situation for knuckle-draggers indulging in the games of the political playpen.
Indeed…. red pill v blue pill…. left v right….dem v rep… lab v con etc…etc when you get globalists such as Sir Kier Starmer and dear old Tony B…. its a bickering nonsense…
The following is an agenda list I can believe in:
Lockdowns, PPE and social distancing have never been shown to benefit the
course of any epidemic, yet they can have devastating effects on society. Such
diktats should be rendered unlawful:
1. Reassert freedom of speech, opinion and choice.
2. Restore open scientific debate.
3. Promote personal responsibility and accountability and the protection of
basic human liberties
4. Promote mutual respect with regards to feelings of fear and personal health
choices.
5. End quarantining of asymptomatic individuals.
6. Eliminate forced isolation of symptomatic individuals. Recommend resting
at home when experiencing flu-like symptoms for up to eight days from the
onset of symptoms and until the absence of fever for 24 hours.
7. Develop a public health awareness campaign to promote hand hygiene and
a healthy lifestyle consisting of healthy eating, plentiful exercise and adequate
exposure to the sun (or vitamin D supplements).
Not to be found on any May 6th canvassing materials…anywhere.
https://www.pandata.org/about/protocol-for-reopening-society/
“ bickering nonsense…”
Indeed. I suppose it keeps the knuckle-draggers happy, but an analysis in traditional one-dimensional political terms is just stupid axe-grinding – and pointless. I’m on the traditional ‘left’ – but I have no idea what the term ‘socialism’ actually means in accurate descriptive terms. But I do know that you have to be intellectually one slate short of a roof to think that this shit-show can be analysed in such a framework.
I’m sort of anarcho-conservative and don’t see lockdown etc as Socialist at all, more Corporatist in the style of Mussolini.
‘The State is everything and everything is The State’ (something like that from memory).
This is not complicated.
Most on here understand that the government is being directed by the National Health Service via SAGE.
The National Health Service is a socialist construct:
‘Placing its creation in the context of a broader social transformation aimed at empowering workers – and diminishing what Marx referred to as “the wages system” – Bevan describes the NHS as “the most revolutionary feature of the British Socialist programme.”
Reference above
The measures instigated by this NHS coup are buttressed by governmental diktat unsupervised by parliament and backed with draconian sanctions enforced by state security services.
Socialist fascism.
In offering the AZ vaccine to the under 60s, the UK has become a definite ‘outlier’.
Maybe we are right and everyone else is wrong – who knows? Maybe they are all risk averse or maybe we are a rogue state. Time will tell
“He’s probably concerned, as I am, about the scenes in London that we saw, for instance, of people enjoying the outside of the pubs and the crowded spaces,” Prof Harnden tells BBC Breakfast.
He probably felt like that long before the pandemic
They want to start getting a bit of CONSISTENCY into their message and pronouncements. That guy clearly hadn’t seen the advertisement being shown every night on TV showing the 2 middle class couples in their garden socialising SAFELY because they were OUTSIDE where the covid gets dispersed into the air – just like all the people outside the pubs in soho were – why is it ok for someone’s back garden and not for outside a pub in soho. Strewth. sorry, I am just so incredibly angry with all the handwringing health and safetyism.
The johnson mantra about the ‘vaccine cavalry being around the corner’ (filched from hancock) either turned into Custers last stand or somebody reminded HMP that shortly after their arrival 50-90% of First Americans died of European virus and other diseases.
Or by chopping and changing perhaps he is deliberately stoking feelings of chaos. Extract from a John le Carre interview shortly before his death.
‘And for the political class a disdain grows with the the years
“Politicians love chaos, don’t ever think otherwise. It gives them authority and it gives them power. It gives them profile.
The idea that they’ll fix it for you”.
He (le Carre) despairs about what he believes is absolutism on the political right and left, libertarian and Leninist with the same objective. To start again after the chaos”.
Or after the Great Reset ?
“Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s suggestion that lockdown has played a significant part in reducing coronavirus infection levels is backed up by the data, says Prof Sir David Spiegelhalter, a statistician from the University of Cambridge.
He told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “It is the lockdown that has caused the major drop, of course, because we’ve seen that happen in the huge reduction in the people who haven’t been vaccinated.”
Spiegelhalter is just relying on the modelling of Ferguson which doesn’t explain the drops in countries that didn’t lock down. I expect he wants a knighthood and this is his price
Either that or he’s applied for a substantial grant from ‘The Foundation’.
The ever-changing position on how to tackle this very normal seasonal virus is to deliberately confuse the already mentally-tenderised population.
If the previously celebrated ‘vaccine’ programme was a success, that would mean the virus has been dealt with… [malfunction!] No, the vaccine is now only a tool in the cabinet to deal with this virus, we need to lockdown again. Of course this is completely at odds with Madcock crying on TV repeatedly about how the ‘vaccine’ is our way to freedom. The confusion puts the population into a state of constant panic, like a rabbit in the headlights waiting to be snuffed out by it’s impending doom.
This will never end until our society is totally unrecognisable and they’ve fully implemented the Great Reset.
The UK Lockdown was so successful it worked in Florida and Sweden too!
Does anyone know of a comparable website to this one which doesn’t promote the vaccine? I’ve had enough of the daily support it is showing towards a dangerous drug that is being used on healthy people.
This PANDA summary J4mes is one of the very best responses to the hysterical unscientific blatherings via the state approved Covidian Cultists within the UK – gargoyles like Eggwina Curry (standing for office again) – spew out:
https://www.pandata.org/a-critical-analysis-of-the-covid-response/
Many thanks, I’ll give it a look.
Bye. Don’t let the door hit you on the way out.
Every time I’m just about to give up hope, you call me back, Lucan. Your predictable insults and general ad hominem is far too entertaining to leave!
““Why is Boris talking down Britain’s vaccine success again?“
Why reference this load of old tosh in Round Up? We can read similar in the Guardian any day.
Somebody seems to be busting a gut here on promoting ‘vaccines’ as the miracle they aren’t.
If they are editorialising as such then fair enough but I don’t think this is so, a round up of the news is fine by me. The figures do not support the vax or the lockdown and I suspect Toby and Will both know this. I’m hugely grateful for this site and it’s efforts over the last year. If there is a new conflict or pressure from a regulator, or they have simply decided the vax is our saviour (when clearly it is not), then they should declare as such and I’ll review my opinions accordingly.
The only place you’ll read anything different is on sites full of nutters. Fortunately this isn’t one of them.
Perhaps time to join James and go elsewhere? Then we can get the comment section back to rational discussions of risk based upon data.
Your own popularity suggests you’ve got a long way to go to get everyone agreeing with your pro-‘vaccine’ madness Lucan.
By next year this time, it could well hsve gone down in history as having been a Titanic success.