Dan Hannan has posted on his YouTube under the heading ‘The vaccination scandal‘ a clip of him asking the Minister, Lord Markham, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary for Health, what the Government’s latest assessment is of the efficacy of the Covid vaccines. In response, the Minister admits that the vaccines did not significantly prevent transmission, leading Lord Hannan to comment beneath the clip: “So why the hell did we force them on to young people? Why did we insist on vaccine passports?”
Here’s the question and reply in full:
My Lords, may I ask my noble friend the Minister about the efficacy of the vaccine in preventing transmission. It does seem to have been very good at keeping people out of hospital and keeping people alive. But we built the most immense edifice of restrictions around the idea that it was preventing the transmission of Covid. We had vaccine passports and travel bass and it now seems that both the WHO and FISA knew at the time that its efficacy when it came to preventing transmission was negligible. Can my noble friend the Minister tell the House what is his Department’s latest assessment of the vaccine as a way of preventing giving other people Covid.
Lord Markham’s reply:
I think the main thing that the vaccine did was prevent, if you did get Covid, you having any bad effects from it all. So whilst it might not particularly reduce the transmission, it absolutely reduced the effects if you had it and the impact in terms of hospitalisations and deaths. That was the main benefit of the vaccine. And because we made it basically a less serious disease, that then enabled us to open up the country in the way that we were one of the first to get going again because we knew there was no longer the high risk from the disease that there was before.
The vaccine “enabled us to open up the country” again. Yet Sweden and South Dakota never shut down, and Florida reopened before the vaccines were available. I guess they’re magical places that don’t need vaccines to live as free people.
Let’s not forget, of course, that Boris Johnson admitted that two doses of the vaccines didn’t protect against “catching the disease” or “passing it on” back in October 2021. He also said the Government wanted “young people” and “kids at school” to be “getting their jabs with complete confidence”.
Of course, some scientists question whether the Covid vaccines were really any good at preventing serious illness or death either, but that’s for another day.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
And they say comedy is dead.
Steam was literally coming out of my ears reading the complete hogwash from our ‘right honourables’ and I was mulling over a response but couldn’t beat your comment!!
“…some scientists question whether the Covid vaccines were really any good at preventing serious illness or death either,”
Well Dr Mike Yeadon is adamant that the so-called “vaccines” were deliberately brewed to kill, maim and induce infertility. I have never seen any evidence to challenge that view so as always I will go along entirely with the good Doctor’s opinion.
Same here Hux , MYeadon was all over it as was Dr Vernon Coleman who was reduced to tears at the thought of what the Jabathon was going to do !
Indeed.
Dr Vernon Coleman was an out an out hero when this shit fest started. One hell of a courageous man.
And he has been impoverished, cancelled and threatened with death for his pains. Such is our “leaders” understanding of anything!
So when will Lord Markham answer the question?
Come to think of it the answer is obvious:
‘No. I can’t’
What a shill is Hannan! There is no disinterested evidence that the covid vaccines saved us from the carnage of covid. There’s plenty of evidence that the vaccines promoted vulnerability to covid and have caused untold misery and death.
But one thing that they are actually very good at is harming the immune system. And Permanently.
As those apparently in charge of our health should have known.
https://doorlesscarp953.substack.com/p/gene-therapies-cancer-risk-and-why?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=650045&post_id=140525937&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=false&r=x6a6a&triedRedirect=true
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1521661623005259?via%3Dihub
modified ie synthetic RNA is a gene therapy and should have felt the full force of being assessed as such by that limb of the MHRA. But they were asleep at the wheel and or complicit. Either way criminal.
The long term effects, always assuming CV events don’t get you at first, are unknown, but they won’t be good.
“I think the main thing that the vaccine did was prevent, if you did get Covid, you having any bad effects from it all.”
This is a lie. They just cannot admit the truth.
ONS shunted CoVid deaths from vaccinated people who contracted the disease within 14 days of last vaccine dose, into the unvaccinated statistics. So it was clear then the jabs were not reducing bad effects.
I think death is a bad effect.
In 2020, before vaccines, there were very few serious cases, no more in fact than in 2021.
And when the data was corrected and reviewed properly, it consistently showed higher death rate in vaccinees.
How can the seriousness of an illness in progress be assessed?
“Oh yes this one’s proper poorly. Thank God he’s had the “vaccine.” He’d have been dead without it.”
What a load of boll ox.
Exactly – it’s scientific nonsense spouted by those with a script. Without a statistical control (RCT) which is thethere is no possibility of determining whether any injected agent is safe!
…. apologies for the corrupted text but I think you’ll get the meaning!
Do you not mean is effective? As there is no control the Lords’ claim is imaginary nonsense. He is clearly unfit to govern and should be thrown out along with 99% of MPs. This may happen in the next GE if the public as a whole realised what has been done to us but again 99% are not bright enough to realise.
Johnson “…. against wearing masks in confined spaces”. Like parks and the countryside. Mr Johnson? Where the police were fining people?
This 50min interview looks good but I haven’t watched it. It’s Sonia Elijah interviewing a Dutch data expert and a Dutch vax injured lady who represents other victims over here in the Netherlands. But guess what the most common side effect of the vax is? I guess it’s true that it doesn’t prevent transmission ( or much else, but we knew that already ) one iota based on this interesting information;
”My bombshell interview with data expert and ethical computer hacker, Wouter Aukema from the Netherlands, exposes the true horrors of the trove of data buried within the European Medicines Agency’s EudraVigilance case safety reporting system– like never before!
Wouter Aukema, a data forensics analyst with over 30 years experience, teamed up with a software expert to develop a tool where they were able to download ALL 15 million case safety reports over the past 20 years, for 6000 medicinal drug products and substances (within and outside of Europe) including the Covid-19 experimental shots.
Up until now, the only way the scientific community had been able to analyse side effects of a specific drug was by using the highly cumbersome and opaque interface of the EMA’s database system. However, thanks to Aukema and his colleague’s unique tool, the public can see for the first time the true extent of the carnage caused by the Covid-19 shots.
Aukema went on to reveal:
https://soniaelijah.substack.com/p/true-horrors-of-covid-vaccine-harm
Wow. Great work Mogs.
Strangely this is a side effect of destroying the immune system, which the MRNA vax does. Because there was not enough testing this was not realised, and is the most criminal action of Governments. EUA (emergency use authorisation) was plain stupid for a new technology with a past of killing experimental animals. But they did it anyway! Now claim no one knew any better!
Not a pandemic.
Not vaccines.
I have no time for people who now act outraged that they were misled about the jabs not stopping spread of coronaviruses.
That information was available in the autumn of 2020 released by the pharmas. It was.published and I read it.
They were extremely clear about it. Their only claim (falsely) was that it reduced mortality by 95%.
I don’t have any respect for anyone who heard what they wanted to hear and now want to hold someone else responsible for their own selective hearing.
I somewhat agree, but we need many more people to get angry. I was fuming mad in 20/21 but it was a pretty lonely anger, except for some like minded people here.
If some are hearing it for the first time and get angry and betrayed then all well and good.
The bit to be angry about is the false claim that it reduced deaths by 95%. As there was no trial against covid at all, they couldn’t know that. See my many other posts on this. There was also no control group, either, in fact Pfizer did have one for 4 weeks, but then vaccinated that as well to cover the problems with the vaxed group. It is all in the paperwork (secret for 75 years) prised out of them by the US courts. The whole saga would make a good spoof horror film, but unfortunately for us all is real and now.
I’m aware of all the ins and outs. I was following very closely at the time. But back then, my anger was solitary.
Now it’s a deep, cold anger, matched by a complete unwillingness to either forgive or forget. Still solitary, but less so as time goes on.
But I want the whole world to be angry too, so if someone prominent keeps loudly repeating something we all knew at the time, then I support that.
If it’s also a Johnny-come-lately who’s ‘discovered’ this fact then a mea culpa “oops, I was wrong and I’m sorry I called them all conspiracy theorists” is also welcome.
Alison Pearson is starting to talk about the jibbyjabbies. She’s quite upset. Good! She’ll shout about that.
John Campbell has woken up to the Midazolam scandal. Good for him, his anger is fresh and will help to convince others.
I knew about the Post Office scandal nearly seven years ago, but it took a TV drama to educate the masses.
Some audiences are slow on the uptake, so spoon feeding is required.
Drip drip drip…
What gets me with these things is that people like Hannan make out as if the information is brand new. I can’t speak for anyone else on here but I recall, back in about March 2020, reading an article which laid out a list of aims for 14 manufacturers. This was before the vaccines were even available and all 14 said the aim was to “mitigate the effects”. If I recall correctly it was an article by Mike Yeadon.
Yet, in one week alone, I saw Johnson state on Monday TV that they give you “immunity” and, on Wednesday, Sajid Javid (Health Secretary) also stated “immunity”. How come I knew they did no such thing yet Government, supposedly, did not?
The real question Hannan needs to seek the answer to is “Why did Government knowingly lie in order to get unlicenced drugs into the entire population of numerous countries?”.
Brown envelopes or cash in offshore banks?
https://dailysceptic.org/2024/04/29/new-study-from-czech-republic-confirms-covid-vaccines-have-around-zero-efficacy-against-death/
We keep being gaslit by government minions that the ‘vaccines’, (which they’re not, they are gene therapies), saved lives and reduced severity of symptoms. However, I would wager any benefit was purely psychosomatic. Until the medical fraternity understand and consider the role of the mind in disease and illness they will forever be chasing unicorns and magic bullets to effect cures whose effects are worse than the illness they seek to cure.
Iatrogenic disease probably causes more death and illness than cancer, heart disease and diabetes put together. We are in the midst of a medical crisis not because of pathogens and gene manipulated viruses but of medical practice itself. The very paradigm medicine is based on is not fit for purpose.
There needs to be a seismic shift in our understanding of health and how to achieve it. Injecting toxins into our bodies is never a good idea, maybe as a last resort, but prevention has always been better than cure.
“It does seem to have been very good at keeping people out of hospital and keeping people alive.”
Er excuse me Lord Hannan but can you please let us here on the DS have any scientific evidence that these gene therapy treatments kept people out hospital or indeed alive? There’s certainly plenty of evidence from the MHRA Yellow Card system that they killed and maimed people. If you have any evidence perhaps you could share it here on the pages of the DS. Models especially from Imperial College are not allowed.
You would think that those who were fooled into filling their arms full of experimental jabs might be the very ones taking the most interest in these disturbing findings not the unjabbed.
‘…, it absolutely reduced the effects if you had it (Covid) and the impact in terms of hospitalisations and deaths.’
Yet the death risk from Covid unless you were old or moribund or both was nil, and everyone knew that before the jab rollout began. The jab was supposed to be just for these people. That was the plan right up to Mar-21, the third month of the rollout. I’ll ignore the cash-till noises rattling in my ears and pretend I don’t know the answer and ask why the rollout was widened to include everyone, including babies.
Was this not the wickedest thing ever done?
There is zero statistical evidence that covid jabs did any good at all, and a great deal that they are harmful. The wall of silence has begun to crumble.