Once upon a time, linking climate change directly back to homosexuality was almost enough to get you sectioned. Remember 10 years ago, during the floods of 2014, when UKIP local councillor David Silvester was widely mocked after writing a letter to then-PM David Cameron, warning that the bad weather of the day was due to Dismal Dave’s acting “arrogantly against the Gospel” by planning to legalise gay marriage, thereby angering God Almighty and causing Him to unleash “storms, disease, pestilence and war” upon us all?
Today, the situation is kind of the reverse, and we are now exhorted to propitiate the angry climate-gods after all – otherwise they will punish those homosexuals who walk amongst us with terrible deluges and inundations of a new kind, as shown by the Daily Sceptic reporting last week on a quite pathetic story in the Independent, headlined ‘How climate change is hitting vulnerable Indonesian trans sex workers’. As the DS wrote, “Street-walking in a Muslim majority country undoubtedly has perils”, but bad weather is not chief amongst them.
Rain of Terror
According to the Independent, the problem was that “the rainy season was lasting longer” and “winds were stronger”, causing clients to stay nice and dry at home and use prostitutes there instead. Even worse, 72% of transsexual escorts in the affected region “had increased expenses” when it rained – how much do umbrellas cost in Java these days? Therefore, it was argued, “climate change makes the vulnerable even more vulnerable”. But does it really? If you bother to read the whole report beyond its absolutely mental headline, you will see that most of the ladyboys involved actually enjoyed a, um, happy ending.
The particular transgender street-walkers interviewed for the piece by a brave journalist who sidled up to them after dark armed with a fistful of tourist dollars whilst whispering the words “it’s okay, I just want to talk”, all ended up in plum jobs once they had been forced off the pavements by an amazing extra 55mm of precipitation per annum – or, at least, plum jobs by comparison to the alternative employment prospect of selling their bodies to random all-comers on street-corners.
One became a singer with a transgender arts group, for whose associated theatre company he now runs a social media channel. Another got a place on a special entrepreneurship training programme aimed at “empowering transgender women”, following which he was able to set up his own small business, selling both home-made cakes and home-made smells re-labelled as ‘perfumes’.
So, if climate change really did force these former harlots off the streets (which it obviously didn’t – the last time heavy rain truly ended prostitution was during the happy, sin-cleansing days of Noah), then it forced them off the streets and into much better, safer, better-paid and more stable jobs – so surely the Independent’s headline should actually have been ‘How climate change is helping vulnerable Indonesian trans sex workers’, not “hitting” them?
Intersection 28
Why are the mainstream media suddenly desperate to begin spuriously linking climate change back to various ostensibly unrelated woke issues like transgenderism and prostitutes’ rights? It is all part of the modish neo-Marxist doctrine of ‘intersectionality’, which holds that, because capitalism, white privilege, patriarchy and homophobia all purportedly link together into one gigantic matrix of self-reinforcing oppression. So this fact (if ‘fact’ it really be) can likewise be combatted by highlighting and promoting the interlinked, intersectional potential nodes of minoritarian resistance against this very same nefarious power-matrix – blacks, Muslims, gays, feminists, rain-sodden transsexual Indonesian prostitutes, etc.
If it can be shown that climate change – caused by evil, white male-led Western capitalism – disproportionately affects, say, blind Taiwanese genderqueer midgets on wheels or something, then this finding can cynically be leveraged in order to place profound moral pressure upon our pathetic, liberal guilt-ridden, polluting institutions, industries and governments to systematically dismantle themselves wholesale.
In other words, instead of rebutting critics of Net Zero along rational, policy-based lines – which is often rather hard to do, as the whole policy of Net Zero is thoroughly irrational in the first place – professional Greentards can instead spare themselves the time and effort and just shout “Racist!”, “Whore-Hater!” or “Transphobe!” at their opponents thereby to shut them up immediately.
The logical conclusion of such trends culminates in the following recent online PR meme, spread jointly by the U.S. conservationist group Oregon Wild and someone named The Intersectional Environmentalist, which I promise is genuine and not a spoof starring Keith Lemon:
Less ‘Save the Trees’, more ‘Save the Trannies’. I didn’t realise that even some dryads were now ‘women with penises’ too these days.
This other twin meme, meanwhile, strongly implies transsexuals are an endangered hairy American forest-species, like Bigfoot:
Like the famous old 1960s Patterson-Gimlin Film footage of Bigfoot, however, I think that’s pretty obviously just a man dressed in a suit.
The Absolute Intersection of Insanity
Who is this meme-spreading ‘Intersectional Environmentalist’, with the emphasis upon those final three syllables? It is none other than a professional Third Sector complainer named Leah Thomas, a young American lady who grumbles that, back “in 2017, I was the only Black person [or even “black person”] in my graduating class to receive an environmental science degree”. Because of this sad racial isolation, says Leah, “at times, I felt the pressure to silence parts of my racial identity” (translation: not to spend every waking moment of my life shouting abuse at white people). Then, however, 2020 and the sudden environmental extinction of George Floyd came along, at which point silencing Ms. Thomas about the colour of her skin became absolutely impossible.
“In June 2020,” Leah told readers of Marie Claire magazine (it’s where the cool girls go to get all their latest peer-reviewed climate-data analysis), “as the Black Lives Matter movement reached global proportions, many of my environmental peers remained silent. I was frustrated. When I asked how it was possible that environmentalists and conservationists could advocate for the protection of even the smallest of species, but not Black lives or endangered people, I was met with confusion.”
I bet you were. What the hell does saving the narrow-ridged finless porpoise from extinction have to do with the death of George Floyd? Absolutely nothing, you may have reasonably thought: until, that is, the magic word ‘intersectionality’ is introduced into the mix.
Frustrated at her scientific colleagues’ inability to understand or appreciate her profoundly unscientific theories, Leah Thomas proudly “coined the term ‘Intersectional Environmentalism’” – hardly an ‘achievement’, one may have thought, it’s literally just putting the word ‘Intersectional’ in front of any given noun. Nonetheless, the term went viral online, and Leah somehow got a book deal out of it. Imaginatively, it is called The Intersectional Environmentalist, and has a twee little picture of a rainbow on the front, whether LGBT or rainfall-related in its nature, I do not know. Probably both – it’s about intersectionality, after all.
Leah even now has her own charitable non-profit propaganda-type organisation, which pushes the utterly fatuous line that biodiversity and political diversity go hand in hand: “The Earth and its eco-systems thrive on diversity and so does climate action.” Her own particular evolutionary niche in the current political eco-system of the West, I think, is best summed up by the single word ‘parasite’.
The basic modus operandi of Thomas’s creed – later taken up by the Independent as regards water-allergic Indonesian ladyboys – is as follows. Take any give piece of climate-related news. Then pick any given ‘vulnerable’ minority group. Now link the two, no matter how tenuously, and claim they will automatically be the worst affected – e.g. floods in Bangladesh will naturally impact local 35 stone comatose quadriplegics worst of all, because they can’t swim very well. Then, bung the key Newspeak word ‘Intersectional’ somewhere into your argument, and Bob’s your uncle – an easy front-page on Marie Claire/The Independent/Pravda/Asian Babes, a job well done!
Catrina and the Rising Waves
If you prefer to make the front page of Pink News, however, your chosen intersectional group of climate-euthanised pseudo-victims will, of course, have to be innately queer in nature, as ably demonstrated by the Scottish branch of Friends of the Earth. In a special essay called ‘Why Climate Change is an LGBTQ+ Issue’, written to mark annual Homo History Month, Catrina Randall, a queer-friendly voice for Friends of the Earth Scotland, reverently explained how:
Through climate justice, we recognise that the roots of climate change are tied up with the roots of multiple oppressions. Capitalism and colonialism fuel climate change, but are also a part of LGBTQ+ oppression… Anti-capitalism has long been important to many in the fight for queer liberation. We recognise that capitalism rewards conformity and punishes diversity [wholly unlike Communism, obviously]. It threatens diversity of gender and sexuality in the same way it threatens biodiversity in its quest for profit. Fighting capitalism and colonialism, both present day and the legacy, is key to fighting climate change, but it’s also a key part of queer liberation. Our fights are inherently linked.
If you ever wanted conclusive proof that, no matter how the whole field may have originally started out, the contemporary Green movement has today become little more than a pathetically obvious front for Marxism of one kind or another, then this is it. Biodiversity and sexual diversity are now revealed as one and the same thing – Save the Gay Pandas today!
From a far-Left perspective, explains Catrina, “when it comes to the fight against climate change, the LGBTQ+ community has so much to offer”, as “we have a history of fighting for survival” during things like the Stonewall Riots, so “we are trained for this fight”. Well, if gays have a long history of organising violent street-marches, so do other rival organisations like the National Front. Can we have Intersectional Fascism next? (Some may say we already do…)
According to Catrina, come the forthcoming Environmental Apocalypse, homosexuals will be particularly well-suited to saving lives and distributing succour on account of their alleged widespread past experience in “providing shelter in gay bars during natural disasters”. I’d rather take my chances outside in all the floodwaters, thanks. “We know when we come together we’re a force to be reckoned with,” Catrina ended her essay. We have been warned.
Oh, I Do Like To Be Gay Beside the Seaside!
Even proper full-blown academic journals have now drunk the Queer Intersectional Environmentalist Kool-Aid, as shown by a laughable piece which appeared in the Journal of Climate Change and Health in February, entitled ‘Climate Change-Related Disasters & the Health of LGBTQ+ Populations’.
With issues of biodiversity in mind, this report, quite genuinely, argued that, as gays are apparently now disproportionately a coastal-dwelling species, like crabs or starfish, who inhabit seaside or riverside towns and cities like Brighton and San Francisco in relatively greater numbers than boring old landlubber heterosexuals do, in a special form of microbiome known as “gayborhoods”, they are placed at innately higher risk of being drowned during global warming-triggered flood-events.
Because of such semi-aquatic dwelling-patterns, we are told, “approximately 4% of gay or lesbian people reported being forced to evacuate their home due to a natural disaster compared with 1.2% of heterosexual people.” Maybe UKIP’s David Silvester was right after all, and God really does send out floodwaters to punish deviants? He may also choose to punish them with wildfires, which likewise affect gay lungs far worse than straight ones, as “approximately 21% of LGBTQ+ adults live with asthma and/or emphysema compared with 14% of heterosexual adults”, for reasons entirely unexplained.
Furthermore, global warming will help spread tropical diseases, the authors warn, leaving HIV/AIDS-ridden gay people, with their suppressed immune systems, even more susceptible to infection from the next global wave of Um Bongo Fever than straight people will be. Furthermore, as supposedly proven during the COVID-19 pandemic, “LGBTQ+ Americans were more likely to work in jobs considered ‘essential’”, like being transgender street-prostitutes, meaning they would find it impossible to avoid being infected in a way their non-queer peers would not (no heterosexuals are known to be employed as binmen, delivery drivers, hospital workers, shopkeepers or policemen throughout all of the continental United States).
Even worse, once the floodwaters do strike, “emergency shelters are frequently ill-equipped to support LGBTQ+ people and are experienced as unwelcoming by them”. Shockingly, I would imagine some don’t even have transgender toilets, just chemical ones.
Now that we have been exposed to such profound Intersectional Environmentalist wisdom, I trust Daily Sceptic readers are all now fully aware of the immense and pressing need for every last one of us to cut down on our carbon emissions immediately, lest we accidentally trigger an irreversible Homosexual Mass Extinction Event sometime before 2050. We must all do our bit, and start transitioning away from fossil fuels this very instant, lest we push Graham Norton and Benjamin Butterworth into unwanted early graves. Any single unnecessary emission you create, and it is tantamount to strangling Matthew Parris with piano-wire.
With this distressing thought in mind, I have one final question for all those Intersectional Environmentalists out there, then: what are the CO2 emissions of the average Pride parade?
Steven Tucker is a journalist and the author of over 10 books, the latest being Hitler’s & Stalin’s Misuse of Science: When Science Fiction Was Turned Into Science Fact by the Nazis and the Soviets (Pen & Sword/Frontline), which is out now.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Top of the world Ma.
Morning all.
Us again!
Looks like it.
Good morning Marcus.
We should meet at a more respectable time and location, Huxley. But then I was told never to meet my heroes
You smooth talking bu….
…buffoon?
Oh, enough, we’re wasting prime screen space on these niceties. Toby will tell us off.
Downunder seriously slept in. Good morning to you both!
Thanks AE.
Gooooooood morning Vietnam!
Good morning, cg (wherever you are … )
Nice one CG.
Sigh! The same bs that they tried to pull on covid, pretending the consequences of their panic policies were the consequences of covid itself.
No, Germany did absolutely the right thing by buying oil and gas from a reliable supplier who could provide the cheapest supply.
The stupid thing to do was let themselves be manipulated into a completely over the top, self-harming response to the Russians doing something the US and NATO have happily done repeatedly without any significant punitive consequences.
At least be honest enough to put the blame for a consequence on the choice that led to that consequence.
No, they imposed green ideology and crippled their own energy production
They did that as well, but that hardly makes them any less the idiots responsible for their own situation!
The result of letting themselves be manipulated into self-harm for the benefit of the US regime will be that German industry will be damaged, possibly destroyed competitively. There is no way around the fact that sourcing energy from other places will increase costs dramatically, because it’s simply the case that Russia is and will remain the cheapest supplier. And the fact is that a significant number of German businesses already cited high energy costs as potential threats to their existence, before the declaration of an economic war of aggression on Russia.
Sympathy for Germans or other Europeans who will suffer as a result of the choice to pander to the US declaration of said economic war of aggression? None whatsoever. They did it to themselves, or let their governments do so on their behalf, mostly (as with the covid panic idiocy) while cheering them on, waving and clapping and banging pots in support.
Morons.
Meanwhile, for all those blue and yellow flag idiots, here’s what was going on in the Ukraine since 2014, that they basically didn’t give a monkey’s about:
Documentary film “Donbass 2016” – understand why Donetsk and Luhansk do not want to belong to Ukraine
Thanks for this. I saw it some time ago and was horrified. The hate-filled beginning should be compulsory viewing for those worshipping all things Ukrainian.
There are superb Ukrainians and appalling ones. The appalling have been encouraged by Western powers who are willing to see innocent Ukrainians die, because they know they can blame it all on the Russians, whom they have turned into caricatures of human beings.
This evil incitement to hatred of an entire people, the people who have brought us some of the most sublime art in all the world, has resulted in the shrugging off or dismissing of barbarism – vicious and barbaric cruelty – because the Russians are once again what they were to the Nazis, subhuman.
Shame on them all.
Those who bought the anti-Russian war propaganda, as Jacob Dreizin aptly put it in the piece I linked here earlier, “began as idealists and ended up as apologists for mass murder.”
Shame on them for being such gullible fools, but the greatest sin was by those who intentionally manipulated them in this way.
“There are superb Ukrainians and appalling ones.”
This, of course, is true of every nation. The question that matters in each case is which are in charge.
I think, sadly, the last couple of decades and especially the past two years have clearly shown which are running the nations of the US sphere. And any foolish inhabitant who thinks that any external issue whatsoever today matters a jot next to changing that situation, is very definitely part of the problem.
When those in charge are also inept, wilful and colossally ill-informed we are all endangered.
Truly crazed ideologues are happy to cut off noses to spite other people’s faces. Perhaps because they believe that they, personally, will not suffer at all.
Of course. Those who have manipulated us into wars have always been able to assume that they and theirs would get off scot-free.
As I’ve noted here before now, that situation changed perhaps forever with the advent of nuclear weapons. Nowadays they can only go to war directly with non-nuclear nations (or at any rate, those without an effective second strike intercontinental capability). But as we’ve seen, that hasn’t stopped them seeking all manner of confrontation and war short of that existentially dangerous open warfare with peer powers.
The stupid thing Germany did was abandon nuclear and coal. The EU was originally the European Coal and Steel Community, with Ruhr coal at its heart. This must have cost them dear. Who would have thought the Green party could wreck countries like that?
Again, “another stupid thing”, not “the stupid thing” here.
In the context of this particular Telegraph piece, the directly relevant stupidity was pandering to the US neocon determination to confront and destabilise Russia. All the rest just set the scene for that final, towering act of stupidity – economic suicide to try to enforce a supposed “rule” (of law and of morality) which does not exist in practice, because they have repeatedly ignored its violation by those (supposedly) on their side..
Spot on.
I totally agree with your and John Mearsheimer’s assessment of this misguided US/UK sabotage and German naivety and stupidity in that regard.
But then, reason has only ever been with a few, as Schiller already observed.
“The Russians are part of our balancing coalition against China. If you live in a world where there are three great powers—China, Russia, and the United States—and one of those great powers, China, is a peer competitor, what you want to do if you’re the United States is have Russia on your side of the ledger. Instead, what we have done with our foolish policies in Eastern Europe is drive the Russians into the arms of the Chinese.”
https://amgreatness.com/2022/04/02/trading-realpolitik-for-a-puppet-show/
You can recognise someone immediately as ignorant or dishonest on global affairs if they think, or claim to believe, that Russia is a real “threat” to us or to the US.
The bottom line is that while Russia has strengths, as we do, it is just not a potential superpower in the current state of the world. There is one superpower (the US) and one aspiring potential superpower (China) that is rapidly overhauling the dominant power. A bipolar or multipolar world is much better for second rank powers like us (who nevertheless have the ultimate safeguard of a nuclear deterrent), than a unipolar world, but for the US, who stand to be the sole hyperpower in question, they would obviously like the unipolar option.
So the US seeks to keep China down, and the options for doing that require Russia either to be a balancing ally, as Mearsheimer correctly suggests, or to be destroyed and replaced by a bunch of US satrapies on the lines of post-WW2 Europe. The latter is the high risk, more costly strategy of the two, but it has been adopted mostly because of the kinds of people (Russia-hating neocons, often of eastern European immigrant stock) who have driven US foreign policy for the past three decades. And our elites are of course basically the same as the east coast US elites, and see those interests as what matters, not British interests per se.
All the rest of the anti-Russian jingoism from the likes of our host here and his fellow suckers of the political right is just childlike noises from people who swallow all the propaganda bs – the direct equivalent of all those who agonised about how dangerous covid was and how we must all be “responsible” in order to “protect the vulnerable”.
“Last Energy, linked to Elon Musk…”
Oh god, no, please don’t give taxpayers’ money to that crook. He is called the Subsidy Truffle Hound. Tesla only makes money by being given money by governments for being “green”. It only loses money making and selling its cars, and the cars are shonky as heck. The gullible fan boys don’t complain because they’re too ashamed they fell for a lemon after idolising “Elon Himself”.
I found something to agree with him on when he spoke out against lockdowns, but the only reason he did that was because he realised that Fascist California was falling out with him and running out of money to give him.
Similar story in Berlin, New York, China, Texas, Nevada.
Don’t get me started on SpaceX. He didn’t have his security clearance renewed because of his drug habits and all round irresponsible and arrogant behaviour. The real genius is Gwynne Shotwell.
The other thing he is called is a Pretengineer, because he pretends to have attended one of the big US universities, when in reality he was never even enrolled.
He is a genius at sniffing out gullible politicians with fragile egos. Methinks we have one of those at the helm.
He is often described as the founder of PayPal, when in reality he just tugged on the coat tails of Peter Thiel. He almost ran it into the ground before the board sacked him.
He calls himself the founder of Tesla, when in reality it was Martin Eberhard.
I could go on. Let me know if you want to know more.
There you go again telling the truth. It’s a very bad habit. Keep it up.
I fear there’s a lot of “eppur si muove” about it.
He is another of Schwab’s young leaders….
How many Africans have died or been seriously injured mining the mineral Musk needs for his car batteries? I know he buys from the company doing the mining but what I’ve read it seems like old fashioned exploitation of the worst kind.
Thank goodness for The Telegraph otherwise DS would have nothing to link to.
Geez.
Thank goodness for DS otherwise the Telegraph would have nothing!
Undoubtedly correct. Silly me.
I don’t like to criticise DS, because I’m so grateful for its existence.
But, in the spirit of free speech, I must say that the preponderance of Telegraph articles (all behind a paywall) has the effect of making DS look a bit like a junior partner.
I find those BTL more reliable suppliers of food for thought.
Most of us have perfected stopping the page loading and reading for free over the last 2 years.
Or 12ft.io
There’s no such thing as a free lunch, but of you have to pay for news it probably isn’t factual news.
Very resourceful – and I congratulate you.
The point stands – too much Telegraph.
A plausible summary of the likely situation, unlike the nonsense you will get in our mainstream media outlets.
This month will decide world politics for next 30+ years
“To all the democracy crusaders, as always, “You began as idealists and ended up as apologists for mass murder.” ”
Pretty much sums up US sphere foreign policy for the past 30 years.
And then there’s US support for the anti-democratic EU (which they would never accept for themselves), an organisation that arguably precipitated war in Europe (in 2014 – possibly one reason people voted to leave).
Thanks for the link.
Here’s another – to the unfashionable war. Putin doesn’t seem to be directly involved (though somebody may be working on a way to make him to blame for it), so we’re short a super-baddy.
It has the bonus of a superb cartoon by Bob Moran.
Ukraine vs Yemen – A contrast in media coverage – OffGuardian (off-guardian.org)
The Ukraine vs Aden.
Anyhow, brings us back to the coup d’etat in Kiev in 2014, and the EU’s role in it.
Disappointing, but understandable that now our fantasy energy policy has been found out, we are swinging between even greater fantasies, and rushed knee-jerk solutions.
Are there any grown ups in charge..?
No. “Grown-ups” believe in calm thought, deliberation and nuance. They do not panic, and they do not shriek abuse at those who differ.
No, the likes of Owen Patterson get thrown under the bus (whilst Insulate Britain get encouraged by the police).
Doggone it, how many children will die because of these stuffing lockdowns? I suppose SAGE and government and the civil service and all the other crooks didn’t discuss this particular aspect when proposing their human rights abuses? (And speaking of crooks, is Fauci in prison yet?).
Considering the HS2 progress (not that I support it), I’m not optimistic Mr Kwarteng’s 2050 prediction will come true. Perhaps seven new nuclear power stations by the year 2500. That I could believe.
Perhaps the Chinese can build us a few more..?
Why are we looking to the US and Elon Musk, when we have the Rolls Royce mini reactor all tested and able to be put into production.? Are we scratching the American backs again, or kissing their arse..?
The more you see, the less sense it makes. I doubt it is a ‘buggers muddle’. It appears to be entirely by design.
Hovercraft, jump jet. We will underfund the modular reactor technology and in the end let the USA buy it for pennies and develop it.
At this point anyone not accepting that the vaccine killed Hawkins is in a state of hypnosis so deep I would argue it makes them a danger to others and themselves.
With the vaccine, or of the vaccine?
Nice one, pjar. I like your style.
That sure is a long way to say “communist lies”
Indeed. About time we decolonised Britain, but perhaps not in the sense they mean it.
This is only natural. Post-Blair Britain has a fairly inflexible social caste system based on race and gender. Black and brown people are significantly higher in the de facto caste system and know any bullying will be met with the full force of the law, sackings and compensation. Lower caste whites know any bullying of their children will be met with laughter. All perfectly natural in a caste-based system where a totalitarian regime ensure people are longer equal before the law.
Alex Belfield just aired a video which included a poster saying that 98% of men won’t date tarns women because of “hatred.”
Similar chains of thought in race as in sex.
Belfield has been pretty good throughout the last few years. I’ve toyed with joining his paid site.
There’s a lot of his ego on the site….he wasn’t very complimentary to those who couldn’t/wouldn’t pay the subscription. There are others blogging, putting out vids who are more humble.
He’s there because one more complaint to YouTube like the one from the Times “journalist” after they alleged he had organised the demo when Starmer & Lammy were leaving Parliament (whom along with the paper he’s now suing) and he’ll be permanently cancelled off YouTube. As he says it’s up to you wether you want to pay or not.
You can always go to Russell Brand’s site but you’ll need to be quick as MSM are now targeting him.
I’ve always been a bit wary of AB. Is he controlled ops? However, until he was booted off for a couple weeks, he was getting very close with the truth bombs…and then he came back with his PAYG platform. Now I think…nah.
I’m not sure what to make of him either, although he is one of the few who mentions the illegal immigrants turning up on the south shore. I’m prepared to give him some kudos for that.
Was the Lady of the Lake a ‘tarns woman’?
We all have our preferences. Obviously most men prefer women as nature intended.
What can you mean? Trans women are women. How can you even tell the difference?
As usual, disagreement with the woke, identitarian left is “hatred”, while the real hatred is what they feel for the dissenters.
“Tarns women are men. Follow the science.
But is it working? Arguably the answer is no. The able don’t need special help. Asians and blacks struggle in first world cultures. They lack the mental structures to operate here without damaging it.
We probably need more of this for ordinary people to waken up and realize that the Tony Sewells are a rarity. We are being replaced by third worlders with absolutely no interest in our culture or history.
The 800 P&O workers .. I wonder how many of them were chanting the “Diversity is our strength” mantra before they got their dose of ‘Diversity’ ??!!
As the last two years has taught us, most cannot independently reason their way through issues. They must experience the downsides firsthand.
Whatever the 800 believed beforehand about multiculturalism fewer will now embrace or endorse it. And each of the 800 will have other family members affected too.
Alas that is what it will take. Like your meme below. Only once they are treated as infidels, their local pub bulldozed because it is offensive, their eating choices restricted, only then will the penny drop for many. That the people we are importing are not like Dutch or French immigrants; they are aliens who will not adapt.
You get what you order.
How many illegal migrants arrived on the southern beaches yesterday?
Fewer and fewer politicians in Parliament have ‘British’ names.
“Diversity is our strength”.
Turkeys voting for Christmas.
Indeed. Sleepwalking into civil war.
However, there is also this, which I’m beginning to see signs of. We live in a dynamic world and attitudes change.
That’s all well and good and I understand entirely where it comes from.
But care is needed, because that is the road the Ukraine travelled….
Blame belongs with the advocates of mass immigration and their dupes, but that doesn’t make the outcomes any less dire.
Indeed. I’m not advocating it. But it seems inevitable now. We can’t go on like this.
Imo, the sooner the backlash comes, the less virulent it will be, and the less damaging.
This is my view too. Done soon, in the next ten years, it is a blunt and uncomfortable public discussion about repatriation, with some incentives to take off the edge. Zero taxes for the year running up to them leaving, no stamp duty selling property etc.
If we wait 30 years it will look much more like a civil war, and it is our children who’ll have to fight it. Because their children will claim to be natives born and bred.
Remind me now – who was it who predicted that “the black man will have the whip hand over the white man”?
Quite.
That’s what happens when you rely on ad hominem attacks and ignore the message. You erode the ability to publicly debate things in a sensible manner long before they become dangerous issues.
It is often overlooked the Enoch Powells were trying to warn us we would put in place a mechanism for the election of a Hitler if we kept importing foreigners who did not fit in. It is that insight we throw out with the bath water.
Another news item on the transgender sports business;
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10679981/Trans-goalkeeper-used-play-mens-football-selected-England-Universities-womens-side.html#comments
I am starting to think that testosterone reducing drugs should be added to the list of substances banned in sport. The idea that a six foot man built like the proverbial brick-****-house, can be considered female because they are taking testosterone reducing drugs is preposterous.
As this article reports this trans in sports issue is already causing women and girls to drop out of sporting activities. This whole business seems to be insulting to women and a real danger to them, ironically these trans athletes seem to be demonstrating a strong display of male aggression and arrogance in the way they are pursuing this issue.
All working as planned. Designed to condition the plebs to believe they have no power or control over societal events. A demoralization strategy.
There are more people saying this is a load of *!?*, so who is able to push an agenda of this magnitude against the majority? They need to be hunted down.
That’s the insight. It is a vanishingly small number. Ignore the actual trannies. They have no power. In real life they are instinctively viewed as mentally disturbed, which you’ll know if one of them appears where you work. Women are particularly unimpressed.
Our system of media amplifies often small fringe concerns. It is the media class we must focus on
.
The media class is in decline. You cannot really cheat real life. All those legacy outlets are clinging on for dear life.
I asked my 10 year old, “Can women have a willy?”. She replied “Don’t be stupid, that’s disgusting!” LOL “Inbetweenies” are all “disgusting” at the moment, but she scored full marks on that aptitude test…unlike most politicians and woketards. Then she goes on to tell me about the 11 year old boy who attends school in make up every day. Maybe when she’s in high school I should worry more about boys in dresses gaining entry to the girls’ changing rooms…
Alas we probably need a few “incidents” for us to come to our senses.
Amazing that these stories are rarely about women who become men. I wonder why that is?
Because women rarely have paraphilias (fetishes). It tends to be men who sexualize things. A casual romp through porn sites aimed almost exclusively at men is a wall to wall freak show. Among the more commonplace stuff, lesbians, threesomes etc., we see midget porn, amputee porn and everyone’s favourite, vomit porn.
And that’s all overlooked. Many “transgender” males are what are known in the literature as autogynephyliacs; men sexually excited at the thought of themselves as women. That is not the same as thinking you are a woman. And women don’t get excited at the thought of themselves as women.
Much of the trans nonsense is really about the erosion of standards in scientific disciplines. Nothing more.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10677845/How-secret-courts-hitting-people-Covid-fines-without-realising-writes-SUE-REID.html
Our “justice” system has been badly abused over the last 20 years or so, with judges’ independence being undermined by politically driven sentencing guidelines, prosecution appeals to increase sentences, the watering down of double jeopardy protections, the use of the DBS to make rehabilitation of offenders more difficult and, of course, the use of Fixed Penalty Notices whose purpose is to sideline the court process.
FPNs have long been a proven money making business model for the speed camera scam. The alacrity with which some cops have handed them out for such “crimes” as not wearing a mask should come as no surprise. Allowing a copper to be judge, jury and executioner is a trait we normally associate with a police state. Rigging the magistrates’ court system to allow a single magistrate to rubber stamp further punishment without representation confirms the situation.
This is very dangerous indeed.
What do we do to stop it?
Many such legal and procedural changes exhibit the same characteristics of being entirely for the convenience and profit of law enforcement and governance, while dressed up as supposedly beneficial for “safety” etc reasons.
As you say, hugely dangerous, but hard to see how we can halt it, let alone roll it back, without a profound cultural (and subsequently political) return to self reliance and (justified) suspicion of government.
Why the timing of this, why is this only coming to light now? Is it to keep people fearful that they might yet be fined, now that restrictions are supposedly over? This smacks of deliberate scaremongering (but maybe true) from Saint Boris’s spin doctors, to keep the public terrified. I notice that the article only tangentially mentions that a police officer had to hand out the fine in the first place.
Is it not a bit on the awkward side though, when those who committed crimes the whole way through via their participation in partygate, some of which were worse than “Joe Bloggs not wearing a mask in a takeaway” are currently being fined only £50.00 and are not being named?
I think it is a false story for the same reason that the awake dismiss many such stories. It doesn’t make sense.
No one intends to save us from ourselves.
Until our appetite for war, deception, duplication and non critical thinking ends, the date of our extinction on this water planet we call earth, will advance at a pace.
Breastfeeding indeed affects infants and proves mRNA vaccine shedding by breastfeeding mothers.
UK Gov:
“It is unknown whether BNT162b2 is excreted in breast milk”
Another blatant lie awaiting explanation.
How many lies does it take for something to be done about this?
“It is unknown whether BNT162b2 is excreted in breast milk”
In which case the bloody stuff should never have been pushed on pregnant ladies or mothers of new born.
Bastards.
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/vitamin-d-call-for-evidence/vitamin-d-call-for-evidence
” This call for evidence seeks views on how to improve the vitamin D status of the population in England, in line with existing recommendations, as well as addressing associated health disparities and improving health outcomes through maximising the benefits of vitamin D.
…
This call for evidence will run for 6 weeks, starting from 3 April and ending on 15 May 2022.”
Watch out for the usual false premises e.g. that mass adulteration (“fortification”) of food is somehow justifiable regardless of the delivered dose being uniform despite varying body size etc and so potentially harmful (excessive vitamin d can be problematic too I gather). So industry lobbying has preceded this perchance?
Irony of ironies that this otherwise benign consultation follows rapidly on from the Government’s decision to push on with water fluoridation. The common theme in each case being that unless stymied, private enterprise will be adulterating something else ingested by the population and no doubt making money in the process. Another burgeoning case of privatisation of profits and socialisation of losses/costs?
They want you farmed, and medicated.
Yes and watch them, if they do go down the fortification route, of doing it with the wrong thing, the inert and biologically inactive vitamin B2 as opposed to the active version, vitamin D3.
And they will fail to take account of the fact that if it is not accompanied by the co-factors of magnesium and vitamin K2 then increasing the amount of Vitamin D could be positively harmful for some people.
I’d certainly like to give them some evidence – but I have been there before and got the T shirt and have other and better things to do with my limited time. Hopefully the Vitamin D Council, which will have more authority than I ever could on the subject, will be included among their consultees and will respond in depth to their consultation. That would be a response worth reading.
Wow – another consultation – which I failed to see in time, seems it closed 1 April.
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/10-year-cancer-plan-call-for-evidence/10-year-cancer-plan-call-for-evidence
So I guess there’s no means of asking why GcMaf seems to be sidelined in favour of cut-burn-poison and if blood testing for nagalase levels is being done at all. (See e.g. Timothy J. Smith MD – The Cancer Book (webpages only?))
https://web.archive.org/web/20140821163232/http://gcmaf.timsmithmd.com/book/book/4/
Brilliant post!
Oddly enough was thinking this exact same thought about Gcmaf and cancer only today. Weird!
No Mr. Warner, Germany’s decision to cooperate more closely with Russia was very sensible and in its and Europe’s national interest.
But obviously not in US and British interests, for shortsighted power and vanity reasons alone (Brzeszinski driven, ignoring that communism is no longer a factor).
Unfortunately, they prevailed with their sabotage, in conjunction with the MIC and OGMC, who are already and for decades to come the main beneficuaries of that sabotage, thanks to Germans naivety.
And noone warned of and described that and the catastrophic geostrategic consequence of that criminal US/UK sabotage better than John Mearsheimer:
“The Russians are part of our balancing coalition against China. If you live in a world where there are three great powers—China, Russia, and the United States—and one of those great powers, China, is a peer competitor, what you want to do if you’re the United States is have Russia on your side of the ledger. Instead, what we have done with our foolish policies in Eastern Europe is drive the Russians into the arms of the Chinese.”
https://amgreatness.com/2022/04/02/trading-realpolitik-for-a-puppet-show/
Massive queques at airports and ferry ports for Easter holidays.
The last time I looked, Easter was still 2 weeks away.
Am I missing something here? or is this the new reality?
The WFH reality?
“Puppies ‘could be more dangerous after lockdown’”
“after a spate of attacks on children by non-dangerous dog breeds”
Husky, “American Bully XL” apparently, i.e. a pit bull by another name, and Rottweiler.
Socialisation isn’t the problem. Just stop buying bloody weapon dogs because they make you feel hard, and then saying “Dethgrip is soft as butter, normally. Wouldn’t hurt a fly, only killed the one kid, to be fair, must have been provoked.”