Doctors across the world are sounding the alarm over a surging epidemic of young people being diagnosed with cancers since the pandemic, with no obvious explanation for what lies behind it. The Mail has the story.
Nearly every continent is experiencing an increase of various types of cancer in people under 50 years old, which is particularly problematic as the disease tends to be caught in later stages in this population because most doctors aren’t trained to look for it in young people.
The disparities of rates and types of the disease are puzzling scientists and have prompted some to kick off multi-decade research projects that will involve hundreds of thousands of people from around the world.
Globally, Australia has seen the highest number of early-onset cancer diagnoses in the world, with a rate of 135 per 100,000 people.
Nearby New Zealand has the second highest rate, at 119 cases in people under 50 per 100,000 people.
But while breast cancer is the top disease in Australia, colon cancer ranks first in its neighbor.
In Asia, Japan and South Korea may be close in proximity and similar economically, but they have different rates of early-onset colon cancer, which is increasing at a faster rate in South Korea.
The United States falls in sixth place, with 87 cases per 100,000 people under 50 years old and the U.K. takes the 28th spot, with 70.5 cases per 100,000 people.
Cancers increasing the fastest include throat and prostate cancers. Early-onset cancers with the highest mortality include beast, tracheal (windpipe), lung, stomach and colon.
Experts have longed speculated the increasing obesity rates and earlier cancer screenings may be behind the rise, as well as high-fat diets, alcohol consumption and tobacco use.
However, because lifestyles, habits and diets vary so widely from country-to-country, they now believe these factors do not entirely account for the surge.
Daniel Huang, a hepatologist at the National University of Singapore, told Nature: “Many have hypothesised that things like obesity and alcohol consumption might explain some of our findings. But it looks like you need a deeper dive into the data.”
More recent researchers have begun to focus on a genetic component to early-onset cancer. Some have found younger people develop more aggressive tumors than older patients, which are better at suppressing a person’s immune system.
Pathologist Shuji Ogino at Harvard Medical School and his colleagues have also discovered a weakened immune response in people with early-onset tumors.
Still, however, the differences are subtle, Ogino said, and a clear reason cannot be determined.
According to the news article in Nature, the rates of some cancers in some countries were increasing before 2020. For example: “In the United States, where data on cancer incidence is particularly rigorous, uterine cancer has increased by 2% each year since the mid-1990s among adults younger than 50. Early-onset breast cancer increased by 3.8% per year between 2016 and 2019.”
However, recent trends indicate a surge since the pandemic that researchers think is set to continue for a number of years:
Statistics from around the world are now clear: the rates of more than a dozen cancers are increasing among adults under the age of 50. This rise varies from country to country and cancer to cancer, but models based on global data predict that the number of early-onset cancer cases will increase by around 30% between 2019 and 2030
The chart showing this predicted surge in overall cancer rates is shown below.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
“with no obvious explanation for what lies behind it.”
Repeat after me. 100% Safe and Effective.
Nothing to see here. Move along…
Yep.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/03/must-watch-unpublished-project-veritas-recording-reveals-pfizer/
MSM should be all over this obviously, but no surprise it’s been carpeted over. Unpublished from 2021though, why now?
Additionally, efficacy figures were exaggerated by miscategorising those within 14-days of jab as ‘unjabbed’. Of course, those of us who were watching already knew that.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378831039_The_extent_and_impact_of_vaccine_status_miscategorisation_on_covid-19_vaccine_efficacy_studies
young people being diagnosed with cancers since the pandemic
The research paper referred to looks at the rise up to 2019.There are dotted lines on the graph marked estimate but no explanation of what that means.
I agree, the graph at the end appears to tell a different story?
And ‘modelling’ which produces numbers not data.
Drip, drip, drip…
Let’s ask Professor Angus Dalgleish.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PnJ5T1Enwq4
It’s been said already, but…
“No obvious cause”
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAA
It will be interesting to see what happens when the actual figures for cancers after the pandemic start being added to this study, rather than the “projections” from models. Perhaps there will be “adjustments” to historical data in order to fit the official narrative, à la Climategate?
I think this cancer situation is in its nascency. You can infer this in a number of ways. Look at how it is coming the fore now. And it seems to be a trajectorty with a slow start which creates a point of illness and then death by cancer shortly theerafter, sometimes just a couple of weeks later. Allow a certain period of time to elapse so that you can always attempt to claim plausible deniability. It is a terrible disease and when it happens that quickly to a young person it throws whole families and communities upside down and the sufferer deteriorates so quickly that there is no time for closure.
I am unvaxxed and gladly cancer free.
Unfortunately my super fit vaccinated best friend is no longer with us having died within five weeks of being seen by his GP of stage four cancer of the liver and bowel. Same story with a close colleague, my retired GP uncle was diagnosed with blood cancer two years ago, wife’s sister with breast cancer, wife’s colleague dead in four months.
All ostensibly fit people.
I am so happy I did not succumb to the madness taking this rushed vaccine.
Five acquaintances have been diagnosed with aggressive cancers, post jab. Three are dead; one is terminal the fifth is receiving treatment and may survive.
I m deeply sorry for your friends and relatives but:
bowel cancer takes many years to develop
blood cancers depends on the specific cancer but if it was one of three most common ones: lymphoma, leukaemia or myeloma then they usually (but not always) take years to develop
breast cancer takes two to five years before you notice it
So the chances are all of them had their cancer before they were vaccinated.
Unless it’s been fueled with an accelerent. If your immune system has been compromised, the rate of growth is no longer normal. In fact, one reason mRNA technology was never approved is because of this unknown influence on the immune system where it actually attacks the body.
As the Nature paper and the Daily Mail article point out, this surge in early onset cancer has been going on for nearly two decades. It is a bit of a mystery what is causing it but it is not Covid or vaccines.
I cannot see how you can be certain that neither covid nor mRNA (or a combination of both) have nothing wahatsoever to do with cancer, given papers such as this –
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027869152200206X
To my knowledgethere has never been a rebuttal of any of it.
You may be right but surely it is unwise to simply dismiss covid and or the jabs as being responsible.
I suggest you read the associated letter to the editor:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278691523002995
In any case, my point is that the surge in early onset cancer mentioned in the Daily Mail article and the associated paper is obviously not to due to vaccines as it happened before the epidemic. If there is other substantial evidence that the vaccines cause cancer that is a different matter.
I’ve read it. Have you read the reply to the letter.
Unfortunately I’ve been unable to get a link to the reply but there is a link to it – “Response to Barriere et al” – in the letter to which you refer.
The AZ jab killed my friend swiftly. Paralysis on day 2. Massive and rapid return of cancer that was supposedly in remission. Unable to speak by week 4. Dead by week six.
Your certainty does you no credit.
Your certainty does you no credit.
I am certain that the Covid vaccines did not cause the surge in early onset cancer described in the article because the surge happened before the epidemic. If that is not grounds for certainty what is?
As for the tragic story of your friend – I know nothing about the specific case so of course I can’t be certain of anything about it. You however seem to be certain his tragic death was caused by the vaccine. Are you sure your certainty does you credit?
Jesus wept.
Deepest sympathy
What has mankind done to itself?
I have lost count of the number of people I know who have died of various cancers – all turbo variety.
The number currently being treated is well above a dozen. I have never known anything like it in my life.
As I have been saying for over the last two plus years, these so-called “vaccines” were brewed to a recipe and the outcome was intended to be the cancers and heart ailments we are currently witnessing. Sadly, the situation is only going to become worse.
Maybe they can use the young, healthy boat people as a control group, doubt that they will have been jabbed
Jesus wept.
Deepest sympathy
What has mankind done to itself?
Words fail in the face of all this carnage!
I work in a job where deaths get reported the deaths of young people through cancer is just going up and up. Old people as well of course at much higher rates. It isn’t a good way to go I saw recently someone in hospital who had a tumour that burst through fheri body, obviously immensely painful and unseemly and a horrific way to be killed. I really hope that we still have the elan vitae to hold these people to account and then to arrive at a reckoning of how we ever allowed them to accede to power and prominence. So may grim years ahead on so many levels. It is important to keep a sense of composure and perspective.
People think that the end stages of cancer is just some weak looking person wearing a headscarf. Turbo cancer is very horrific and not quite so picturesque that is why I object to this photo. The acceleration of this disease leads to far worse than your hair falling out in the last stages, And even if you din’t get the stab there is a good chance that you have been shed on enough to give you terminal cancer. Wait and see how many people are really affected. My own view is that the pathogen is so toxic that even if you din’t take it you are probably on the same trajectory anyway.
And lest we forget the absolutely dreadful bilge, hate, lies and propaganda that were directed at us, society’s scapegoats: the ”unvaccinated”. Totally criminal, this was, but I’ll bet everyone guilty is still walking around Scott free, no consequences and zero f**ks given. A <2min collection of psychopaths, so just a minute sample then. But remember, it’s the ‘Far Right’ that are the real threat! ( strewth!! );
https://twitter.com/TheMilkBarTV/status/1761934974784246068
If only justice was served on these…people, that, at least, would be some kind of closure
If you can sit back and watch the death of you firstborn and any child thereafter and not even enquire about it then you probably are ripe for extinction. This isn’t advanced level stuff. |t is called basic mammalian contact. If you have lost that then I pity you. That you led your children into disaster I will always hold against you. Implicit in the role of parenthood is the sense that the parent will always try to seek out wisdo and the best interest of the child. You just threw your children to the fire. It is a case of depart from me I never knew you.
I hope your Bible quote was intentional, we’re very close…
And for those who think that our overlords are ignorant dupes – the MP Andrew Bridgen recently reported that a very senior government minisster told him that there is no point in his action because he will be dead of cancer very soon because he took the shot. If you don’t believe me then just look it up. This is a very cruel way to speak to people even if it is true. They put it forward as an IQ test because tey can’t see any other way of thinning the herd,
In two years time we will understand. I don’t mean to rain on anyone’s parade.
Much as I appreciate getting 41 upticks I don’t think I have got across the main point. Neither the Daily Mail story nor the research paper on which it is based have anything to do with the pandemic or vaccination. The data is all pre 2020. The estimates following 2020 appear to be based on that data but in any case they are only estimates. The suggestion that this surge was post pandemic is Will Jones creation.
Of course the application of DNA changing medical interventions has no part in this? How surprising!
Deeply unconvincing, sorry.
Look at that graph. Figures bubbling along, roughly steady, until 2020, then a line for “estimate” that surges upwards, for no apparent reason. (Note: the vaccines were only introduced right at the very end of 2020.)
And the article says that the estimates are from “models”. Not sure how you “model” cancer incidence!
Ask an oncologist, the most learned ones are all saying the same thing, they’ve never seen so many early onset cancers!
Just look it up yourself if you don’t believe me
“Between 1990 and 2019, cases of cancer in young people across the globe have increased by 79 percent and deaths have risen 28 percent.”
The graph does not show that. For men the incidence looks more or less level. For women the incidence shows a peak in 2005 then falls slightly until about 2016.
Picking any point on the timeline when there is an upturn, then drawing a straight line extrapolation is not science it’s fortune telling. Just as is done in climate change and was done for Covid.
Historic increases in disease can often be explained by increased screening, earlier reporting, or a combination of factors.