Serving officers have established a gender-critical network to challenge self-ID policies they believe undermine public confidence and the law. The Mail has more.
The serving officers have launched the Police Sex Equality and Equity Network, accusing the service of “actions that embed gender ideology” within forces nationwide.
They called on bodies representing both rank and file officers, as well as chief constables, to recognise lobby groups and activists within policing in England and Wales had created a “culture of fear” among those holding gender-critical views.
The group said by focusing on gender issues, police forces risked undermining public confidence.
‘Police SEEN’ have said the group intends to emulate the civil service network, which was established “to re-focus attention on improving equality and equity between women and men”.
The group said in a statement: “Police SEEN warns that the influence of lobby groups and activists within U.K. policing has created a culture of fear which prevents officers and staff who believe there are two sexes and that sex is real and immutable, from speaking out, for fear of disciplinary action.
“They believe a formal internal network is desperately needed, not only to provide a voice and support for those who want to ensure the law is upheld, but also to restore political impartiality to policing.”
Examples cited by the group of gender ideology in the police service include recent guidance that would allow trans-officers to strip search people of the opposite biological sex.
The National Police Chiefs’ Council, which published the guidance, was forced to retract it and conduct a “thorough” review, following an outcry and concern from the Government. …
The group also accused police forces of routinely recording crime data based on gender self-ID, rather than biological sex, including in reports of rape – an offence which can only be committed by a man.
The National Police Chiefs Council, the Superintendents’ Association and the Police Federation, were all asked to support the new group, Police SEEN said.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
A person in his position should be sacked immediately for outright lies!
LOL. It’s how he got there.
Integrity and consequences disappeared from politics with 9/11.
Since then, they can do and do whatever they want.
Any big NGO develops a life of its own, fights to grow and survive, outlives its usefulness and becomes a parasite. Needing money, they cast around for things to tax. Bingo! Carbon taxes fit the bill.
The question is, how do we-the-people protect ourselves against these natural harms. One idea might be to write a clause into their founding documents requiring a ten year audit of fit for purpose-ness. Like a sunset clause for temporary legislation, which otherwise becomes permanent. Any others?
500%? Why not 5 Trillion %? A ‘weather event’ means what? Windy day = extreme never before seen. Not a windy day = extreme since we expect wind at this time of year. Blah blah blah.
Defund the UN and WHO. Leave immediately. 2 finger salute.
He’s a socialist, no such thing as a honest socialist!
They are making everything up on the fly and take the p*ss out of the plebs.
We are living Solshenitzyn’s ‘lies’ statement now in the West.
Who is this person? What’s his qualification? What is his role and responsibilities exactly? Who delegated or elected him? Who pays his salary? Who or what does he represent? Why he thinks he is in a position to claim something? Why does he think people need to pay attention to his utterance?
All of the fact checkers are corrupt. They are not independent. They are paid for and represent the interests of NGOs and governments. We could just ignore them, but that is dangerous, they are used to justify censoring dissenting voices.
It is time for a new fact checker, one which sticks rigidly to actual science in an unarguable way. If it was funded by public donations I would certainly subscribe.
Well this is fortunate:
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/the-woman-who-could-cancel-net-zero/
This should wake a few up, although the initial impacts will probably be used to secure the 2030 Agenda.
That deserves a lot more publicity
I agree john. Posting on here might help but sadly too many come on here, quick browse and then leave.
Some of the members are genuinely digging elsewhere and posting relevant finds on here but most seem to be ignored, unfortunately.
We keep trying though.
Anything that helps debunk the stupid, harmful idea that co2 drives climate is a good thing in my book.
Try https://www.history-of-geo-and-space-sciences.net/2021-05-26_hgss-2021-1_latest-version-of-the-manuscript.pdf
I have sent links to Prof Richet’s essay to the great and the good. With a couple of honourable exceptions they don’t want to know.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/cop27-understanding-climate-change-un-hidden-agenda-behind-catastrophic-global-warming/5802882
A cracking article which helps demolish the lies of such as Guterres.
“UN Secretary-General António Guterres Falsely Claims Weather Disasters Have Increased 500% in 50 Years”
No doubt reported as an indisputable fact across the world.
If anyone needs someone to talk to we meet every Sunday.
Stand in the Park Sundays 10.30am to 11.30am
Make friends & keep sane
From 1st January 2023
Elms Field (near Everyman Cinema and play area)
Wokingham RG40 2FE
Most of the pronouncements from the Official Science Lectern are a smidgeon of the truth elevated into a planetary emergency. But when most people around the world are too busy with work and family life to investigate every issue, they simply get away with it. When people hear things repeated from what they think are reliable sources backed up by what would seem to them to be the whole of science, it is difficult to get people to listen to alternative points of view which they will tend to consider as “Conspiracy Theories”, because they have listened to mainstream media who they assume are investigative journalists.—————– People can become like a rabbit in the headlights when you present them with information that runs counter to what they have heard on the TV News. When you tell them eg that Polar Bears are growing in number and have increased 5-fold in the last 60 years, you get this blank stare. ———It is the kind of stare unlike any other. It is a stare caused by brain freeze as they try to process the information. It is like that Robot in the old series “Lost in Space”, where the robot goes into meltdown with shrieks of “Does not compute”. “Does not compute” before it grinds to a halt.—- Basically though climate officialdom can make all manner of claims with zero evidence to back it up, and then claim it is “science” because most ordinary people don’t realise that if something cannot be falsified then it ISN’T science. Science is not a dictatorship. Science is not decided by a show of hands from government funded data adjusters and bureaucrats seeking control of the world’s wealth and resources.————-People need to realise the extent to which this political agenda masquerading as science will affect every aspect of their life and their freedom and prosperity, because if they don’t then their freedom and prosperity will be GONE.
Excellent post.