People dealing with life-changing injuries from the Oxford-AstraZeneca Covid jab say they’re being silenced on social media when they try to talk about their symptoms. The Mail has the story.
They believe they are vaccine victims who suffered a number of severe reactions, including a father-of-two who formed a blood clot after being given the vaccine in spring 2021 causing a permanent brain injury.
The man is in the process of suing the pharmaceutical giant at the High Court in London over the injury, while the widower of a woman who died from the jab has also brought a claim.
Now, other victims who claim they reacted badly to the jab, and are not involved in legal proceedings, have claimed sites such as Facebook have given them “warnings” when they have tried to speak to others about their experiences.
They alleged that they are being forced to “self censor” and speak in cryptic language to avoid having groups shut down, the Telegraph reported.
UK CV Family – a private Facebook group with over 1,000 members for those who claim they were left injured or bereaved by the Covid vaccines – has had to take steps to avoid being shut down.
The group began in November 2021, led by Charlet Crichton, 42, after she suffered an adverse reaction from the AstraZeneca jab …
She told the paper: “I set up the group because I was finding people online in the U.K. like me. And we felt we didn’t have anyone to talk to about it apart from each other.” …
“We very quickly learned that we had to self censor, otherwise we’d be shut down,” she added, explaining that her own comments had previously been blocked “to prevent misuse”. …
Molly Kingsley, the co-founder of UsForThem, said the restrictions put in place by social media platforms were “Orwellian” after her views about the Government’s Counter Disinformation Unit were allegedly criticised by YouTube.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Just imagine, the population finally realises that “vaccination” has been a 200 year scam. Jenner’s fairy tale was a marketing tool.
All those babies and children sacrificed on the altar, stabbed by a needle, parents accused of murder, the brain damage, mysterious failures to thrive, resurgence of illness….
Whooping cough is back as vaccinated children can become silent carriers, yet their answer is to jab women in pregnancy.
When the penny finally drops, no pharma shill will be able to sleep easy for the rest of his or her life.
Regimes which censor are by definition totalitarian and fascistic. You know you have won the argument when you are censored or as Oliver said in his monologue Sat, called various ad hominems and simply deplatformed and shut down. The UK is not a free society. It is a corporate fascism where govt and large corporations manage the affairs. It matters not who is in power. An ineluctable implosion is in train. The deracination of culture and heritage only leads to destruction.
No surprise whatsoever.
The RPTB have simply utilised and refined the tools that bigpharma has been using since the end of WW2.
“Vaccines are the greatest boon to mankind there has ever been. They have saved millions of lives”.
So, anything and everything which encourages vaccine hesitancy must be censored/discredited etc. etc.
Because all vaccines are good for you all. The Science is settled. So there.
The only good thing to come out of Covid debacle is a growing awareness of the dangers of all vaccines – and in that sense a big thanks to bigpharma for getting your gene therapies to be called “Vaccines”.
http://vaccinepapers.org/
Thank you for the link S. It took a bit of getting to it, but got there I did. Wow! There’s a lot on there. Bitdefender kept blocking it saying “Dangerous site”. The video “Dr. Suzanne Humphries Honesty vs Policy Video Series” is now showing as “This video is unavailable” on YouTube” Censorship? Censorship?
What you talking about you filthy conspiracy theorists. Censorship? It’s not censorship, it’s redaction for your own good Jim.
It’s there to protect us poor likkle ‘mouses’ from discovering scary stuff that might make us squeak.
Hmmph!
It’s certainly true that they have changed the definition of the term “vaccine” a few times over the years, without explaining why. A cynic might suggest that there was a deliberate choice based on common (mis)understanding of their purpose. At any rate, there has been a lot of blatant lying about the safety and efficacy of the product on sale for C-19.
Calling this novel pharmaceutical product a “vaccine” is an insult to cows. It is not even a “batcine”. It does not significantly reduce the chances of infection or transmission. The words”fauccine” or “fauxine” are gaining ground to describe this class of product, even if the definition has not stabilised!
Things are not true on the say so of some authority, they are only true when they can be demonstrated to be so. And as Mark Twain pointed out “It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure just ain’t so”.
“They believe they are vaccine victims who suffered a number of severe reactions”.
“Now, other victims who claim they reacted badly to the jab”
Is this the Daily Mail self censoring?
It’s anxiety and all in their heads stress or global boiling but not the sacred vaccines. Dame Gilbert what’s her face may have to give back her gong.
17 million dead from these abominations.
https://t.co/ku3O5BdeoF