• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Is X Now Making Some Retweets Un-Retweetable?

by Robert Kogon
30 December 2023 3:00 PM

What happened here? Below is a reply which I posted taking issue with a detail in a tweet by the great Hart Group:

Leaving aside the substance of the tweet, what is significant here is that it was reposted by Thomas Binder, who was tagged in the original Hart tweet, but that his retweet, as can be seen below, did not generate a single additional retweet. The other retweets are either my own or by followers of mine.

But how is this possible given that Thomas Binder has over 80,000 followers? We all know from experience on Twitter 1.0 that a retweet from a high impact-factor account would have a multiplier effect, generating a series of secondary retweets which would generate further retweets in turn. This was a veritable law of nature on old Twitter. But in this case, the apple did not fall to the ground.

The same exact thing occurred with a tweet of my recent Christmas article on BioNTech’s “gift to God”. It was retweeted by Nick Hudson, whose account again has over 80,000 followers, but this did not have any multiplier effect or indeed any effect at all. There were no additional retweets. Nick was kind enough to call attention to the issue himself the next day: namely, in the quote tweet reproduced below.

This quote-tweet then generated a ‘normal’ level of engagement from Nick’s followers and presumably followers’ followers and so on, as would be expected. This would appear to teach us that quote-tweeting, as opposed to retweeting, is a way of getting around a visibility filter – at least until X decides that it is not and closes this loophole in its visibility-filtering algorithm.

I have in fact encountered this phenomenon of the apparently unretweetable retweet many times on X in recent months. (Here is another example.)

But why would either of the above tweets be subject to visibility filtering anyway? Why is any given tweet subject to visibility filtering for that matter? On X, we do not know.

We know that X engages in visibility filtering because it says so. See below, for instance, from the X Help Center:

And we know that the X visibility-filtering algorithm includes “safety labels” which are applied to accounts or posts, in order to suppress their reach. These are the labels to which X CEO Linda Yaccarino was alluding when she famously boasted that if users post “lawful but awful” content, they get “labelled and deamplified”.

A selection of ‘safety labels’ which are meant to suppress various forms of ‘misinformation’ can be seen below. They come from the published portion of the Twitter/X algorithm here.

But the difference between these labels and the ‘misleading’ labels which tweets would be hit with on the old Twitter and which could lead to account suspension is that the latter were publicly visible, whereas the new Twitter/X ‘safety labels’ are only visible in the back office. We do not know when X is applying them to our posts or accounts, and hence X has no need to justify their application.

We knew what old Twitter was censoring as ‘misinformation’, and hence we also knew that it was not misinformation or at least could decide for ourselves. We have no idea what is being treated as ‘civic’, ‘crisis’, ‘medical’ or ‘generic’ misinformation on X and hence we have no way of contesting this treatment.

This new system of covert censorship is obviously susceptible to far greater abuse and manipulation by the powers-that-be – for instance, the European Commission, whose censorship demands X is legally required to satisfy under the Digital Services Act – than the old system of (predominantly) open censorship.

Perhaps what is being “labelled and deamplified” are simply politically inconvenient facts.

Tags: CensorshipLinda YaccarinoMisinformationRetweetsTwitterX

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

COVID-19 Vaccines May Trigger Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy, According to New Research

Next Post

Driving Law Changes Coming in 2024 to Have Huge Impact on All U.K. Motorists Including New Charging Schemes

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

11 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
steve_w
steve_w
4 years ago

no idea what the NHS app is. Track and Trace I downloaded out of interest. Turned off bluetooth then deleted it after a couple of days and just wrote ‘Neil Ferguson’ wherever I had to go in. time to get rid of smartphone I reckon

29
0
RickH
RickH
4 years ago
Reply to  steve_w

The assumption that you will always have a ‘phone appended to you has constantly irritated me, anyway. I do use one when convenient or useful – but I haven’t had the graft that so many fellow citizens seem to undergo, and I certainly am not adding another useless app to its clutter.

31
0
iane
iane
4 years ago
Reply to  RickH

And then there are those of us who only have a decade old Nokia to take on car journeys!

25
0
caipirinha17
caipirinha17
4 years ago

There are two prerequisites for withdrawing the app in the statement:

We intend to withdraw the app once the epidemic is over and it is no longer required.

Reasonable to conclude that they still think it is required for something…Or want it to be.

Also interesting to see that the loon was describing the situation as an epidemic in early May 2020 and not a pandemic… Should we read into that?

11
0
Splatt
Splatt
4 years ago

Other issue with the NHS App is it doesn’t work in Wales and i believe Scotland.
Its an NHS England only system.

7
0
Matt Dalby
Matt Dalby
4 years ago

The pandemic won’t be over until SAGE says it’s over. With all their nonesense talk about a third wave either this summer and winter, plus the repeated BS that no one is save until everyone is safe, i.e. the whole world has benn vaccinated multiple times it’s obvious that it will be claimed we’re still in a pandemic for years to come, no matter what the data on “cases” and deaths in this country says.

19
0
Rogerborg
Rogerborg
4 years ago

They just allocated another £25 billion (yes, billion) to Track and Trace, on top of the £12 billion that’s already been sunk into it. That’s just the English system, not the entirely separately developed ones being inflicted on people in the provinces.

As a software developer, I’m struggling to see how you could spend £12 million, soup to nuts, on the whole thing

The only objection from the Public Accounts Committee was that there should be “long term value” from that money.

So whatever monster it morphs into, it’s here to stay.

11
0
peyrole
peyrole
4 years ago
Reply to  Rogerborg

How can the PAC pass that? Its literally criminal.

7
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

The Sceptic | Episode 46: Ofcom’s Ill-Fated Imperialism, One Year of Two-Tier Keir and Phoney Green Jobs

by Richard Eldred
1 August 2025
3

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

UK Met Office Flirts With Conspiracy Theory as it Slams Critics of Its ‘Junk’ Temperature Measuring Sites

6 August 2025
by Chris Morrison

News Round-Up

6 August 2025
by Richard Eldred

Does ‘The Village WhatsApp’ Reflect the Reality of Rising Crime Rates?

6 August 2025
by Joanna Gray

How Have We Ended Up Paying For Everything While Doing All the Work Ourselves?

6 August 2025
by Guy de la Bédoyère

Reeves Faces £50 Billion Black Hole as Tax Pressure Mounts

6 August 2025
by Will Jones

Reeves Faces £50 Billion Black Hole as Tax Pressure Mounts

37

UK Met Office Flirts With Conspiracy Theory as it Slams Critics of Its ‘Junk’ Temperature Measuring Sites

27

The EU Has Spent Over a Million Euros Fighting Online Hate Speech in South Sudan, Where Almost Nobody Has Internet Access

23

News Round-Up

20

The Government Has No Idea Who is in Britain

15

How Have We Ended Up Paying For Everything While Doing All the Work Ourselves?

6 August 2025
by Guy de la Bédoyère

UK Met Office Flirts With Conspiracy Theory as it Slams Critics of Its ‘Junk’ Temperature Measuring Sites

6 August 2025
by Chris Morrison

The Ministry of Truth? The Government, Police and Media Monitoring

5 August 2025
by Dominic Adler

Green Elites Broke Britain, Not Beijing

5 August 2025
by Ben Pile

Votes for 16 and 17 Year-Olds Will Be a Disaster for the Right

4 August 2025
by Noah Carl

POSTS BY DATE

December 2023
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Nov   Jan »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

POSTS BY DATE

December 2023
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Nov   Jan »

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

UK Met Office Flirts With Conspiracy Theory as it Slams Critics of Its ‘Junk’ Temperature Measuring Sites

6 August 2025
by Chris Morrison

News Round-Up

6 August 2025
by Richard Eldred

Does ‘The Village WhatsApp’ Reflect the Reality of Rising Crime Rates?

6 August 2025
by Joanna Gray

How Have We Ended Up Paying For Everything While Doing All the Work Ourselves?

6 August 2025
by Guy de la Bédoyère

Reeves Faces £50 Billion Black Hole as Tax Pressure Mounts

6 August 2025
by Will Jones

Reeves Faces £50 Billion Black Hole as Tax Pressure Mounts

37

UK Met Office Flirts With Conspiracy Theory as it Slams Critics of Its ‘Junk’ Temperature Measuring Sites

27

The EU Has Spent Over a Million Euros Fighting Online Hate Speech in South Sudan, Where Almost Nobody Has Internet Access

23

News Round-Up

20

The Government Has No Idea Who is in Britain

15

How Have We Ended Up Paying For Everything While Doing All the Work Ourselves?

6 August 2025
by Guy de la Bédoyère

UK Met Office Flirts With Conspiracy Theory as it Slams Critics of Its ‘Junk’ Temperature Measuring Sites

6 August 2025
by Chris Morrison

The Ministry of Truth? The Government, Police and Media Monitoring

5 August 2025
by Dominic Adler

Green Elites Broke Britain, Not Beijing

5 August 2025
by Ben Pile

Votes for 16 and 17 Year-Olds Will Be a Disaster for the Right

4 August 2025
by Noah Carl

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences